Ustavnost ustavnog zakona : Kada Ustavni sud treba da ceni ustavnost ustavnog zakona?
Constitutional Law’s constitutionality : When should Constitutional Court decide on constitutional law’s constitutionality?
Abstract
У пракси некадашње Југославије, али и у Србији и након њеног ус- тавотворног осамостаљeња, често је прибегавано доношењу уставних закона. Ова врста општих аката доношена је по поступцима различите сложености, чиме је мењана њихова правна снага и тиме однос са важећим уставима, што је било узроковано различитим правним и, чешће, политичким мотивима. Та неуједначеност пратила је и однос уставног судства према овој врсти акта, које се, без ваљаног упоришта у јасним ставовима уставноправне науке, различито односило према питању оцене сагласности уставних закона са уставом.
The Constitutional Law represents a special sort of act which had different
meanings in former socialist Yugoslavia. One of these is related to the FPRY’s
Constitutional Law of 1953, which, being adopted under the procedure for the
adoption and amendment of the constitution and regulating the particular constitutional
materia, represented the constitution itself. Second type of constitutional
laws, which is known both by the socialist constitutionalism and that
established after the fall of socialism, in the first place by the Serbian Constitution
of 1990 and followed later by the actual Constitution of 2006, are the
implementing laws which are adopted, as the constitutional creators themselves
regulate, under the different procedure from that designed for the constitutional
amendment and which contents are defined by their aim, which is the implementation
of the constitutional amendment. As for the nature of these acts, constitutional
doctrine is unanimous – their legal fo...rce is of lesser value than the
constitution. One open question is the relation of the constitutional court to the
constitutional law. The Constitutional court refuses to establish its jurisdiction
to revise the constitutionality of laws and other general acts over the constitutional
law itself, basing this position on the fact that the Constitution of the
Republic of Serbia does not explicitly acknowledge this jurisdiction.
Keywords:
Ustavni zakon / Sprovedbeni zakon / Ustavni sud / Ocena ustavnosti ustavnog suda / Constitutional law / Implementing law / Constitutional court / Revision of constitutional law’s constitutionalitySource:
Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 1 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume I, 2011, 118-131Publisher:
- Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
Funding / projects:
- Perspectives of Implementing European Standards in the Serbian Legal System (RS-MESTD-Basic Research (BR or ON)-179059)
Collections
Institution/Community
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of BelgradeTY - CHAP AU - Vučić, Olivera PY - 2011 UR - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1904 AB - У пракси некадашње Југославије, али и у Србији и након њеног ус- тавотворног осамостаљeња, често је прибегавано доношењу уставних закона. Ова врста општих аката доношена је по поступцима различите сложености, чиме је мењана њихова правна снага и тиме однос са важећим уставима, што је било узроковано различитим правним и, чешће, политичким мотивима. Та неуједначеност пратила је и однос уставног судства према овој врсти акта, које се, без ваљаног упоришта у јасним ставовима уставноправне науке, различито односило према питању оцене сагласности уставних закона са уставом. AB - The Constitutional Law represents a special sort of act which had different meanings in former socialist Yugoslavia. One of these is related to the FPRY’s Constitutional Law of 1953, which, being adopted under the procedure for the adoption and amendment of the constitution and regulating the particular constitutional materia, represented the constitution itself. Second type of constitutional laws, which is known both by the socialist constitutionalism and that established after the fall of socialism, in the first place by the Serbian Constitution of 1990 and followed later by the actual Constitution of 2006, are the implementing laws which are adopted, as the constitutional creators themselves regulate, under the different procedure from that designed for the constitutional amendment and which contents are defined by their aim, which is the implementation of the constitutional amendment. As for the nature of these acts, constitutional doctrine is unanimous – their legal force is of lesser value than the constitution. One open question is the relation of the constitutional court to the constitutional law. The Constitutional court refuses to establish its jurisdiction to revise the constitutionality of laws and other general acts over the constitutional law itself, basing this position on the fact that the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia does not explicitly acknowledge this jurisdiction. PB - Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje T2 - Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 1 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume I T1 - Ustavnost ustavnog zakona : Kada Ustavni sud treba da ceni ustavnost ustavnog zakona? T1 - Constitutional Law’s constitutionality : When should Constitutional Court decide on constitutional law’s constitutionality? EP - 131 SP - 118 ER -
@inbook{ author = "Vučić, Olivera", year = "2011", abstract = "У пракси некадашње Југославије, али и у Србији и након њеног ус- тавотворног осамостаљeња, често је прибегавано доношењу уставних закона. Ова врста општих аката доношена је по поступцима различите сложености, чиме је мењана њихова правна снага и тиме однос са важећим уставима, што је било узроковано различитим правним и, чешће, политичким мотивима. Та неуједначеност пратила је и однос уставног судства према овој врсти акта, које се, без ваљаног упоришта у јасним ставовима уставноправне науке, различито односило према питању оцене сагласности уставних закона са уставом., The Constitutional Law represents a special sort of act which had different meanings in former socialist Yugoslavia. One of these is related to the FPRY’s Constitutional Law of 1953, which, being adopted under the procedure for the adoption and amendment of the constitution and regulating the particular constitutional materia, represented the constitution itself. Second type of constitutional laws, which is known both by the socialist constitutionalism and that established after the fall of socialism, in the first place by the Serbian Constitution of 1990 and followed later by the actual Constitution of 2006, are the implementing laws which are adopted, as the constitutional creators themselves regulate, under the different procedure from that designed for the constitutional amendment and which contents are defined by their aim, which is the implementation of the constitutional amendment. As for the nature of these acts, constitutional doctrine is unanimous – their legal force is of lesser value than the constitution. One open question is the relation of the constitutional court to the constitutional law. The Constitutional court refuses to establish its jurisdiction to revise the constitutionality of laws and other general acts over the constitutional law itself, basing this position on the fact that the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia does not explicitly acknowledge this jurisdiction.", publisher = "Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje", journal = "Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 1 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume I", booktitle = "Ustavnost ustavnog zakona : Kada Ustavni sud treba da ceni ustavnost ustavnog zakona?, Constitutional Law’s constitutionality : When should Constitutional Court decide on constitutional law’s constitutionality?", pages = "131-118" }
Vučić, O.. (2011). Ustavnost ustavnog zakona : Kada Ustavni sud treba da ceni ustavnost ustavnog zakona?. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 1 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume I Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje., 118-131.
Vučić O. Ustavnost ustavnog zakona : Kada Ustavni sud treba da ceni ustavnost ustavnog zakona?. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 1 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume I. 2011;:118-131..
Vučić, Olivera, "Ustavnost ustavnog zakona : Kada Ustavni sud treba da ceni ustavnost ustavnog zakona?" in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 1 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume I (2011):118-131.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Izmene i dopune Zakona o Ustavnom sudu : kritički pogled / Amendments to the law on The Constitutional Court : a critical view
Stanković, Marko (Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje, 2012) -
Ustavni sud Srbije - prvih pet decenija / Constitutional Court of Serbia: The first five decades
Stanković, Marko (Kriminalističko-policijski univerzitet, Beograd, 2013) -
Ustavna istorija kao samostalna disciplina? / Constitutional history as an independent discipline?
Cvetković, Aleksandar (Savez udruženja pravnika Srbije, Beograd, 2023)