Zahtev za povraćaj ulaganja zbog prestanka ugovora o kupoprodaji, najmu i građenju

Abstract

Pravila o povraćaju ulaganja i troškova nastalih u korist drugih mogu se naći u raznim granama slovenačkog prava, u okviru prava neosnovanog obogaćenja, poslovodstva bez naloga, ugovornog i imovinskog prava. Iako se bave sličnim situacijama, pravila se međusobno razlikuju. Neka više štite interes poverioca da povrati što veći deo uloženih sredstava, dok druga nastoje da zaštite dužnika od prinudnog finansiranja tuđih ekonomskih odluka. Ovaj rad razmatra neka otvorena pitanja u vezi sa povraćajem ulaganja nakon prestanka ugovora o kupoprodaji, najmu i građenju, koja se pojavljuju u slovenačkoj sudskoj praksi te ih analizira u svetlu rešenja koja su se ustalila u uporednom pravu.

Rules on restitution for improvements made to someone elses property can be found in various branches of Slovenian private law, such as the law of unjustified enrichment, negotiorum gestio, contract law and property law. Even though to some extent these rules deal with very similar situations, they differ in various aspects. While some of them are more favourable to the creditors in getting as much of their investment back as possible, others are more inclined toward protecting the debtor against forced financing of anothers economic decisions. This paper discusses some open dilemmas concerning restitution of improvements made to someone elses property in Slovenian contract law. More precisely, it deals with restitutionary consequences of failed sales, lease and construction contracts and approaches this topic from a comparative perspective.