TY  - JOUR
AU  - Gajić, Aleksandar
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1386
AB  - U ovom radu autor razmatra pitanja vezana za prirodu i status Specijalizovanih veća i Specijalizovanog tužilaštva Kosova čije osnivanje je projektovano od Evropske unije (u oblasti spoljne i bezbednosne politike) i sprovedeno putem instrumentarija tzv. Republike Kosovo uz punu logističku i finansijsku podršku Evropske unije. Po prirodi stvari, imajući u vidu da se bavi ključnim događajima iz perioda 1998-2000.godine, ove pravosudne institucije će se nužno baviti pravnim kvalifikacijama i statusom glavnih učesnika u sukobima na teritoriji Kosova i Metohije. Pravni i institucionalni okvir koji je nastao formiranjem Specijalizovanih veća i Specijalizovanog tužilaštva Kosova upravo omogućava sprovođenje politike tužilaštva koja ide u pravcu "legalizacije" Oslobodilačke vojske Kosova i jačanja zahteva pojedinih političkih aktera za nezavisnošću Kosova.
AB  - In this article, the Author considers various issues concerning the nature and the status of the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor's Office whose establishment was projected by the European Union (in the field of foreign and security policy) and implemented through legal instruments of the so-called "Republic of Kosovo", with the full logistical and financial support of the European Union. Those judicial institutions deal with key events from 1998 to 2000 and also with the legal qualifications and status under international law of the main actors in the conflict on the territory of Kosovo and Metohija. The institutional and Legal framework established by the creation of the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor's Office enables implementation of the prosecutorial policy that goes in the direction of the "legalization" of the Kosovo Liberation Army and strengthening the claim of certain political actors for Kosovo independence.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd i Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
T2  - Crimen (Beograd)
T1  - Priroda i status Specijalizovanih veća i Specijalizovanog tužilaštva Kosova - projekat Evropske unije sproveden po "propisima Kosova"
T1  - The nature and the status of the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor's Office: The European Union project implemented through "Kosovo legislation"
EP  - 246
IS  - 3
SP  - 231
VL  - 13
DO  - 10.5937/crimen2203231G
UR  - conv_2801
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Gajić, Aleksandar",
year = "2022",
abstract = "U ovom radu autor razmatra pitanja vezana za prirodu i status Specijalizovanih veća i Specijalizovanog tužilaštva Kosova čije osnivanje je projektovano od Evropske unije (u oblasti spoljne i bezbednosne politike) i sprovedeno putem instrumentarija tzv. Republike Kosovo uz punu logističku i finansijsku podršku Evropske unije. Po prirodi stvari, imajući u vidu da se bavi ključnim događajima iz perioda 1998-2000.godine, ove pravosudne institucije će se nužno baviti pravnim kvalifikacijama i statusom glavnih učesnika u sukobima na teritoriji Kosova i Metohije. Pravni i institucionalni okvir koji je nastao formiranjem Specijalizovanih veća i Specijalizovanog tužilaštva Kosova upravo omogućava sprovođenje politike tužilaštva koja ide u pravcu "legalizacije" Oslobodilačke vojske Kosova i jačanja zahteva pojedinih političkih aktera za nezavisnošću Kosova., In this article, the Author considers various issues concerning the nature and the status of the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor's Office whose establishment was projected by the European Union (in the field of foreign and security policy) and implemented through legal instruments of the so-called "Republic of Kosovo", with the full logistical and financial support of the European Union. Those judicial institutions deal with key events from 1998 to 2000 and also with the legal qualifications and status under international law of the main actors in the conflict on the territory of Kosovo and Metohija. The institutional and Legal framework established by the creation of the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor's Office enables implementation of the prosecutorial policy that goes in the direction of the "legalization" of the Kosovo Liberation Army and strengthening the claim of certain political actors for Kosovo independence.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd i Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd",
journal = "Crimen (Beograd)",
title = "Priroda i status Specijalizovanih veća i Specijalizovanog tužilaštva Kosova - projekat Evropske unije sproveden po "propisima Kosova", The nature and the status of the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor's Office: The European Union project implemented through "Kosovo legislation"",
pages = "246-231",
number = "3",
volume = "13",
doi = "10.5937/crimen2203231G",
url = "conv_2801"
}

Gajić, A.. (2022). Priroda i status Specijalizovanih veća i Specijalizovanog tužilaštva Kosova - projekat Evropske unije sproveden po "propisima Kosova". in Crimen (Beograd)
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd i Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd., 13(3), 231-246.
https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen2203231G
conv_2801

Gajić A. Priroda i status Specijalizovanih veća i Specijalizovanog tužilaštva Kosova - projekat Evropske unije sproveden po "propisima Kosova". in Crimen (Beograd). 2022;13(3):231-246.
doi:10.5937/crimen2203231G
conv_2801 .

Gajić, Aleksandar, "Priroda i status Specijalizovanih veća i Specijalizovanog tužilaštva Kosova - projekat Evropske unije sproveden po "propisima Kosova"" in Crimen (Beograd), 13, no. 3 (2022):231-246,
https://doi.org/10.5937/crimen2203231G .,
conv_2801 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Gajić, Aleksandar
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1351
AB  - The main aim of this article is to highlight two interconnected issues raised in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The first one concerns a need to change the EU Health Policy legal framework, particularly the founding treaties (TEU and TFEU), while the second one relates to the issue of the very perception of the identity of the European Union. The possible adequate solution for the situation created by the unprecedented nature of the COVID-19 pandemic and unprecedented measures that followed, was to proclaim state of emergency, which was largely avoided. It seems that it should be considered whether there is a need for amendments of the European Union founding treaties and/or the Charter on Fundamental Rights by providing the possibility of the state of emergency proclamation in the case of "the threats of the life" of the EU. The European Union is not entrusted with the competencies, powers, and responsibilities in health matters such as a pandemic, however founding treaties, functioning institutions as well as procedures seem sufficient for an effective response to health crises such as the one caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, having in mind experience with the COVID-19 pandemic it seems that there is a need to strengthen the EU legal framework concerning the issues of pandemic and similar threats, not by altering the nature of the EU competence regarding health issues, but by identifying the threats such as pandemic in the founding treaties that should contain basic regulations concerning European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. In that manner the efficient response would be in a form of an institutionalized mechanism at the core of the European Union instead of being fully dependent on the variable political will. At the same time there is an urgent need to identify those Health Policy issues that should be an adequate subject of judicial scrutiny. The COVID-19 pandemic also proved that Member States and the European Union should be more realistic regarding the perception of the role and identity of the European Union. The author argues that the identity of the European Union is blurred with a variety of considerations and that its content and features should be more determined, not only in academic literature but also in political practice, especially when it comes to the issue of self-determination of the European Union. The world is not the same as it was before the pandemic, and it seems that the European Union, in order to be prepared to face new challenges, must build its identity in realistic parameters and act in one voice "if it wants to make itself heard and play its proper role in the world", as it was declared in the 1973 Declaration on the European Identity.
PB  - Josip Juraj Strossmayer Univ Osijek, Osijek
C3  - Recovery of the EU and Strengthening the Ability to Respond to New Challenges - Legal and Economic Aspects
T1  - Facing reality: a need to change the legal framework of the EU public health policy and the influence of the pandemic of Covid-19 on the perception of identity and the role of the EU
EP  - 374
SP  - 353
UR  - conv_3180
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Gajić, Aleksandar",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The main aim of this article is to highlight two interconnected issues raised in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The first one concerns a need to change the EU Health Policy legal framework, particularly the founding treaties (TEU and TFEU), while the second one relates to the issue of the very perception of the identity of the European Union. The possible adequate solution for the situation created by the unprecedented nature of the COVID-19 pandemic and unprecedented measures that followed, was to proclaim state of emergency, which was largely avoided. It seems that it should be considered whether there is a need for amendments of the European Union founding treaties and/or the Charter on Fundamental Rights by providing the possibility of the state of emergency proclamation in the case of "the threats of the life" of the EU. The European Union is not entrusted with the competencies, powers, and responsibilities in health matters such as a pandemic, however founding treaties, functioning institutions as well as procedures seem sufficient for an effective response to health crises such as the one caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, having in mind experience with the COVID-19 pandemic it seems that there is a need to strengthen the EU legal framework concerning the issues of pandemic and similar threats, not by altering the nature of the EU competence regarding health issues, but by identifying the threats such as pandemic in the founding treaties that should contain basic regulations concerning European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. In that manner the efficient response would be in a form of an institutionalized mechanism at the core of the European Union instead of being fully dependent on the variable political will. At the same time there is an urgent need to identify those Health Policy issues that should be an adequate subject of judicial scrutiny. The COVID-19 pandemic also proved that Member States and the European Union should be more realistic regarding the perception of the role and identity of the European Union. The author argues that the identity of the European Union is blurred with a variety of considerations and that its content and features should be more determined, not only in academic literature but also in political practice, especially when it comes to the issue of self-determination of the European Union. The world is not the same as it was before the pandemic, and it seems that the European Union, in order to be prepared to face new challenges, must build its identity in realistic parameters and act in one voice "if it wants to make itself heard and play its proper role in the world", as it was declared in the 1973 Declaration on the European Identity.",
publisher = "Josip Juraj Strossmayer Univ Osijek, Osijek",
journal = "Recovery of the EU and Strengthening the Ability to Respond to New Challenges - Legal and Economic Aspects",
title = "Facing reality: a need to change the legal framework of the EU public health policy and the influence of the pandemic of Covid-19 on the perception of identity and the role of the EU",
pages = "374-353",
url = "conv_3180"
}

Gajić, A.. (2022). Facing reality: a need to change the legal framework of the EU public health policy and the influence of the pandemic of Covid-19 on the perception of identity and the role of the EU. in Recovery of the EU and Strengthening the Ability to Respond to New Challenges - Legal and Economic Aspects
Josip Juraj Strossmayer Univ Osijek, Osijek., 353-374.
conv_3180

Gajić A. Facing reality: a need to change the legal framework of the EU public health policy and the influence of the pandemic of Covid-19 on the perception of identity and the role of the EU. in Recovery of the EU and Strengthening the Ability to Respond to New Challenges - Legal and Economic Aspects. 2022;:353-374.
conv_3180 .

Gajić, Aleksandar, "Facing reality: a need to change the legal framework of the EU public health policy and the influence of the pandemic of Covid-19 on the perception of identity and the role of the EU" in Recovery of the EU and Strengthening the Ability to Respond to New Challenges - Legal and Economic Aspects (2022):353-374,
conv_3180 .

TY  - THES
AU  - Gajić, Aleksandar V.
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/handle/123456789/2604
UR  - http://eteze.bg.ac.rs/application/showtheses?thesesId=384
UR  - https://fedorabg.bg.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:6059/bdef:Content/download
UR  - http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=DISPLAY&base=70036&RID=512550577
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/6
AB  - Doktorska disertacija Dokazivanje pred Međunarodnim sudom pravde je studija iz oblasti međunarodnog javnog prava (prava međunarodnog pravosuđa). Osnovni cilj disertacije je formulisanje teroije o dokazivanju po uzoru na Međunarodni sud pravde, kao i da se kroz prizmu načela i pravila o dokazivanju u međunarodnom pravosuđu sagleda mesto i uloga Međunarodnog suda pravde u kontekstu proliferacije međunarodnih sudova i tribunala, i posebno njegov odnos sa međunarodnim krivičnim sudovima i tribunalima. Predmet istraživanja salgedan je pre svega de lege lata, u nastojanju da se utvrde načela i pravila međunarodnog prava koja su obuhvaćena predmetom istraživanja. Tamo gde smo smatrali da je to korisno, i s obzirom na mogućnosti implementacije predloženih rešenja, korišćen je i de lege ferenda pristup. Za ovakav pristup smo se opredelili iz razloga što su elemeti pozitivnopravne sadežine predmeta istraživanja sporni ili nedovoljno istraženi, te da je preduslov za de lege ferenda razmatranja temeljno istraživanje i razumevanje pozitivnog prava. Izvori načela i pravila o dokazivanju. Inherentna karakteristika sudsnog načina rešavanja sporova je ne samo ta da sud ili tribunal rešava spor koji je pred njega iznet primenom međunarodnog prava, već i da je sam način rešavanja spora pravno regulisan.. Izvori načela i pravila međunardnog pravosuđa su nužno izvori međunaodnog prava. Međunarodni sudovi i tribunali nisu vezani procesnim pravilima (uključujući tu i pravila o dokazivanju) ma kog unutrašnjeg pravnog poretka. Pitanje hijerarhijskog odnosa izvora prava u materiji međunarodnog pravosuđa je kompleksno pitanje, i za razliku od unutrašnjeg prava u kome forma akta često determiniše i poziciju pravila koja su u njemu sadržana, u međunarodnom pravu se sa terena formalne snage izvora, težište prebacuje na suštinski (matrijalni) značaj konkretne norme. Konstitutivni akti međunarodnih sudova i tribunala, po pravilu, veoma šturo regulišu pitanja u vezi sa izvođenjem dokaza i utvrđivanja činjenica.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet
T1  - Dokazivanje pred Međunarodnim sudom pravde
T1  - Evidence before the International Court of Justice
UR  - t-2295
ER  - 

@phdthesis{
author = "Gajić, Aleksandar V.",
year = "2012",
abstract = "Doktorska disertacija Dokazivanje pred Međunarodnim sudom pravde je studija iz oblasti međunarodnog javnog prava (prava međunarodnog pravosuđa). Osnovni cilj disertacije je formulisanje teroije o dokazivanju po uzoru na Međunarodni sud pravde, kao i da se kroz prizmu načela i pravila o dokazivanju u međunarodnom pravosuđu sagleda mesto i uloga Međunarodnog suda pravde u kontekstu proliferacije međunarodnih sudova i tribunala, i posebno njegov odnos sa međunarodnim krivičnim sudovima i tribunalima. Predmet istraživanja salgedan je pre svega de lege lata, u nastojanju da se utvrde načela i pravila međunarodnog prava koja su obuhvaćena predmetom istraživanja. Tamo gde smo smatrali da je to korisno, i s obzirom na mogućnosti implementacije predloženih rešenja, korišćen je i de lege ferenda pristup. Za ovakav pristup smo se opredelili iz razloga što su elemeti pozitivnopravne sadežine predmeta istraživanja sporni ili nedovoljno istraženi, te da je preduslov za de lege ferenda razmatranja temeljno istraživanje i razumevanje pozitivnog prava. Izvori načela i pravila o dokazivanju. Inherentna karakteristika sudsnog načina rešavanja sporova je ne samo ta da sud ili tribunal rešava spor koji je pred njega iznet primenom međunarodnog prava, već i da je sam način rešavanja spora pravno regulisan.. Izvori načela i pravila međunardnog pravosuđa su nužno izvori međunaodnog prava. Međunarodni sudovi i tribunali nisu vezani procesnim pravilima (uključujući tu i pravila o dokazivanju) ma kog unutrašnjeg pravnog poretka. Pitanje hijerarhijskog odnosa izvora prava u materiji međunarodnog pravosuđa je kompleksno pitanje, i za razliku od unutrašnjeg prava u kome forma akta često determiniše i poziciju pravila koja su u njemu sadržana, u međunarodnom pravu se sa terena formalne snage izvora, težište prebacuje na suštinski (matrijalni) značaj konkretne norme. Konstitutivni akti međunarodnih sudova i tribunala, po pravilu, veoma šturo regulišu pitanja u vezi sa izvođenjem dokaza i utvrđivanja činjenica.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet",
title = "Dokazivanje pred Međunarodnim sudom pravde, Evidence before the International Court of Justice",
url = "t-2295"
}

Gajić, A. V.. (2012). Dokazivanje pred Međunarodnim sudom pravde. 
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet..
t-2295

Gajić AV. Dokazivanje pred Međunarodnim sudom pravde. 2012;.
t-2295 .

Gajić, Aleksandar V., "Dokazivanje pred Međunarodnim sudom pravde" (2012),
t-2295 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Gajić, Aleksandar
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/626
AB  - Autor kritički analizira koncept formalnog prijema na znanje presuđenih činjenica u pravu i praksi savremenih međunarodnih krivičnih sudova i tribunala, Međunarodnog krivičnog tribunala za bivšu Jugoslaviju (MKTJ), Međunarodnog krivičnog tribunala za Ruandu (MKTR), Posebnog tribunala za Liban (PTL) i Međunarodnog krivičnog suda (MKS). Autor je stanovišta da je koncept formalnog prijema na znanje presuđenih činjenica, na način na koji je razvijen u jurisprudenciji MKTJ i MKTR, neprimeren za međunarodni krivični postupak koji teži ostvarivanju najviših standarda pravičnog suđenja. Od usvajanja Rimskog statuta MKS treba da je nesporno da optuženi ima, kao minimalnu garanciju, pravo da 'mu ne bude nametnut nikakav obrt tereta dokazivanja ili teret pobijanja'. Autor zaključuje da, osim pred MKTJ i MKTR, postoji mogućnost primene koncepta presuđenih činjenica pred savremenim i budućim privremenim međunarodnim krivičnim tribunalima (što pokazuju i Pravilnik o postupku i dokazima Posebnog suda za Liban), ali da bi ispravna primena doktrine formalnog prijema na znanje zahtevala da se formalno mogu primiti na znanje samo one činjenice koje su utvrđene u nekom drugom postupku pred istim tribunalom koje nisu predmet 'razumnog spora' i da one ne bi trebalo da budu predmet pobijanja.
AB  - Subject of this paper is critical analysis of the concept of judicial notice of adjudicated facts in the law and practice of the contemporary international criminal courts and tribunals, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) and International Criminal Court (ICC). The author is of the opinion that the concept of judicial notice of adjudicated facts, as developed in the jurisprudence of the ICTY and ICTR, is inappropriate for international criminal proceedings tending to achieve the highest standards of fair trial and full protection of the rights of the accused. Since the adoption of the Rome Statute of the ICC it should be undisputable that the accused has, as one of the minimal guarantees, a right 'not to have imposed on him or her any reversal of the burden of proof or any onus of rebuttal'. The author concludes that, apart from ICTY and ICTR, there is a possibility of the application of the concept of judicial notice of adjudicated facts before contemporary or some future ad hoc international criminal courts and tribunals (the STL is an example). However, correct and proper application of the doctrine of judicial notice would require that the subject of judicial notice should be only facts (or factual findings) that are not subject of reasonable dispute, and that they should not be a subject of rebuttal.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Formalni prijem na znanje presuđenih činjenica u međunarodnom krivičnom pravosuđu
T1  - Judicial notice of adjudicated facts in the international administration of criminal justice
EP  - 326
IS  - 2
SP  - 292
VL  - 60
UR  - conv_270
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Gajić, Aleksandar",
year = "2012",
abstract = "Autor kritički analizira koncept formalnog prijema na znanje presuđenih činjenica u pravu i praksi savremenih međunarodnih krivičnih sudova i tribunala, Međunarodnog krivičnog tribunala za bivšu Jugoslaviju (MKTJ), Međunarodnog krivičnog tribunala za Ruandu (MKTR), Posebnog tribunala za Liban (PTL) i Međunarodnog krivičnog suda (MKS). Autor je stanovišta da je koncept formalnog prijema na znanje presuđenih činjenica, na način na koji je razvijen u jurisprudenciji MKTJ i MKTR, neprimeren za međunarodni krivični postupak koji teži ostvarivanju najviših standarda pravičnog suđenja. Od usvajanja Rimskog statuta MKS treba da je nesporno da optuženi ima, kao minimalnu garanciju, pravo da 'mu ne bude nametnut nikakav obrt tereta dokazivanja ili teret pobijanja'. Autor zaključuje da, osim pred MKTJ i MKTR, postoji mogućnost primene koncepta presuđenih činjenica pred savremenim i budućim privremenim međunarodnim krivičnim tribunalima (što pokazuju i Pravilnik o postupku i dokazima Posebnog suda za Liban), ali da bi ispravna primena doktrine formalnog prijema na znanje zahtevala da se formalno mogu primiti na znanje samo one činjenice koje su utvrđene u nekom drugom postupku pred istim tribunalom koje nisu predmet 'razumnog spora' i da one ne bi trebalo da budu predmet pobijanja., Subject of this paper is critical analysis of the concept of judicial notice of adjudicated facts in the law and practice of the contemporary international criminal courts and tribunals, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) and International Criminal Court (ICC). The author is of the opinion that the concept of judicial notice of adjudicated facts, as developed in the jurisprudence of the ICTY and ICTR, is inappropriate for international criminal proceedings tending to achieve the highest standards of fair trial and full protection of the rights of the accused. Since the adoption of the Rome Statute of the ICC it should be undisputable that the accused has, as one of the minimal guarantees, a right 'not to have imposed on him or her any reversal of the burden of proof or any onus of rebuttal'. The author concludes that, apart from ICTY and ICTR, there is a possibility of the application of the concept of judicial notice of adjudicated facts before contemporary or some future ad hoc international criminal courts and tribunals (the STL is an example). However, correct and proper application of the doctrine of judicial notice would require that the subject of judicial notice should be only facts (or factual findings) that are not subject of reasonable dispute, and that they should not be a subject of rebuttal.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Formalni prijem na znanje presuđenih činjenica u međunarodnom krivičnom pravosuđu, Judicial notice of adjudicated facts in the international administration of criminal justice",
pages = "326-292",
number = "2",
volume = "60",
url = "conv_270"
}

Gajić, A.. (2012). Formalni prijem na znanje presuđenih činjenica u međunarodnom krivičnom pravosuđu. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 60(2), 292-326.
conv_270

Gajić A. Formalni prijem na znanje presuđenih činjenica u međunarodnom krivičnom pravosuđu. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2012;60(2):292-326.
conv_270 .

Gajić, Aleksandar, "Formalni prijem na znanje presuđenih činjenica u međunarodnom krivičnom pravosuđu" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 60, no. 2 (2012):292-326,
conv_270 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Gajić, Aleksandar
PY  - 2009
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/454
AB  - Ovaj rad bavi se pravom i praksom Međunarodnog krivičnog tribunala za bivšu Jugoslaviju iz perspektive ljudskih prava. Autor posebno nastoji da objasni metode kojima Tribunal teži da zaštiti ljudska prava strana u postupku. U tom smislu, autor kritikuje odluku donetu u slučaju Tadić, gde je Sudsko veće zauzelo stav da ga principi ljudskih prava ne obavezuju zbog njegove jedinstvene strukture i prirode samog predmeta kojim se ono bavilo. Ispitujući dalje da li je nadležnost Međunarodnog krivičnog tribunala za bivšu Jugoslaviju u saglasnosti sa standardima ljudskih prava, ovaj autor proučava tri grupe pitanja. Prvo, istražuju se određena materijalno-pravna pitanja kako bi se odredilo da li je Međunarodni krivični tribunal za bivšu Jugoslaviju uključen u takozvani progresivni razvoj ili ovo telo samo primenjuje postojeća pravila međunarodnog humanitarnog prava. Drugo, autor istražuje princip 'jednakosti oružja' i zaključuje da je on jednostran, jer ne postoji realna mogućnost da optuženi na odgovarajući način prouče sve materijale koji im mogu poslužiti kao olakšavajuća okolnost ili ih pak osloboditi optužbi. Pored toga, autor smatra da bi se pri iznošenju dokaza u krivičnim postupcima trebalo držati standarda 'van razumne sumnje', a ne standarda 'verovatnoće'. Takođe, standard jednoobraznosti apelacionog preispitivanja koju primenjuje Žalbeno veće u značajnoj meri ograničava pravo na žalbu. Autor zaključuje da nadležnost Međunarodnog krivičnog tribunala za bivšu Jugoslaviju jeste i biće kritički procenjivana, naročito u pokušajima da se stvore solidne osnove za jurisprudenciju Međunarodnog krivičnog suda.
AB  - This paper deals with the law and practice of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia from the human rights perspective. In particular, the author tries to clarify methods by which the Tribunal has sought to protect human rights of parties in the proceedings. In that respect, the author criticizes the Tadić decision where the Trial Chamber held that it was not bound by universal human rights principles because of its unique structure and the nature of subject matter it dealt with. In his further analysis of the question whether the ICTY's jurisprudence is in line with human rights standards, the author explores three sets of questions. First, certain substantive law issues are investigated in order to determine whether the ICTY is involved in the so-called progressive development, or this body merely applies the existing rules of International Humanitarian Law. Second, the author explores the equality of arms principle and concludes that it is one-sided, because there is no real possibility for the accused to properly examine all exculpating and mitigating materials. In addition, the author argues that in criminal matters, it is the 'beyond reasonable doubt' standard of proof rather than the 'probability standard' that should be preserved. Besides, the standard of appellate review uniformity applied by the Appeals Chamber significantly restricts the right of appeal. The author concludes that the ICTY's jurisprudence is, and will be critically evaluated particularly in attempts to build some solid basis for the imminent jurisprudence of the International Criminal Court.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Međunarodni krivični sud za bivšu Jugoslaviju - iz perspektive ljudskih prava
T1  - International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: Human rights perspective
EP  - 155
IS  - 4
