TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vukotić, Miloš
PY  - 2024
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1891
AB  - Settlement of deceaseds debts is one of the fundamental questions of succession. The liability of heirs for these debts is very difficult to regulate because of the need to balance several conflicting interests: the interests of heirs, the interests of estate creditors and the interests of heirs personal creditors. Legal systems may attempt a simple, but rigid approach to heirs liability or provide detailed and flexible, but complex rules on different scopes of liability in different situations. This article discusses the main approaches to liability of heirs for estate debts and provides a critical analysis of their advantages and disadvantages. The author concludes that complex and flexible rules on liability of heirs may ultimately lead to more just distribution of estate assets.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - A comparative perspective on the liability of heirs
EP  - 70
IS  - 1
SP  - 47
VL  - 72
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_24103A
UR  - conv_3450
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vukotić, Miloš",
year = "2024",
abstract = "Settlement of deceaseds debts is one of the fundamental questions of succession. The liability of heirs for these debts is very difficult to regulate because of the need to balance several conflicting interests: the interests of heirs, the interests of estate creditors and the interests of heirs personal creditors. Legal systems may attempt a simple, but rigid approach to heirs liability or provide detailed and flexible, but complex rules on different scopes of liability in different situations. This article discusses the main approaches to liability of heirs for estate debts and provides a critical analysis of their advantages and disadvantages. The author concludes that complex and flexible rules on liability of heirs may ultimately lead to more just distribution of estate assets.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "A comparative perspective on the liability of heirs",
pages = "70-47",
number = "1",
volume = "72",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_24103A",
url = "conv_3450"
}

Vukotić, M.. (2024). A comparative perspective on the liability of heirs. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 72(1), 47-70.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_24103A
conv_3450

Vukotić M. A comparative perspective on the liability of heirs. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2024;72(1):47-70.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_24103A
conv_3450 .

Vukotić, Miloš, "A comparative perspective on the liability of heirs" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 72, no. 1 (2024):47-70,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_24103A .,
conv_3450 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vukotić, Miloš
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1350
AB  - U ovom radu se analiziraju i kritikuju pravila o prebijanju koja su prihvaćena u srpskim propisima i sudskoj praksi. Autor nastoji da pruži celovit prikaz te ustanove tako što će odgovoriti na osnovna pitanja koja se javljaju u vezi sa prebijanjem iz perspektive srpskog prava. U istraživanju su uzeti u obzir vodeći akademski predlozi koji se tiču ustanove prebijanja, te zakonski propisi, iskustvo i teorijska razmatranja iz pravnih sistema koji su bliski srpskom pravu i mogu da mu posluže kao uzor. Autor zaključuje da su pravila Zakona o obligacionim odnosima adekvatna i jasna, ali da se koncepcija prebijanja koja je postavljena u toj kodifikaciji napušta u evropskoj pravnoj teoriji i da zato treba razmišljati o njenoj temeljnoj reformi. Kao najslabiju tačku srpskih pravila o prebijanju autor ističe prebijanje u parničnom postupku koje se izdvojilo u posebnu vrstu prebijanja, čime je narušena ideja o jedinstvenoj materijalnopravnoj ustanovi prebijanja.
AB  - This article contains a critical review of rules on set-off in Serbian legislation and court practice. The author provides a comprehensive overview of this institution by answering the main issues which arise in connection to set-off from the perspective of Serbian law. The research takes into account leading academic proposals for regulating set-off, as well as legislation, experience and academic discussions from legal systems which are closely related to Serbian law and may serve as a model. The author concludes that the Serbian Obligations Act provides adequate and clear rules, but that the accepted concept of set-off is being abandoned in European legal theory, which should be a reason to contemplate its fundamental reform. As the weakest point of Serbian rules on set-off, the author underlines set-off in judicial proceedings which has developed into a special type of set-off and undermined the idea of a unified substantive law of set-off.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Obrisi ustanove prebijanja u srpskom pravu
T1  - An outline of the rules on set-off in Serbian law
EP  - 449
IS  - poseban
SP  - 421
VL  - 70
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK15A
UR  - conv_565
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vukotić, Miloš",
year = "2022",
abstract = "U ovom radu se analiziraju i kritikuju pravila o prebijanju koja su prihvaćena u srpskim propisima i sudskoj praksi. Autor nastoji da pruži celovit prikaz te ustanove tako što će odgovoriti na osnovna pitanja koja se javljaju u vezi sa prebijanjem iz perspektive srpskog prava. U istraživanju su uzeti u obzir vodeći akademski predlozi koji se tiču ustanove prebijanja, te zakonski propisi, iskustvo i teorijska razmatranja iz pravnih sistema koji su bliski srpskom pravu i mogu da mu posluže kao uzor. Autor zaključuje da su pravila Zakona o obligacionim odnosima adekvatna i jasna, ali da se koncepcija prebijanja koja je postavljena u toj kodifikaciji napušta u evropskoj pravnoj teoriji i da zato treba razmišljati o njenoj temeljnoj reformi. Kao najslabiju tačku srpskih pravila o prebijanju autor ističe prebijanje u parničnom postupku koje se izdvojilo u posebnu vrstu prebijanja, čime je narušena ideja o jedinstvenoj materijalnopravnoj ustanovi prebijanja., This article contains a critical review of rules on set-off in Serbian legislation and court practice. The author provides a comprehensive overview of this institution by answering the main issues which arise in connection to set-off from the perspective of Serbian law. The research takes into account leading academic proposals for regulating set-off, as well as legislation, experience and academic discussions from legal systems which are closely related to Serbian law and may serve as a model. The author concludes that the Serbian Obligations Act provides adequate and clear rules, but that the accepted concept of set-off is being abandoned in European legal theory, which should be a reason to contemplate its fundamental reform. As the weakest point of Serbian rules on set-off, the author underlines set-off in judicial proceedings which has developed into a special type of set-off and undermined the idea of a unified substantive law of set-off.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Obrisi ustanove prebijanja u srpskom pravu, An outline of the rules on set-off in Serbian law",
pages = "449-421",
number = "poseban",
volume = "70",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK15A",
url = "conv_565"
}

Vukotić, M.. (2022). Obrisi ustanove prebijanja u srpskom pravu. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 70(poseban), 421-449.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK15A
conv_565

Vukotić M. Obrisi ustanove prebijanja u srpskom pravu. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2022;70(poseban):421-449.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK15A
conv_565 .

Vukotić, Miloš, "Obrisi ustanove prebijanja u srpskom pravu" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 70, no. poseban (2022):421-449,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK15A .,
conv_565 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vukotić, Miloš
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1304
AB  - Zakon o nasleđivanju propisuje da prava i obaveze davaoca izdržavanja mogu da naslede samo njegovi potomci i supružnik. Ukoliko druga lica naslede davaoca ili potomci i supružnik odbiju da preuzmu izdržavanje, ugovor se raskida po samom zakonu. Pravo na naknadu za primljeno izdržavanje predviđeno je samo za slučaj da potomci i supružnik odbiju da preuzmu izdržavanje iz opravdanih razloga. Ovaj rad je posvećen analizi i kritici tog rešenja. Autor pokazuje da je ograničenje nasledivosti suviše usko i kruto, da je pitanje naknade neadekvatno uređeno i da su interesi primaoca izdržavanja ugroženi jer njemu nije ostavljena mogućnost da utiče na sudbinu ugovora. Autor predlaže rešenje prema kojem bi nasledivost pozicije davaoca izdržavanja bila neograničena, uz pravo svake strane da odbije da nastavi s ugovorom. Opravdanost razloga za raskid ugovora uzimala bi se u obzir prilikom odlučivanja o naknadi za primljeno izdržavanje.
AB  - Serbian Succession Act provides that the position of a caregiver in a life care contract may be inherited only by their descendants and spouse. If other persons succeed the caregiver, or if descendants or spouse refuse to provide care, the contract is rescinded by operation of law. The right to compensation for received care is provided only if descendants or spouse have a justified reason for refusing to provide care. This article contains a critical analysis of this solution. The author shows that the restriction of heritability is too narrow, that the issue of compensation is inadequately resolved, and that the interests of care recipient are endangered because they cannot influence the fate of the contract. The author proposes a solution of unlimited heritability with the right of both parties to rescind the contract. The reasons for rescission would be taken into account when the issue of compensation is decided.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Pravne posledice smrti davaoca izdržavanja
T1  - Legal consequences of the caregiver's death in a life care contract
EP  - 215
IS  - 1
SP  - 193
VL  - 69
DO  - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21108A
UR  - conv_538
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vukotić, Miloš",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Zakon o nasleđivanju propisuje da prava i obaveze davaoca izdržavanja mogu da naslede samo njegovi potomci i supružnik. Ukoliko druga lica naslede davaoca ili potomci i supružnik odbiju da preuzmu izdržavanje, ugovor se raskida po samom zakonu. Pravo na naknadu za primljeno izdržavanje predviđeno je samo za slučaj da potomci i supružnik odbiju da preuzmu izdržavanje iz opravdanih razloga. Ovaj rad je posvećen analizi i kritici tog rešenja. Autor pokazuje da je ograničenje nasledivosti suviše usko i kruto, da je pitanje naknade neadekvatno uređeno i da su interesi primaoca izdržavanja ugroženi jer njemu nije ostavljena mogućnost da utiče na sudbinu ugovora. Autor predlaže rešenje prema kojem bi nasledivost pozicije davaoca izdržavanja bila neograničena, uz pravo svake strane da odbije da nastavi s ugovorom. Opravdanost razloga za raskid ugovora uzimala bi se u obzir prilikom odlučivanja o naknadi za primljeno izdržavanje., Serbian Succession Act provides that the position of a caregiver in a life care contract may be inherited only by their descendants and spouse. If other persons succeed the caregiver, or if descendants or spouse refuse to provide care, the contract is rescinded by operation of law. The right to compensation for received care is provided only if descendants or spouse have a justified reason for refusing to provide care. This article contains a critical analysis of this solution. The author shows that the restriction of heritability is too narrow, that the issue of compensation is inadequately resolved, and that the interests of care recipient are endangered because they cannot influence the fate of the contract. The author proposes a solution of unlimited heritability with the right of both parties to rescind the contract. The reasons for rescission would be taken into account when the issue of compensation is decided.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Pravne posledice smrti davaoca izdržavanja, Legal consequences of the caregiver's death in a life care contract",
pages = "215-193",
number = "1",
volume = "69",
doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21108A",
url = "conv_538"
}

Vukotić, M.. (2021). Pravne posledice smrti davaoca izdržavanja. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 69(1), 193-215.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21108A
conv_538

Vukotić M. Pravne posledice smrti davaoca izdržavanja. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2021;69(1):193-215.
doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21108A
conv_538 .

Vukotić, Miloš, "Pravne posledice smrti davaoca izdržavanja" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 69, no. 1 (2021):193-215,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21108A .,
conv_538 .

