Репозиторијум Правног факултета Универзитета у Београду
Универзитет у Београду - Правни факултет
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • Српски (ћирилица) 
    • Енглески
    • Српски (ћирилица)
    • Српски (латиница)
  • Пријава
Преглед записа 
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
  • Преглед записа
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
  • Преглед записа
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Monopolization standards in US competition law: Evolution and evaluation

Thumbnail
2020
Преузимање 🢃
1792.pdf (211.4Kb)
Аутори
Rakić, Ivana
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
CC BY
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документу
Апстракт
The aim of this article is to provide a short overview and analysis of the US Antitrust Law. Section 2 of the Sherman Act stipulates that it is unlawful to monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations. The article presents case law that reflects the evolution of monopolization standards and provides some interpretations of undertakings behavior that can be defined as monopolization. US practice shows that monopolization standards have changed several times, in accordance with the need to increasingly consider economic efficiencies and the consequences of making wrong decisions, which may lead to reduced innovation and other behaviors of undertakings that increase economic efficiency and improve competition, which is a type I error.
Кључне речи:
Sherman Act / monopolization / competition law / Antitrust Law / abuse of dominance
Извор:
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2020, 68, 4, 98-110

DOI: 10.51204/Anali_PFUB_20405A

ISSN: 0003-2565

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1799
Колекције
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
Институција/група
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Rakić, Ivana
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1799
AB  - The aim of this article is to provide a short overview and analysis of the US Antitrust Law. Section 2 of the Sherman Act stipulates that it is unlawful to monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations. The article presents case law that reflects the evolution of monopolization standards and provides some interpretations of undertakings behavior that can be defined as monopolization. US practice shows that monopolization standards have changed several times, in accordance with the need to increasingly consider economic efficiencies and the consequences of making wrong decisions, which may lead to reduced innovation and other behaviors of undertakings that increase economic efficiency and improve competition, which is a type I error.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Monopolization standards in US competition law: Evolution and evaluation
EP  - 110
IS  - 4
SP  - 98
VL  - 68
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFUB_20405A
UR  - conv_3385
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Rakić, Ivana",
year = "2020",
abstract = "The aim of this article is to provide a short overview and analysis of the US Antitrust Law. Section 2 of the Sherman Act stipulates that it is unlawful to monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations. The article presents case law that reflects the evolution of monopolization standards and provides some interpretations of undertakings behavior that can be defined as monopolization. US practice shows that monopolization standards have changed several times, in accordance with the need to increasingly consider economic efficiencies and the consequences of making wrong decisions, which may lead to reduced innovation and other behaviors of undertakings that increase economic efficiency and improve competition, which is a type I error.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Monopolization standards in US competition law: Evolution and evaluation",
pages = "110-98",
number = "4",
volume = "68",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFUB_20405A",
url = "conv_3385"
}
Rakić, I.. (2020). Monopolization standards in US competition law: Evolution and evaluation. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 68(4), 98-110.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFUB_20405A
conv_3385
Rakić I. Monopolization standards in US competition law: Evolution and evaluation. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2020;68(4):98-110.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFUB_20405A
conv_3385 .
Rakić, Ivana, "Monopolization standards in US competition law: Evolution and evaluation" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 68, no. 4 (2020):98-110,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFUB_20405A .,
conv_3385 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
О репозиторијуму RALF | Пошаљите запажања

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

Комплетан репозиторијумГрупеАуториНасловиТемеОва институцијаАуториНасловиТеме

Статистика

Преглед статистика

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
О репозиторијуму RALF | Пошаљите запажања

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB