Репозиторијум Правног факултета Универзитета у Београду
Универзитет у Београду - Правни факултет
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • Српски (ћирилица) 
    • Енглески
    • Српски (ћирилица)
    • Српски (латиница)
  • Пријава
Преглед записа 
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • Преглед записа
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • Преглед записа
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Consensual Secession of Montenegro - Towards Good Practice?

Нема приказа
Аутори
Jovanović, M.
Поглавље у монографији (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документу
Апстракт
Allen Buchanan offered the first systematic account of secession, and contributed to the normative classification of the growing body of literature in this field of study. Apart from the unilateral right to secession, Buchanan acknowledges the ‘consensual’ type of secession, which ‘results either from a negotiated agreement between the state and the secessionists or through constitutional processes’. This sub-type of consensual secession may take the forms of, first, an explicit constitutional right to secession; and second, an implicit constitutional right to secession, recognised as such through the process of constitutional interpretation, by the respective constitutional tribunal, and subsequently legally spelled out through an adequate constitutional amending formula. Buchanan initially divides all normative theories into two groupRemedial Right Only Theory and Primary Right Theories. This chapter examines whether the recent case of the consensual secession of Montenegro can contr...ibute to creating such practice.

Извор:
On the Way to Statehood: Secession and Globalisation, 2017, 133-148

DOI: 10.4324/9781315247656-8

Scopus: 2-s2.0-85145512579
[ Google Scholar ]
6
URI
https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/960
Колекције
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Институција/група
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
TY  - CHAP
AU  - Jovanović, M.
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/960
AB  - Allen Buchanan offered the first systematic account of secession, and contributed to the normative classification of the growing body of literature in this field of study. Apart from the unilateral right to secession, Buchanan acknowledges the ‘consensual’ type of secession, which ‘results either from a negotiated agreement between the state and the secessionists or through constitutional processes’. This sub-type of consensual secession may take the forms of, first, an explicit constitutional right to secession; and second, an implicit constitutional right to secession, recognised as such through the process of constitutional interpretation, by the respective constitutional tribunal, and subsequently legally spelled out through an adequate constitutional amending formula. Buchanan initially divides all normative theories into two groupRemedial Right Only Theory and Primary Right Theories. This chapter examines whether the recent case of the consensual secession of Montenegro can contribute to creating such practice.
T2  - On the Way to Statehood: Secession and Globalisation
T1  - Consensual Secession of Montenegro - Towards Good Practice?
EP  - 148
SP  - 133
DO  - 10.4324/9781315247656-8
UR  - conv_3375
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Jovanović, M.",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Allen Buchanan offered the first systematic account of secession, and contributed to the normative classification of the growing body of literature in this field of study. Apart from the unilateral right to secession, Buchanan acknowledges the ‘consensual’ type of secession, which ‘results either from a negotiated agreement between the state and the secessionists or through constitutional processes’. This sub-type of consensual secession may take the forms of, first, an explicit constitutional right to secession; and second, an implicit constitutional right to secession, recognised as such through the process of constitutional interpretation, by the respective constitutional tribunal, and subsequently legally spelled out through an adequate constitutional amending formula. Buchanan initially divides all normative theories into two groupRemedial Right Only Theory and Primary Right Theories. This chapter examines whether the recent case of the consensual secession of Montenegro can contribute to creating such practice.",
journal = "On the Way to Statehood: Secession and Globalisation",
booktitle = "Consensual Secession of Montenegro - Towards Good Practice?",
pages = "148-133",
doi = "10.4324/9781315247656-8",
url = "conv_3375"
}
Jovanović, M.. (2017). Consensual Secession of Montenegro - Towards Good Practice?. in On the Way to Statehood: Secession and Globalisation, 133-148.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315247656-8
conv_3375
Jovanović M. Consensual Secession of Montenegro - Towards Good Practice?. in On the Way to Statehood: Secession and Globalisation. 2017;:133-148.
doi:10.4324/9781315247656-8
conv_3375 .
Jovanović, M., "Consensual Secession of Montenegro - Towards Good Practice?" in On the Way to Statehood: Secession and Globalisation (2017):133-148,
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315247656-8 .,
conv_3375 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
О репозиторијуму RALF | Пошаљите запажања

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

Комплетан репозиторијумГрупеАуториНасловиТемеОва институцијаАуториНасловиТеме

Статистика

Преглед статистика

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
О репозиторијуму RALF | Пошаљите запажања

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB