Ilić, Goran

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
a58a4684-d14b-4bc2-ae9f-782819259b26
  • Ilić, Goran (18)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Ilić Aleksandra : Komentar zakona o izvršenju krivičnih sankcija, JP Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2022

Ilić, Goran

(Advokatska komora Vojvodine, Novi Sad, 2022)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ilić, Goran
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1358
PB  - Advokatska komora Vojvodine, Novi Sad
T2  - Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine
T1  - Ilić Aleksandra : Komentar zakona o izvršenju krivičnih sankcija, JP Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2022
EP  - 1371
IS  - 4
SP  - 1367
VL  - 94
UR  - conv_1041
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ilić, Goran",
year = "2022",
publisher = "Advokatska komora Vojvodine, Novi Sad",
journal = "Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine",
title = "Ilić Aleksandra : Komentar zakona o izvršenju krivičnih sankcija, JP Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2022",
pages = "1371-1367",
number = "4",
volume = "94",
url = "conv_1041"
}
Ilić, G.. (2022). Ilić Aleksandra : Komentar zakona o izvršenju krivičnih sankcija, JP Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2022. in Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine
Advokatska komora Vojvodine, Novi Sad., 94(4), 1367-1371.
conv_1041
Ilić G. Ilić Aleksandra : Komentar zakona o izvršenju krivičnih sankcija, JP Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2022. in Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine. 2022;94(4):1367-1371.
conv_1041 .
Ilić, Goran, "Ilić Aleksandra : Komentar zakona o izvršenju krivičnih sankcija, JP Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2022" in Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine, 94, no. 4 (2022):1367-1371,
conv_1041 .

Pojam, standardi i ograničenja prava na slobodu izražavanja s posebnim osvrtom na praksu Evropskog suda za ljudska prava

Ilić, Goran

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet bezbednosti, Beograd, 2018)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ilić, Goran
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1018
AB  - U radu autor razmatra značaj prava na slobodu izražavanja koje je nesumnjivo za uspostavljanje demokratskih institucija. Ipak, u određenim slučajevima se može postaviti pitanje granice slobode izražavanja. Reč je o situacijama koje se u doktrini ustavnog prava i praksi najviših sudova uobičajeno označavaju pojmom "borbene demokratije". Pravo na slobodu izražavanja uključuje slobodu posedovanja sopstvenog mišljenja, primanja i saopštavanja informacija i ideja bez mešanja javne vlasti i bez obzira na granice. Od navedenog pravila postoje izuzeci a njihov ratio se izvodi iz dužnosti i odgovornosti koje postoje prilikom korišćenja navedenog prava. U tom smislu autor analizira pojedine presude Evropskog suda za ljudska prava koje se tiču izuzetaka od prava na slobodu izražavanja u kojima se uočava nedoslednost u pristupu. Jedno od mogućih objašnjenja te nedoslednosti na koje autor ukazuje je postojanje evropskih različitosti. Zbog značaja koji se pridaje slobodi medija, Evropski sud za ljudska prava u pojedinim predmetima zastupa gledište da novinarska sloboda podrazumeva mogućnost korišćenja određene mere preterivanja, pa čak i provokacije. S druge strane se postavlja pitanje problema zaštite izvora informacija koje je naročito prisutno u istraživačkom novinarstvu. Na kraju treba istaći da granice slobode izražavanja zavise u velikoj meri od toga da li je u informaciji sadržana činjenična tvrdnja ili vrednosni sud zbog čega je važno napraviti razliku između te dve stvari.
AB  - In this paper, the author considers the importance of the right to freedom of expression, which is undoubtedly for the establishment of democratic institutions. However, in some cases, it can be questioned the issue of the freedom of expression boundaries. These are the situations that in the doctrine of constitutional law and the practice of the highest courts are commonly referred to as the term "combat democracy". The right to freedom of expression includes the freedom to hold own opinions, receive and communicate information and ideas without interference by the public authority and regardless of boundaries. There are exceptions to this rule and their ratio is derived from the duties and responsibilities that exist when using that right. In this regard, the author analyzes individual judgments of the European Court of Human Rights concerning exceptions to the right to freedom of expression in which inconsistency in approach is observed. One of the possible explanations of this inconsistency that the author points out is the existence of European diversity. Due to the importance attached to the freedom of the media, the European Court of Human Rights in individual cases argues that journalistic freedom implies the possibility of using a certain measure of exaggeration and even provocation. On the other hand, the issue of protection of sources of information is another problem which is particularly present in investigative journalism. Finally, it should be noted that the limits of freedom of expression depend largely on whether the information contains a factual claim or a value judgment, which makes it important to distinguish between these two things.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet bezbednosti, Beograd
T2  - Godišnjak Fakulteta bezbednosti
T1  - Pojam, standardi i ograničenja prava na slobodu izražavanja s posebnim osvrtom na praksu Evropskog suda za ljudska prava
T1  - Conception, standards and limitations of the right to freedom of expression with a special review on the practice of the European Court of Human Rights
EP  - 40
IS  - 1
SP  - 29
DO  - 10.5937/GFB1801029I
UR  - conv_2747
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ilić, Goran",
year = "2018",
abstract = "U radu autor razmatra značaj prava na slobodu izražavanja koje je nesumnjivo za uspostavljanje demokratskih institucija. Ipak, u određenim slučajevima se može postaviti pitanje granice slobode izražavanja. Reč je o situacijama koje se u doktrini ustavnog prava i praksi najviših sudova uobičajeno označavaju pojmom "borbene demokratije". Pravo na slobodu izražavanja uključuje slobodu posedovanja sopstvenog mišljenja, primanja i saopštavanja informacija i ideja bez mešanja javne vlasti i bez obzira na granice. Od navedenog pravila postoje izuzeci a njihov ratio se izvodi iz dužnosti i odgovornosti koje postoje prilikom korišćenja navedenog prava. U tom smislu autor analizira pojedine presude Evropskog suda za ljudska prava koje se tiču izuzetaka od prava na slobodu izražavanja u kojima se uočava nedoslednost u pristupu. Jedno od mogućih objašnjenja te nedoslednosti na koje autor ukazuje je postojanje evropskih različitosti. Zbog značaja koji se pridaje slobodi medija, Evropski sud za ljudska prava u pojedinim predmetima zastupa gledište da novinarska sloboda podrazumeva mogućnost korišćenja određene mere preterivanja, pa čak i provokacije. S druge strane se postavlja pitanje problema zaštite izvora informacija koje je naročito prisutno u istraživačkom novinarstvu. Na kraju treba istaći da granice slobode izražavanja zavise u velikoj meri od toga da li je u informaciji sadržana činjenična tvrdnja ili vrednosni sud zbog čega je važno napraviti razliku između te dve stvari., In this paper, the author considers the importance of the right to freedom of expression, which is undoubtedly for the establishment of democratic institutions. However, in some cases, it can be questioned the issue of the freedom of expression boundaries. These are the situations that in the doctrine of constitutional law and the practice of the highest courts are commonly referred to as the term "combat democracy". The right to freedom of expression includes the freedom to hold own opinions, receive and communicate information and ideas without interference by the public authority and regardless of boundaries. There are exceptions to this rule and their ratio is derived from the duties and responsibilities that exist when using that right. In this regard, the author analyzes individual judgments of the European Court of Human Rights concerning exceptions to the right to freedom of expression in which inconsistency in approach is observed. One of the possible explanations of this inconsistency that the author points out is the existence of European diversity. Due to the importance attached to the freedom of the media, the European Court of Human Rights in individual cases argues that journalistic freedom implies the possibility of using a certain measure of exaggeration and even provocation. On the other hand, the issue of protection of sources of information is another problem which is particularly present in investigative journalism. Finally, it should be noted that the limits of freedom of expression depend largely on whether the information contains a factual claim or a value judgment, which makes it important to distinguish between these two things.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet bezbednosti, Beograd",
journal = "Godišnjak Fakulteta bezbednosti",
title = "Pojam, standardi i ograničenja prava na slobodu izražavanja s posebnim osvrtom na praksu Evropskog suda za ljudska prava, Conception, standards and limitations of the right to freedom of expression with a special review on the practice of the European Court of Human Rights",
pages = "40-29",
number = "1",
doi = "10.5937/GFB1801029I",
url = "conv_2747"
}
Ilić, G.. (2018). Pojam, standardi i ograničenja prava na slobodu izražavanja s posebnim osvrtom na praksu Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. in Godišnjak Fakulteta bezbednosti
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet bezbednosti, Beograd.(1), 29-40.
https://doi.org/10.5937/GFB1801029I
conv_2747
Ilić G. Pojam, standardi i ograničenja prava na slobodu izražavanja s posebnim osvrtom na praksu Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. in Godišnjak Fakulteta bezbednosti. 2018;(1):29-40.
doi:10.5937/GFB1801029I
conv_2747 .
Ilić, Goran, "Pojam, standardi i ograničenja prava na slobodu izražavanja s posebnim osvrtom na praksu Evropskog suda za ljudska prava" in Godišnjak Fakulteta bezbednosti, no. 1 (2018):29-40,
https://doi.org/10.5937/GFB1801029I .,
conv_2747 .
1

