Procedural Guarantees of Human Rights in Arbitration Proceedings A Still Unsettled Problem?
Abstract
A presistent question exists about whether human rights guarantees should be applied to voluntary arbitration. Opponents give no dogmatic grounds for non-applicability of Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights ("ECHR") to voluntary arbitration. Moreover, recent developments in case law in various jurisdictions demonstrate a clear departure from the so-called waiver theory. The conclusion of an arbitration agreement does not signify a waiver from the procedural guarantees enshrined in Article 6(1) of ECHR. The direct appplicability of Convention's provisions in arbitration proceedings does not harm the arbitral process, however. On the contrary, it appears to be useful, because it removes the respect for procedural guarantees from the phase of control over the arbitral award to the very stage of conducting the arbitration proceedings.
Source:
Journal of International Arbitration, 2007, 24, 2, 159-171Publisher:
- Kluwer Law Int, Alphen Aan Den Rijn
Collections
Institution/Community
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of BelgradeTY - JOUR AU - Jakšić, Aleksandar PY - 2007 UR - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/342 AB - A presistent question exists about whether human rights guarantees should be applied to voluntary arbitration. Opponents give no dogmatic grounds for non-applicability of Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights ("ECHR") to voluntary arbitration. Moreover, recent developments in case law in various jurisdictions demonstrate a clear departure from the so-called waiver theory. The conclusion of an arbitration agreement does not signify a waiver from the procedural guarantees enshrined in Article 6(1) of ECHR. The direct appplicability of Convention's provisions in arbitration proceedings does not harm the arbitral process, however. On the contrary, it appears to be useful, because it removes the respect for procedural guarantees from the phase of control over the arbitral award to the very stage of conducting the arbitration proceedings. PB - Kluwer Law Int, Alphen Aan Den Rijn T2 - Journal of International Arbitration T1 - Procedural Guarantees of Human Rights in Arbitration Proceedings A Still Unsettled Problem? EP - 171 IS - 2 SP - 159 VL - 24 UR - conv_3033 ER -
@article{ author = "Jakšić, Aleksandar", year = "2007", abstract = "A presistent question exists about whether human rights guarantees should be applied to voluntary arbitration. Opponents give no dogmatic grounds for non-applicability of Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights ("ECHR") to voluntary arbitration. Moreover, recent developments in case law in various jurisdictions demonstrate a clear departure from the so-called waiver theory. The conclusion of an arbitration agreement does not signify a waiver from the procedural guarantees enshrined in Article 6(1) of ECHR. The direct appplicability of Convention's provisions in arbitration proceedings does not harm the arbitral process, however. On the contrary, it appears to be useful, because it removes the respect for procedural guarantees from the phase of control over the arbitral award to the very stage of conducting the arbitration proceedings.", publisher = "Kluwer Law Int, Alphen Aan Den Rijn", journal = "Journal of International Arbitration", title = "Procedural Guarantees of Human Rights in Arbitration Proceedings A Still Unsettled Problem?", pages = "171-159", number = "2", volume = "24", url = "conv_3033" }
Jakšić, A.. (2007). Procedural Guarantees of Human Rights in Arbitration Proceedings A Still Unsettled Problem?. in Journal of International Arbitration Kluwer Law Int, Alphen Aan Den Rijn., 24(2), 159-171. conv_3033
Jakšić A. Procedural Guarantees of Human Rights in Arbitration Proceedings A Still Unsettled Problem?. in Journal of International Arbitration. 2007;24(2):159-171. conv_3033 .
Jakšić, Aleksandar, "Procedural Guarantees of Human Rights in Arbitration Proceedings A Still Unsettled Problem?" in Journal of International Arbitration, 24, no. 2 (2007):159-171, conv_3033 .