Репозиторијум Правног факултета Универзитета у Београду
Универзитет у Београду - Правни факултет
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • Српски (ћирилица) 
    • Енглески
    • Српски (ћирилица)
    • Српски (латиница)
  • Пријава
Преглед записа 
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
  • Преглед записа
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
  • Преглед записа
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Avoiding mandatory COVID-19 vaccination: Arrogance toward science and lack of respect for common sense

Thumbnail
2022
Преузимање 🢃
1858.pdf (287.2Kb)
Аутори
Draškić, Marija
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
CC BY
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документу
Апстракт
This paper is a continuation of the research that the author started several years ago and which was published in the article Compulsory Vaccination of Children: Rights of Patients or Interests of Public Health? The emphasis will be on professional and scientific discussions on whether it is permissible to prescribe mandatory vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as whether this is in line with the Constitution and legally allowed for all or only for certain population categories in Serbia. Earlier decisions of the constitutional courts of Serbia, Croatia, and Slovenia, as well as the recent judgment of the ECtHR in the Vavřička case will be reconsidered. All these decisions by the highest national courts, as well as the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, have unequivocally confirmed that mandatory vaccination is not contrary to some basic human rights regularly invoked by opponents of vaccination.
Кључне речи:
pandemic / mandatory vaccination / Law on the Protection of the Population from Communicable Diseases / COVID-19 / case law of the European Court of Human Rights
Извор:
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2022, 70, 4, 1049-1075

DOI: 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22404A

ISSN: 0003-2565

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1865
Колекције
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
Институција/група
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Draškić, Marija
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1865
AB  - This paper is a continuation of the research that the author started several years ago and which was published in the article Compulsory Vaccination of Children: Rights of Patients or Interests of Public Health? The emphasis will be on professional and scientific discussions on whether it is permissible to prescribe mandatory vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as whether this is in line with the Constitution and legally allowed for all or only for certain population categories in Serbia. Earlier decisions of the constitutional courts of Serbia, Croatia, and Slovenia, as well as the recent judgment of the ECtHR in the Vavřička case will be reconsidered. All these decisions by the highest national courts, as well as the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, have unequivocally confirmed that mandatory vaccination is not contrary to some basic human rights regularly invoked by opponents of vaccination.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Avoiding mandatory COVID-19 vaccination: Arrogance toward science and lack of respect for common sense
EP  - 1075
IS  - 4
SP  - 1049
VL  - 70
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22404A
UR  - conv_3416
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Draškić, Marija",
year = "2022",
abstract = "This paper is a continuation of the research that the author started several years ago and which was published in the article Compulsory Vaccination of Children: Rights of Patients or Interests of Public Health? The emphasis will be on professional and scientific discussions on whether it is permissible to prescribe mandatory vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as whether this is in line with the Constitution and legally allowed for all or only for certain population categories in Serbia. Earlier decisions of the constitutional courts of Serbia, Croatia, and Slovenia, as well as the recent judgment of the ECtHR in the Vavřička case will be reconsidered. All these decisions by the highest national courts, as well as the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, have unequivocally confirmed that mandatory vaccination is not contrary to some basic human rights regularly invoked by opponents of vaccination.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Avoiding mandatory COVID-19 vaccination: Arrogance toward science and lack of respect for common sense",
pages = "1075-1049",
number = "4",
volume = "70",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22404A",
url = "conv_3416"
}
Draškić, M.. (2022). Avoiding mandatory COVID-19 vaccination: Arrogance toward science and lack of respect for common sense. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 70(4), 1049-1075.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22404A
conv_3416
Draškić M. Avoiding mandatory COVID-19 vaccination: Arrogance toward science and lack of respect for common sense. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2022;70(4):1049-1075.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22404A
conv_3416 .
Draškić, Marija, "Avoiding mandatory COVID-19 vaccination: Arrogance toward science and lack of respect for common sense" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 70, no. 4 (2022):1049-1075,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22404A .,
conv_3416 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
О репозиторијуму RALF | Пошаљите запажања

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

Комплетан репозиторијумГрупеАуториНасловиТемеОва институцијаАуториНасловиТеме

Статистика

Преглед статистика

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
О репозиторијуму RALF | Пошаљите запажања

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB