TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kolarić, Dragana
AU  - Marković, Saša
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1849
AB  - U analizi koja je predmet ovog rada proučavaćemo podatke o primeni Zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici u periodu 2018-2020. Primenom statističke metode, analize sadržaja, komparativne i formalnologičke analize, u radu su analizirani podaci Ministarstva unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, javnog tužilaštva i suda koji se odnose na nasilje u porodici. Afirmativni efekti primene Zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici trebalo bi da budu prevencija - smanjenje događaja nasilja u porodici, smanjenje broja krivičnih dela nasilja u porodici, buđenje svesti o prijavljivanju nasilja, bolja saradnja nadležnih državnih organa u sprečavanju i suzbijanju nasilja u porodici, uticaj na dosledniju primenu odredaba drugih zakona usmerenih na suprotstavljanje nasilju u porodici. Identifikovano je da nadležni državni organi nejednako primenjuju zakonske odredbe, zbog čega žrtve nasilja u porodici nemaju iste mogućnosti da ostvare pravo na zaštitu. Kao ključni uzrok opisanog problema potvrđena je različita praksa postupanja nadležnih organa u suprotstavljanju nasilju u porodici.
AB  - In this paper we examine data related to the implementation of the Law on Prevention of Domestic Violence, between 2018 and 2020, provided by the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Serbia, the Public Prosecutors Office, and the courts. The positive effects of the implementation of the Law on Prevention of Domestic Violence should be preventive - reducing incidents, reducing the number of crimes, raising awareness regarding the reporting of violence, better cooperation between state authorities in prevention and suppression of domestic violence, more consistent implementation of provisions of other laws directed at fighting domestic violence. It has been noted that the competent state authorities implement legal provisions unequally, which causes the victims of domestic violence not to have the same possibilities in exercising their right to protection. A key cause of this issue has been varying practices by competent authorities in fighting domestic violence.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Analiza dosadašnje primene zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici
T1  - Analysis of the implementation of the law on prevention of domestic violence
EP  - 223
IS  - 1
SP  - 189
VL  - 70
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22107A
UR  - conv_3399_6
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Kolarić, Dragana and Marković, Saša",
year = "2022",
abstract = "U analizi koja je predmet ovog rada proučavaćemo podatke o primeni Zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici u periodu 2018-2020. Primenom statističke metode, analize sadržaja, komparativne i formalnologičke analize, u radu su analizirani podaci Ministarstva unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, javnog tužilaštva i suda koji se odnose na nasilje u porodici. Afirmativni efekti primene Zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici trebalo bi da budu prevencija - smanjenje događaja nasilja u porodici, smanjenje broja krivičnih dela nasilja u porodici, buđenje svesti o prijavljivanju nasilja, bolja saradnja nadležnih državnih organa u sprečavanju i suzbijanju nasilja u porodici, uticaj na dosledniju primenu odredaba drugih zakona usmerenih na suprotstavljanje nasilju u porodici. Identifikovano je da nadležni državni organi nejednako primenjuju zakonske odredbe, zbog čega žrtve nasilja u porodici nemaju iste mogućnosti da ostvare pravo na zaštitu. Kao ključni uzrok opisanog problema potvrđena je različita praksa postupanja nadležnih organa u suprotstavljanju nasilju u porodici., In this paper we examine data related to the implementation of the Law on Prevention of Domestic Violence, between 2018 and 2020, provided by the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Serbia, the Public Prosecutors Office, and the courts. The positive effects of the implementation of the Law on Prevention of Domestic Violence should be preventive - reducing incidents, reducing the number of crimes, raising awareness regarding the reporting of violence, better cooperation between state authorities in prevention and suppression of domestic violence, more consistent implementation of provisions of other laws directed at fighting domestic violence. It has been noted that the competent state authorities implement legal provisions unequally, which causes the victims of domestic violence not to have the same possibilities in exercising their right to protection. A key cause of this issue has been varying practices by competent authorities in fighting domestic violence.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Analiza dosadašnje primene zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici, Analysis of the implementation of the law on prevention of domestic violence",
pages = "223-189",
number = "1",
volume = "70",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22107A",
url = "conv_3399_6"
}

Kolarić, D.,& Marković, S.. (2022). Analiza dosadašnje primene zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 70(1), 189-223.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22107A
conv_3399_6

Kolarić D, Marković S. Analiza dosadašnje primene zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2022;70(1):189-223.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22107A
conv_3399_6 .