Zapažanja o uređenju sudijske funkcije

Ilić, Goran

(Advokatska komora Vojvodine, Novi Sad, 2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ilić, Goran
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/973
AB  - U radu su analizirane ustavne odredbe koje se odnose na izbor, trajanje i okončanje funkcije sudije. Prilikom razmatranja osnovnih pitanja koja se postavljaju u vezi s navedenom problematikom, vođeno je računa o odgovarajućim međunarodnim standardima i dokumentima koji se odnose na uslove pod kojima se može vršiti sudijska funkcija. Autor smatra da uticaj i ovlašćenja koja ima izvršna i zakonodavna vlast suštinski dovodi u pitanje ustavom proklamovanu nezavisnost suda i sudija. Pored toga, načelo stalnosti sudijske funkcije u značajnoj meri je oslabljeno zbog uvođenja trogodišnjeg probnog perioda na koji se bira lice koje prvi put vrši sudijsku funkciju. Autor kritički analizira i ustavne odredbe koje, za razliku od prethodnog ustavnog rešenja, ovlašćuju zakonodavca da predvidi uslove za prestanak sudijske funkcije. U radu je razmotren i položaj sudije-porotnika i izneto je mišljenje da sudska veća treba da budu sačinjena isključivo od profesionalnih sudija. Na kraju, ali ne manje važno, autor ukazuje u kom pravcu bi bilo neophodno izmeniti ustavne odredbe kako bi sudijska funkcija postala nezavisna, samostalna i stalna.
AB  - This paper analyzes the constitutional provisions related to the election, duration and termination of the judicial function. In consideration of the fundamental questions related to this issue, the author took in consideration relevant international standards and documents which relate to the conditions under which the judicial function may be exercised. The author believes that the impact and powers of the executive and legislative authorities substantially prejudice the independence of courts and judges proclaimed by the Constitution. In addition, the principle of the permanency of the judicial function has been substan-weakened by the introduction of the three year trial period during which the elected person performs a judicial function for the first time. The author critically analyzes the constitutional provisions that, unlike previous constitutional solutions, authorize the legislature to provide the conditions for termination of the judicial function. The paper discusses the position of the juror judge and expresses the opinion that the judicial chambers should be composed exclusively of professional judges. Last but not least, the author indicates in which direction it would be necessary to change the constitutional provision so that the judicial function may become independent, autonomous and permanent.
PB  - Advokatska komora Vojvodine, Novi Sad
T2  - Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine
T1  - Zapažanja o uređenju sudijske funkcije
T1  - Observations on the regulation of the judicial function
EP  - 214
IS  - 3-4
SP  - 204
VL  - 89
DO  - 10.5937/gakv1704204I
UR  - conv_1030
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ilić, Goran",
year = "2017",
abstract = "U radu su analizirane ustavne odredbe koje se odnose na izbor, trajanje i okončanje funkcije sudije. Prilikom razmatranja osnovnih pitanja koja se postavljaju u vezi s navedenom problematikom, vođeno je računa o odgovarajućim međunarodnim standardima i dokumentima koji se odnose na uslove pod kojima se može vršiti sudijska funkcija. Autor smatra da uticaj i ovlašćenja koja ima izvršna i zakonodavna vlast suštinski dovodi u pitanje ustavom proklamovanu nezavisnost suda i sudija. Pored toga, načelo stalnosti sudijske funkcije u značajnoj meri je oslabljeno zbog uvođenja trogodišnjeg probnog perioda na koji se bira lice koje prvi put vrši sudijsku funkciju. Autor kritički analizira i ustavne odredbe koje, za razliku od prethodnog ustavnog rešenja, ovlašćuju zakonodavca da predvidi uslove za prestanak sudijske funkcije. U radu je razmotren i položaj sudije-porotnika i izneto je mišljenje da sudska veća treba da budu sačinjena isključivo od profesionalnih sudija. Na kraju, ali ne manje važno, autor ukazuje u kom pravcu bi bilo neophodno izmeniti ustavne odredbe kako bi sudijska funkcija postala nezavisna, samostalna i stalna., This paper analyzes the constitutional provisions related to the election, duration and termination of the judicial function. In consideration of the fundamental questions related to this issue, the author took in consideration relevant international standards and documents which relate to the conditions under which the judicial function may be exercised. The author believes that the impact and powers of the executive and legislative authorities substantially prejudice the independence of courts and judges proclaimed by the Constitution. In addition, the principle of the permanency of the judicial function has been substan-weakened by the introduction of the three year trial period during which the elected person performs a judicial function for the first time. The author critically analyzes the constitutional provisions that, unlike previous constitutional solutions, authorize the legislature to provide the conditions for termination of the judicial function. The paper discusses the position of the juror judge and expresses the opinion that the judicial chambers should be composed exclusively of professional judges. Last but not least, the author indicates in which direction it would be necessary to change the constitutional provision so that the judicial function may become independent, autonomous and permanent.",
publisher = "Advokatska komora Vojvodine, Novi Sad",
journal = "Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine",
title = "Zapažanja o uređenju sudijske funkcije, Observations on the regulation of the judicial function",
pages = "214-204",
number = "3-4",
volume = "89",
doi = "10.5937/gakv1704204I",
url = "conv_1030"
}
Ilić, G.. (2017). Zapažanja o uređenju sudijske funkcije. in Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine
Advokatska komora Vojvodine, Novi Sad., 89(3-4), 204-214.
https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv1704204I
conv_1030
Ilić G. Zapažanja o uređenju sudijske funkcije. in Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine. 2017;89(3-4):204-214.
doi:10.5937/gakv1704204I
conv_1030 .
Ilić, Goran, "Zapažanja o uređenju sudijske funkcije" in Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine, 89, no. 3-4 (2017):204-214,
https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv1704204I .,
conv_1030 .
1

Načelo ne bis in idem u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava

Ilić, Goran

(Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd, 2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ilić, Goran
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/955
AB  - U radu je analizirana praksa Evropskog suda za ljudska prava koja se odnosi na primenu čl. 4, st. 1. Protokola broj 7 uz Evropsku konvenciju o ljudskim pravima. To je podrazumevalo razmatranje pitanja koja se odnose na 'krivičnu' prirodu postupaka, problem ponavljanja postupaka (bis) i postojanje istog dela (idem). Autor je razmotrio brojne predmete u kojima je Evropski sud za ljudska prava potvrđivao, unapređivao ili napuštao svoju praksu u vezi s primenom načela ne bis in idem. Uprkos prigovorima koji se mogu uputiti zbog povremene nedoslednosti u postupanju, van svake sumnje je da postupanje Evropskog suda za ljudska prava ima za cilj unapređenje jemstva koje sadrži čl. 4, st. 1. Protokola broj 7 uz Evropsku konvenciju o ljudskim pravima. Taj utisak ne umanjuje ni određena protivurečnost kriterijuma koji su izneti u presudama Sergey Zolotukhin protiv Rusije i A. i B. protiv Norveške. Imajući u vidu vrstu predmeta u kojima je došao do izražaja kriterijum 'dovoljno tesne sadržinske i vremenske povezanosti' otvoreno je pitanje kada će i u kojoj oblasti Evropski sud za ljudska prava oceniti da je paralelno vođenje dva postupka u saglasnosti s načelom ne bis in idem.
AB  - The paper is analysed the practice of the European Court of Human Rights which relates to the application of the Art. 4 para. 1. Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights. This involved consideration of questions related to the 'criminal' nature of the proceedings, the problem of procedures repetition (bis) and the existence of the same act (idem). The author considered numerous cases in which the European Court of Human Rights confirmed, promoted or abandoned its practice regarding the application of the ne bis in idem principle. Despite objections that can be direct because of the occasional inconsistency in treatment, it is beyond any doubt that the conduct of the European Court of Human Rights is aimed at improving the guarantees contained in Art. 4 para. 1. Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights. That impression is not diminished by a certain contradiction between the criteria stated in the judgments of Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia and A. and B. v. Norway. Having in mind the type of cases in which the criterion of 'sufficiently close content and time interconnection' emerged, it is open to question when and in which area the European Court of Human Rights will judge that the parallel conduct of two proceedings is in accordance with the ne bis in idem principle.
PB  - Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
T2  - Strani pravni život
T1  - Načelo ne bis in idem u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava
T1  - Ne bis in idem principle in practice of the European Court of Human Rights
EP  - 34
IS  - 3
SP  - 21
UR  - conv_1177
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ilić, Goran",
year = "2017",
abstract = "U radu je analizirana praksa Evropskog suda za ljudska prava koja se odnosi na primenu čl. 4, st. 1. Protokola broj 7 uz Evropsku konvenciju o ljudskim pravima. To je podrazumevalo razmatranje pitanja koja se odnose na 'krivičnu' prirodu postupaka, problem ponavljanja postupaka (bis) i postojanje istog dela (idem). Autor je razmotrio brojne predmete u kojima je Evropski sud za ljudska prava potvrđivao, unapređivao ili napuštao svoju praksu u vezi s primenom načela ne bis in idem. Uprkos prigovorima koji se mogu uputiti zbog povremene nedoslednosti u postupanju, van svake sumnje je da postupanje Evropskog suda za ljudska prava ima za cilj unapređenje jemstva koje sadrži čl. 4, st. 1. Protokola broj 7 uz Evropsku konvenciju o ljudskim pravima. Taj utisak ne umanjuje ni određena protivurečnost kriterijuma koji su izneti u presudama Sergey Zolotukhin protiv Rusije i A. i B. protiv Norveške. Imajući u vidu vrstu predmeta u kojima je došao do izražaja kriterijum 'dovoljno tesne sadržinske i vremenske povezanosti' otvoreno je pitanje kada će i u kojoj oblasti Evropski sud za ljudska prava oceniti da je paralelno vođenje dva postupka u saglasnosti s načelom ne bis in idem., The paper is analysed the practice of the European Court of Human Rights which relates to the application of the Art. 4 para. 1. Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights. This involved consideration of questions related to the 'criminal' nature of the proceedings, the problem of procedures repetition (bis) and the existence of the same act (idem). The author considered numerous cases in which the European Court of Human Rights confirmed, promoted or abandoned its practice regarding the application of the ne bis in idem principle. Despite objections that can be direct because of the occasional inconsistency in treatment, it is beyond any doubt that the conduct of the European Court of Human Rights is aimed at improving the guarantees contained in Art. 4 para. 1. Protocol No. 7 to the European Convention on Human Rights. That impression is not diminished by a certain contradiction between the criteria stated in the judgments of Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia and A. and B. v. Norway. Having in mind the type of cases in which the criterion of 'sufficiently close content and time interconnection' emerged, it is open to question when and in which area the European Court of Human Rights will judge that the parallel conduct of two proceedings is in accordance with the ne bis in idem principle.",
publisher = "Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd",
journal = "Strani pravni život",
title = "Načelo ne bis in idem u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava, Ne bis in idem principle in practice of the European Court of Human Rights",
pages = "34-21",
number = "3",
url = "conv_1177"
}
Ilić, G.. (2017). Načelo ne bis in idem u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. in Strani pravni život
Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd.(3), 21-34.
conv_1177
Ilić G. Načelo ne bis in idem u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. in Strani pravni život. 2017;(3):21-34.
conv_1177 .
Ilić, Goran, "Načelo ne bis in idem u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava" in Strani pravni život, no. 3 (2017):21-34,
conv_1177 .

Nature, importance and limits of finding the truth in criminal proceedings

Ilić, Goran; Majić, Miodrag

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2013)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ilić, Goran
AU  - Majić, Miodrag
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/695
AB  - The paper analyzes reasonable possibilities of finding the truth in modern criminal proceedings. Instead of the often uncritical, and sometimes even populist referring to the so-called principle of 'material truth' as the main objective of criminal proceedings in continental legal tradition, the authors point out that the nature, importance and limits of finding the truth in criminal proceedings must be perceived in relation to other values included in the modern procedure, such as the presumption of innocence, adversary principle, equality of arms, the rules in dubio pro reo etc. Therefore, in a brief overview of the relevant philosophical movements, the authors first point out that the very notion of truth, which is inevitably philosophical, is inaccessible and enigmatic. It is highlighted that referring to the truth as an objective which should be reached in criminal proceedings is often a specific alibi for many open issues inherent to the system of criminal justice coercion. It is specifically high­lighted that due to its 'normative ' nature, judicial truth inevitably differs from scientific, philosophical, ethical or aesthetic truth, and that under the modern circumstances it also has a number of 'rivals ' in the form of the value of criminal procedure it must be harmonized with. The authors believe that modern criminal procedure is most appropriately demonstrated in the so-called 'adversary' model of process which is a unique mixture of solutions taken from the two major legal systems. Instead of insisting on pure solutions taken from the continental or Anglo-American legal heritage, the authors propose a formula which includes adequate solutions of both systems. The obligation of the prosecutor to prove the allegations of indictment in discussion with the defense, together with the judicial restraint in the search for evidence supporting the indictment and the possibility to introduce evidence ex officio in favour of the defense could eliminate the most significant objections raised in both systems. Thus, adversary proceeding would be spared from the complaints regarding its lack of efficiency when it comes to the accused without the professional support, while the inquisitorial procedure would cease to be a mechanism in which the court, searching for truth, could call into question its own impartiality and the presumption of innocence of the accused.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Nature, importance and limits of finding the truth in criminal proceedings
EP  - 100
IS  - 3
SP  - 82
VL  - 61
UR  - conv_318
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ilić, Goran and Majić, Miodrag",
year = "2013",
abstract = "The paper analyzes reasonable possibilities of finding the truth in modern criminal proceedings. Instead of the often uncritical, and sometimes even populist referring to the so-called principle of 'material truth' as the main objective of criminal proceedings in continental legal tradition, the authors point out that the nature, importance and limits of finding the truth in criminal proceedings must be perceived in relation to other values included in the modern procedure, such as the presumption of innocence, adversary principle, equality of arms, the rules in dubio pro reo etc. Therefore, in a brief overview of the relevant philosophical movements, the authors first point out that the very notion of truth, which is inevitably philosophical, is inaccessible and enigmatic. It is highlighted that referring to the truth as an objective which should be reached in criminal proceedings is often a specific alibi for many open issues inherent to the system of criminal justice coercion. It is specifically high­lighted that due to its 'normative ' nature, judicial truth inevitably differs from scientific, philosophical, ethical or aesthetic truth, and that under the modern circumstances it also has a number of 'rivals ' in the form of the value of criminal procedure it must be harmonized with. The authors believe that modern criminal procedure is most appropriately demonstrated in the so-called 'adversary' model of process which is a unique mixture of solutions taken from the two major legal systems. Instead of insisting on pure solutions taken from the continental or Anglo-American legal heritage, the authors propose a formula which includes adequate solutions of both systems. The obligation of the prosecutor to prove the allegations of indictment in discussion with the defense, together with the judicial restraint in the search for evidence supporting the indictment and the possibility to introduce evidence ex officio in favour of the defense could eliminate the most significant objections raised in both systems. Thus, adversary proceeding would be spared from the complaints regarding its lack of efficiency when it comes to the accused without the professional support, while the inquisitorial procedure would cease to be a mechanism in which the court, searching for truth, could call into question its own impartiality and the presumption of innocence of the accused.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Nature, importance and limits of finding the truth in criminal proceedings",
pages = "100-82",
number = "3",
volume = "61",
url = "conv_318"
}
Ilić, G.,& Majić, M.. (2013). Nature, importance and limits of finding the truth in criminal proceedings. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 61(3), 82-100.
conv_318
Ilić G, Majić M. Nature, importance and limits of finding the truth in criminal proceedings. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2013;61(3):82-100.
conv_318 .
Ilić, Goran, Majić, Miodrag, "Nature, importance and limits of finding the truth in criminal proceedings" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 61, no. 3 (2013):82-100,
conv_318 .

O položaju oštećenog u krivičnom postupku

Ilić, Goran

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2012)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ilić, Goran
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/650
AB  - U radu su razmotrene značajne promene do kojih je poslednjih decenija došlo u sagledavanju položaja oštećenog u krivičnom postupku. Autor ističe da je načelni zahtev da se sa oštećenim u krivičnom postupku ima postupati saosećajno, sa poštovanjem i uz uvažavanje njegovog dostojanstva, proklamovan u brojnim međunarodnim dokumenima. Usled toga je u uporednom pravu procesni položaj oštećenog dobio zapaženo mesto, pri čemu normativno uređenje ovog pitanja ima dva aspekta. Prvi se odnosi na nastojanje oštećenog da u krivičnom postupku ostvari imovinskopravni zahtev, dok je drugi aspekt posledica potrebe za preduzimanjem mera za sprečavanje njegove sekundarne viktimizacije. Kada je reč o srpskom pravu, autor zaključuje da je ono na tragu postojećih uporednih rešenja u ovoj oblasti, i to kako u pogledu procesnog položaja oštećenog u krivičnom postupku, tako i u odnosu na mere njegove procesne zaštite. Određene promene do kojih je došlo u procesnom položaju oštećenog, posledica su nove koncepcije krivičnog postupka, s tim da je prilikom njihovog zakonskog uređenja vođeno računa o standardima ljudskih prava. Sa tim u vezi, autor ukazuje na veliki značaj koji za ovu problematiku imaju standardi koji su izgrađeni u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. U okviru njih se položaj oštećenog u krivičnom postupku sagledava kako u svetlu prava na pravično suđenje, tako i u okviru koncepta evropskog javnog poretka.
AB  - The paper considers important changes which have ensued in the last decade and so regarding views on the position of an injured party in criminal proceedings, and which come as a result of an endeavor to strengthen the process of pacification of custom. The author emphasizes that greater sensitivity towards injuries or jeopardizing of personal or property rights of an injured party has primarily led to a principal stand that he/she should be treated during criminal proceedings with compassion, respect, and with valuing of his/her dignity. This approach, which has been proclaimed in numerous international documents, has resulted in an intensified interest for the rights of injured parties in criminal proceedings which has led to a noticeable movement in comparative law for the establishment of a legal framework that would guarantee a procedural position and the rights of the injured party. With all the differences highlighted in the paper, the author concludes that the legislative framework pertaining to the position of an injured party essentially has two aspects. First pertains to the attempt of the injured party to satisfy his/her restitution claim in criminal proceedings, while the second aspect comes as a result of a need to take measures in order to prevent secondary victimization. When it comes to Serbian legal system, the author concludes that it follows the existing comparative legal solutions in this field, both in relation to the procedural position of an injured party in criminal proceedings, as well as in relation to his/her procedural protection. Certain changes that have taken place regarding the procedural position of an injured party have come as a result of a new concept of criminal proceedings during whose legal drafting attention was paid to human rights standards. Relatedly, the author points out the great significance of standards developed by the European Court of Human Rights to this issue. Within this framework, the position of an injured party in criminal proceedings is viewed both in light of the right to a fair trial, as well as within the concept of a European public order. The said two aspects sometimes have to be analyzed in parallel having in mind that the European Court of Human Rights in its decisions often views the right to a fair trial in the context of 'core' human rights.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - O položaju oštećenog u krivičnom postupku
T1  - On the position of an injured party in criminal proceedings
EP  - 158
IS  - 1
SP  - 137
VL  - 60
UR  - conv_250
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ilić, Goran",
year = "2012",
abstract = "U radu su razmotrene značajne promene do kojih je poslednjih decenija došlo u sagledavanju položaja oštećenog u krivičnom postupku. Autor ističe da je načelni zahtev da se sa oštećenim u krivičnom postupku ima postupati saosećajno, sa poštovanjem i uz uvažavanje njegovog dostojanstva, proklamovan u brojnim međunarodnim dokumenima. Usled toga je u uporednom pravu procesni položaj oštećenog dobio zapaženo mesto, pri čemu normativno uređenje ovog pitanja ima dva aspekta. Prvi se odnosi na nastojanje oštećenog da u krivičnom postupku ostvari imovinskopravni zahtev, dok je drugi aspekt posledica potrebe za preduzimanjem mera za sprečavanje njegove sekundarne viktimizacije. Kada je reč o srpskom pravu, autor zaključuje da je ono na tragu postojećih uporednih rešenja u ovoj oblasti, i to kako u pogledu procesnog položaja oštećenog u krivičnom postupku, tako i u odnosu na mere njegove procesne zaštite. Određene promene do kojih je došlo u procesnom položaju oštećenog, posledica su nove koncepcije krivičnog postupka, s tim da je prilikom njihovog zakonskog uređenja vođeno računa o standardima ljudskih prava. Sa tim u vezi, autor ukazuje na veliki značaj koji za ovu problematiku imaju standardi koji su izgrađeni u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. U okviru njih se položaj oštećenog u krivičnom postupku sagledava kako u svetlu prava na pravično suđenje, tako i u okviru koncepta evropskog javnog poretka., The paper considers important changes which have ensued in the last decade and so regarding views on the position of an injured party in criminal proceedings, and which come as a result of an endeavor to strengthen the process of pacification of custom. The author emphasizes that greater sensitivity towards injuries or jeopardizing of personal or property rights of an injured party has primarily led to a principal stand that he/she should be treated during criminal proceedings with compassion, respect, and with valuing of his/her dignity. This approach, which has been proclaimed in numerous international documents, has resulted in an intensified interest for the rights of injured parties in criminal proceedings which has led to a noticeable movement in comparative law for the establishment of a legal framework that would guarantee a procedural position and the rights of the injured party. With all the differences highlighted in the paper, the author concludes that the legislative framework pertaining to the position of an injured party essentially has two aspects. First pertains to the attempt of the injured party to satisfy his/her restitution claim in criminal proceedings, while the second aspect comes as a result of a need to take measures in order to prevent secondary victimization. When it comes to Serbian legal system, the author concludes that it follows the existing comparative legal solutions in this field, both in relation to the procedural position of an injured party in criminal proceedings, as well as in relation to his/her procedural protection. Certain changes that have taken place regarding the procedural position of an injured party have come as a result of a new concept of criminal proceedings during whose legal drafting attention was paid to human rights standards. Relatedly, the author points out the great significance of standards developed by the European Court of Human Rights to this issue. Within this framework, the position of an injured party in criminal proceedings is viewed both in light of the right to a fair trial, as well as within the concept of a European public order. The said two aspects sometimes have to be analyzed in parallel having in mind that the European Court of Human Rights in its decisions often views the right to a fair trial in the context of 'core' human rights.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "O položaju oštećenog u krivičnom postupku, On the position of an injured party in criminal proceedings",
pages = "158-137",
number = "1",
volume = "60",
url = "conv_250"
}
Ilić, G.. (2012). O položaju oštećenog u krivičnom postupku. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 60(1), 137-158.
conv_250
Ilić G. O položaju oštećenog u krivičnom postupku. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2012;60(1):137-158.
conv_250 .
Ilić, Goran, "O položaju oštećenog u krivičnom postupku" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 60, no. 1 (2012):137-158,
conv_250 .

Oštećeni i standardi ljudskih prava u krivičnom postupku

Ilić, Goran

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2012)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ilić, Goran
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/621
AB  - U radu su analizirani strazburški standardi o položaju oštećenog u krivičnom postupku, tačnije dva osnova pomoću kojih je oštećeni uveden pod njihovo okrilje. Prvi je pravo na pravično suđenje, a drugi 'tvrdo jezgro' ljudskih prava. Autor analizira i praksu Ustavnog suda Srbije, dajući ocenu u kojoj meri je ona na tragu strazburških stavova. Autor smatra da 'ulazak' oštećenog na teren pravičnog suđenja umanjuje delotvornost zaštite koju čl. 6, st. 1 Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima pruža licu protiv kojeg je podignuta krivična optužba. On ističe da bi prilikom ocene da li je oštećenom povređeno pravo na pristup sudu, trebalo voditi računa o njegovoj mogućnosti da građanski zahtev istakne u parnici. Kada je, pak, reč o oceni da li bi oštećeni mogao da se poziva na povredu prava na suđenje u razumnom roku, autorov stav je da bi osnovni kriterijum trebalo da bude odlučujući značaj ishoda krivičnog postupka za sudbinu građanskog zahteva. Pod ovim uslovima bi oštećenom mogle da budu priznate garancije iz čl. 6, st. 1 EKLjP, i to samo u postupku u kojem krivičnu optužbu zastupa javni tužilac, ali ne i u slučaju kada oštećeni ima svojstvo ovlašćenog tužioca. Prema autorovom mišljenju strazburška praksa o položaju oštećenog u svetlu 'tvrdog jezgra' ljudskih prava je ispravna.
AB  - This article considers issues relating to the position of the injured party in criminal proceedings and human rights standards that should be recognized to him/her in such a situation. The paper thereafter considers standards set by Strasbourg relating to the position of an injured party in criminal proceedings, namely the two grounds for the inclusion of an injured party within its jurisdiction. First pertains to the right to a fair trial, while the second relates to 'core' human rights. A civil claim submitted by an injured party in criminal proceedings represents a link between an injured party and the right to a fair hearing under Art. 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights. The author summarizes the analysis of numerous decisions rendered by the European Court of Human Rights, as well as cases handled by the European Commission of Human Rights, by concluding that a civil claim of an injured party has to pertain at least to a symbolic compensation for damages incurred or to protection of a certain civil right. It is also necessary that the outcome of criminal proceedings is decisive for the civil claim of the injured party. When speaking of 'core' human rights, the author emphasises the link between the said concept and the concept of the European public order. It has been particularly stressed that the European public order is of a limited scope in respect to an injured party because it pertains solely to persons who’s physical or psychological integrity (Art. 2, 3, and 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights) had been violated or jeopardized by specific criminal offences. The article thereafter considers the practice of the Serbian Constitutional Court relating to the issue of the position of an injured party in criminal proceedings and human rights standards. Through analysis of relevant decisions the author sheds light on the development of the Constitutional Court practice and assesses its compatibility with positions taken by Strasbourg. In the concluding chapter the author presents a position that the 'entrance' of an injured party in the fair trial sphere diminishes the effectiveness of the protection provided by Art. 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights to a person charged. This partially stems from the strengthening of the position of an injured party in different legal systems, but is largely attributable to the European Court of Human Rights. After providing a reminder that an injured party has an interest in having his/her civil claim resolved in criminal proceedings, as well as an interest in the defendant being found guilty, the author states the position that Strasbourg case-law does not sufficiently address certain issues. When assessing whether the right of an injured party to have access to court has been violated one should also take into account a possibility of making a civil claim in litigation proceedings. On the other hand, when one speaks about an assessment of whether an injured party could invoke a violation of the right to trial within reasonable time, the author takes the position that the core criteria in that respect should be - the determinative character of the outcome of criminal proceedings to the fate of a civil claim. Under these conditions an injured party could have the guarantees deriving from Art. 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights recognized, albeit only in proceedings in which the criminal charge is represented by a public prosecutor. In cases where the injured party is acting in criminal proceedings in the capacity of an authorized prosecutor he/she could not invoke the right to a fair trial. In the author’s opinion, Strasbourg practice relating to the position of an injured party in the context of core human rights is right.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Oštećeni i standardi ljudskih prava u krivičnom postupku
T1  - The injured party and human rights standards in criminal proceedings
EP  - 161
IS  - 2
SP  - 135
VL  - 60
UR  - conv_263
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ilić, Goran",
year = "2012",
abstract = "U radu su analizirani strazburški standardi o položaju oštećenog u krivičnom postupku, tačnije dva osnova pomoću kojih je oštećeni uveden pod njihovo okrilje. Prvi je pravo na pravično suđenje, a drugi 'tvrdo jezgro' ljudskih prava. Autor analizira i praksu Ustavnog suda Srbije, dajući ocenu u kojoj meri je ona na tragu strazburških stavova. Autor smatra da 'ulazak' oštećenog na teren pravičnog suđenja umanjuje delotvornost zaštite koju čl. 6, st. 1 Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima pruža licu protiv kojeg je podignuta krivična optužba. On ističe da bi prilikom ocene da li je oštećenom povređeno pravo na pristup sudu, trebalo voditi računa o njegovoj mogućnosti da građanski zahtev istakne u parnici. Kada je, pak, reč o oceni da li bi oštećeni mogao da se poziva na povredu prava na suđenje u razumnom roku, autorov stav je da bi osnovni kriterijum trebalo da bude odlučujući značaj ishoda krivičnog postupka za sudbinu građanskog zahteva. Pod ovim uslovima bi oštećenom mogle da budu priznate garancije iz čl. 6, st. 1 EKLjP, i to samo u postupku u kojem krivičnu optužbu zastupa javni tužilac, ali ne i u slučaju kada oštećeni ima svojstvo ovlašćenog tužioca. Prema autorovom mišljenju strazburška praksa o položaju oštećenog u svetlu 'tvrdog jezgra' ljudskih prava je ispravna., This article considers issues relating to the position of the injured party in criminal proceedings and human rights standards that should be recognized to him/her in such a situation. The paper thereafter considers standards set by Strasbourg relating to the position of an injured party in criminal proceedings, namely the two grounds for the inclusion of an injured party within its jurisdiction. First pertains to the right to a fair trial, while the second relates to 'core' human rights. A civil claim submitted by an injured party in criminal proceedings represents a link between an injured party and the right to a fair hearing under Art. 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights. The author summarizes the analysis of numerous decisions rendered by the European Court of Human Rights, as well as cases handled by the European Commission of Human Rights, by concluding that a civil claim of an injured party has to pertain at least to a symbolic compensation for damages incurred or to protection of a certain civil right. It is also necessary that the outcome of criminal proceedings is decisive for the civil claim of the injured party. When speaking of 'core' human rights, the author emphasises the link between the said concept and the concept of the European public order. It has been particularly stressed that the European public order is of a limited scope in respect to an injured party because it pertains solely to persons who’s physical or psychological integrity (Art. 2, 3, and 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights) had been violated or jeopardized by specific criminal offences. The article thereafter considers the practice of the Serbian Constitutional Court relating to the issue of the position of an injured party in criminal proceedings and human rights standards. Through analysis of relevant decisions the author sheds light on the development of the Constitutional Court practice and assesses its compatibility with positions taken by Strasbourg. In the concluding chapter the author presents a position that the 'entrance' of an injured party in the fair trial sphere diminishes the effectiveness of the protection provided by Art. 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights to a person charged. This partially stems from the strengthening of the position of an injured party in different legal systems, but is largely attributable to the European Court of Human Rights. After providing a reminder that an injured party has an interest in having his/her civil claim resolved in criminal proceedings, as well as an interest in the defendant being found guilty, the author states the position that Strasbourg case-law does not sufficiently address certain issues. When assessing whether the right of an injured party to have access to court has been violated one should also take into account a possibility of making a civil claim in litigation proceedings. On the other hand, when one speaks about an assessment of whether an injured party could invoke a violation of the right to trial within reasonable time, the author takes the position that the core criteria in that respect should be - the determinative character of the outcome of criminal proceedings to the fate of a civil claim. Under these conditions an injured party could have the guarantees deriving from Art. 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights recognized, albeit only in proceedings in which the criminal charge is represented by a public prosecutor. In cases where the injured party is acting in criminal proceedings in the capacity of an authorized prosecutor he/she could not invoke the right to a fair trial. In the author’s opinion, Strasbourg practice relating to the position of an injured party in the context of core human rights is right.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Oštećeni i standardi ljudskih prava u krivičnom postupku, The injured party and human rights standards in criminal proceedings",
pages = "161-135",
number = "2",
volume = "60",
url = "conv_263"
}
Ilić, G.. (2012). Oštećeni i standardi ljudskih prava u krivičnom postupku. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 60(2), 135-161.
conv_263
Ilić G. Oštećeni i standardi ljudskih prava u krivičnom postupku. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2012;60(2):135-161.
conv_263 .
Ilić, Goran, "Oštećeni i standardi ljudskih prava u krivičnom postupku" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 60, no. 2 (2012):135-161,
conv_263 .

Pravo na obrazloženu sudsku odluku

Ilić, Goran

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd i Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd, 2011)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ilić, Goran
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/578
AB  - Pravo na pravično suđenje pored izričito predviđenih garancija fer postupka, sadrži i implicitna jemstva koja su nastala kroz praksu Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. Rukovođen idejom o vladavini prava koja ima poseban značaj u oblasti procesnog prava, Sud u Strazburu je kao sastavni elemenat prava na pravično suđenje ustanovio i pravo na obrazloženu sudsku odluku. U radu je najpre ukazano na teorijsko opravdanje ovog prava, a potom je analizirano njegovo postojanje u uporednom pravu. Detaljno su izloženi standardi prava na obrazloženu sudsku odluku koji su razvijeni u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava, pri čemu je osvrt učinjen i na stavove strazburških organa u vezi sa odlukom porote i činjenicom da ona ne sadrži obrazloženje. Nakon toga su analizirane odredbe Zakonika o krivičnom postupku od 2001. godine koje se odnose na nedostake u obrazloženju presude kao osnovu za izjavljivanje žalbe. S tim u vezi, razmotrena je domaća sudska praksa u periodu od 1994. do 1998. godine i ukazano je da nedostaci u obrazloženju predstavljaju osnov po kojem žalbeni sud najčešće ukida prvostepenu presudu. Dat je i kritički osvrt na stavove teorije i sudske prakse po kojima određeni nedostaci u obrazloženju predstavljaju u suštini razlog za ispitivanje činjenične ispravnosti presude. Učinjen je osvrt i na rešenja sadržana u Zakoniku o krivičnom postupku od 2011. godine i izmene koje se odnose na nedostatke obrazloženja presude kao osnova za izjavljivanje žalbe. Analizirana su i nova zakonska rešenja koja omogućavaju da presuda pod određenim uslovima ne sadrži obrazloženje ili da ono bude delimično. Na kraju, ali ne manje važno, razmotrena je i praksa Ustavnog suda Srbije i stavovi koje on zastupa u vezi sa pravom na obrazloženu sudsku odluku.
AB  - In addition to expressly stipulated guarantees of fair proceedings, the right to a fair trial also contains implicit guarantees which were developed through the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Guided by the idea of the rule of law which has a specific meaning in the field of procedural law, the Court in Strasbourg set forth as an integral part of the right to a fair trial also the right to a reasoned court decision. The paper first points to the theoretical justification of this right, and proceeds to analyzing its existence in comparative law. Standards relating to the right to a reasoned decision developed through case-law of the European Court of Human Rights are presented in detail, covering also positions taken by Strasbourg institutions regarding decisions rendered by juries and the fact that they do not contain reasoning. The paper then proceeds to analyze provisions of the 2001 Criminal Procedure Code which pertain to shortcomings in the reasoning of a judgment as a basis for lodging an appeal. In relation to that, the paper analyses domestic case-law in the period from 1994 to 1998 and points to the fact that shortcomings in the reasoning has been the basis relied on most frequently by the appellate court when annulling the first instance judgment. A critique of theoretical positions and court practice whereby certain shortcomings in the reasoning in essence represent a basis for review of factual accuracy of a judgment is also provided. A review of solutions contained in the 2011 Criminal Procedure Code and changes to the rules regarding shortcomings of the reasoning as a basis for lodging an appeal is also provided. The paper also analyses new legislative solutions which provide a possibility for a judgment not to contain reasoning, under specific circumstances, or for it to be partial. Lastly, but in no way of less significance, the paper also considers jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of Serbia and positions it has taken regarding the right to a reasoned decision.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd i Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
T2  - Crimen (Beograd)
T1  - Pravo na obrazloženu sudsku odluku
T1  - Right to a reasoned court decision
EP  - 244
IS  - 2
SP  - 227
VL  - 2
UR  - conv_2756
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ilić, Goran",
year = "2011",
abstract = "Pravo na pravično suđenje pored izričito predviđenih garancija fer postupka, sadrži i implicitna jemstva koja su nastala kroz praksu Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. Rukovođen idejom o vladavini prava koja ima poseban značaj u oblasti procesnog prava, Sud u Strazburu je kao sastavni elemenat prava na pravično suđenje ustanovio i pravo na obrazloženu sudsku odluku. U radu je najpre ukazano na teorijsko opravdanje ovog prava, a potom je analizirano njegovo postojanje u uporednom pravu. Detaljno su izloženi standardi prava na obrazloženu sudsku odluku koji su razvijeni u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava, pri čemu je osvrt učinjen i na stavove strazburških organa u vezi sa odlukom porote i činjenicom da ona ne sadrži obrazloženje. Nakon toga su analizirane odredbe Zakonika o krivičnom postupku od 2001. godine koje se odnose na nedostake u obrazloženju presude kao osnovu za izjavljivanje žalbe. S tim u vezi, razmotrena je domaća sudska praksa u periodu od 1994. do 1998. godine i ukazano je da nedostaci u obrazloženju predstavljaju osnov po kojem žalbeni sud najčešće ukida prvostepenu presudu. Dat je i kritički osvrt na stavove teorije i sudske prakse po kojima određeni nedostaci u obrazloženju predstavljaju u suštini razlog za ispitivanje činjenične ispravnosti presude. Učinjen je osvrt i na rešenja sadržana u Zakoniku o krivičnom postupku od 2011. godine i izmene koje se odnose na nedostatke obrazloženja presude kao osnova za izjavljivanje žalbe. Analizirana su i nova zakonska rešenja koja omogućavaju da presuda pod određenim uslovima ne sadrži obrazloženje ili da ono bude delimično. Na kraju, ali ne manje važno, razmotrena je i praksa Ustavnog suda Srbije i stavovi koje on zastupa u vezi sa pravom na obrazloženu sudsku odluku., In addition to expressly stipulated guarantees of fair proceedings, the right to a fair trial also contains implicit guarantees which were developed through the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Guided by the idea of the rule of law which has a specific meaning in the field of procedural law, the Court in Strasbourg set forth as an integral part of the right to a fair trial also the right to a reasoned court decision. The paper first points to the theoretical justification of this right, and proceeds to analyzing its existence in comparative law. Standards relating to the right to a reasoned decision developed through case-law of the European Court of Human Rights are presented in detail, covering also positions taken by Strasbourg institutions regarding decisions rendered by juries and the fact that they do not contain reasoning. The paper then proceeds to analyze provisions of the 2001 Criminal Procedure Code which pertain to shortcomings in the reasoning of a judgment as a basis for lodging an appeal. In relation to that, the paper analyses domestic case-law in the period from 1994 to 1998 and points to the fact that shortcomings in the reasoning has been the basis relied on most frequently by the appellate court when annulling the first instance judgment. A critique of theoretical positions and court practice whereby certain shortcomings in the reasoning in essence represent a basis for review of factual accuracy of a judgment is also provided. A review of solutions contained in the 2011 Criminal Procedure Code and changes to the rules regarding shortcomings of the reasoning as a basis for lodging an appeal is also provided. The paper also analyses new legislative solutions which provide a possibility for a judgment not to contain reasoning, under specific circumstances, or for it to be partial. Lastly, but in no way of less significance, the paper also considers jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of Serbia and positions it has taken regarding the right to a reasoned decision.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd i Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd",
journal = "Crimen (Beograd)",
title = "Pravo na obrazloženu sudsku odluku, Right to a reasoned court decision",
pages = "244-227",
number = "2",
volume = "2",
url = "conv_2756"
}
Ilić, G.. (2011). Pravo na obrazloženu sudsku odluku. in Crimen (Beograd)
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd i Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd., 2(2), 227-244.
conv_2756
Ilić G. Pravo na obrazloženu sudsku odluku. in Crimen (Beograd). 2011;2(2):227-244.
conv_2756 .
Ilić, Goran, "Pravo na obrazloženu sudsku odluku" in Crimen (Beograd), 2, no. 2 (2011):227-244,
conv_2756 .

O novinama u Zakoniku o krivičnom postupku

Ilić, Goran

(Advokatska komora Srbije, Beograd, 2009)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ilić, Goran
PY  - 2009
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/443
PB  - Advokatska komora Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije
T1  - O novinama u Zakoniku o krivičnom postupku
T1  - On innovations in the Code of criminal procedures
EP  - 28
IS  - 3-4
SP  - 9
VL  - 122
UR  - conv_1824
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ilić, Goran",
year = "2009",
publisher = "Advokatska komora Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije",
title = "O novinama u Zakoniku o krivičnom postupku, On innovations in the Code of criminal procedures",
pages = "28-9",
number = "3-4",
volume = "122",
url = "conv_1824"
}
Ilić, G.. (2009). O novinama u Zakoniku o krivičnom postupku. in Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije
Advokatska komora Srbije, Beograd., 122(3-4), 9-28.
conv_1824
Ilić G. O novinama u Zakoniku o krivičnom postupku. in Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije. 2009;122(3-4):9-28.
conv_1824 .
Ilić, Goran, "O novinama u Zakoniku o krivičnom postupku" in Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije, 122, no. 3-4 (2009):9-28,
conv_1824 .

In favorem defensionis - homage profesoru dr Đorđu Lazinu

Ilić, Goran

(Advokatska komora Srbije, Beograd, 2009)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ilić, Goran
PY  - 2009
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/438
PB  - Advokatska komora Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije
T1  - In favorem defensionis - homage profesoru dr Đorđu Lazinu
T1  - In favorem defensionis - hommage to professor dr. Đorđe Lazin
EP  - 51
IS  - 1
SP  - 35
VL  - 122
UR  - conv_1819
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ilić, Goran",
year = "2009",
publisher = "Advokatska komora Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije",
title = "In favorem defensionis - homage profesoru dr Đorđu Lazinu, In favorem defensionis - hommage to professor dr. Đorđe Lazin",
pages = "51-35",
number = "1",
volume = "122",
url = "conv_1819"
}
Ilić, G.. (2009). In favorem defensionis - homage profesoru dr Đorđu Lazinu. in Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije
Advokatska komora Srbije, Beograd., 122(1), 35-51.
conv_1819
Ilić G. In favorem defensionis - homage profesoru dr Đorđu Lazinu. in Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije. 2009;122(1):35-51.
conv_1819 .
Ilić, Goran, "In favorem defensionis - homage profesoru dr Đorđu Lazinu" in Branič - časopis Advokatske komore Srbije, 122, no. 1 (2009):35-51,
conv_1819 .

Žalba protiv prvostepene krivične presude - osvrt na nova zakonska rešenja

Ilić, Goran

(Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd, 2006)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ilić, Goran
PY  - 2006
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/317
AB  - Novo zakonsko uređenje žalbe protiv prvostepene presude unosi određene novine u drugostepeni postupak sa ciljem njegovog efikasnijeg vođenja i okončanja. Nekima od novih rešenja, poput obaveze javnog tužioca da izjavi žalbu protiv oslobađajuće presude, mogu se uputiti određeni prigovori. Na drugoj strani, zakonodavac nije u dovoljnoj meri vodio računa o određenim nedostacima dosadašnje zakonske regulative na koje je ukazano u procesnoj teoriji i sudskoj praksi.
AB  - New legislative solutions regarding first degree rulings introduced certain novelties in the second instance procedures with the aim of ensuring greater efficiency in its management and finalization. Some of these solutions, like the obligation of the public prosecutor to file an appeal against acquittal judgments, may deserve certain criticism. On the other hand, the legislator did not take sufficient care of certain deficiencies in the previous regulations that process practice and theory have indicated to.
PB  - Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd
T2  - Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
T1  - Žalba protiv prvostepene krivične presude - osvrt na nova zakonska rešenja
T1  - Appeal against the first degree criminal charges: An overview of new legislative solutions
EP  - 128
IS  - 2
SP  - 117
VL  - 44
UR  - conv_1068
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ilić, Goran",
year = "2006",
abstract = "Novo zakonsko uređenje žalbe protiv prvostepene presude unosi određene novine u drugostepeni postupak sa ciljem njegovog efikasnijeg vođenja i okončanja. Nekima od novih rešenja, poput obaveze javnog tužioca da izjavi žalbu protiv oslobađajuće presude, mogu se uputiti određeni prigovori. Na drugoj strani, zakonodavac nije u dovoljnoj meri vodio računa o određenim nedostacima dosadašnje zakonske regulative na koje je ukazano u procesnoj teoriji i sudskoj praksi., New legislative solutions regarding first degree rulings introduced certain novelties in the second instance procedures with the aim of ensuring greater efficiency in its management and finalization. Some of these solutions, like the obligation of the public prosecutor to file an appeal against acquittal judgments, may deserve certain criticism. On the other hand, the legislator did not take sufficient care of certain deficiencies in the previous regulations that process practice and theory have indicated to.",
publisher = "Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd",
journal = "Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo",
title = "Žalba protiv prvostepene krivične presude - osvrt na nova zakonska rešenja, Appeal against the first degree criminal charges: An overview of new legislative solutions",
pages = "128-117",
number = "2",
volume = "44",
url = "conv_1068"
}
Ilić, G.. (2006). Žalba protiv prvostepene krivične presude - osvrt na nova zakonska rešenja. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd., 44(2), 117-128.
conv_1068
Ilić G. Žalba protiv prvostepene krivične presude - osvrt na nova zakonska rešenja. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo. 2006;44(2):117-128.
conv_1068 .
Ilić, Goran, "Žalba protiv prvostepene krivične presude - osvrt na nova zakonska rešenja" in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, 44, no. 2 (2006):117-128,
conv_1068 .

Vanprocesna zaštita učesnika u krivičnom postupku

Ilić, Goran; Majić, Miodrag

(Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd, 2006)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Ilić, Goran
AU  - Majić, Miodrag
PY  - 2006
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/308
PB  - Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravni život
T1  - Vanprocesna zaštita učesnika u krivičnom postupku
T1  - The extra-procedural protection of participants in criminal procedure
EP  - 954
IS  - 9
SP  - 939
VL  - 55
UR  - conv_1380
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Ilić, Goran and Majić, Miodrag",
year = "2006",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravni život",
title = "Vanprocesna zaštita učesnika u krivičnom postupku, The extra-procedural protection of participants in criminal procedure",
pages = "954-939",
number = "9",
volume = "55",
url = "conv_1380"
}
Ilić, G.,& Majić, M.. (2006). Vanprocesna zaštita učesnika u krivičnom postupku. in Pravni život
Udruženje pravnika Srbije, Beograd., 55(9), 939-954.
conv_1380
Ilić G, Majić M. Vanprocesna zaštita učesnika u krivičnom postupku. in Pravni život. 2006;55(9):939-954.
conv_1380 .
Ilić, Goran, Majić, Miodrag, "Vanprocesna zaštita učesnika u krivičnom postupku" in Pravni život, 55, no. 9 (2006):939-954,
conv_1380 .

Standardi lišenja slobode u svetlu Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima

Ilić, Goran

(Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd, 2006)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ilić, Goran
PY  - 2006
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/297
AB  - Odredba člana 5 Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima pruža fizičkom licu odgovarajuće garancije od proizvoljnog lišenja slobode. U praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava se koriste tri kriterijuma za razgraničenje pojma lišenja slobode od ograničenja prava na slobodu kretanja. Reč je o teritorijalnom i vremenskom kriterijumu i pravnom položaju lica koje je u pitanju. Uslovi koje lišenje slobode treba da ispuni da bi se smatralo saglasnim standardima koji važe u demokratskom društvu sadržani su u članu 5 Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima. Lišenje slobode treba najpre da bude zakonito. Ono, uz to, mora da bude izvršeno u postupku koji je predviđen nacionalnim zakonom. Na kraju, do lišenja slobode može da dođe samo po nekom od osnova taksativno nabrojanih u članu 5 Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima.
AB  - The provision of Section 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights offers a person adequate guarantee against arbitrary arrest. The European Court for Human Rights uses three criteria in order to distinguish the concepts of arrest and that of restricted movement. These are related to the issues of territory, time, and legal position of the person in question. Section 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights contains the conditions which an arrest should meet in order to be considered in keeping with the standards of a democratic society. First of all, the arrest has to be lawful. It has to be carried out in accordance with the procedure provided for by national legislation. Finally, the arrest should take place only on the grounds specifically listed under Section 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
PB  - Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Bezbednost, Beograd
T1  - Standardi lišenja slobode u svetlu Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima
T1  - Standards related to deprivation of liberty in the light of the European Convention on Human Rights
EP  - 538
IS  - 4
SP  - 529
VL  - 48
UR  - conv_2538
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ilić, Goran",
year = "2006",
abstract = "Odredba člana 5 Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima pruža fizičkom licu odgovarajuće garancije od proizvoljnog lišenja slobode. U praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava se koriste tri kriterijuma za razgraničenje pojma lišenja slobode od ograničenja prava na slobodu kretanja. Reč je o teritorijalnom i vremenskom kriterijumu i pravnom položaju lica koje je u pitanju. Uslovi koje lišenje slobode treba da ispuni da bi se smatralo saglasnim standardima koji važe u demokratskom društvu sadržani su u članu 5 Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima. Lišenje slobode treba najpre da bude zakonito. Ono, uz to, mora da bude izvršeno u postupku koji je predviđen nacionalnim zakonom. Na kraju, do lišenja slobode može da dođe samo po nekom od osnova taksativno nabrojanih u članu 5 Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima., The provision of Section 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights offers a person adequate guarantee against arbitrary arrest. The European Court for Human Rights uses three criteria in order to distinguish the concepts of arrest and that of restricted movement. These are related to the issues of territory, time, and legal position of the person in question. Section 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights contains the conditions which an arrest should meet in order to be considered in keeping with the standards of a democratic society. First of all, the arrest has to be lawful. It has to be carried out in accordance with the procedure provided for by national legislation. Finally, the arrest should take place only on the grounds specifically listed under Section 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights.",
publisher = "Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Bezbednost, Beograd",
title = "Standardi lišenja slobode u svetlu Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima, Standards related to deprivation of liberty in the light of the European Convention on Human Rights",
pages = "538-529",
number = "4",
volume = "48",
url = "conv_2538"
}
Ilić, G.. (2006). Standardi lišenja slobode u svetlu Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima. in Bezbednost, Beograd
Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd., 48(4), 529-538.
conv_2538
Ilić G. Standardi lišenja slobode u svetlu Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima. in Bezbednost, Beograd. 2006;48(4):529-538.
conv_2538 .
Ilić, Goran, "Standardi lišenja slobode u svetlu Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima" in Bezbednost, Beograd, 48, no. 4 (2006):529-538,
conv_2538 .

