Pravo poverioca da zahteva dobijanje odgovarajuće zaštite u slučaju statusne promene privrednog društva - dužnika

Abstract

U radu se analizira pravo na odgovarajuću zaštitu poverioca kod statusne promene privrednog društva dužnika. Ovo pravo je u Srbijiuređeno kao osnovni mehanizam zaštite poverilaca u situaciji statusne promene dužnika. Uvodni deo rada prikazuje pravno uređenje ovog pitanja u pravu Evropske unije i Srbije. Potom je istražen krug poverilaca kojima se priznaje pravo da zahtevaju odgovarajuću zaštitu. S obzirom na to da ovo pravo postoji samo ako je poveriocu ugroženo namirenje potraživanja usled statusne promene, sledeći deo rada je posvećen analizi pojma i razloga takve eventualne ugroženosti. U narednom delu, autor se bavi pitanjem protiv kog društva koje učestvuje u statusnoj promeni poverilac može da vrši svoje pravo. Uz to je objašnjena i sadržina prava na odgovarajuću zaštitu, u smislu vrsta mera kojima se interesi poverilaca adekvatno štite. Najzad, poslednji deo rada istražuje način vršenja prava na odgovarajuću zaštitu, uključujući i posebna pravila u vezi sa sudskom zaštitom poverioca. Cilj rada je pronalaženje odgovora na pitanje da li i u kojoj meri važeća regulativa obezbeđuje adekvatno očuvanje interesa poverilaca u situaciji kada njihov dužnik odluči da sprovede restrukturiranje putem statusne promene.

This paper deals with the creditor's right to obtain adequate safeguards in case of a merger or division of his debtor. In Serbia the said right is regulated as the main mechanism of creditor protection in mergers and divisions. The introductory part of the paper sets forth the regulatory framework for this issue in the European Union and Serbia. Thereafter, the author defines the circle of creditors who are afforded the right to obtain adequate safeguards. Given the fact that this right exists only if satisfaction of the creditor's claim is jeopardized because of the merger or division, the next part of the paper analyses potential risks and causes to this effect. In the following part, the author deals with the question against which company involved in a merger or division can the creditor exercise his right. Additionally, the subject-matter of the right to obtain adequate safeguards is explained, especially with regard to the types of measures which constitute suitable means of creditor protection. Finally, the last part of the paper analyses how this right is exercised, including specific rules regarding judicial protection of creditors. The aim of the present paper is to establish whether and to what extent does the current regulation ensure adequate protection of creditors' interests when their debtor decides to restructure its business through merger of division.