TY  - JOUR
AU  - Babović-Vuksanović, Branka
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1319
AB  - U članku koji se bavi posledicama pandemije korona virusa na parnični postupak, autorka analizira institut ročišta na daljinu u Republici Srbiji. Najpre je dat kritički osvrt na važeći Zakon o parničnom postupku i njegove odredbe o izvođenju dokaza na daljinu, a zatim su analizirane mogućnosti za izmene i dopune u toj oblasti. Sagledano je nekoliko aspekata uređenja ročišta na daljinu da bi se formirali elementi buduće norme. Povodom pitanja usklađenost pravila postupka sa tehnološkim razvojem društva u stručnoj javnosti se javila sumnja da li je taj institut usklađen sa načelima parničnog postupka i pravom na pravično suđenje. Autorka je analizirala uporednopravna rešenja i praksu Evropskog suda za ljudska prava kako bi došla do zaključaka o usklađenosti ročišta na daljinu sa načelima parničnog postupka i pravom na pravično suđenje.
AB  - In a paper dealing with the ramifications of the COVID-19 pandemic to the litigation proceeding, the author analyses the institution of remote hearings in the Republic of Serbia. A critical reflection was given to the current Law on Civil Litigation and its provisions on presenting evidence from a distance. Afterwards, suggestions were provided for changing and amending these provisions. Several ways for regulating distant hearings were analysed to form the elements of the future norm. When it comes to the actual issue of harmonising the proceeding with the society's technological advancements, there is scepticism in the expertly public on how to harmonise this institution with the principles of litigation proceedings and the right to the fair trial. The author analysed arrangements from the comparative law and the ECHR practice to reach a conclusion on harmonising remote hearings with the principles of litigation proceedings and the right to a fair trial.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Ročišta na daljinu u parničnom postupku
T1  - Virtual litigation hearings
EP  - 549
IS  - 2
SP  - 533
VL  - 70
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22207A
UR  - conv_578
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Babović-Vuksanović, Branka",
year = "2022",
abstract = "U članku koji se bavi posledicama pandemije korona virusa na parnični postupak, autorka analizira institut ročišta na daljinu u Republici Srbiji. Najpre je dat kritički osvrt na važeći Zakon o parničnom postupku i njegove odredbe o izvođenju dokaza na daljinu, a zatim su analizirane mogućnosti za izmene i dopune u toj oblasti. Sagledano je nekoliko aspekata uređenja ročišta na daljinu da bi se formirali elementi buduće norme. Povodom pitanja usklađenost pravila postupka sa tehnološkim razvojem društva u stručnoj javnosti se javila sumnja da li je taj institut usklađen sa načelima parničnog postupka i pravom na pravično suđenje. Autorka je analizirala uporednopravna rešenja i praksu Evropskog suda za ljudska prava kako bi došla do zaključaka o usklađenosti ročišta na daljinu sa načelima parničnog postupka i pravom na pravično suđenje., In a paper dealing with the ramifications of the COVID-19 pandemic to the litigation proceeding, the author analyses the institution of remote hearings in the Republic of Serbia. A critical reflection was given to the current Law on Civil Litigation and its provisions on presenting evidence from a distance. Afterwards, suggestions were provided for changing and amending these provisions. Several ways for regulating distant hearings were analysed to form the elements of the future norm. When it comes to the actual issue of harmonising the proceeding with the society's technological advancements, there is scepticism in the expertly public on how to harmonise this institution with the principles of litigation proceedings and the right to the fair trial. The author analysed arrangements from the comparative law and the ECHR practice to reach a conclusion on harmonising remote hearings with the principles of litigation proceedings and the right to a fair trial.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Ročišta na daljinu u parničnom postupku, Virtual litigation hearings",
pages = "549-533",
number = "2",
volume = "70",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22207A",
url = "conv_578"
}

Babović-Vuksanović, B.. (2022). Ročišta na daljinu u parničnom postupku. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 70(2), 533-549.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22207A
conv_578

Babović-Vuksanović B. Ročišta na daljinu u parničnom postupku. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2022;70(2):533-549.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22207A
conv_578 .

Babović-Vuksanović, Branka, "Ročišta na daljinu u parničnom postupku" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 70, no. 2 (2022):533-549,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22207A .,
conv_578 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Babović, Branka
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1109
AB  - Parnični postupak u sporovima male vrednosti je poseban parnični postupak u kome se primat daje efikasnosti u rešavanju spora u odnosu na druge procesne garancije. To se opravdava malim značajem sporova koji se rešavaju u ovom postupku. Međutim, pozitivnopravno regulisanje ovog postupka obuhvata ogroman opseg sporova koji se rešavaju u ovom posebnom parničnom postupku i za koje se često teško može reći da su malog značaja. U sudskoj praksi su identifikovani brojni problemi u primeni pravila ovog posebnog parničnog postupka. Međutim, svim spornim odnosima koji se trenutno rešavaju primenom pravila ovog postupka ne mogu se naći zajedničke karakteristike koje bi omogućavale jednu vrstu postupka. Sledstveno tome, nije svrsishodno ni probleme koji su u praksi identifikovani rešavati bez krupnijih zahvata u ovu vrstu parničnog postupka.
AB  - Small claims litigation proceedings constitute special rules for disputes for which efficiency of resolution is predominant in comparison to the other procedural guarantees. This is due to the small value of the claims and anticipated small importance of those disputes. However, current Serbian law encompasses large scale of disputes to which small claims proceedings apply, even though the importance of these disputes does not justify application of simplified proceedings. Therefore, many problems in application of those rules are identified in the case law. If one tries to find a resolution to those problems, it seems to be impossible without either the reform of those proceedings or change of scope of those proceedings. In order to improve application of right to the fair trial guarantees, several ways in which rules on small claims proceedings could be reformed, are analysed.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Pravo na pravično suđenje i parnični postupak u sporovima male vrednosti
T1  - Right to the fair trial and small claims litigation proceedings
EP  - 79
IS  - 10-12
SP  - 66
VL  - 57
UR  - conv_2312
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Babović, Branka",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Parnični postupak u sporovima male vrednosti je poseban parnični postupak u kome se primat daje efikasnosti u rešavanju spora u odnosu na druge procesne garancije. To se opravdava malim značajem sporova koji se rešavaju u ovom postupku. Međutim, pozitivnopravno regulisanje ovog postupka obuhvata ogroman opseg sporova koji se rešavaju u ovom posebnom parničnom postupku i za koje se često teško može reći da su malog značaja. U sudskoj praksi su identifikovani brojni problemi u primeni pravila ovog posebnog parničnog postupka. Međutim, svim spornim odnosima koji se trenutno rešavaju primenom pravila ovog postupka ne mogu se naći zajedničke karakteristike koje bi omogućavale jednu vrstu postupka. Sledstveno tome, nije svrsishodno ni probleme koji su u praksi identifikovani rešavati bez krupnijih zahvata u ovu vrstu parničnog postupka., Small claims litigation proceedings constitute special rules for disputes for which efficiency of resolution is predominant in comparison to the other procedural guarantees. This is due to the small value of the claims and anticipated small importance of those disputes. However, current Serbian law encompasses large scale of disputes to which small claims proceedings apply, even though the importance of these disputes does not justify application of simplified proceedings. Therefore, many problems in application of those rules are identified in the case law. If one tries to find a resolution to those problems, it seems to be impossible without either the reform of those proceedings or change of scope of those proceedings. In order to improve application of right to the fair trial guarantees, several ways in which rules on small claims proceedings could be reformed, are analysed.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Pravo na pravično suđenje i parnični postupak u sporovima male vrednosti, Right to the fair trial and small claims litigation proceedings",
pages = "79-66",
number = "10-12",
volume = "57",
url = "conv_2312"
}

Babović, B.. (2019). Pravo na pravično suđenje i parnični postupak u sporovima male vrednosti. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 57(10-12), 66-79.
conv_2312

Babović B. Pravo na pravično suđenje i parnični postupak u sporovima male vrednosti. in Pravo i privreda. 2019;57(10-12):66-79.
conv_2312 .

Babović, Branka, "Pravo na pravično suđenje i parnični postupak u sporovima male vrednosti" in Pravo i privreda, 57, no. 10-12 (2019):66-79,
conv_2312 .

TY  - THES
AU  - Babović, Branka
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/handle/123456789/12249
UR  - http://eteze.bg.ac.rs/application/showtheses?thesesId=7398
UR  - https://fedorabg.bg.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:21717/bdef:Content/download
UR  - http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=DISPLAY&base=70036&RID=51955215
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/31
AB  - Predmet istraživanja u ovom radu su instituti množine subjekata u parničnom postupku srpskog prava. Istraživanje počinje analizom istorijskog razvoja ovih instituta i dovođenjem u vezu sa drugim institutima parničnog procesnog prava kako bi se izveli zaključci o prednostima i manjkavostima pozitivnopravnog regulisanja instituta množine subjekata u parničnom postupku srpskog prava. Kritički osvrt na ove institute je potpuniji onda kada se analiziraju razlike u odnosu na nama srodne pravne sisteme nemačkog i austrijskog prava. Nakon takve analize je bilo moguće utvrditi i pravce kretanja našeg modernog parničnog procesnog prava i odnosa našeg pravnog sistema sa pravnim sistema sa kojima delimo tradiciju u ovoj oblasti. Cilj istraživanja je i da se utvri kako se pozitivnopravnim institutima množine subjekata u parničnom postupku ostvaruje efikasnost. Uporednopravna analiza je upotpunjena tek onda kada se analiziraju instituti množine subjekta pravnih sistema common law, posebno kada se analizira pravni sistem SAD kao posebno uticajan. Zajedničke karakteristike, ali i brojne razlike koje postoje među institutima su potpuno analizirane tek onda kada se analizira primena prava na pravično suđenje (due process of law) na institute množine subjekata u parničnom postupku pred sudovima SAD. Rezultati ovog istraživanja omogućavaju pozicioniranje instituta množine subjekata u parničnom postupku srpskog prava u odnosu na druge pravne sisteme današnjice kao i sveobuhvatnije sagledavanje ciljeva koji se postižu institutima našeg parničnog procesnog prava. Analiza instituta množine subjekata u parničnom postupku srpskog prava za rezultat ima između ostalog i determinisanje interesa koji se ostvaruju pojedinim institutima množine subjekata u parničnom postupku i ciljeva koje ti instituti ostvaruju u postupku. Rezultati ovog istraživanja polazna osnova za teorijsko uobličavanje instituta množine subjekata u parničnom postupku u garancije prava na pravično suđenje. Potrebno je bilo identifikovati i specifičnosti koje se javljaju kod instituta množine subjekata u parničnom postupku iz perspektive prava na pravično suđenje.
AB  - The research subject of this thesis is multi-party litigation in the Serbian law. In order to obtain research goals, the analyses of both historical development of multi-party litigation in Serbia and the connection of the institutes of multi-party litigation to other institutes of civil procedural law were done. Critical review of these institutes is more comprehensive when analyzing differences in relation to the German and Austrian legal systems, which are similar to our own. After such an analysis, it is possible to determine the direction of our modern civil procedural law and the ways if we are moving away from the legal systems with which we share the tradition in this field. On top of that, comparative analysis is complete only when the institutes of the multi-party litigation of common law legal systems are examined (especially the United States’ legal system, due to its influence). Bearing in mind the research goal of this thesis, the application of due process of law clause to the institutes of the multi-party litigation in civil proceedings before the United States courts was examined in particular. The results of this research clarify the position of our institutes of the multi-party litigation in civil proceedings in relation to other modern legal systems. Also, a more comprehensive examination of the purpose of the institute of our civil procedural law was important to examine if the right to a fair trial is properly granted. Analysis of the institutes of the multi-party litigation serves also to determine the goals of a particular institute. Such results are significant for the theoretical shaping of the institutes of the multi-party litigation in civil proceedings into a guarantee of the right to a fair trial. Namely, it is necessary to analyze the issues that arise in the application of the right to a fair trial specifically in the institutes of the multi-party litigation in civil proceedings. Furthermore, the resolution of identified problems in the application of the institute of the International Civil Procedure Law are also based on these analyses. Having in mind that this topic was not dealt with in the Serbian theory of the International Civil Procedure Law, the analysis of the particularities of the multi-party litigation in civil proceedings required making a connection to numerous institutes in this branch of law. Finally, the specifics of determining the applicable law when the institutes of the multi-party litigation are applied are examined in order to finalize the analysis on IPL interests of the parties. In this way, this dissertation deals with the institutes of multi-party litigation in civil proceedings both from the perspective of the right to a fair trial and the perspective of IPL interests of parties.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet
T1  - Množina subjekata u parničnom postupku sa elementom inostranosti
T1  - Multy - party international litigation
UR  - t-2427
ER  - 

@phdthesis{
author = "Babović, Branka",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Predmet istraživanja u ovom radu su instituti množine subjekata u parničnom postupku srpskog prava. Istraživanje počinje analizom istorijskog razvoja ovih instituta i dovođenjem u vezu sa drugim institutima parničnog procesnog prava kako bi se izveli zaključci o prednostima i manjkavostima pozitivnopravnog regulisanja instituta množine subjekata u parničnom postupku srpskog prava. Kritički osvrt na ove institute je potpuniji onda kada se analiziraju razlike u odnosu na nama srodne pravne sisteme nemačkog i austrijskog prava. Nakon takve analize je bilo moguće utvrditi i pravce kretanja našeg modernog parničnog procesnog prava i odnosa našeg pravnog sistema sa pravnim sistema sa kojima delimo tradiciju u ovoj oblasti. Cilj istraživanja je i da se utvri kako se pozitivnopravnim institutima množine subjekata u parničnom postupku ostvaruje efikasnost. Uporednopravna analiza je upotpunjena tek onda kada se analiziraju instituti množine subjekta pravnih sistema common law, posebno kada se analizira pravni sistem SAD kao posebno uticajan. Zajedničke karakteristike, ali i brojne razlike koje postoje među institutima su potpuno analizirane tek onda kada se analizira primena prava na pravično suđenje (due process of law) na institute množine subjekata u parničnom postupku pred sudovima SAD. Rezultati ovog istraživanja omogućavaju pozicioniranje instituta množine subjekata u parničnom postupku srpskog prava u odnosu na druge pravne sisteme današnjice kao i sveobuhvatnije sagledavanje ciljeva koji se postižu institutima našeg parničnog procesnog prava. Analiza instituta množine subjekata u parničnom postupku srpskog prava za rezultat ima između ostalog i determinisanje interesa koji se ostvaruju pojedinim institutima množine subjekata u parničnom postupku i ciljeva koje ti instituti ostvaruju u postupku. Rezultati ovog istraživanja polazna osnova za teorijsko uobličavanje instituta množine subjekata u parničnom postupku u garancije prava na pravično suđenje. Potrebno je bilo identifikovati i specifičnosti koje se javljaju kod instituta množine subjekata u parničnom postupku iz perspektive prava na pravično suđenje., The research subject of this thesis is multi-party litigation in the Serbian law. In order to obtain research goals, the analyses of both historical development of multi-party litigation in Serbia and the connection of the institutes of multi-party litigation to other institutes of civil procedural law were done. Critical review of these institutes is more comprehensive when analyzing differences in relation to the German and Austrian legal systems, which are similar to our own. After such an analysis, it is possible to determine the direction of our modern civil procedural law and the ways if we are moving away from the legal systems with which we share the tradition in this field. On top of that, comparative analysis is complete only when the institutes of the multi-party litigation of common law legal systems are examined (especially the United States’ legal system, due to its influence). Bearing in mind the research goal of this thesis, the application of due process of law clause to the institutes of the multi-party litigation in civil proceedings before the United States courts was examined in particular. The results of this research clarify the position of our institutes of the multi-party litigation in civil proceedings in relation to other modern legal systems. Also, a more comprehensive examination of the purpose of the institute of our civil procedural law was important to examine if the right to a fair trial is properly granted. Analysis of the institutes of the multi-party litigation serves also to determine the goals of a particular institute. Such results are significant for the theoretical shaping of the institutes of the multi-party litigation in civil proceedings into a guarantee of the right to a fair trial. Namely, it is necessary to analyze the issues that arise in the application of the right to a fair trial specifically in the institutes of the multi-party litigation in civil proceedings. Furthermore, the resolution of identified problems in the application of the institute of the International Civil Procedure Law are also based on these analyses. Having in mind that this topic was not dealt with in the Serbian theory of the International Civil Procedure Law, the analysis of the particularities of the multi-party litigation in civil proceedings required making a connection to numerous institutes in this branch of law. Finally, the specifics of determining the applicable law when the institutes of the multi-party litigation are applied are examined in order to finalize the analysis on IPL interests of the parties. In this way, this dissertation deals with the institutes of multi-party litigation in civil proceedings both from the perspective of the right to a fair trial and the perspective of IPL interests of parties.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet",
title = "Množina subjekata u parničnom postupku sa elementom inostranosti, Multy - party international litigation",
url = "t-2427"
}

Babović, B.. (2019). Množina subjekata u parničnom postupku sa elementom inostranosti. 
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet..
t-2427

Babović B. Množina subjekata u parničnom postupku sa elementom inostranosti. 2019;.
t-2427 .

Babović, Branka, "Množina subjekata u parničnom postupku sa elementom inostranosti" (2019),
t-2427 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Babović, Branka
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/962
AB  - Grupna tužba po modelu class action je instrument kolektivne zaštite interesa građana u parničnom postupku najrazvijeniji u pravu SAD. Ipak, u evropskokontinenalnom pravnom području je razmatrano uvođenje ovog insituta kako bi se u pojedinim oblastima prava upravnopravna i sudska zaštita upotpunila i kolektivnom zaštitom u parničnom postupku. U pojedinim pravima zemalja članica EU je tužba slična ovoj uvedena, ali u drugačijem obliku nego što je to slučaj u SAD. Prilikom razmatranja uvođenja ove tužbe u prava zemalja članica su se javila kako procesnopravna, tako i pravosudno-organizaciona pitanja čije razmatranje je predmet i ovog rada.
AB  - Class action is mechanism of collective redress developed in the USA and transplated to the law of several EU countries. However, the transplant of class action in EU law undergone same modifications in order to fit this legal transplant in the laws of the EU countries. The modifications were needed due to the differeces in procedural rules, organization of judiciary as well as the different aspects of the law in which the class action is to be applied. Transformation of Serbian law and society is the reason that possible introduction of collective redress mechanisms other than organizational claim in Serbian law would need an extra view from the transitional point.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - O uvođenju grupne tužbe anglosaksonskog tipa u prava država članica EU
T1  - Introduction of class action in the member states of EU
EP  - 532
IS  - 4-6
SP  - 521
VL  - 55
UR  - conv_2210
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Babović, Branka",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Grupna tužba po modelu class action je instrument kolektivne zaštite interesa građana u parničnom postupku najrazvijeniji u pravu SAD. Ipak, u evropskokontinenalnom pravnom području je razmatrano uvođenje ovog insituta kako bi se u pojedinim oblastima prava upravnopravna i sudska zaštita upotpunila i kolektivnom zaštitom u parničnom postupku. U pojedinim pravima zemalja članica EU je tužba slična ovoj uvedena, ali u drugačijem obliku nego što je to slučaj u SAD. Prilikom razmatranja uvođenja ove tužbe u prava zemalja članica su se javila kako procesnopravna, tako i pravosudno-organizaciona pitanja čije razmatranje je predmet i ovog rada., Class action is mechanism of collective redress developed in the USA and transplated to the law of several EU countries. However, the transplant of class action in EU law undergone same modifications in order to fit this legal transplant in the laws of the EU countries. The modifications were needed due to the differeces in procedural rules, organization of judiciary as well as the different aspects of the law in which the class action is to be applied. Transformation of Serbian law and society is the reason that possible introduction of collective redress mechanisms other than organizational claim in Serbian law would need an extra view from the transitional point.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "O uvođenju grupne tužbe anglosaksonskog tipa u prava država članica EU, Introduction of class action in the member states of EU",
pages = "532-521",
number = "4-6",
volume = "55",
url = "conv_2210"
}

Babović, B.. (2017). O uvođenju grupne tužbe anglosaksonskog tipa u prava država članica EU. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 55(4-6), 521-532.
conv_2210

Babović B. O uvođenju grupne tužbe anglosaksonskog tipa u prava država članica EU. in Pravo i privreda. 2017;55(4-6):521-532.
conv_2210 .

Babović, Branka, "O uvođenju grupne tužbe anglosaksonskog tipa u prava država članica EU" in Pravo i privreda, 55, no. 4-6 (2017):521-532,
conv_2210 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Babović, Branka
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/883
AB  - Član 111 st. 1 druge knjige Prednacrta Građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije je istovetne sadržine kao i odredba čl. 156. st. 1. Zakona o obligacionim odnosima kojim je predviđen institut popularne tužbe. Uporednopravnom analizom se dolazi do zaključka da je popularna tužba relikt prošlosti koji je u modernim pravima ili ukinut ili zamenjen drugim institutima. Analizom instituta popularne tužbe se dolazi do zaključka da ovakva vrsta tužbe nije uklopljena u važeće procesno pravo. Pored toga, popularna tužba iz Zakona o obligacionim odnosima nije dala zadovoljavajuće rezultate, pa treba razmotriti zamenu ovog instituta drugim. U ovom radu autor analizira popularnu tužbu kroz poređenje sa sličnim institutima uporednog prava i poređenjem sa rešenjima u drugim oblastima materijalnog prava Republike Srbije zaključujući da je ova vrsta tužbe višak u našem pravnom sistemu.
AB  - Article 111 (1) of the second book of the Predraft to the Civil Code of the Republic of Serbia has the very same provisions as the article 156 (1) of the Law on torts and contracts which regulates actio popularis. Comparative analysis leads us to the conclusion that actio popularis is relic from the past which has been either substituted or completely repealed. Analysis of the actio popularis leads to the conclusion that this kind of law suit does not properly fit in the current procedural law system. In addition, use of actio popularis was not successful enough so far. Subject of this paper is comparative analysis of actio popularis and analysis of its place in the Serbian legal system, which lead to the conclusion that, from the procedural point of view, this kind of law suit should not remain the part of Serbian legal system.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Zahtev da se ukloni opasnost od štete - procesni aspekti
T1  - Request to eliminate a danger of damage: Procedural aspects
EP  - 167
IS  - 4-6
SP  - 154
VL  - 53
UR  - conv_2147
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Babović, Branka",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Član 111 st. 1 druge knjige Prednacrta Građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije je istovetne sadržine kao i odredba čl. 156. st. 1. Zakona o obligacionim odnosima kojim je predviđen institut popularne tužbe. Uporednopravnom analizom se dolazi do zaključka da je popularna tužba relikt prošlosti koji je u modernim pravima ili ukinut ili zamenjen drugim institutima. Analizom instituta popularne tužbe se dolazi do zaključka da ovakva vrsta tužbe nije uklopljena u važeće procesno pravo. Pored toga, popularna tužba iz Zakona o obligacionim odnosima nije dala zadovoljavajuće rezultate, pa treba razmotriti zamenu ovog instituta drugim. U ovom radu autor analizira popularnu tužbu kroz poređenje sa sličnim institutima uporednog prava i poređenjem sa rešenjima u drugim oblastima materijalnog prava Republike Srbije zaključujući da je ova vrsta tužbe višak u našem pravnom sistemu., Article 111 (1) of the second book of the Predraft to the Civil Code of the Republic of Serbia has the very same provisions as the article 156 (1) of the Law on torts and contracts which regulates actio popularis. Comparative analysis leads us to the conclusion that actio popularis is relic from the past which has been either substituted or completely repealed. Analysis of the actio popularis leads to the conclusion that this kind of law suit does not properly fit in the current procedural law system. In addition, use of actio popularis was not successful enough so far. Subject of this paper is comparative analysis of actio popularis and analysis of its place in the Serbian legal system, which lead to the conclusion that, from the procedural point of view, this kind of law suit should not remain the part of Serbian legal system.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Zahtev da se ukloni opasnost od štete - procesni aspekti, Request to eliminate a danger of damage: Procedural aspects",
pages = "167-154",
number = "4-6",
volume = "53",
url = "conv_2147"
}

Babović, B.. (2015). Zahtev da se ukloni opasnost od štete - procesni aspekti. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 53(4-6), 154-167.
conv_2147

Babović B. Zahtev da se ukloni opasnost od štete - procesni aspekti. in Pravo i privreda. 2015;53(4-6):154-167.
conv_2147 .

