Repository of the University of Belgrade Faculty of Law
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Law
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
  • View Item
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The anatomy of price gouging: A regulatory or competition law antidote

Thumbnail
2022
Download 🢃
1848.pdf (284.0Kb)
Authors
Njegovan, Nikola
Ristić, Bojan
Article (Published version)
CC BY
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Unlike other natural disasters, the coronavirus disease pandemic is global in character, which is why interest among researchers in the price gouging phenomenon is on the rise. Without disputing many solid arguments favouring the market mechanism, we will reconsider the goals and means of potential government intervention. One possibility lies in economic regulation, the other in competition law. In the first case, price ceilings are usually imposed for necessary goods, followed by rationing and export restrictions. On the other hand, competition policy focuses on preventing the exercise of temporary market power. We will try to show that market failures can provide specific arguments for regulation but relying on competition protection policy seems unjustified. Still, since the critical issue is defining excessive prices in the short run, we expect competition authorities to address this issue, considering that they are permanently monitoring various markets.
Keywords:
Windfall market power / Regulation / Price gouging / Excessive prices / Competition law
Source:
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2022, 70, 2, 373-397

DOI: 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22201A

ISSN: 0003-2565

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1855
Collections
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
Institution/Community
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Njegovan, Nikola
AU  - Ristić, Bojan
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1855
AB  - Unlike other natural disasters, the coronavirus disease pandemic is global in character, which is why interest among researchers in the price gouging phenomenon is on the rise. Without disputing many solid arguments favouring the market mechanism, we will reconsider the goals and means of potential government intervention. One possibility lies in economic regulation, the other in competition law. In the first case, price ceilings are usually imposed for necessary goods, followed by rationing and export restrictions. On the other hand, competition policy focuses on preventing the exercise of temporary market power. We will try to show that market failures can provide specific arguments for regulation but relying on competition protection policy seems unjustified. Still, since the critical issue is defining excessive prices in the short run, we expect competition authorities to address this issue, considering that they are permanently monitoring various markets.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - The anatomy of price gouging: A regulatory or competition law antidote
EP  - 397
IS  - 2
SP  - 373
VL  - 70
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22201A
UR  - conv_3369
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Njegovan, Nikola and Ristić, Bojan",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Unlike other natural disasters, the coronavirus disease pandemic is global in character, which is why interest among researchers in the price gouging phenomenon is on the rise. Without disputing many solid arguments favouring the market mechanism, we will reconsider the goals and means of potential government intervention. One possibility lies in economic regulation, the other in competition law. In the first case, price ceilings are usually imposed for necessary goods, followed by rationing and export restrictions. On the other hand, competition policy focuses on preventing the exercise of temporary market power. We will try to show that market failures can provide specific arguments for regulation but relying on competition protection policy seems unjustified. Still, since the critical issue is defining excessive prices in the short run, we expect competition authorities to address this issue, considering that they are permanently monitoring various markets.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "The anatomy of price gouging: A regulatory or competition law antidote",
pages = "397-373",
number = "2",
volume = "70",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22201A",
url = "conv_3369"
}
Njegovan, N.,& Ristić, B.. (2022). The anatomy of price gouging: A regulatory or competition law antidote. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 70(2), 373-397.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22201A
conv_3369
Njegovan N, Ristić B. The anatomy of price gouging: A regulatory or competition law antidote. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2022;70(2):373-397.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22201A
conv_3369 .
Njegovan, Nikola, Ristić, Bojan, "The anatomy of price gouging: A regulatory or competition law antidote" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 70, no. 2 (2022):373-397,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22201A .,
conv_3369 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the RALF Repository | Send Feedback

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the RALF Repository | Send Feedback

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB