(Екс)територијално дејство начела ne bis in idem

Abstract

(Екс)територијално дејтво начела ne bis in idem потврђује правило да судске одлуке (не)дејствују у границама нацио- налне јурисдикције али да исте могу да се извршавају и у другој др- жа ви прихватањем идеје о слободи кретања страних судских од- лука, утврђеној Оквирном одлуком о европском налогу за хапшење и предају или примјеном института признања и извршења страних судских одлука. Слобода кретања судских одлука у Европској унији значи извршење правноснажних судских одлука без испитивања да ли би такву одлуку донијела држава од које се тражи извршење стране судске одлуке. С друге стране, институт признања и извр- шења страних судских одлука подразумијева прилагођавање стране судске одлуке правилима националног законодавства.

The extraterritorial effect of the principle ne bis in idem confirms the rule that the court decisions (do not) operate within the borders of national jurisdiction, but the same decisions can be executed in another country, by accepting the idea of freedom of movement of foreign court decisions established, by the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant or by applying the institute of recognition and enforcement of foreign court decisions. On the territory of the European Union it is indisputable the extraterritorial effect of the principle ne bis in idem, but also the interprocsual effect of this principle. The Volkswagen case by the European Court of Justice confirmed that procedural interference lispendentio as part of the principle ne bis in idem and prevents the initiation of proceedings for the same offense in another member state of the European Union. The penalty imposed of 5,000,000 euros Volkswagen Group at Italy is considered a criminal penalty even it was imposed in an administrative procedure. The imposed fine has a repressive effect and preventive purpose. Recognition of the intertrial effect of the ne bis in idem principle is disputed when we talk about act wich have the characteristics of a disciplinary offense and a criminal offense, because the punishment imposed in the disciplinary procedure concerns a certain group of citizens, it has no effects of general prevention. The interprocedural effect of the ne bis in idem principle means that the sentence imposed in another criminal proceeding (misdemeanor, administrative) is an obstacle to the initiation of criminal proceedings for the same offense to the same person. But the interprocedural efect of the principle ne bis in idem does not necessarily exclude criminal prosecution, by accepting the rule od criminal law merger of sentence.