Rakić, Branko

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
aa9c5235-828e-400e-8785-796915ab457d
  • Rakić, Branko (8)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Ustaški genocid nad Srbima - Dolus Specialis koji traje

Rakić, Branko

(2022)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Rakić, Branko
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1312
AB  - Ključna karakteristika krivičnog dela genocida, koja ga izdvaja od drugih kršenja međunarodnog humanitarnog prava i diže ga na nivo "zločina nad svim zločinima", jeste postojanje tzv. genocidne namere, tj. namere "potpunog ili delimičnog uništenja jedne nacionalne, etničke, rasne ili verske grupe kao takve". Težina i monstruoznost sadržaja takve namere, po pravilu, zahtevaju da je ona duboko ukorenjena u svesti pripadnika one grupe koja je izvršilac ovakvog zločina, a takva ukorenjenost podrazumeva i trajnost takve namere, odnosno genocidne ideje. Tokom Drugog svetskog rata srpski narod je, zajedno sa Romima i Jevrejima, u Nezavisnoj Državi Hrvatskoj bio žrtva genocida, zločina kojeg su se gnušali čak i nacisti. Ideja i namera iskorenjenja srpskog naroda sa prostora koji su hrvatski nacionalisti smatrali za hrvatski nacionalni prostor, iako je ukorenjena vekovima unazad, dobila je svoje "teorijsko uobličenje" u XIX veku, pre svega u radovima Ante Starčevića, koji je još za života nazvan "Ocem Domovine". Svoje oduševljenje i inspirisanost Starčevićevim delom ustaše su tokom Drugog svetskog rata otvoreno iskazivale, tvrdeći da Nezavisne Države Hrvatske ne bi bilo da nije bilo Starčevića. Ustaška ideologija je nastavila da živi posle Drugog svetskog rata, pre svega kroz aktivnosti ustaške emigracije, ali je hrvatski nacionalizam, otvoren za prihvatanje ustaškog idejnog nasleđa, nastavio da živi i na prostoru same Hrvatske. Krajem osamdesetih i početkom devedesetih godina HH veka, sa oživljavanjem ideje o secesiji Hrvatske i sa njenom realizacijom, oživljava i ideja o Srbima kao "remetilačkom faktoru" u Hrvatskoj i o nužnosti njihove eliminacije sa tog prostora. Tuđmanova Hrvatska se vraća ustaškoj ideologiji u svim njenim elementima, uključujući u odnosu na Srbe i genocidnu nameru, koja je tokom Drugog svetskog rata bila u velikoj meri realizovana. Poučeni iskustvom iz NDH, Srbi se organizuju i sprečavaju ponavljanje sudbine svojih pobijenih predaka i srodnika iz perioda Drugog svetskog rata, ali ne uspevaju da izbegnu "etničko čišćenje" sa prostora Hrvatske. Način na koji se u današnjoj Hrvatskoj interpretiraju događaji i iz Drugog svetskog rata i iz devedesetih godina XIX veka pokazuje da je ustaška ideologija i dalje duboko ukorenjena u značajnim segmentima hrvatskog društva, uključujući praktično celinu hrvatskog državnog vrha. A bitan, suštinski element ustaške ideologije je genocidna namera prema Srbima koja je još živa u Hrvatskoj.
AB  - The key characteristic of the criminal aspect of the genocide, which distinguishes it from other violations of international humanitarian law and raises it to the level of the "crime above all crimes", is the existence of the so-called genocidal intention of "complete or partial destruction of a specific national, ethnic, racial or religious group". The gravity and monstrosity of the content of such intention, as q rule, require that it is deeply rooted in the conscience of the members of the group perpetrating this crime, while such inveteracy also implies the permanence of the intention, or genocidal idea. During World War II, the Serbian people, together with Jews and Romas, in the Independent State of Croatia were the victims of the genocide, the crime that abhorred even the Nazis. The idea and intention of the extermination of the Serbian people from the territory considered as Croatia's national territory by the Croatian nationalists, although existing for centuries in the past, got its "theoretical formation" in the 19th century, primarily in the works of Ante Starčević, who was called the "Father of the Fatherland" while he was still alive. The Ustasha openly showed their enthusiasm and inspiration by Starčević's works during World War II, claiming that there would not have been the Independent State of Croatia if it had not been for Starčević. The Ustasha ideology persisted after World War II, primarily through the activities of the Ustasha emigrants, but Croatian nationalism, open to accept the Ustasha ideological legacy, also persisted in the territory of Croatia itself. At the end of the 1980s and the beginning of the 1990s, the revival of the idea about the secession of Croatia and its realization also led to the revival of the idea of the Serbs as a "destructive factor" in Croatia and the necessity of their elimination from that territory. Tuđman's Croatia resumed the Ustasha ideology in all its elements, including its attitude towards the Serbs and the genocidal intention, which had been largely realized during World War II. Drawing on the experience from the ISC, the Serbs became organized and prevented the repetition of the fate of their ancestors and relatives killed during World War II, but did not succeed in avoiding the "ethnic cleansing" from the territory of Croatia. The manner in which today's Croatia interprets events both from World War II and from the 1990s shows that the Ustasha ideology is still deeply rooted in the significant element of the Croatian society, including practically the entire top government of Croatia. An essentially important element of the Ustasha ideology is its genocidal intention towards the Serbs still living in Croatia.
T2  - Napredak - časopis za političku teoriju i praksu
T1  - Ustaški genocid nad Srbima - Dolus Specialis koji traje
T1  - The Ustasha genocide over the Serbs: The continuing Dolus Specialis
EP  - 102
IS  - 2
SP  - 69
VL  - 3
DO  - 10.5937/napredak3-39804
UR  - conv_2865
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Rakić, Branko",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Ključna karakteristika krivičnog dela genocida, koja ga izdvaja od drugih kršenja međunarodnog humanitarnog prava i diže ga na nivo "zločina nad svim zločinima", jeste postojanje tzv. genocidne namere, tj. namere "potpunog ili delimičnog uništenja jedne nacionalne, etničke, rasne ili verske grupe kao takve". Težina i monstruoznost sadržaja takve namere, po pravilu, zahtevaju da je ona duboko ukorenjena u svesti pripadnika one grupe koja je izvršilac ovakvog zločina, a takva ukorenjenost podrazumeva i trajnost takve namere, odnosno genocidne ideje. Tokom Drugog svetskog rata srpski narod je, zajedno sa Romima i Jevrejima, u Nezavisnoj Državi Hrvatskoj bio žrtva genocida, zločina kojeg su se gnušali čak i nacisti. Ideja i namera iskorenjenja srpskog naroda sa prostora koji su hrvatski nacionalisti smatrali za hrvatski nacionalni prostor, iako je ukorenjena vekovima unazad, dobila je svoje "teorijsko uobličenje" u XIX veku, pre svega u radovima Ante Starčevića, koji je još za života nazvan "Ocem Domovine". Svoje oduševljenje i inspirisanost Starčevićevim delom ustaše su tokom Drugog svetskog rata otvoreno iskazivale, tvrdeći da Nezavisne Države Hrvatske ne bi bilo da nije bilo Starčevića. Ustaška ideologija je nastavila da živi posle Drugog svetskog rata, pre svega kroz aktivnosti ustaške emigracije, ali je hrvatski nacionalizam, otvoren za prihvatanje ustaškog idejnog nasleđa, nastavio da živi i na prostoru same Hrvatske. Krajem osamdesetih i početkom devedesetih godina HH veka, sa oživljavanjem ideje o secesiji Hrvatske i sa njenom realizacijom, oživljava i ideja o Srbima kao "remetilačkom faktoru" u Hrvatskoj i o nužnosti njihove eliminacije sa tog prostora. Tuđmanova Hrvatska se vraća ustaškoj ideologiji u svim njenim elementima, uključujući u odnosu na Srbe i genocidnu nameru, koja je tokom Drugog svetskog rata bila u velikoj meri realizovana. Poučeni iskustvom iz NDH, Srbi se organizuju i sprečavaju ponavljanje sudbine svojih pobijenih predaka i srodnika iz perioda Drugog svetskog rata, ali ne uspevaju da izbegnu "etničko čišćenje" sa prostora Hrvatske. Način na koji se u današnjoj Hrvatskoj interpretiraju događaji i iz Drugog svetskog rata i iz devedesetih godina XIX veka pokazuje da je ustaška ideologija i dalje duboko ukorenjena u značajnim segmentima hrvatskog društva, uključujući praktično celinu hrvatskog državnog vrha. A bitan, suštinski element ustaške ideologije je genocidna namera prema Srbima koja je još živa u Hrvatskoj., The key characteristic of the criminal aspect of the genocide, which distinguishes it from other violations of international humanitarian law and raises it to the level of the "crime above all crimes", is the existence of the so-called genocidal intention of "complete or partial destruction of a specific national, ethnic, racial or religious group". The gravity and monstrosity of the content of such intention, as q rule, require that it is deeply rooted in the conscience of the members of the group perpetrating this crime, while such inveteracy also implies the permanence of the intention, or genocidal idea. During World War II, the Serbian people, together with Jews and Romas, in the Independent State of Croatia were the victims of the genocide, the crime that abhorred even the Nazis. The idea and intention of the extermination of the Serbian people from the territory considered as Croatia's national territory by the Croatian nationalists, although existing for centuries in the past, got its "theoretical formation" in the 19th century, primarily in the works of Ante Starčević, who was called the "Father of the Fatherland" while he was still alive. The Ustasha openly showed their enthusiasm and inspiration by Starčević's works during World War II, claiming that there would not have been the Independent State of Croatia if it had not been for Starčević. The Ustasha ideology persisted after World War II, primarily through the activities of the Ustasha emigrants, but Croatian nationalism, open to accept the Ustasha ideological legacy, also persisted in the territory of Croatia itself. At the end of the 1980s and the beginning of the 1990s, the revival of the idea about the secession of Croatia and its realization also led to the revival of the idea of the Serbs as a "destructive factor" in Croatia and the necessity of their elimination from that territory. Tuđman's Croatia resumed the Ustasha ideology in all its elements, including its attitude towards the Serbs and the genocidal intention, which had been largely realized during World War II. Drawing on the experience from the ISC, the Serbs became organized and prevented the repetition of the fate of their ancestors and relatives killed during World War II, but did not succeed in avoiding the "ethnic cleansing" from the territory of Croatia. The manner in which today's Croatia interprets events both from World War II and from the 1990s shows that the Ustasha ideology is still deeply rooted in the significant element of the Croatian society, including practically the entire top government of Croatia. An essentially important element of the Ustasha ideology is its genocidal intention towards the Serbs still living in Croatia.",
journal = "Napredak - časopis za političku teoriju i praksu",
title = "Ustaški genocid nad Srbima - Dolus Specialis koji traje, The Ustasha genocide over the Serbs: The continuing Dolus Specialis",
pages = "102-69",
number = "2",
volume = "3",
doi = "10.5937/napredak3-39804",
url = "conv_2865"
}
Rakić, B.. (2022). Ustaški genocid nad Srbima - Dolus Specialis koji traje. in Napredak - časopis za političku teoriju i praksu, 3(2), 69-102.
https://doi.org/10.5937/napredak3-39804
conv_2865
Rakić B. Ustaški genocid nad Srbima - Dolus Specialis koji traje. in Napredak - časopis za političku teoriju i praksu. 2022;3(2):69-102.
doi:10.5937/napredak3-39804
conv_2865 .
Rakić, Branko, "Ustaški genocid nad Srbima - Dolus Specialis koji traje" in Napredak - časopis za političku teoriju i praksu, 3, no. 2 (2022):69-102,
https://doi.org/10.5937/napredak3-39804 .,
conv_2865 .

Divlja gradnja u sferi jezika

Rakić, Branko

(Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Rakić, Branko
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1300
AB  - Konstatujući da je društvena akcija u cilju postizanja što većeg stepena ravnopravnosti između muškaraca i žena potrebna i korisna, autor dovodi u pitanje valjanost pristupa iz nedavno usvojenog Zakona o rodnoj ravnopravnosti koji nastoji da rodnu ravnopravnost uspostavlja, uz ostalo, prisilnom intervencijom u sferi jezika, kroz nametanje primene tzv. "rodno osetljivog jezika". Pored toga što ovakav pristup teško da bi mogao da zaista doprinese ravnopravnosti, prisilna intervencija u sferi jezika predstavlja povredu jezika kao segmenta nematerijalnog kulturnog nasleđa, što je suprotno Ustavu Republike Srbije i nizu međunarodnopravnih akata. Srećom, odredbe Zakona o rodnoj ravnopravnosti koje se odnose na primenu rodno osetljivog jezika su u toj meri neprecizne, nejasne i pune unutrašnjih kontradiktornosti da se može konstatovati da su neprimenjive.
AB  - Stating that social action aimed at achieving a higher degree of equality between men and women is necessary and useful, the author questions the validity of the approach in the recently adopted Law on Gender Equality that tries to establish gender equality, among other things, by forced intervention in the language sphere, through imposing the application of the so-called "gender-sensitive language". Despite the fact that such an approach could hardly contribute to actual equality, this forced intervention in the language sphere is the violation of the language as a segment of intangible cultural heritage, which is contrary to the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia and a number of international acts. Fortunately, the provisions of the Law on Gender Equality regarding the application of gender-sensitive language are inaccurate, unclear and full of internal contradictions to such an extent that it can be said that they are not applicable.
PB  - Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Sociološki pregled
T1  - Divlja gradnja u sferi jezika
T1  - Illegal construction in the language sphere
EP  - 805
IS  - 3
SP  - 771
VL  - 55
DO  - 10.5937/socpreg55-34110
UR  - conv_1262
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Rakić, Branko",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Konstatujući da je društvena akcija u cilju postizanja što većeg stepena ravnopravnosti između muškaraca i žena potrebna i korisna, autor dovodi u pitanje valjanost pristupa iz nedavno usvojenog Zakona o rodnoj ravnopravnosti koji nastoji da rodnu ravnopravnost uspostavlja, uz ostalo, prisilnom intervencijom u sferi jezika, kroz nametanje primene tzv. "rodno osetljivog jezika". Pored toga što ovakav pristup teško da bi mogao da zaista doprinese ravnopravnosti, prisilna intervencija u sferi jezika predstavlja povredu jezika kao segmenta nematerijalnog kulturnog nasleđa, što je suprotno Ustavu Republike Srbije i nizu međunarodnopravnih akata. Srećom, odredbe Zakona o rodnoj ravnopravnosti koje se odnose na primenu rodno osetljivog jezika su u toj meri neprecizne, nejasne i pune unutrašnjih kontradiktornosti da se može konstatovati da su neprimenjive., Stating that social action aimed at achieving a higher degree of equality between men and women is necessary and useful, the author questions the validity of the approach in the recently adopted Law on Gender Equality that tries to establish gender equality, among other things, by forced intervention in the language sphere, through imposing the application of the so-called "gender-sensitive language". Despite the fact that such an approach could hardly contribute to actual equality, this forced intervention in the language sphere is the violation of the language as a segment of intangible cultural heritage, which is contrary to the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia and a number of international acts. Fortunately, the provisions of the Law on Gender Equality regarding the application of gender-sensitive language are inaccurate, unclear and full of internal contradictions to such an extent that it can be said that they are not applicable.",
publisher = "Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Sociološki pregled",
title = "Divlja gradnja u sferi jezika, Illegal construction in the language sphere",
pages = "805-771",
number = "3",
volume = "55",
doi = "10.5937/socpreg55-34110",
url = "conv_1262"
}
Rakić, B.. (2021). Divlja gradnja u sferi jezika. in Sociološki pregled
Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd., 55(3), 771-805.
https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg55-34110
conv_1262
Rakić B. Divlja gradnja u sferi jezika. in Sociološki pregled. 2021;55(3):771-805.
doi:10.5937/socpreg55-34110
conv_1262 .
Rakić, Branko, "Divlja gradnja u sferi jezika" in Sociološki pregled, 55, no. 3 (2021):771-805,
https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg55-34110 .,
conv_1262 .
2

Kulturno nasleđe - pravo, identitet i dostojanstvo - pravo na pristup kulturnom nasleđu i na uživanje kulturnog nasleđa kao ljudsko pravo

Rakić, Branko

(Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Rakić, Branko
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1202
AB  - U međunarodnom pravu ljudskih prava uspostavljenom nakon Drugog svetskog rata, kao jedno od kulturnih prava, tradicionalno najzapostavljenije od pet kategorija ljudskih prava (građanska, politička, ekonomska, socijalna i kulturna prava), figurira i pravo na učešće u kulturnom životu, a njegov segment po prirodi stvari je i pravo na pristup kulturnom nasleđu i uživanje kulturnog nasleđa. Iako je međunarodnom pravu ljudskih prava tako uspostavljen osnov za tretiranje prava na pristup kulturnom nasleđu i uživanje kulturnog nasleđa kao ljudskog prava, u međunarodnopravnim aktima koji se bave pitanjem zaštite kulturnog nasleđa dugo je preovladavao pristup kod koga su kulturna dobra štićena zbog njihove inherentne vrednosti. Tek je od nedavno, i to sa pojavom potrebe i interesovanja da se očuva kulturna raznovrsnost i da se štiti nematerijalno kulturno nasleđe, počela da se naglašava veza, pa i pravna veza, između kulturnog nasleđa i ljudskih zajednica, grupa i pojedinaca sa posebnim subjektivnim odnosom prema njemu. Tako se postepeno uspostavlja na ljudskim pravima zasnovan sistem zaštite kulturnog nasleđa i dolazi do približavanja onog segmenta međunarodnog prava koji se bavi ljudskim pravima sa onim segmentom koji se bavi kulturnim nasleđem. Da bi se neko pravo smatralo ljudskim pravom, pored volje kreatora prava da tako bude, neophodno je i postojanje određenih vrednosti koje predstavljaju osnov za to i koje bi trebalo da se štite kroz zaštitu tog ljudskog prava. Iz niza međunarodnopravnih akata proističe a u teoriji je široko rasprostranjeno shvatanje da, kada se radi o kulturnim pravima, uključujući i pravo na pristup kulturnom nasleđu i uživanje kulturnog nasleđa, takav osnov predstavljaju identitet, pre svega kulturni identitet, i ljudsko dostojanstvo. Iako je, dakle, postavljen osnov da se pravo na pristup kulturnom nasleđu i uživanje kulturnog nasleđa tretira kao ljudsko pravo, neophodno je da se razjasni i na pravnom planu razradi niz pitanja koja bi trebalo da omoguće efektivno uživanje navedenog prava. Taj zadatak je u rukama država, bilo kao učesnicima u usvajanju akata međunarodnog prava bilo kao kreatorima nacionalnog prava, pa ostaje otvoreno pitanje kakav će biti njihov stav prema daljem razvoju na ljudskim pravima zasnovanog sistema zaštite kulturnog nasleđa.
AB  - In international human rights law established after World War Two, one of cultural rights that has been traditionally most neglected out of five categories of human rights (civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights), is the right to participation in cultural life, while its segment, by the nature of things, is also the right of access to and enjoyment of cultural heritage. Although international human rights law thus establishes the basis for treating the right of access to and enjoyment of cultural heritage as a human right, international acts dealing with the matters of cultural heritage protection have had a long-prevailing approach in which cultural goods were protected because of their inherent value. It was only recently, with the emerging needs and interests in respect of the safeguarding of cultural diversity and protection of intangible cultural heritage, that the emphasis began to be placed on the relationship, including the legal one, between cultural heritage and human communities, groups and individuals with a special subjective attitude towards it. That is how the human-rights based system of cultural heritage protection was gradually established and the segment of international law dealing with human rights was brought closer to the segment dealing with cultural heritage. In order to consider a right as a human right, apart from the will of law-makers to be like that, it also requires the existence of certain values which constitute the basis for it and which should be safeguarded through the protection of that human right. An understanding deriving from a series of international legal acts and being widespread in theory is that, when it comes to cultural rights, including the right of access to and enjoyment of cultural heritage, such basis is constituted by identity, first of all cultural identity, and human dignity. Therefore, although the foundation is laid for the right of access to and enjoyment of cultural heritage to be treated as a human right, it is necessary to clarify and elaborate, at the legal level, a number of questions which should ensure effective enjoyment of this right. The task is in the hands of states, either as participants in the adoption of international law acts or as national law-makers, so the question remains open as to the nature of their attitude to further development of the human-rights based system of cultural heritage protection.
PB  - Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Sociološki pregled
T1  - Kulturno nasleđe - pravo, identitet i dostojanstvo - pravo na pristup kulturnom nasleđu i na uživanje kulturnog nasleđa kao ljudsko pravo
T1  - Cultural heritage: Right, identity and dignity: Right of access to and enjoyment of cultural heritage as a human right
EP  - 1259
IS  - 4
SP  - 1210
VL  - 54
DO  - 10.5937/socpreg54-30009
UR  - conv_1260
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Rakić, Branko",
year = "2020",
abstract = "U međunarodnom pravu ljudskih prava uspostavljenom nakon Drugog svetskog rata, kao jedno od kulturnih prava, tradicionalno najzapostavljenije od pet kategorija ljudskih prava (građanska, politička, ekonomska, socijalna i kulturna prava), figurira i pravo na učešće u kulturnom životu, a njegov segment po prirodi stvari je i pravo na pristup kulturnom nasleđu i uživanje kulturnog nasleđa. Iako je međunarodnom pravu ljudskih prava tako uspostavljen osnov za tretiranje prava na pristup kulturnom nasleđu i uživanje kulturnog nasleđa kao ljudskog prava, u međunarodnopravnim aktima koji se bave pitanjem zaštite kulturnog nasleđa dugo je preovladavao pristup kod koga su kulturna dobra štićena zbog njihove inherentne vrednosti. Tek je od nedavno, i to sa pojavom potrebe i interesovanja da se očuva kulturna raznovrsnost i da se štiti nematerijalno kulturno nasleđe, počela da se naglašava veza, pa i pravna veza, između kulturnog nasleđa i ljudskih zajednica, grupa i pojedinaca sa posebnim subjektivnim odnosom prema njemu. Tako se postepeno uspostavlja na ljudskim pravima zasnovan sistem zaštite kulturnog nasleđa i dolazi do približavanja onog segmenta međunarodnog prava koji se bavi ljudskim pravima sa onim segmentom koji se bavi kulturnim nasleđem. Da bi se neko pravo smatralo ljudskim pravom, pored volje kreatora prava da tako bude, neophodno je i postojanje određenih vrednosti koje predstavljaju osnov za to i koje bi trebalo da se štite kroz zaštitu tog ljudskog prava. Iz niza međunarodnopravnih akata proističe a u teoriji je široko rasprostranjeno shvatanje da, kada se radi o kulturnim pravima, uključujući i pravo na pristup kulturnom nasleđu i uživanje kulturnog nasleđa, takav osnov predstavljaju identitet, pre svega kulturni identitet, i ljudsko dostojanstvo. Iako je, dakle, postavljen osnov da se pravo na pristup kulturnom nasleđu i uživanje kulturnog nasleđa tretira kao ljudsko pravo, neophodno je da se razjasni i na pravnom planu razradi niz pitanja koja bi trebalo da omoguće efektivno uživanje navedenog prava. Taj zadatak je u rukama država, bilo kao učesnicima u usvajanju akata međunarodnog prava bilo kao kreatorima nacionalnog prava, pa ostaje otvoreno pitanje kakav će biti njihov stav prema daljem razvoju na ljudskim pravima zasnovanog sistema zaštite kulturnog nasleđa., In international human rights law established after World War Two, one of cultural rights that has been traditionally most neglected out of five categories of human rights (civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights), is the right to participation in cultural life, while its segment, by the nature of things, is also the right of access to and enjoyment of cultural heritage. Although international human rights law thus establishes the basis for treating the right of access to and enjoyment of cultural heritage as a human right, international acts dealing with the matters of cultural heritage protection have had a long-prevailing approach in which cultural goods were protected because of their inherent value. It was only recently, with the emerging needs and interests in respect of the safeguarding of cultural diversity and protection of intangible cultural heritage, that the emphasis began to be placed on the relationship, including the legal one, between cultural heritage and human communities, groups and individuals with a special subjective attitude towards it. That is how the human-rights based system of cultural heritage protection was gradually established and the segment of international law dealing with human rights was brought closer to the segment dealing with cultural heritage. In order to consider a right as a human right, apart from the will of law-makers to be like that, it also requires the existence of certain values which constitute the basis for it and which should be safeguarded through the protection of that human right. An understanding deriving from a series of international legal acts and being widespread in theory is that, when it comes to cultural rights, including the right of access to and enjoyment of cultural heritage, such basis is constituted by identity, first of all cultural identity, and human dignity. Therefore, although the foundation is laid for the right of access to and enjoyment of cultural heritage to be treated as a human right, it is necessary to clarify and elaborate, at the legal level, a number of questions which should ensure effective enjoyment of this right. The task is in the hands of states, either as participants in the adoption of international law acts or as national law-makers, so the question remains open as to the nature of their attitude to further development of the human-rights based system of cultural heritage protection.",
publisher = "Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Sociološki pregled",
title = "Kulturno nasleđe - pravo, identitet i dostojanstvo - pravo na pristup kulturnom nasleđu i na uživanje kulturnog nasleđa kao ljudsko pravo, Cultural heritage: Right, identity and dignity: Right of access to and enjoyment of cultural heritage as a human right",
pages = "1259-1210",
number = "4",
volume = "54",
doi = "10.5937/socpreg54-30009",
url = "conv_1260"
}
Rakić, B.. (2020). Kulturno nasleđe - pravo, identitet i dostojanstvo - pravo na pristup kulturnom nasleđu i na uživanje kulturnog nasleđa kao ljudsko pravo. in Sociološki pregled
Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd., 54(4), 1210-1259.
https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg54-30009
conv_1260
Rakić B. Kulturno nasleđe - pravo, identitet i dostojanstvo - pravo na pristup kulturnom nasleđu i na uživanje kulturnog nasleđa kao ljudsko pravo. in Sociološki pregled. 2020;54(4):1210-1259.
doi:10.5937/socpreg54-30009
conv_1260 .
Rakić, Branko, "Kulturno nasleđe - pravo, identitet i dostojanstvo - pravo na pristup kulturnom nasleđu i na uživanje kulturnog nasleđa kao ljudsko pravo" in Sociološki pregled, 54, no. 4 (2020):1210-1259,
https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg54-30009 .,
conv_1260 .
1

Genocid i etničko čišćenje ili o odnosu dispozicije jednog međunarodno-krivičnog dela i jednog sociološko-politikološkog pojma

Šuvaković, Uroš V.; Rakić, Branko

(Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd, 2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Šuvaković, Uroš V.
AU  - Rakić, Branko
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/951
AB  - U radu se analizira pojmovno određenje krivičnog dela genocida, shodno Konvenciji OUN i Lempkinovom shvatanju ovog pojma, a zatim vrši komparacija sa pojmom etničkog čišćenja. Ukazuje se na to da genocid jeste krivično delo, najteži mogući zločin, ali da etničko čišćenje nije zločin, pošto nije pravni, već sociološko-politikološki pojam. Svakako, detaljnom analizom ovog pojma, ukazuje se da elementi iz kojih se on obično sadrži (npr. ratni zločini, masakri, prinudne deportacije) predstavljaju svaki ponaosob neko od krivičnih dela iz oblasti međunarodnog krivičnog prava. Istovremeno, ukazuje se i na moguće razloge zbog kojih nikada nije kodifikovano kumulativno krivično delo - etničko čišćenje.
AB  - Genocide is the most severe criminal act in the international law that is determined by the Genocide Convention; there is no criminal act that is legally codified as ethnic cleansing, but it is a media and sociological-political science concept that, starting from the '80s of the 20th century, collectively implicate large number of individually codified crimes that are determined in the international criminal legislation as crimes against humanity and war crimes. According to Lemkin, the concept of genocide is significantly wider even in regard to the concept of ethnic cleansing, since it implicates a wide scale of measures committed against a national minority, with intent to destroy it, considering not only biological and physical destruction, but including them also. In any case, there must be a dolus specialis, which according to Lemkin consists of destroying one national group in various aspects of its identity, while according to the Genocide Convention it consists exclusively of physical and biological extermination of a national, ethnic, racial or religious group. Ethnic cleansing, as comprehended in sociological-political science interpretations, primarily denotes forced actions with the aim of creating ethnical monolithic territories. The actions are not directed to physical and biological extermination of an 'undesirable ethnic group' in a territory, but as forced actions are directed to the leaving of the territory and may implicate also war crimes and crimes against humanity, but cannot be reduced only to them. In that sense, dolus specialis would be creation of an ethnically homogenous territory and this would make a difference from the genocide if this concept were legally codified. Besides, ethnic cleansing must be connected with the concept of ethnic group.
PB  - Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
T2  - Strani pravni život
T1  - Genocid i etničko čišćenje ili o odnosu dispozicije jednog međunarodno-krivičnog dela i jednog sociološko-politikološkog pojma
T1  - Genocide and ethnic cleansing or about disposition relation between one international-criminal act and one sociological-political science concept
EP  - 75
IS  - 2
SP  - 59
UR  - conv_1174
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Šuvaković, Uroš V. and Rakić, Branko",
year = "2017",
abstract = "U radu se analizira pojmovno određenje krivičnog dela genocida, shodno Konvenciji OUN i Lempkinovom shvatanju ovog pojma, a zatim vrši komparacija sa pojmom etničkog čišćenja. Ukazuje se na to da genocid jeste krivično delo, najteži mogući zločin, ali da etničko čišćenje nije zločin, pošto nije pravni, već sociološko-politikološki pojam. Svakako, detaljnom analizom ovog pojma, ukazuje se da elementi iz kojih se on obično sadrži (npr. ratni zločini, masakri, prinudne deportacije) predstavljaju svaki ponaosob neko od krivičnih dela iz oblasti međunarodnog krivičnog prava. Istovremeno, ukazuje se i na moguće razloge zbog kojih nikada nije kodifikovano kumulativno krivično delo - etničko čišćenje., Genocide is the most severe criminal act in the international law that is determined by the Genocide Convention; there is no criminal act that is legally codified as ethnic cleansing, but it is a media and sociological-political science concept that, starting from the '80s of the 20th century, collectively implicate large number of individually codified crimes that are determined in the international criminal legislation as crimes against humanity and war crimes. According to Lemkin, the concept of genocide is significantly wider even in regard to the concept of ethnic cleansing, since it implicates a wide scale of measures committed against a national minority, with intent to destroy it, considering not only biological and physical destruction, but including them also. In any case, there must be a dolus specialis, which according to Lemkin consists of destroying one national group in various aspects of its identity, while according to the Genocide Convention it consists exclusively of physical and biological extermination of a national, ethnic, racial or religious group. Ethnic cleansing, as comprehended in sociological-political science interpretations, primarily denotes forced actions with the aim of creating ethnical monolithic territories. The actions are not directed to physical and biological extermination of an 'undesirable ethnic group' in a territory, but as forced actions are directed to the leaving of the territory and may implicate also war crimes and crimes against humanity, but cannot be reduced only to them. In that sense, dolus specialis would be creation of an ethnically homogenous territory and this would make a difference from the genocide if this concept were legally codified. Besides, ethnic cleansing must be connected with the concept of ethnic group.",
publisher = "Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd",
journal = "Strani pravni život",
title = "Genocid i etničko čišćenje ili o odnosu dispozicije jednog međunarodno-krivičnog dela i jednog sociološko-politikološkog pojma, Genocide and ethnic cleansing or about disposition relation between one international-criminal act and one sociological-political science concept",
pages = "75-59",
number = "2",
url = "conv_1174"
}
Šuvaković, U. V.,& Rakić, B.. (2017). Genocid i etničko čišćenje ili o odnosu dispozicije jednog međunarodno-krivičnog dela i jednog sociološko-politikološkog pojma. in Strani pravni život
Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd.(2), 59-75.
conv_1174
Šuvaković UV, Rakić B. Genocid i etničko čišćenje ili o odnosu dispozicije jednog međunarodno-krivičnog dela i jednog sociološko-politikološkog pojma. in Strani pravni život. 2017;(2):59-75.
conv_1174 .
Šuvaković, Uroš V., Rakić, Branko, "Genocid i etničko čišćenje ili o odnosu dispozicije jednog međunarodno-krivičnog dela i jednog sociološko-politikološkog pojma" in Strani pravni život, no. 2 (2017):59-75,
conv_1174 .

'Univerzitet u prirodi' - mesto učenja održivog razvoja

Rakić, Branko

(Univerzitet u Nišu, Niš, 2014)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Rakić, Branko
PY  - 2014
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/760
AB  - U ovom radu predstavljen je Projekat 'Univerzitet u prirodi- Univerziteta u Beogradu, koji se uspostavlja na području Rezervata biosfere Golija-Studenica, Parka prirode Golija i vazdušne banje Ivanjica. Projekat ne bi trebalo da se ograniči samo na Univerzitet u Beogradu, već bi trebalo da obuhvati, ili u srodne projekte u mreži, i druge univerzitete u Srbiji. Univerzitet u prirodi bi mogao da pruži značajan doprinos održivom razvoju područja na kome će funkcionisati, ali istovremeno on treba da bude mesto, s jedne strane, za naučno istraživanje različitih aspekata održivog razvoja i, s druge strane, za 'obrazovanje za održivi razvoj'. Univerzitet u prirodi bi trebalo da pruži doprinos modernizacii rada na Univerzitetu u Beogradu, a nadamo se i na drugim univerzitetima koji bi se priključili. On se uklapa u savremenu tendenciju uspostavljanja modela društveno angažovanog univerziteta.
AB  - This paper presents the project 'University in Nature' by the University of Belgrade, which is being established on the territory of the Golija-Studenica Biosphere Reserve, Nature Park Golija, and air spa Ivanjica. The project should not be limited to the University of Belgrade, but should encompass other universities in Serbia by their inclusion either in this project or in similar projects. The University in Nature could provide a significant contribution to sustainable development of the area in which it will operate, but it should simultaneously provide the opportunity, on the one hand, for scientific study of various aspects of sustainable development and, on the other hand, for 'Education for Sustainable Development'. The University in Nature should contribute to the modernization of work at the University of Belgrade and, hopefully, at other universities in Serbia. It fits into the modern tendency towards establishing socially engaged universities.
PB  - Univerzitet u Nišu, Niš
T2  - Teme
T1  - 'Univerzitet u prirodi' - mesto učenja održivog razvoja
T1  - 'University in nature': A place for learning about sustainable development
EP  - 1838
IS  - 4
SP  - 1817
VL  - 38
UR  - conv_1784
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Rakić, Branko",
year = "2014",
abstract = "U ovom radu predstavljen je Projekat 'Univerzitet u prirodi- Univerziteta u Beogradu, koji se uspostavlja na području Rezervata biosfere Golija-Studenica, Parka prirode Golija i vazdušne banje Ivanjica. Projekat ne bi trebalo da se ograniči samo na Univerzitet u Beogradu, već bi trebalo da obuhvati, ili u srodne projekte u mreži, i druge univerzitete u Srbiji. Univerzitet u prirodi bi mogao da pruži značajan doprinos održivom razvoju područja na kome će funkcionisati, ali istovremeno on treba da bude mesto, s jedne strane, za naučno istraživanje različitih aspekata održivog razvoja i, s druge strane, za 'obrazovanje za održivi razvoj'. Univerzitet u prirodi bi trebalo da pruži doprinos modernizacii rada na Univerzitetu u Beogradu, a nadamo se i na drugim univerzitetima koji bi se priključili. On se uklapa u savremenu tendenciju uspostavljanja modela društveno angažovanog univerziteta., This paper presents the project 'University in Nature' by the University of Belgrade, which is being established on the territory of the Golija-Studenica Biosphere Reserve, Nature Park Golija, and air spa Ivanjica. The project should not be limited to the University of Belgrade, but should encompass other universities in Serbia by their inclusion either in this project or in similar projects. The University in Nature could provide a significant contribution to sustainable development of the area in which it will operate, but it should simultaneously provide the opportunity, on the one hand, for scientific study of various aspects of sustainable development and, on the other hand, for 'Education for Sustainable Development'. The University in Nature should contribute to the modernization of work at the University of Belgrade and, hopefully, at other universities in Serbia. It fits into the modern tendency towards establishing socially engaged universities.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Nišu, Niš",
journal = "Teme",
title = "'Univerzitet u prirodi' - mesto učenja održivog razvoja, 'University in nature': A place for learning about sustainable development",
pages = "1838-1817",
number = "4",
volume = "38",
url = "conv_1784"
}
Rakić, B.. (2014). 'Univerzitet u prirodi' - mesto učenja održivog razvoja. in Teme
Univerzitet u Nišu, Niš., 38(4), 1817-1838.
conv_1784
Rakić B. 'Univerzitet u prirodi' - mesto učenja održivog razvoja. in Teme. 2014;38(4):1817-1838.
conv_1784 .
Rakić, Branko, "'Univerzitet u prirodi' - mesto učenja održivog razvoja" in Teme, 38, no. 4 (2014):1817-1838,
conv_1784 .

O smislu 'saradnje' ili 'dijaloga' između Suda pravde EU i sudova država članica

Rakić, Branko

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2013)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Rakić, Branko
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/685
AB  - U okviru sistema pravnih sredstava i postupaka pred Sudom pravde EU, postupak rešavanja o prethodnom pitanju ima posebno mesto, kako zbog svoje atipičnosti, tako i zbog izuzetnog doprinosa uniformnom tumačenju i primeni i razvoju komunitarnog prava. U odsustvu hijerarhijske nadređenosti Suda pravde EU, a s ciljem obezbeđenja uniformnog tumačenja i primene komunitarnog prava u svim državama članicama, putem ovog postupka uspostavlja se 'saradnja' ili ' dijalog ' između nacionalnih i evropskih sudija. Atipičnost ovog postupka rezultat je atipičnih svojstava komunitarnog pravnog poretka i, posebno, integrisanosti komunitarnog pravnog poretka u pravne poretke država članica. Uprkos lutanju sudske prakse Suda pravde EU kod uspostavljanja valjanih okvira i pravila svog postupanja kod ove vrste postupka, postupak odlučivanja o prethodnom pitanju pred Sudom pravde EU je široko prihvaćen od nacionalnih sudova, a veliki broj najznačajnijih presuda Suda pravde donet je upravo u tom postupku.
AB  - Within the system of legal proceedings before the Court of Justice of the EU, the preliminary ruling procedure has a special place because of its atypical nature and because of its exceptional contribution to uniform interpretation and application as well as to development of the EU law. In the absence of hierarchical superiority of the Court of Justice of the EU over the national courts, this procedure establishes 'cooperation' or 'dialogue' between national judges on one side and European judges on the other in order to ensure uniform interpretation and application of Community law in all Member States. Atypical character of this procedure is the result of atypical characteristics of the EU legal system and, in particular, of the fact that that legal system is an integral part of the legal system of the Member States. Despite some apparent ramblings and inconsistencies of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU in establishing valid framework and rules of conduct in this type of procedure, the preliminary ruling procedure before the Court of Justice of the EU has been widely accepted by national courts and a large number of the most important judgments of the Court of Justice was adopted precisely in this type of procedure.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - O smislu 'saradnje' ili 'dijaloga' između Suda pravde EU i sudova država članica
T1  - The meaning of 'cooperation' or 'dialogue' between the Court of Justice of the EU and National Courts of the EU member states
EP  - 91
IS  - 2
SP  - 69
VL  - 61
UR  - conv_298
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Rakić, Branko",
year = "2013",
abstract = "U okviru sistema pravnih sredstava i postupaka pred Sudom pravde EU, postupak rešavanja o prethodnom pitanju ima posebno mesto, kako zbog svoje atipičnosti, tako i zbog izuzetnog doprinosa uniformnom tumačenju i primeni i razvoju komunitarnog prava. U odsustvu hijerarhijske nadređenosti Suda pravde EU, a s ciljem obezbeđenja uniformnog tumačenja i primene komunitarnog prava u svim državama članicama, putem ovog postupka uspostavlja se 'saradnja' ili ' dijalog ' između nacionalnih i evropskih sudija. Atipičnost ovog postupka rezultat je atipičnih svojstava komunitarnog pravnog poretka i, posebno, integrisanosti komunitarnog pravnog poretka u pravne poretke država članica. Uprkos lutanju sudske prakse Suda pravde EU kod uspostavljanja valjanih okvira i pravila svog postupanja kod ove vrste postupka, postupak odlučivanja o prethodnom pitanju pred Sudom pravde EU je široko prihvaćen od nacionalnih sudova, a veliki broj najznačajnijih presuda Suda pravde donet je upravo u tom postupku., Within the system of legal proceedings before the Court of Justice of the EU, the preliminary ruling procedure has a special place because of its atypical nature and because of its exceptional contribution to uniform interpretation and application as well as to development of the EU law. In the absence of hierarchical superiority of the Court of Justice of the EU over the national courts, this procedure establishes 'cooperation' or 'dialogue' between national judges on one side and European judges on the other in order to ensure uniform interpretation and application of Community law in all Member States. Atypical character of this procedure is the result of atypical characteristics of the EU legal system and, in particular, of the fact that that legal system is an integral part of the legal system of the Member States. Despite some apparent ramblings and inconsistencies of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU in establishing valid framework and rules of conduct in this type of procedure, the preliminary ruling procedure before the Court of Justice of the EU has been widely accepted by national courts and a large number of the most important judgments of the Court of Justice was adopted precisely in this type of procedure.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "O smislu 'saradnje' ili 'dijaloga' između Suda pravde EU i sudova država članica, The meaning of 'cooperation' or 'dialogue' between the Court of Justice of the EU and National Courts of the EU member states",
pages = "91-69",
number = "2",
volume = "61",
url = "conv_298"
}
Rakić, B.. (2013). O smislu 'saradnje' ili 'dijaloga' između Suda pravde EU i sudova država članica. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 61(2), 69-91.
conv_298
Rakić B. O smislu 'saradnje' ili 'dijaloga' između Suda pravde EU i sudova država članica. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2013;61(2):69-91.
conv_298 .
Rakić, Branko, "O smislu 'saradnje' ili 'dijaloga' između Suda pravde EU i sudova država članica" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 61, no. 2 (2013):69-91,
conv_298 .

Fragmentacija međunarodnog prava i evropsko pravo - na zapadu nešto novo

Rakić, Branko

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2009)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Rakić, Branko
PY  - 2009
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/432
AB  - Međunarodno pravo se još od početka međunarodnog organizovanja susreće s problemom sopstvene fragmentacije, ali taj proces dostiže dramatične razmere u novije vreme, što je nateralo i Komisiju za međunarodno pravo da se pozabavi tim pitanjem. Među pravnim porecima koji imaju svoje poreklo u međunarodnom ugovoru, te se makar po tom osnovu mogu smatrati delom međunarodnog prava, posebnu poziciju ima komunitarni pravni poredak, kao osobeni pravni poredak sa dostignutim visokim stepenom konstitucionalizacije. Ipak, posmatrano kako iz međunarodnopravne, tako i iz komunitarne perspektive, postoji primat međunarodnog prava, a pre svega prava izgrađenog na osnovu Povelje UN, u odnosu na komunitarno pravo. Taj primat je u svojoj sudskoj praksi potvrđivao i Sud pravde Evropskih zajednica. Međutim postupajući u postupku zbog kršenja osnovnih prava zagarantovanih u komunitarnom pravnom poretku putem mera usvojenih u antiterorističkoj borbi od strane Saveta bezbednosti UN i implementiranih od strane komunitarnih organa, Sud pravde Evropskih zajednica je konstatovao da ustavne garancije osnovnih prava sadržane u komunitarnom pravu, kao autonomnom pravnom sistemu ne smeju biti dovedene u pitanje bilo kojim međunarodnim sporazumom, pa čak ni Poveljom UN i rezolucijama Saveta bezbednosti usvojenim na osnovu Glave VII Povelje, pa je poništio osporenu uredbu Saveta EU usvojenu radi primene odgovarajućih rezolucija Saveta bezbednosti. Autor kritikuje naglašeno dualistički (pluralistički) stav Suda.
AB  - International law has been facing the problem of its own fragmentation from the early stages of international organizing at the dawn of 20th century. The process of globalization has a tendency to unify social phenomena on a world scale. Nevertheless, the practice of diversification of international organizations, based on both regional and substantial criteria, creates great tensions. The tension due to such expansion has been growing both vertically i.e. between the general international law and the particular international laws; and horizontally, i.e. among diverse particular legal systems. In the year 2006, subsequent to frequent warnings from the high-ranking international officials and scholars alike, the UN International Law Commission was propelled to produce and submit to the General Assembly a report on the abovementioned issue ('Koskenniemi Report').
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Fragmentacija međunarodnog prava i evropsko pravo - na zapadu nešto novo
T1  - Fragmentation of international law and European law: Something new on the western front
EP  - 147
IS  - 1
SP  - 122
VL  - 57
UR  - conv_147
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Rakić, Branko",
year = "2009",
abstract = "Međunarodno pravo se još od početka međunarodnog organizovanja susreće s problemom sopstvene fragmentacije, ali taj proces dostiže dramatične razmere u novije vreme, što je nateralo i Komisiju za međunarodno pravo da se pozabavi tim pitanjem. Među pravnim porecima koji imaju svoje poreklo u međunarodnom ugovoru, te se makar po tom osnovu mogu smatrati delom međunarodnog prava, posebnu poziciju ima komunitarni pravni poredak, kao osobeni pravni poredak sa dostignutim visokim stepenom konstitucionalizacije. Ipak, posmatrano kako iz međunarodnopravne, tako i iz komunitarne perspektive, postoji primat međunarodnog prava, a pre svega prava izgrađenog na osnovu Povelje UN, u odnosu na komunitarno pravo. Taj primat je u svojoj sudskoj praksi potvrđivao i Sud pravde Evropskih zajednica. Međutim postupajući u postupku zbog kršenja osnovnih prava zagarantovanih u komunitarnom pravnom poretku putem mera usvojenih u antiterorističkoj borbi od strane Saveta bezbednosti UN i implementiranih od strane komunitarnih organa, Sud pravde Evropskih zajednica je konstatovao da ustavne garancije osnovnih prava sadržane u komunitarnom pravu, kao autonomnom pravnom sistemu ne smeju biti dovedene u pitanje bilo kojim međunarodnim sporazumom, pa čak ni Poveljom UN i rezolucijama Saveta bezbednosti usvojenim na osnovu Glave VII Povelje, pa je poništio osporenu uredbu Saveta EU usvojenu radi primene odgovarajućih rezolucija Saveta bezbednosti. Autor kritikuje naglašeno dualistički (pluralistički) stav Suda., International law has been facing the problem of its own fragmentation from the early stages of international organizing at the dawn of 20th century. The process of globalization has a tendency to unify social phenomena on a world scale. Nevertheless, the practice of diversification of international organizations, based on both regional and substantial criteria, creates great tensions. The tension due to such expansion has been growing both vertically i.e. between the general international law and the particular international laws; and horizontally, i.e. among diverse particular legal systems. In the year 2006, subsequent to frequent warnings from the high-ranking international officials and scholars alike, the UN International Law Commission was propelled to produce and submit to the General Assembly a report on the abovementioned issue ('Koskenniemi Report').",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Fragmentacija međunarodnog prava i evropsko pravo - na zapadu nešto novo, Fragmentation of international law and European law: Something new on the western front",
pages = "147-122",
number = "1",
volume = "57",
url = "conv_147"
}
Rakić, B.. (2009). Fragmentacija međunarodnog prava i evropsko pravo - na zapadu nešto novo. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 57(1), 122-147.
conv_147
Rakić B. Fragmentacija međunarodnog prava i evropsko pravo - na zapadu nešto novo. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2009;57(1):122-147.
conv_147 .
Rakić, Branko, "Fragmentacija međunarodnog prava i evropsko pravo - na zapadu nešto novo" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 57, no. 1 (2009):122-147,
conv_147 .

Evropski sud pravde između ljudskih prava i borbe protiv terorizma - odnos međunarodnog i evropskog prava