Babović, Branka, "Zahtev da se ukloni opasnost od štete - procesni aspekti" in Pravo i privreda, 53, no. 4-6 (2015):154-167,
conv_2147 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Babović, Branka
PY  - 2014
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/777
AB  - Predmet ovog rada je analiza sistema o kolektivnoj zaštiti potrošača sadržanih u Zakonu o zaštiti potrošača iz 2010. godine i poređenje s novokreiranim sistemom iz tek usvojenog Zakona o zaštiti potrošača iz 2014. godine. Naime, za razliku od pređašnjeg u kome je za zaštitu kolektivnih interesa potrošača bio predviđen parnični postupak, u novom sistemu je zaštita kolektivnih interesa potrošača poverena organima uprave. Autor analizira prednosti i mane jednog i drugog sistema ograničavajući se na: (i) pojam kolektivnog interesa, (ii) disperziju ovlašćenja za pokretanje postupka za zaštitu kolektivnih interesa potrošača u našem pravu i (iii) poređenje vrsta tužbenih zahteva koji su se mogli istaći u tim postupcima i obima zaštite u upravnom postupku.
AB  - Subject of this paper is the comparative analysis of the system of collective redress in the field of consumer protection contained in the Law on Consumer Protection from 2010 and the new Law on Consumer Protection from 2014. While the previous Law on Consumer Protection contained the provisions on collective redress in litigation proceedings, the new Law on Consumer Protection provided for collective redress in administrative proceedings. Therefore, analysis of advantages and disadvantages of both systems is provided, limited to: (i) meaning of the collective interest, (ii) dispersion of the motion for collective redress in Serbian law and (iii) analysis of requests which could have been raised in the litigation proceedings and scope of protection granted in administrative proceedings.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Zaštita kolektivnih interesa potrošača
T1  - Legislative changes in the field of consumer collective redress
EP  - 228
IS  - 2
SP  - 215
VL  - 62
DO  - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1402215B
UR  - conv_342
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Babović, Branka",
year = "2014",
abstract = "Predmet ovog rada je analiza sistema o kolektivnoj zaštiti potrošača sadržanih u Zakonu o zaštiti potrošača iz 2010. godine i poređenje s novokreiranim sistemom iz tek usvojenog Zakona o zaštiti potrošača iz 2014. godine. Naime, za razliku od pređašnjeg u kome je za zaštitu kolektivnih interesa potrošača bio predviđen parnični postupak, u novom sistemu je zaštita kolektivnih interesa potrošača poverena organima uprave. Autor analizira prednosti i mane jednog i drugog sistema ograničavajući se na: (i) pojam kolektivnog interesa, (ii) disperziju ovlašćenja za pokretanje postupka za zaštitu kolektivnih interesa potrošača u našem pravu i (iii) poređenje vrsta tužbenih zahteva koji su se mogli istaći u tim postupcima i obima zaštite u upravnom postupku., Subject of this paper is the comparative analysis of the system of collective redress in the field of consumer protection contained in the Law on Consumer Protection from 2010 and the new Law on Consumer Protection from 2014. While the previous Law on Consumer Protection contained the provisions on collective redress in litigation proceedings, the new Law on Consumer Protection provided for collective redress in administrative proceedings. Therefore, analysis of advantages and disadvantages of both systems is provided, limited to: (i) meaning of the collective interest, (ii) dispersion of the motion for collective redress in Serbian law and (iii) analysis of requests which could have been raised in the litigation proceedings and scope of protection granted in administrative proceedings.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Zaštita kolektivnih interesa potrošača, Legislative changes in the field of consumer collective redress",
pages = "228-215",
number = "2",
volume = "62",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1402215B",
url = "conv_342"
}

Babović, B.. (2014). Zaštita kolektivnih interesa potrošača. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 62(2), 215-228.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1402215B
conv_342

Babović B. Zaštita kolektivnih interesa potrošača. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2014;62(2):215-228.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1402215B
conv_342 .

Babović, Branka, "Zaštita kolektivnih interesa potrošača" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 62, no. 2 (2014):215-228,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1402215B .,
conv_342 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Babović, Branka
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/729
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
C3  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Pravo na suđenje u razumnom roku i parnični postupak
T1  - Right to a trial within reasonable time and civil procedure
EP  - 465
IS  - 7-9
SP  - 454
VL  - 50
UR  - conv_2109
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Babović, Branka",
year = "2013",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Pravo na suđenje u razumnom roku i parnični postupak, Right to a trial within reasonable time and civil procedure",
pages = "465-454",
number = "7-9",
volume = "50",
url = "conv_2109"
}

Babović, B.. (2013). Pravo na suđenje u razumnom roku i parnični postupak. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 50(7-9), 454-465.
conv_2109

Babović B. Pravo na suđenje u razumnom roku i parnični postupak. in Pravo i privreda. 2013;50(7-9):454-465.
conv_2109 .

Babović, Branka, "Pravo na suđenje u razumnom roku i parnični postupak" in Pravo i privreda, 50, no. 7-9 (2013):454-465,
conv_2109 .