Repository of the University of Belgrade Faculty of Law
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Law
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
  • View Item
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Public interest and the question of Locus Standi

No Thumbnail
Authors
Pečarič, Mirko
Article (Published version)
CC BY
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
An era of rapid industrial progress, scientific development, globalization, i.e. of phenomena whose consequences transcend national boundaries, increasingly raise questions about the eligibility to participate in proceedings, not only of those that are directly, but also of those that are indirectly affected; in many cases it happens that an entire community suffers because of misdeeds caused by public authorities. This paper is based on the assumption that a distinction should be made in the approach to private and public law because they protect different goods. If parties in the process may only be the ones that have an individual, personal, and concrete interest, who then may represent groups or individuals that for various reasons cannot do it by themselves? How can we determine the substance of the public interest, how do we preserve it? The paper will attempt to answer these and similar questions by highlighting the very nature of the public interest, the comparative legal arran...gements, and the dividing line between the procedural and substantive content of individual cases.

Keywords:
standing / Public law / public interest / nature of things
Source:
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2012, 60, 3, 318-333

ISSN: 0003-2565

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1542
Collections
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
Institution/Community
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Pečarič, Mirko
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1542
AB  - An era of rapid industrial progress, scientific development, globalization, i.e. of phenomena whose consequences transcend national boundaries, increasingly raise questions about the eligibility to participate in proceedings, not only of those that are directly, but also of those that are indirectly affected; in many cases it happens that an entire community suffers because of misdeeds caused by public authorities. This paper is based on the assumption that a distinction should be made in the approach to private and public law because they protect different goods. If parties in the process may only be the ones that have an individual, personal, and concrete interest, who then may represent groups or individuals that for various reasons cannot do it by themselves? How can we determine the substance of the public interest, how do we preserve it? The paper will attempt to answer these and similar questions by highlighting the very nature of the public interest, the comparative legal arrangements, and the dividing line between the procedural and substantive content of individual cases.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Public interest and the question of Locus Standi
EP  - 333
IS  - 3
SP  - 318
VL  - 60
UR  - conv_3102
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Pečarič, Mirko",
year = "2012",
abstract = "An era of rapid industrial progress, scientific development, globalization, i.e. of phenomena whose consequences transcend national boundaries, increasingly raise questions about the eligibility to participate in proceedings, not only of those that are directly, but also of those that are indirectly affected; in many cases it happens that an entire community suffers because of misdeeds caused by public authorities. This paper is based on the assumption that a distinction should be made in the approach to private and public law because they protect different goods. If parties in the process may only be the ones that have an individual, personal, and concrete interest, who then may represent groups or individuals that for various reasons cannot do it by themselves? How can we determine the substance of the public interest, how do we preserve it? The paper will attempt to answer these and similar questions by highlighting the very nature of the public interest, the comparative legal arrangements, and the dividing line between the procedural and substantive content of individual cases.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Public interest and the question of Locus Standi",
pages = "333-318",
number = "3",
volume = "60",
url = "conv_3102"
}
Pečarič, M.. (2012). Public interest and the question of Locus Standi. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 60(3), 318-333.
conv_3102
Pečarič M. Public interest and the question of Locus Standi. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2012;60(3):318-333.
conv_3102 .
Pečarič, Mirko, "Public interest and the question of Locus Standi" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 60, no. 3 (2012):318-333,
conv_3102 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the RALF Repository | Send Feedback

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the RALF Repository | Send Feedback

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB