TY  - JOUR
AU  - Popović, Dragoljub
PY  - 2024
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1895
AB  - Autor članka predlaže da se u Srbiji polupredsednički sistem organizacije vlasti, koji loše funkcioniše, zameni režimom parlamentarne republike. Parlamentarizam bi prevazišao slabosti sadašnjeg sistema koje se pre svega sastoje u hipertrofiji predsedničke vlasti. Pisac razmatra dva pitanja budućeg parlamentarnog uređenja - izbor šefa države i odnos vlade i parlamenta. Predlozi za uređenje tih ustanova, dati u članku, predstavljaju samo poziv za raspravu o promeni sistema organizacije vlasti, koju pisac smatra neophodnom.
AB  - The author puts forward the idea to replace the existing, ill-functioning semi-presidential form of government in Serbia with parliamentary government. The latter would put an end to the shortcomings of the current form of government, predominantly consisting in hypertrophy of the presidential powers. The author discusses two topics concerning the parliamentary form of government: election of the head of state and the relations between parliament and the cabinet. The authors suggestions regarding the future shape of these institutions in a future parliamentary republic are aimed solely at instigating debate, which he considers indispensable.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Glas za parlamentarnu republiku
T1  - An opinon in favour of parliamentary Republic
EP  - 122
IS  - 1
SP  - 105
VL  - 72
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_24105A
UR  - conv_3452
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Popović, Dragoljub",
year = "2024",
abstract = "Autor članka predlaže da se u Srbiji polupredsednički sistem organizacije vlasti, koji loše funkcioniše, zameni režimom parlamentarne republike. Parlamentarizam bi prevazišao slabosti sadašnjeg sistema koje se pre svega sastoje u hipertrofiji predsedničke vlasti. Pisac razmatra dva pitanja budućeg parlamentarnog uređenja - izbor šefa države i odnos vlade i parlamenta. Predlozi za uređenje tih ustanova, dati u članku, predstavljaju samo poziv za raspravu o promeni sistema organizacije vlasti, koju pisac smatra neophodnom., The author puts forward the idea to replace the existing, ill-functioning semi-presidential form of government in Serbia with parliamentary government. The latter would put an end to the shortcomings of the current form of government, predominantly consisting in hypertrophy of the presidential powers. The author discusses two topics concerning the parliamentary form of government: election of the head of state and the relations between parliament and the cabinet. The authors suggestions regarding the future shape of these institutions in a future parliamentary republic are aimed solely at instigating debate, which he considers indispensable.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Glas za parlamentarnu republiku, An opinon in favour of parliamentary Republic",
pages = "122-105",
number = "1",
volume = "72",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_24105A",
url = "conv_3452"
}

Popović, D.. (2024). Glas za parlamentarnu republiku. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 72(1), 105-122.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_24105A
conv_3452

Popović D. Glas za parlamentarnu republiku. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2024;72(1):105-122.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_24105A
conv_3452 .

Popović, Dragoljub, "Glas za parlamentarnu republiku" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 72, no. 1 (2024):105-122,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_24105A .,
conv_3452 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Popović, Dragoljub
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1844
AB  - Profesor Mihailo Konstantinović je zajedno sa svojim kolegama, Mihailom Ilićem i Đorđem Tasićem, savetovao predsednika vlade Dragišu Cvetkovića, koji je inspirisan zamislima kneza-namesnika Pavla, posle komplikovanih pregovora postigao sporazum s vođom najjače hrvatske političke stranke Vlatkom Mačekom. Na osnovu tog sporazuma, koji je sklopljen pri samom kraju avgusta 1939. godine, doneta je Uredba o Banovini Hrvatskoj, kojom je ova stekla poseban položaj u jugoslovenskoj kraljevini. Konstantinović je učestvovao u pregovorima kao ekspert i umnogome doprineo formulisanju teksta te uredbe. Namere tvoraca sporazuma, kao i kneza Pavla, težile su načelnom preuređenju države tako što će biti uveden federalizam. Konstantinović se vrlo mnogo angažovao u tom pogledu i sastavio je nacrt uredbe o Banovini Srpskih Zemalja. Političke prilike i rat omeli su ostvarenje takve zamisli, ali se profesor Konstantinović jasno pokazao kao pristalica federativnog uređenja.
AB  - Mihailo Konstantinović, together with his colleagues Mihailo Ilić and Đorđe Tasić, served as counsel to Prime Minister Dragiša Cvetković committed by Prince Regent Pavle to reach an agreement with Vlatko Maček, the leader of the strongest Croatian political party. The August 1939 agreement resulted in the creation of the Banovina of Croatia, which thus obtained special status within the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. Konstantinović took part in the negotiations and significantly contributed to the drafting of the accompanying decree. The intention of the parties to the agreement, in line with the Prince Regents, was in the direction of introducing federalism in Yugoslavia. Konstantinović very much engaged in such efforts and drafted a decree that was to create the Banovina of Serbian Lands. Political circumstances, as well as the war, impeded the implementation of such ideas, but Konstantinović nevertheless proved himself a convinced federalist.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Federalist Mihailo Konstantinović
T1  - Federalist Mihailo Konstantinović
EP  - 115
IS  - poseban
SP  - 93
VL  - 70
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK04A
UR  - conv_3409
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Popović, Dragoljub",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Profesor Mihailo Konstantinović je zajedno sa svojim kolegama, Mihailom Ilićem i Đorđem Tasićem, savetovao predsednika vlade Dragišu Cvetkovića, koji je inspirisan zamislima kneza-namesnika Pavla, posle komplikovanih pregovora postigao sporazum s vođom najjače hrvatske političke stranke Vlatkom Mačekom. Na osnovu tog sporazuma, koji je sklopljen pri samom kraju avgusta 1939. godine, doneta je Uredba o Banovini Hrvatskoj, kojom je ova stekla poseban položaj u jugoslovenskoj kraljevini. Konstantinović je učestvovao u pregovorima kao ekspert i umnogome doprineo formulisanju teksta te uredbe. Namere tvoraca sporazuma, kao i kneza Pavla, težile su načelnom preuređenju države tako što će biti uveden federalizam. Konstantinović se vrlo mnogo angažovao u tom pogledu i sastavio je nacrt uredbe o Banovini Srpskih Zemalja. Političke prilike i rat omeli su ostvarenje takve zamisli, ali se profesor Konstantinović jasno pokazao kao pristalica federativnog uređenja., Mihailo Konstantinović, together with his colleagues Mihailo Ilić and Đorđe Tasić, served as counsel to Prime Minister Dragiša Cvetković committed by Prince Regent Pavle to reach an agreement with Vlatko Maček, the leader of the strongest Croatian political party. The August 1939 agreement resulted in the creation of the Banovina of Croatia, which thus obtained special status within the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. Konstantinović took part in the negotiations and significantly contributed to the drafting of the accompanying decree. The intention of the parties to the agreement, in line with the Prince Regents, was in the direction of introducing federalism in Yugoslavia. Konstantinović very much engaged in such efforts and drafted a decree that was to create the Banovina of Serbian Lands. Political circumstances, as well as the war, impeded the implementation of such ideas, but Konstantinović nevertheless proved himself a convinced federalist.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Federalist Mihailo Konstantinović, Federalist Mihailo Konstantinović",
pages = "115-93",
number = "poseban",
volume = "70",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK04A",
url = "conv_3409"
}

Popović, D.. (2022). Federalist Mihailo Konstantinović. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 70(poseban), 93-115.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK04A
conv_3409

Popović D. Federalist Mihailo Konstantinović. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2022;70(poseban):93-115.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK04A
conv_3409 .