Kolarić, Dragana, Marković, Saša, "Analiza dosadašnje primene zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 70, no. 1 (2022):189-223,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22107A .,
conv_3399_6 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kolarić, Dragana
AU  - Marković, Saša
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1708
AB  - Rad sadrži analizu pojedinih odredaba Zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici i prvih efekata njegove primene. Odmah na početku se postavlja pitanje opravdanosti Zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici. Danas se udarne vesti u kolumnama svakodnevno odnose na nasilje među članovima porodice, naročito muškaraca nad ženama i decom. Glavna polemika u medijima vodi se o tome da li su državni organi i društvo u celini preduzeli sve što je neophodno da do nasilja ne dođe. Autori ukazuju na neprihvatljivu terminologiju zakonodavca. Postavljaju mnogobrojna pitanja i na neka od njih pokušavaju da daju odgovore prateći norme zakona. Ko je mogući učinilac nasilja u porodici? Koja je vrsta postupka u pitanju? Uloga branioca u ovom postupku? Da li hitne mere imaju preventivnu ili represivnu ulogu? Da li je njihovo izricanje postalo dominantan način sprečavanja i suzbijanja nasilja u porodici? Da li je ugroženo pravo na slobodu mogućeg učinioca? Kakvi su prvi efekti ovakvog načina rada državnih organa, pre svega policije, javnog tužilaštva i suda? Kako sprečiti eventualne zloupotrebe? Jedan od efekata primene Zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici trebalo bi da bude prevencija - smanjenje broja krivičnih dela nasilja u porodici. Međutim, analizom dostupnih podataka autori zaključuju upravo suprotno. To znači da država nije na najbolji način, sa strogim naučnim rezonom i objektivnim pristupom, odgovorila na problem nasilja u porodici, koji je predmet doktrinarne analize u ovom radu.
AB  - The paper contains an analysis of certain provisions of the Law on the Prevention of Domestic Violence and the first effects of its implementation. At the very beginning the question is asked of justification of the Law on the Prevention of Domestic Violence. Almost on a daily basis nowadays the news headlines refer to violence among the family members, particularly the violence of men against women and children. The main debate in media is about whether the state organs and society as a whole have taken all necessary steps to prevent violence from happening at all. The authors point to the unacceptable terminology of the legislator. There are many questions asked and an attempt is made to give the answers to some of them following the legal norms. Who is the possible perpetrator of domestic violence? What kind of procedure are we talking about? What is the role of the defender in this procedure? Do urgent measures play preventive or repressive role? Has their imposing become a dominant manner in preventing and suppressing domestic violence? Has the right to freedom of a possible perpetrator been jeopardized? What are the first effects of such manner of conduct of state organs, primarily the police, the public prosecution office and the court? How can possible abuses be prevented? One of the effects of the implementation of the Law on the Prevention of Domestic Violence should be prevention - the reduction in number of criminal offences of domestic violence. However, analyzing the available data the authors have come to quite the opposite conclusions. This means that the state has not responded in the best manner, using strict scientific reasoning and objective approach, to the matter of doctrinal analysis, and this is the problem of domestic violence.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Pojedine nedoumice u primeni Zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici
T1  - Some dilemmas regarding implementation of the Law on Prevention of Domestic Violence
EP  - 71
IS  - 1
SP  - 45
VL  - 66
DO  - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1801045K
UR  - conv_3035_6
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Kolarić, Dragana and Marković, Saša",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Rad sadrži analizu pojedinih odredaba Zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici i prvih efekata njegove primene. Odmah na početku se postavlja pitanje opravdanosti Zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici. Danas se udarne vesti u kolumnama svakodnevno odnose na nasilje među članovima porodice, naročito muškaraca nad ženama i decom. Glavna polemika u medijima vodi se o tome da li su državni organi i društvo u celini preduzeli sve što je neophodno da do nasilja ne dođe. Autori ukazuju na neprihvatljivu terminologiju zakonodavca. Postavljaju mnogobrojna pitanja i na neka od njih pokušavaju da daju odgovore prateći norme zakona. Ko je mogući učinilac nasilja u porodici? Koja je vrsta postupka u pitanju? Uloga branioca u ovom postupku? Da li hitne mere imaju preventivnu ili represivnu ulogu? Da li je njihovo izricanje postalo dominantan način sprečavanja i suzbijanja nasilja u porodici? Da li je ugroženo pravo na slobodu mogućeg učinioca? Kakvi su prvi efekti ovakvog načina rada državnih organa, pre svega policije, javnog tužilaštva i suda? Kako sprečiti eventualne zloupotrebe? Jedan od efekata primene Zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici trebalo bi da bude prevencija - smanjenje broja krivičnih dela nasilja u porodici. Međutim, analizom dostupnih podataka autori zaključuju upravo suprotno. To znači da država nije na najbolji način, sa strogim naučnim rezonom i objektivnim pristupom, odgovorila na problem nasilja u porodici, koji je predmet doktrinarne analize u ovom radu., The paper contains an analysis of certain provisions of the Law on the Prevention of Domestic Violence and the first effects of its implementation. At the very beginning the question is asked of justification of the Law on the Prevention of Domestic Violence. Almost on a daily basis nowadays the news headlines refer to violence among the family members, particularly the violence of men against women and children. The main debate in media is about whether the state organs and society as a whole have taken all necessary steps to prevent violence from happening at all. The authors point to the unacceptable terminology of the legislator. There are many questions asked and an attempt is made to give the answers to some of them following the legal norms. Who is the possible perpetrator of domestic violence? What kind of procedure are we talking about? What is the role of the defender in this procedure? Do urgent measures play preventive or repressive role? Has their imposing become a dominant manner in preventing and suppressing domestic violence? Has the right to freedom of a possible perpetrator been jeopardized? What are the first effects of such manner of conduct of state organs, primarily the police, the public prosecution office and the court? How can possible abuses be prevented? One of the effects of the implementation of the Law on the Prevention of Domestic Violence should be prevention - the reduction in number of criminal offences of domestic violence. However, analyzing the available data the authors have come to quite the opposite conclusions. This means that the state has not responded in the best manner, using strict scientific reasoning and objective approach, to the matter of doctrinal analysis, and this is the problem of domestic violence.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Pojedine nedoumice u primeni Zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici, Some dilemmas regarding implementation of the Law on Prevention of Domestic Violence",
pages = "71-45",
number = "1",
volume = "66",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1801045K",
url = "conv_3035_6"
}

Kolarić, D.,& Marković, S.. (2018). Pojedine nedoumice u primeni Zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 66(1), 45-71.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1801045K
conv_3035_6

Kolarić D, Marković S. Pojedine nedoumice u primeni Zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2018;66(1):45-71.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1801045K
conv_3035_6 .

Kolarić, Dragana, Marković, Saša, "Pojedine nedoumice u primeni Zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 66, no. 1 (2018):45-71,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1801045K .,
conv_3035_6 .