Rakić, Branko

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd, 2009)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Rakić, Branko
PY  - 2009
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/430
AB  - U postupcima u slučajevima Kadi i Al Barakat, vođenim zbog kršenja osnovnih prava zagarantovanih u komunitarnom pravnom poretku putem mera usvojenih u antiterorističkoj borbi od strane Saveta bezbednosti UN i implementiranih od strane komunitarnih organa putem komunitarnih akata, Prvostepeni sud i Sud pravde Evropskih zajednica, u postupku po žalbi, zauzeli su suprotne stavove. Sud pravde Evropskih zajednica je u presudi donetoj u postupku po žalbi, konstatovao da ustavne garancije osnovnih prava sadržane u komunitarnom pravu, kao autonomnom pravnom sistemu, ne smeju biti dovedene u pitanje bilo kojim međunarodnim sporazumom, pa čak ni Poveljom UN i rezolucijama Saveta bezbednosti usvojenim na osnovu Glave VII Povelje. Stoga je on poništio osporenu uredbu Saveta EU usvojenu radi primene odgovarajućih rezolucija Saveta bezbednosti. Međutim, do istog rezultata, odstranjenja iz okvira komunitarnog sekundarnog prava akta kojim se krše navedena prava moglo se doći i bez suprotstavljanja, od strane Suda, komunitarnog prava i prava Ujedinjenih nacija. Jer ova dva pravna sistema počivaju na istim vrednostima i praktično ista ljudska prava su zagarantovana u oba sistema. I organi kako UN (uključujući i Savet bezbednosti, čak i kada postupa po Glavi VII Povelje) tako i EZ (EU), dužni su da poštuju ta osnovna prava. Razlika je samo u mehanizmima zaštite.
AB  - The antiterrorist campaign undertaken by the United Nations Security Council at the end of the last century, and the obligation of transposition of punitive measures against individuals and entities related to the Al-Qaeda network into the European Communities legal system, put once again the issue of relations between the international legal system (in particular the one under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter) and the European Communities legal system on the European Court of Justice agenda. In its judgments in the cases Kadi and Al Barakaat, the Court of First Instance confirmed, in 2005 the primacy of the United Nations law, refusing to carry out any, even indirect review of the United Nations Security Council resolutions in the light of fundamental rights guaranteed by the EC law and seeing exceptionally, jus cogens norms as the only standard of review to which it would allow itself recourse in this situation. Following in principle the remarks and suggestion given by the Advocate General Poiares Maduro in January 2008, the European Court of Justice, deciding on appeal in September 2008, gave primacy to the European 'constitutional tradition' including fundamental rights. The two judicial bodies adopted thus two opposite approaches. The Court of First Instance, had adopted an approach that some scholars (e.g. G. de Burca) qualified as 'a strong constitutionalist approach which was premised on the systemic unity of the international legal order and the regional European order, and on a hierarchy of legal authority within this integrated system', while the ECJ opted 'for a strong pluralist approach which presented the European Community as a separate and self-contained system which determines its relationship to the international order in accordance with its own internal values and priorities rather than in accordance with any common principles or norms of international law'. But the third way was possible; a way beyond the polarized alternatives the two judicial instances opted for. And that third way should have been based on the unity of values of the UN and the EC legal orders reflected in the conceptual unity of their norms concerning fundamental rights. Surprisingly both the Court of First Instance and the European Court of Justice omitted to refer to Art. 24 para. 2, which stipulates that in discharging its duties for the maintenance of international peace and security, the UNSC shall act in accordance with the Purposes and Principles of the UN. And the respect of fundamental rights constitutes a part of those objectives. Thus, the EC Judiciary missed the opportunity to conciliate the need to fight terrorism by strong punitive measures established on universal level and to respect human rights, the concept of which is based on the same values both on the UN and the EC levels.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Evropski sud pravde između ljudskih prava i borbe protiv terorizma - odnos međunarodnog i evropskog prava
T1  - European Court of Justice in between human rights and terrorism: Relationship between international and European law
EP  - 185
IS  - 2
SP  - 155
VL  - 57
UR  - conv_159
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Rakić, Branko",
year = "2009",
abstract = "U postupcima u slučajevima Kadi i Al Barakat, vođenim zbog kršenja osnovnih prava zagarantovanih u komunitarnom pravnom poretku putem mera usvojenih u antiterorističkoj borbi od strane Saveta bezbednosti UN i implementiranih od strane komunitarnih organa putem komunitarnih akata, Prvostepeni sud i Sud pravde Evropskih zajednica, u postupku po žalbi, zauzeli su suprotne stavove. Sud pravde Evropskih zajednica je u presudi donetoj u postupku po žalbi, konstatovao da ustavne garancije osnovnih prava sadržane u komunitarnom pravu, kao autonomnom pravnom sistemu, ne smeju biti dovedene u pitanje bilo kojim međunarodnim sporazumom, pa čak ni Poveljom UN i rezolucijama Saveta bezbednosti usvojenim na osnovu Glave VII Povelje. Stoga je on poništio osporenu uredbu Saveta EU usvojenu radi primene odgovarajućih rezolucija Saveta bezbednosti. Međutim, do istog rezultata, odstranjenja iz okvira komunitarnog sekundarnog prava akta kojim se krše navedena prava moglo se doći i bez suprotstavljanja, od strane Suda, komunitarnog prava i prava Ujedinjenih nacija. Jer ova dva pravna sistema počivaju na istim vrednostima i praktično ista ljudska prava su zagarantovana u oba sistema. I organi kako UN (uključujući i Savet bezbednosti, čak i kada postupa po Glavi VII Povelje) tako i EZ (EU), dužni su da poštuju ta osnovna prava. Razlika je samo u mehanizmima zaštite., The antiterrorist campaign undertaken by the United Nations Security Council at the end of the last century, and the obligation of transposition of punitive measures against individuals and entities related to the Al-Qaeda network into the European Communities legal system, put once again the issue of relations between the international legal system (in particular the one under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter) and the European Communities legal system on the European Court of Justice agenda. In its judgments in the cases Kadi and Al Barakaat, the Court of First Instance confirmed, in 2005 the primacy of the United Nations law, refusing to carry out any, even indirect review of the United Nations Security Council resolutions in the light of fundamental rights guaranteed by the EC law and seeing exceptionally, jus cogens norms as the only standard of review to which it would allow itself recourse in this situation. Following in principle the remarks and suggestion given by the Advocate General Poiares Maduro in January 2008, the European Court of Justice, deciding on appeal in September 2008, gave primacy to the European 'constitutional tradition' including fundamental rights. The two judicial bodies adopted thus two opposite approaches. The Court of First Instance, had adopted an approach that some scholars (e.g. G. de Burca) qualified as 'a strong constitutionalist approach which was premised on the systemic unity of the international legal order and the regional European order, and on a hierarchy of legal authority within this integrated system', while the ECJ opted 'for a strong pluralist approach which presented the European Community as a separate and self-contained system which determines its relationship to the international order in accordance with its own internal values and priorities rather than in accordance with any common principles or norms of international law'. But the third way was possible; a way beyond the polarized alternatives the two judicial instances opted for. And that third way should have been based on the unity of values of the UN and the EC legal orders reflected in the conceptual unity of their norms concerning fundamental rights. Surprisingly both the Court of First Instance and the European Court of Justice omitted to refer to Art. 24 para. 2, which stipulates that in discharging its duties for the maintenance of international peace and security, the UNSC shall act in accordance with the Purposes and Principles of the UN. And the respect of fundamental rights constitutes a part of those objectives. Thus, the EC Judiciary missed the opportunity to conciliate the need to fight terrorism by strong punitive measures established on universal level and to respect human rights, the concept of which is based on the same values both on the UN and the EC levels.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Evropski sud pravde između ljudskih prava i borbe protiv terorizma - odnos međunarodnog i evropskog prava, European Court of Justice in between human rights and terrorism: Relationship between international and European law",
pages = "185-155",
number = "2",
volume = "57",
url = "conv_159"
}
Rakić, B.. (2009). Evropski sud pravde između ljudskih prava i borbe protiv terorizma - odnos međunarodnog i evropskog prava. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 57(2), 155-185.
conv_159
Rakić B. Evropski sud pravde između ljudskih prava i borbe protiv terorizma - odnos međunarodnog i evropskog prava. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2009;57(2):155-185.
conv_159 .
Rakić, Branko, "Evropski sud pravde između ljudskih prava i borbe protiv terorizma - odnos međunarodnog i evropskog prava" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 57, no. 2 (2009):155-185,
conv_159 .