Popović, Dragoljub, "Federalist Mihailo Konstantinović" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 70, no. poseban (2022):93-115,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK04A .,
conv_3409 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Popović, Dragoljub
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1816
AB  - The ECtHR does not review decisions of national courts of the States Parties to the European Convention. However, it has developed a pattern in its case law to find a violation of the Convention on the grounds that the fair hearing lacked if there was a case law inconsistency at the level of national jurisdiction. The ECtHR case law was settled in a Grand Chamber case against Turkey in 2011. To find a violation under Article 6 of the Convention the ECtHR requires two tests. Firstly, it must establish the existence of a profound and long-standing inconsistency in the domestic case law, and secondly, the ECtHR raises the issue of a mechanism aimed at removing the inconsistency. If the mechanism does not exist, or if it applied ineffectively, the ECtHR finds a violation of human rights. The author suggests the ECtHR should revisit its jurisprudence.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Inconsistent adjudication: A violation of the right to fair trial under the European Convention on human rights
EP  - 320
IS  - 2
SP  - 297
VL  - 69
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21201A
UR  - conv_3344_6
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Popović, Dragoljub",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The ECtHR does not review decisions of national courts of the States Parties to the European Convention. However, it has developed a pattern in its case law to find a violation of the Convention on the grounds that the fair hearing lacked if there was a case law inconsistency at the level of national jurisdiction. The ECtHR case law was settled in a Grand Chamber case against Turkey in 2011. To find a violation under Article 6 of the Convention the ECtHR requires two tests. Firstly, it must establish the existence of a profound and long-standing inconsistency in the domestic case law, and secondly, the ECtHR raises the issue of a mechanism aimed at removing the inconsistency. If the mechanism does not exist, or if it applied ineffectively, the ECtHR finds a violation of human rights. The author suggests the ECtHR should revisit its jurisprudence.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Inconsistent adjudication: A violation of the right to fair trial under the European Convention on human rights",
pages = "320-297",
number = "2",
volume = "69",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21201A",
url = "conv_3344_6"
}

Popović, D.. (2021). Inconsistent adjudication: A violation of the right to fair trial under the European Convention on human rights. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 69(2), 297-320.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21201A
conv_3344_6

Popović D. Inconsistent adjudication: A violation of the right to fair trial under the European Convention on human rights. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2021;69(2):297-320.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21201A
conv_3344_6 .

Popović, Dragoljub, "Inconsistent adjudication: A violation of the right to fair trial under the European Convention on human rights" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 69, no. 2 (2021):297-320,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21201A .,
conv_3344_6 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Popović, Dragoljub
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1823
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - The puzzle of Yugoslavia - Begović Boris, Mirković Zoran: Sto godina od ujedinjenja - formiranje države i prava, University of Belgrade - Faculty of Law, Belgrade, 2020
EP  - 245
IS  - 1
SP  - 235
VL  - 69
UR  - conv_3018_6
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Popović, Dragoljub",
year = "2021",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "The puzzle of Yugoslavia - Begović Boris, Mirković Zoran: Sto godina od ujedinjenja - formiranje države i prava, University of Belgrade - Faculty of Law, Belgrade, 2020",
pages = "245-235",
number = "1",
volume = "69",
url = "conv_3018_6"
}

Popović, D.. (2021). The puzzle of Yugoslavia - Begović Boris, Mirković Zoran: Sto godina od ujedinjenja - formiranje države i prava, University of Belgrade - Faculty of Law, Belgrade, 2020. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 69(1), 235-245.
conv_3018_6

Popović D. The puzzle of Yugoslavia - Begović Boris, Mirković Zoran: Sto godina od ujedinjenja - formiranje države i prava, University of Belgrade - Faculty of Law, Belgrade, 2020. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2021;69(1):235-245.
conv_3018_6 .

Popović, Dragoljub, "The puzzle of Yugoslavia - Begović Boris, Mirković Zoran: Sto godina od ujedinjenja - formiranje države i prava, University of Belgrade - Faculty of Law, Belgrade, 2020" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 69, no. 1 (2021):235-245,
conv_3018_6 .