Stanarsko pravo, kao specifičan institut socijalističkih društevnih odnosa,
sagledava se iz bitno drugačijeg ugla nakon ustanovljavanja ustavnog uređenja
zasnovanog na privatnoj svojini i tržišnoj privredi. U tom smislu, postavilo se pitanje
pravnog statusa nosilaca stanarskog prava i sa njima povezanih lica u jednom
novom pravnom kontekstu. Stanarsko pravo kada je zasnovano na stanu u privatnoj
svojini se manifestovalo kao ograničenje svojinskih prava, ali to ograničenje je imalo
svoju vremensku dimenziju. Čak je i socijalistički zakonodavac to imao u vidu kada
je propisao da se posle određenog datuma više ne može zasnivati stanarsko pravo na
stanu u privatnoj svojini. Nakon smrti nosioca stanarskog prava postavilo se pitanje
sudbine lica koja su bila u određenoj pravno relevantnoj vezi nosiocem stanarskog
prava, a koja su se u stan uselila nakon što zasnivanje stanarskog prava na stanu u
privatnoj svojini više nije bilo moguće. U radu analiziramo ovu situaciju iz ugla
pra...va na imovinu i uz ugla prava na dom, odnosno kroz stavove koje su u svojim
presudama zauzimali Ustavni sud i Evropski sud za ljudska prava.
The purpose of this paper was to tackle the legal position of protected tenants and
related persons in the new circumstances created by transition from socialism to
democracy. Flat owners have been filing lawsuits seeking eviction of those persons
in order to fully exercise their property rights. The clear and consistent position of
Serbian civil courts was that no one who moved into private flat after July 29, 1973,
could acquire the status of protected tenant. However, contrary to both relevant
legal provisions and Serbian courts jurisprudence, Consitutional Court ruled that
those persons have the right to permamently use the flat in which they moved in
after July 29, 1973. Furthermore, Constituional Court stated that this ruling represented
a fair balance between the right to property of the flat owner (Article 1 of
the First Protocol to the European Convention for Protection of Human Rights and
Fundamental Freedoms, hereinafter: EHRC) and the right to home of protected
...tenant (Article 8 of EHRC). We have analyzed the position of Eureopan Court of
Human Rights in respect of this issue and emphasized the criteria that need to be
taken into account in establishing a fair balance between the competing interests.
From the aspects of these criteria, the application of relevant provisions of EHRC by
Constituional Court was clearly erroneous. Therefor, procedural mechanisms are
necessary so that application of EHRC by Constitutional Court could be monitored.
Ključne reči:
Stanarsko pravo / Iseljenje / Pravo na imovinu / Pravo na dom / Evropski sud za ljudska prava / Ustavni sud / Protected tenants / Eviction / Right to peaceful enjoyment of property / Right to home / Constitutional Court / European Court of Human Rights
Izvor:
Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 5 / Perspectives of Implementa tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume V, 2015, 213-229
Izdavač:
Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
TY - CHAP
AU - Bodiroga, Nikola
PY - 2015
UR - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1991
AB - Stanarsko pravo, kao specifičan institut socijalističkih društevnih odnosa,
sagledava se iz bitno drugačijeg ugla nakon ustanovljavanja ustavnog uređenja
zasnovanog na privatnoj svojini i tržišnoj privredi. U tom smislu, postavilo se pitanje
pravnog statusa nosilaca stanarskog prava i sa njima povezanih lica u jednom
novom pravnom kontekstu. Stanarsko pravo kada je zasnovano na stanu u privatnoj
svojini se manifestovalo kao ograničenje svojinskih prava, ali to ograničenje je imalo
svoju vremensku dimenziju. Čak je i socijalistički zakonodavac to imao u vidu kada
je propisao da se posle određenog datuma više ne može zasnivati stanarsko pravo na
stanu u privatnoj svojini. Nakon smrti nosioca stanarskog prava postavilo se pitanje
sudbine lica koja su bila u određenoj pravno relevantnoj vezi nosiocem stanarskog
prava, a koja su se u stan uselila nakon što zasnivanje stanarskog prava na stanu u
privatnoj svojini više nije bilo moguće. U radu analiziramo ovu situaciju iz ugla
prava na imovinu i uz ugla prava na dom, odnosno kroz stavove koje su u svojim
presudama zauzimali Ustavni sud i Evropski sud za ljudska prava.
AB - The purpose of this paper was to tackle the legal position of protected tenants and
related persons in the new circumstances created by transition from socialism to
democracy. Flat owners have been filing lawsuits seeking eviction of those persons
in order to fully exercise their property rights. The clear and consistent position of
Serbian civil courts was that no one who moved into private flat after July 29, 1973,
could acquire the status of protected tenant. However, contrary to both relevant
legal provisions and Serbian courts jurisprudence, Consitutional Court ruled that
those persons have the right to permamently use the flat in which they moved in
after July 29, 1973. Furthermore, Constituional Court stated that this ruling represented
a fair balance between the right to property of the flat owner (Article 1 of
the First Protocol to the European Convention for Protection of Human Rights and
Fundamental Freedoms, hereinafter: EHRC) and the right to home of protected
tenant (Article 8 of EHRC). We have analyzed the position of Eureopan Court of
Human Rights in respect of this issue and emphasized the criteria that need to be
taken into account in establishing a fair balance between the competing interests.
From the aspects of these criteria, the application of relevant provisions of EHRC by
Constituional Court was clearly erroneous. Therefor, procedural mechanisms are
necessary so that application of EHRC by Constitutional Court could be monitored.
PB - Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
T2 - Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 5 / Perspectives of Implementa tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume V
T1 - Prinudno iseljenje zaštićenih podstanara−praksa Ustavnog suda i Evropskog suda za ljudska prava
T1 - Eviction of Protected Tenants−Jurisprudence of Serbian Constitutional Court and European Court of Human Rights
EP - 229
SP - 213
ER -
@inbook{
author = "Bodiroga, Nikola",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Stanarsko pravo, kao specifičan institut socijalističkih društevnih odnosa,
sagledava se iz bitno drugačijeg ugla nakon ustanovljavanja ustavnog uređenja
zasnovanog na privatnoj svojini i tržišnoj privredi. U tom smislu, postavilo se pitanje
pravnog statusa nosilaca stanarskog prava i sa njima povezanih lica u jednom
novom pravnom kontekstu. Stanarsko pravo kada je zasnovano na stanu u privatnoj
svojini se manifestovalo kao ograničenje svojinskih prava, ali to ograničenje je imalo
svoju vremensku dimenziju. Čak je i socijalistički zakonodavac to imao u vidu kada
je propisao da se posle određenog datuma više ne može zasnivati stanarsko pravo na
stanu u privatnoj svojini. Nakon smrti nosioca stanarskog prava postavilo se pitanje
sudbine lica koja su bila u određenoj pravno relevantnoj vezi nosiocem stanarskog
prava, a koja su se u stan uselila nakon što zasnivanje stanarskog prava na stanu u
privatnoj svojini više nije bilo moguće. U radu analiziramo ovu situaciju iz ugla
prava na imovinu i uz ugla prava na dom, odnosno kroz stavove koje su u svojim
presudama zauzimali Ustavni sud i Evropski sud za ljudska prava., The purpose of this paper was to tackle the legal position of protected tenants and
related persons in the new circumstances created by transition from socialism to
democracy. Flat owners have been filing lawsuits seeking eviction of those persons
in order to fully exercise their property rights. The clear and consistent position of
Serbian civil courts was that no one who moved into private flat after July 29, 1973,
could acquire the status of protected tenant. However, contrary to both relevant
legal provisions and Serbian courts jurisprudence, Consitutional Court ruled that
those persons have the right to permamently use the flat in which they moved in
after July 29, 1973. Furthermore, Constituional Court stated that this ruling represented
a fair balance between the right to property of the flat owner (Article 1 of
the First Protocol to the European Convention for Protection of Human Rights and
Fundamental Freedoms, hereinafter: EHRC) and the right to home of protected
tenant (Article 8 of EHRC). We have analyzed the position of Eureopan Court of
Human Rights in respect of this issue and emphasized the criteria that need to be
taken into account in establishing a fair balance between the competing interests.
From the aspects of these criteria, the application of relevant provisions of EHRC by
Constituional Court was clearly erroneous. Therefor, procedural mechanisms are
necessary so that application of EHRC by Constitutional Court could be monitored.",
publisher = "Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje",
journal = "Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 5 / Perspectives of Implementa tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume V",
booktitle = "Prinudno iseljenje zaštićenih podstanara−praksa Ustavnog suda i Evropskog suda za ljudska prava, Eviction of Protected Tenants−Jurisprudence of Serbian Constitutional Court and European Court of Human Rights",
pages = "229-213"
}
Bodiroga, N.. (2015). Prinudno iseljenje zaštićenih podstanara−praksa Ustavnog suda i Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 5 / Perspectives of Implementa tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume V
Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje., 213-229.
Bodiroga N. Prinudno iseljenje zaštićenih podstanara−praksa Ustavnog suda i Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 5 / Perspectives of Implementa tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume V. 2015;:213-229..
Bodiroga, Nikola, "Prinudno iseljenje zaštićenih podstanara−praksa Ustavnog suda i Evropskog suda za ljudska prava" in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 5 / Perspectives of Implementa tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume V (2015):213-229.