Zaštita svedoka i drugih učesnika u krivičnom postupku

Ilić, Goran

(Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd, 2005)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ilić, Goran
PY  - 2005
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/264
AB  - Problematika zaštite svedoka i drugih učesnika u krivičnom postupku, kao materija koja u poslednjih nekoliko godina privlači izuzetnu pažnju domaće procesne teorije i prakse, čini predmet obrade u ovome radu. Pored uvodnih napomena u kojima je ukazano na značaj ove problematike i na međunarodna akta koja tretiraju istu, posmatra-na problematika u radu je analizirana kroz tri grupe pitanja. Prva grupa pitanja posvećena je prikazu, naučno-stručnoj analizi mera procesne zaštite svedoka i drugih učesnika u krivičnom postupku (slučaj npr. sa merom zaštite ličnih podataka svedoka i drugih učesnika sprečavanja posrednog obelodanjivanja ličnih podataka zaštićenog lica anonimnosti svedoka i si). Mere vanprocesne zaštite i pomoći svedocima i drugim učesnicima u krivičnom postupku (slučaj npr. sa službom za po-moć oštećenim i svedocima, programom zaštite učesnika u krivičnom postupku, o usklađenosti rešenja u našem zakonodavstvu sa određenim međunarodnim pravnim aktima i preporukama i si) su pitanja koja su obrađena u drugom delu ovog rada. Predmet razmatranja trećeg dela rada su pitanja međusobne saradnje pojedinih subjekata na polju pružanja zaštite svedoku i drugim učesnicima u krivičnim postupku. Na kraju rada data su zaključna razmatranja u kojima je autor na rezimirani način izneo svoje stavove u vezi sa problematikom obrađenom u radu.
AB  - The paper deals with the problem of the protection of witnesses and other participants in a criminal procedure as one of the most interesting problems which has been the subject of domestic procedural theory and practice in the past few years. Introductory observations focus on the importance of this problem as well as the international acts which are concerned with the same issue analyzing the problem through three groups of questions. The first group of questions has been dedicated to the scientific and professional analysis of the measures of the protection of witnesses and other participants in a criminal procedure (e.g. the case with the measure of the protection of the personal data of witnesses and other participants prevention of indirect revealing the personal data of a protected person anonymity of witnesses, etc). Further the paper surveys the measures of extra-procedural protection and assistance to injured parties and witnesses as well as the other participants in a criminal procedure (e.g. the case with the service for the assistance to injured parties and witnesses; the program for the protection of the participants in a criminal procedure harmonization of the solutions provided for by our legislation with particular international legal acts and recommendations, etc). The third part of the paper reviews the issue of cooperation among the subjects who deal with the protection of witnesses and other participants in a criminal procedure. The closing part lists the author's observations and attitude to the problem dealt with in the paper.
PB  - Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd
T2  - Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
T1  - Zaštita svedoka i drugih učesnika u krivičnom postupku
T1  - Protection of witnesses and other participants in criminal procedure
EP  - 191
IS  - 2-3
SP  - 170
VL  - 43
UR  - conv_2710
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ilić, Goran",
year = "2005",
abstract = "Problematika zaštite svedoka i drugih učesnika u krivičnom postupku, kao materija koja u poslednjih nekoliko godina privlači izuzetnu pažnju domaće procesne teorije i prakse, čini predmet obrade u ovome radu. Pored uvodnih napomena u kojima je ukazano na značaj ove problematike i na međunarodna akta koja tretiraju istu, posmatra-na problematika u radu je analizirana kroz tri grupe pitanja. Prva grupa pitanja posvećena je prikazu, naučno-stručnoj analizi mera procesne zaštite svedoka i drugih učesnika u krivičnom postupku (slučaj npr. sa merom zaštite ličnih podataka svedoka i drugih učesnika sprečavanja posrednog obelodanjivanja ličnih podataka zaštićenog lica anonimnosti svedoka i si). Mere vanprocesne zaštite i pomoći svedocima i drugim učesnicima u krivičnom postupku (slučaj npr. sa službom za po-moć oštećenim i svedocima, programom zaštite učesnika u krivičnom postupku, o usklađenosti rešenja u našem zakonodavstvu sa određenim međunarodnim pravnim aktima i preporukama i si) su pitanja koja su obrađena u drugom delu ovog rada. Predmet razmatranja trećeg dela rada su pitanja međusobne saradnje pojedinih subjekata na polju pružanja zaštite svedoku i drugim učesnicima u krivičnim postupku. Na kraju rada data su zaključna razmatranja u kojima je autor na rezimirani način izneo svoje stavove u vezi sa problematikom obrađenom u radu., The paper deals with the problem of the protection of witnesses and other participants in a criminal procedure as one of the most interesting problems which has been the subject of domestic procedural theory and practice in the past few years. Introductory observations focus on the importance of this problem as well as the international acts which are concerned with the same issue analyzing the problem through three groups of questions. The first group of questions has been dedicated to the scientific and professional analysis of the measures of the protection of witnesses and other participants in a criminal procedure (e.g. the case with the measure of the protection of the personal data of witnesses and other participants prevention of indirect revealing the personal data of a protected person anonymity of witnesses, etc). Further the paper surveys the measures of extra-procedural protection and assistance to injured parties and witnesses as well as the other participants in a criminal procedure (e.g. the case with the service for the assistance to injured parties and witnesses; the program for the protection of the participants in a criminal procedure harmonization of the solutions provided for by our legislation with particular international legal acts and recommendations, etc). The third part of the paper reviews the issue of cooperation among the subjects who deal with the protection of witnesses and other participants in a criminal procedure. The closing part lists the author's observations and attitude to the problem dealt with in the paper.",
publisher = "Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd",
journal = "Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo",
title = "Zaštita svedoka i drugih učesnika u krivičnom postupku, Protection of witnesses and other participants in criminal procedure",
pages = "191-170",
number = "2-3",
volume = "43",
url = "conv_2710"
}
Ilić, G.. (2005). Zaštita svedoka i drugih učesnika u krivičnom postupku. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd., 43(2-3), 170-191.
conv_2710
Ilić G. Zaštita svedoka i drugih učesnika u krivičnom postupku. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo. 2005;43(2-3):170-191.
conv_2710 .
Ilić, Goran, "Zaštita svedoka i drugih učesnika u krivičnom postupku" in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, 43, no. 2-3 (2005):170-191,
conv_2710 .

Policijsko obrazovanje i obuka u Francuskoj

Ilić, Goran

(Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd, 2005)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ilić, Goran
PY  - 2005
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/255
AB  - Nakon uvodnih napomena o Francuskoj, predstavljen je sistem organizacije bezbednosnih službi. Nakon toga je prikazan nastanak i razvoj sistema policijskog obrazovanja i obuke, a potom je izložena postojeća struktura obrazovanja i obuke policije. U okviru nje su sagledane organizacione specifičnosti državnih institucija koje se bave ovom problematikom. Potom je pažnja posvećena odlikama postojećeg sistema obrazovanja i obuke policije, u okviru kojeg su obrađeni osnovno i kontinuirano obrazovanje policajaca i obrazovanje policijskog nastavnog kadra. Analizirani su i nedostatci politike policijskog obrazovanja i obuke, a u završnim napomenama su izneta mišljenja o načinima na koje bi oni mogli da budu prevaziđeni.
AB  - Following brief introductory notes on France, the paper introduces the organizational structure of security services in this country. It further shows the beginnings and the development of the police system of training and education, presenting the current structure of police training and education. Within this frame we have viewed some specific organizational features of state institutions dealing therewith. The focus then shifts to the features of the existing police training and education system and police education and training teaching staff. There is an analysis of the drawbacks of the policy of police training and education, and the closing considerations include opinions on the ways in which these could be overcome.
PB  - Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Bezbednost, Beograd
T1  - Policijsko obrazovanje i obuka u Francuskoj
T1  - Police education in France
EP  - 82
IS  - 1
SP  - 67
VL  - 47
UR  - conv_2536
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ilić, Goran",
year = "2005",
abstract = "Nakon uvodnih napomena o Francuskoj, predstavljen je sistem organizacije bezbednosnih službi. Nakon toga je prikazan nastanak i razvoj sistema policijskog obrazovanja i obuke, a potom je izložena postojeća struktura obrazovanja i obuke policije. U okviru nje su sagledane organizacione specifičnosti državnih institucija koje se bave ovom problematikom. Potom je pažnja posvećena odlikama postojećeg sistema obrazovanja i obuke policije, u okviru kojeg su obrađeni osnovno i kontinuirano obrazovanje policajaca i obrazovanje policijskog nastavnog kadra. Analizirani su i nedostatci politike policijskog obrazovanja i obuke, a u završnim napomenama su izneta mišljenja o načinima na koje bi oni mogli da budu prevaziđeni., Following brief introductory notes on France, the paper introduces the organizational structure of security services in this country. It further shows the beginnings and the development of the police system of training and education, presenting the current structure of police training and education. Within this frame we have viewed some specific organizational features of state institutions dealing therewith. The focus then shifts to the features of the existing police training and education system and police education and training teaching staff. There is an analysis of the drawbacks of the policy of police training and education, and the closing considerations include opinions on the ways in which these could be overcome.",
publisher = "Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Bezbednost, Beograd",
title = "Policijsko obrazovanje i obuka u Francuskoj, Police education in France",
pages = "82-67",
number = "1",
volume = "47",
url = "conv_2536"
}
Ilić, G.. (2005). Policijsko obrazovanje i obuka u Francuskoj. in Bezbednost, Beograd
Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srbije, Beograd., 47(1), 67-82.
conv_2536
Ilić G. Policijsko obrazovanje i obuka u Francuskoj. in Bezbednost, Beograd. 2005;47(1):67-82.
conv_2536 .
Ilić, Goran, "Policijsko obrazovanje i obuka u Francuskoj" in Bezbednost, Beograd, 47, no. 1 (2005):67-82,
conv_2536 .

Francusko pravo pred izazovom organizovanog kriminala

Ilić, Goran

(Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd, 2004)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ilić, Goran
PY  - 2004
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/232
AB  - Ovlašćenja koja pravosudni organi imaju u redovnom krivičnom postupku su nedovoljna pri suočavanju sa organizovanim kriminalom. Zbog toga se u procesne zakonike unose odredbe o postupku za krivična dela organizovanog kriminala. Ove procesne norme uređuju uslove za vođenje postupka, nadležne pravosudne organe, posebne tehnike prikupljanja dokaza i olakšice za učinioce koji pristanu da sarađuju sa pravdom. Konkretan sadržaj i domašaj novih procesnih odredaba je određen ciljevima kriminalne politike pojedine zemlje, ali i potrebom harmonizacije odgovora na međunarodnom nivou pred izazovom organizovanog kriminala. Iako se na ovaj način odstupa od uobičajenih standarda zaštite ljudskih prava, primetno je nastojanje da se ostane u okvirima pravne države.
AB  - The authorities which judicial organs have in regular criminal proceeding are insufficient in confrontation with organized crime. Because of that rules about organized crime proceeding are brought into the procedural codes. This procedural rules arrange conditions for leading the procedure, competent judicial organs, special examining techniques and allowances for the offenders who are agreed to cooperate with justice. Concrete content and reach of new procedural rules is determinated with aims of criminal politics of each country but also and with necessity of making responses harmony in the international level in front of the organized crime challenge. Although this is retreating from the regular protection standards of human rights, that what is perceptible is attempt to stay in frames of legal state.
PB  - Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd
T2  - Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
T1  - Francusko pravo pred izazovom organizovanog kriminala
T1  - French law in front of the organized crime challenge
EP  - 15
IS  - 2
SP  - 3
VL  - 42
UR  - conv_1063
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ilić, Goran",
year = "2004",
abstract = "Ovlašćenja koja pravosudni organi imaju u redovnom krivičnom postupku su nedovoljna pri suočavanju sa organizovanim kriminalom. Zbog toga se u procesne zakonike unose odredbe o postupku za krivična dela organizovanog kriminala. Ove procesne norme uređuju uslove za vođenje postupka, nadležne pravosudne organe, posebne tehnike prikupljanja dokaza i olakšice za učinioce koji pristanu da sarađuju sa pravdom. Konkretan sadržaj i domašaj novih procesnih odredaba je određen ciljevima kriminalne politike pojedine zemlje, ali i potrebom harmonizacije odgovora na međunarodnom nivou pred izazovom organizovanog kriminala. Iako se na ovaj način odstupa od uobičajenih standarda zaštite ljudskih prava, primetno je nastojanje da se ostane u okvirima pravne države., The authorities which judicial organs have in regular criminal proceeding are insufficient in confrontation with organized crime. Because of that rules about organized crime proceeding are brought into the procedural codes. This procedural rules arrange conditions for leading the procedure, competent judicial organs, special examining techniques and allowances for the offenders who are agreed to cooperate with justice. Concrete content and reach of new procedural rules is determinated with aims of criminal politics of each country but also and with necessity of making responses harmony in the international level in front of the organized crime challenge. Although this is retreating from the regular protection standards of human rights, that what is perceptible is attempt to stay in frames of legal state.",
publisher = "Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd",
journal = "Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo",
title = "Francusko pravo pred izazovom organizovanog kriminala, French law in front of the organized crime challenge",
pages = "15-3",
number = "2",
volume = "42",
url = "conv_1063"
}
Ilić, G.. (2004). Francusko pravo pred izazovom organizovanog kriminala. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd., 42(2), 3-15.
conv_1063
Ilić G. Francusko pravo pred izazovom organizovanog kriminala. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo. 2004;42(2):3-15.
conv_1063 .
Ilić, Goran, "Francusko pravo pred izazovom organizovanog kriminala" in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, 42, no. 2 (2004):3-15,
conv_1063 .

Međunarodna krivičnopravna pomoć i državna zajednica Srbija i Crna Gora

Banović, Božidar; Ilić, Goran

(Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd, 2003)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Banović, Božidar
AU  - Ilić, Goran
PY  - 2003
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/198
AB  - Ratifikacijom dokumenata koji uređuju oblast međunarodne krivičnopravne pomoći, naša zemlja je načinila važan korak u pravcu jačanja međunarodne saradnje na suzbijanju kriminaliteta. Njenu osnovnu karakteristiku predstavlja otklanjanje ili svođenje na razumnu meru pravnih ograničenja koja proizilaze iz državnog ius puniendi. Opravdanje za to se nalazi kako u neophodnosti uspešnijeg suprotstavljanja kriminalitetu koji poprima globalne razmere, tako i u potrebi pružanja krivičnopravne zaštite pravnim dobrima koja prevazilaze pojam države-nacije i njeno pravo na kažnjavanje. Bolja međudržavna saradnja u pružanju krivičnopravne pomoći podrazumeva i određeni stepen harmonizacije odredaba krivično procesnog zakonodavstva. Zbog toga bi naša zemlja morala da ratifikuje Evropsku konvenciju o ljudskim pravima, kako bi Evropski sud za ljudska prava dobio priliku da ocenjuje u kojoj meri su kod nas ostvarene pretpostavke za vođenje „pravičnog procesa“. Ne treba, naravno, smetnuti s uma ni oblast materijalnog krivičnog prava u kojoj su nakon ratifikacije pojedinih međunarodnih ugovora postala aktuelna pitanja krivične i komandne odgovornosti.
PB  - Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd
C3  - Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
T1  - Međunarodna krivičnopravna pomoć i državna zajednica Srbija i Crna Gora
EP  - 300
IS  - 2-3
SP  - 285
VL  - 41
UR  - conv_1061
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Banović, Božidar and Ilić, Goran",
year = "2003",
abstract = "Ratifikacijom dokumenata koji uređuju oblast međunarodne krivičnopravne pomoći, naša zemlja je načinila važan korak u pravcu jačanja međunarodne saradnje na suzbijanju kriminaliteta. Njenu osnovnu karakteristiku predstavlja otklanjanje ili svođenje na razumnu meru pravnih ograničenja koja proizilaze iz državnog ius puniendi. Opravdanje za to se nalazi kako u neophodnosti uspešnijeg suprotstavljanja kriminalitetu koji poprima globalne razmere, tako i u potrebi pružanja krivičnopravne zaštite pravnim dobrima koja prevazilaze pojam države-nacije i njeno pravo na kažnjavanje. Bolja međudržavna saradnja u pružanju krivičnopravne pomoći podrazumeva i određeni stepen harmonizacije odredaba krivično procesnog zakonodavstva. Zbog toga bi naša zemlja morala da ratifikuje Evropsku konvenciju o ljudskim pravima, kako bi Evropski sud za ljudska prava dobio priliku da ocenjuje u kojoj meri su kod nas ostvarene pretpostavke za vođenje „pravičnog procesa“. Ne treba, naravno, smetnuti s uma ni oblast materijalnog krivičnog prava u kojoj su nakon ratifikacije pojedinih međunarodnih ugovora postala aktuelna pitanja krivične i komandne odgovornosti.",
publisher = "Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd",
journal = "Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo",
title = "Međunarodna krivičnopravna pomoć i državna zajednica Srbija i Crna Gora",
pages = "300-285",
number = "2-3",
volume = "41",
url = "conv_1061"
}
Banović, B.,& Ilić, G.. (2003). Međunarodna krivičnopravna pomoć i državna zajednica Srbija i Crna Gora. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo
Udruženje za krivično pravo i kriminologiju, Beograd i Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd., 41(2-3), 285-300.
conv_1061
Banović B, Ilić G. Međunarodna krivičnopravna pomoć i državna zajednica Srbija i Crna Gora. in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo. 2003;41(2-3):285-300.
conv_1061 .
Banović, Božidar, Ilić, Goran, "Međunarodna krivičnopravna pomoć i državna zajednica Srbija i Crna Gora" in Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, 41, no. 2-3 (2003):285-300,
conv_1061 .

Pritvor - francuska iskustva

Ilić, Goran

(Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd, 1999)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ilić, Goran
PY  - 1999
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/135
AB  - Članak sadrži prikaz ustanove pritvora u francuskom krivičnom postupku. Autor najpre izlaže razvoj ustanove i kolebanje zakonodavca između represivne i liberalne koncepcije. Potom, sledi analiza bitnih elemenata ustanove: određivanje pritvora (materijalni i formalni uslovi), njegovo trajanje i posledice.
AB  - L'article comprend la representation de l'institution de la detention provisoire dans la procedure penal francaise. L'auteur expose en premier lieu l'evolution de l'institution et l'oscillation du legislateur entre la conception repressive et la conception liberal. Ensuit on suit l'analise des elements substantiels de l'institution: la mise en detention provisoire (les conditions de fond et de forme), sa duree et les effets
PB  - Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
T2  - Strani pravni život
T1  - Pritvor - francuska iskustva
T1  - La détention provisoire - les expériences Françaises
EP  - 72
IS  - 1-2
SP  - 55
UR  - conv_1230
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ilić, Goran",
year = "1999",
abstract = "Članak sadrži prikaz ustanove pritvora u francuskom krivičnom postupku. Autor najpre izlaže razvoj ustanove i kolebanje zakonodavca između represivne i liberalne koncepcije. Potom, sledi analiza bitnih elemenata ustanove: određivanje pritvora (materijalni i formalni uslovi), njegovo trajanje i posledice., L'article comprend la representation de l'institution de la detention provisoire dans la procedure penal francaise. L'auteur expose en premier lieu l'evolution de l'institution et l'oscillation du legislateur entre la conception repressive et la conception liberal. Ensuit on suit l'analise des elements substantiels de l'institution: la mise en detention provisoire (les conditions de fond et de forme), sa duree et les effets",
publisher = "Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd",
journal = "Strani pravni život",
title = "Pritvor - francuska iskustva, La détention provisoire - les expériences Françaises",
pages = "72-55",
number = "1-2",
url = "conv_1230"
}
Ilić, G.. (1999). Pritvor - francuska iskustva. in Strani pravni život
Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd.(1-2), 55-72.
conv_1230
Ilić G. Pritvor - francuska iskustva. in Strani pravni život. 1999;(1-2):55-72.
conv_1230 .
Ilić, Goran, "Pritvor - francuska iskustva" in Strani pravni život, no. 1-2 (1999):55-72,
conv_1230 .