SP  - 138
VL  - 57
UR  - conv_181
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Gajić, Aleksandar",
year = "2009",
abstract = "Ovaj rad bavi se pravom i praksom Međunarodnog krivičnog tribunala za bivšu Jugoslaviju iz perspektive ljudskih prava. Autor posebno nastoji da objasni metode kojima Tribunal teži da zaštiti ljudska prava strana u postupku. U tom smislu, autor kritikuje odluku donetu u slučaju Tadić, gde je Sudsko veće zauzelo stav da ga principi ljudskih prava ne obavezuju zbog njegove jedinstvene strukture i prirode samog predmeta kojim se ono bavilo. Ispitujući dalje da li je nadležnost Međunarodnog krivičnog tribunala za bivšu Jugoslaviju u saglasnosti sa standardima ljudskih prava, ovaj autor proučava tri grupe pitanja. Prvo, istražuju se određena materijalno-pravna pitanja kako bi se odredilo da li je Međunarodni krivični tribunal za bivšu Jugoslaviju uključen u takozvani progresivni razvoj ili ovo telo samo primenjuje postojeća pravila međunarodnog humanitarnog prava. Drugo, autor istražuje princip 'jednakosti oružja' i zaključuje da je on jednostran, jer ne postoji realna mogućnost da optuženi na odgovarajući način prouče sve materijale koji im mogu poslužiti kao olakšavajuća okolnost ili ih pak osloboditi optužbi. Pored toga, autor smatra da bi se pri iznošenju dokaza u krivičnim postupcima trebalo držati standarda 'van razumne sumnje', a ne standarda 'verovatnoće'. Takođe, standard jednoobraznosti apelacionog preispitivanja koju primenjuje Žalbeno veće u značajnoj meri ograničava pravo na žalbu. Autor zaključuje da nadležnost Međunarodnog krivičnog tribunala za bivšu Jugoslaviju jeste i biće kritički procenjivana, naročito u pokušajima da se stvore solidne osnove za jurisprudenciju Međunarodnog krivičnog suda., This paper deals with the law and practice of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia from the human rights perspective. In particular, the author tries to clarify methods by which the Tribunal has sought to protect human rights of parties in the proceedings. In that respect, the author criticizes the Tadić decision where the Trial Chamber held that it was not bound by universal human rights principles because of its unique structure and the nature of subject matter it dealt with. In his further analysis of the question whether the ICTY's jurisprudence is in line with human rights standards, the author explores three sets of questions. First, certain substantive law issues are investigated in order to determine whether the ICTY is involved in the so-called progressive development, or this body merely applies the existing rules of International Humanitarian Law. Second, the author explores the equality of arms principle and concludes that it is one-sided, because there is no real possibility for the accused to properly examine all exculpating and mitigating materials. In addition, the author argues that in criminal matters, it is the 'beyond reasonable doubt' standard of proof rather than the 'probability standard' that should be preserved. Besides, the standard of appellate review uniformity applied by the Appeals Chamber significantly restricts the right of appeal. The author concludes that the ICTY's jurisprudence is, and will be critically evaluated particularly in attempts to build some solid basis for the imminent jurisprudence of the International Criminal Court.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Međunarodni krivični sud za bivšu Jugoslaviju - iz perspektive ljudskih prava, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: Human rights perspective",
pages = "155-138",
number = "4",
volume = "57",
url = "conv_181"
}

Gajić, A.. (2009). Međunarodni krivični sud za bivšu Jugoslaviju - iz perspektive ljudskih prava. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 57(4), 138-155.
conv_181

Gajić A. Međunarodni krivični sud za bivšu Jugoslaviju - iz perspektive ljudskih prava. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2009;57(4):138-155.
conv_181 .

Gajić, Aleksandar, "Međunarodni krivični sud za bivšu Jugoslaviju - iz perspektive ljudskih prava" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 57, no. 4 (2009):138-155,
conv_181 .