TY  - THES
AU  - Vukotić, Miloš
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://eteze.bg.ac.rs/application/showtheses?thesesId=7821
UR  - https://fedorabg.bg.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:23095/bdef:Content/download
UR  - http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=DISPLAY&base=70036&RID=22211081
UR  - https://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/handle/123456789/17716
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/32
AB  - U ovoj disertaciji autor nastoji da odgovori na pitanje da li pravo na naknadu neimovinske štete treba da bude nasledivo i pod kojim uslovima. Povod za ovo istraživanje pružaju restriktivne odredbe srpskog Zakona o obligacionim odnosima, koje isključuju nasledivost prava na naknadu neimovinske štete, osim u slučajevima kada je to pravo priznato pravnosnažnom sudskom odlukom ili pismenim sporazumom između oštećenika i odgovornog lica. Kako bi došao do odgovora, autor istražuje istoriju ustanove neimovinske štete, rešenja iz drugih pravnih sistema i teorijska shvatanja o pojmu neimovinske štete i ciljevima njene naknade. Autor zaključuje da pojam neimovinske štete treba proširiti na sve značajne neimovinske gubitke, koji se mogu kvalifikovati kao ograničenje prava na slobodan razvoj ličnosti, i da pravo na naknadu neimovinske štete treba da bude nasledivo bez ikakvih ograničenja jer je takvo rešenje u skladu s ciljevima koje naknada treba da ostvari.
AB  - In this dissertation the author attempts to answer the question whether the right to compensation for non-pecuniary loss should pass to the heirs of the victim and under which conditions. This research is occasioned by the restrictive provisions of the Serbian Code of Obligations, which exclude heritability of the right to compensation for non-pecuniary loss, except in cases where that right is recognised by a final court decision or a written agreement between the victim and the responsible party. In order to find the answer, the author examines the history of the institution of non-pecuniary loss, solutions from other legal systems and theoretical conceptions about the notion of non-pecuniary loss and the goals of its compensation. The author concludes that the notion of non-pecuniary loss should be extended to all significant immaterial losses, which may be qualified as restrictions of the right to free development of personality, and that the right to compensation for non-pecuniary loss should pass to the heirs without any restrictions because such solution is fully in line with the goals that the compensation aims to achieve.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet
T1  - Nasledivost prava na naknadu neimovinske štete
T1  - Heritability of the right to compensation for non-pecuniary loss
UR  - t-10833
ER  - 

@phdthesis{
author = "Vukotić, Miloš",
year = "2020",
abstract = "U ovoj disertaciji autor nastoji da odgovori na pitanje da li pravo na naknadu neimovinske štete treba da bude nasledivo i pod kojim uslovima. Povod za ovo istraživanje pružaju restriktivne odredbe srpskog Zakona o obligacionim odnosima, koje isključuju nasledivost prava na naknadu neimovinske štete, osim u slučajevima kada je to pravo priznato pravnosnažnom sudskom odlukom ili pismenim sporazumom između oštećenika i odgovornog lica. Kako bi došao do odgovora, autor istražuje istoriju ustanove neimovinske štete, rešenja iz drugih pravnih sistema i teorijska shvatanja o pojmu neimovinske štete i ciljevima njene naknade. Autor zaključuje da pojam neimovinske štete treba proširiti na sve značajne neimovinske gubitke, koji se mogu kvalifikovati kao ograničenje prava na slobodan razvoj ličnosti, i da pravo na naknadu neimovinske štete treba da bude nasledivo bez ikakvih ograničenja jer je takvo rešenje u skladu s ciljevima koje naknada treba da ostvari., In this dissertation the author attempts to answer the question whether the right to compensation for non-pecuniary loss should pass to the heirs of the victim and under which conditions. This research is occasioned by the restrictive provisions of the Serbian Code of Obligations, which exclude heritability of the right to compensation for non-pecuniary loss, except in cases where that right is recognised by a final court decision or a written agreement between the victim and the responsible party. In order to find the answer, the author examines the history of the institution of non-pecuniary loss, solutions from other legal systems and theoretical conceptions about the notion of non-pecuniary loss and the goals of its compensation. The author concludes that the notion of non-pecuniary loss should be extended to all significant immaterial losses, which may be qualified as restrictions of the right to free development of personality, and that the right to compensation for non-pecuniary loss should pass to the heirs without any restrictions because such solution is fully in line with the goals that the compensation aims to achieve.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet",
title = "Nasledivost prava na naknadu neimovinske štete, Heritability of the right to compensation for non-pecuniary loss",
url = "t-10833"
}

Vukotić, M.. (2020). Nasledivost prava na naknadu neimovinske štete. 
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet..
t-10833

Vukotić M. Nasledivost prava na naknadu neimovinske štete. 2020;.
t-10833 .

Vukotić, Miloš, "Nasledivost prava na naknadu neimovinske štete" (2020),
t-10833 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vukotić, Miloš
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1114
AB  - Ovaj rad istražuje mogućnost i opravdanost priznavanja prava na naknadu neimovinske štete pravnim licima. Usled specifičnog shvatanja neimovinske štete kao patnje oštećenika i pratećeg shvatanja o ličnom zadovoljenju kao cilju novčane naknade, u srpskom pravu pravna lica nemaju pravo na naknadu za povredu neimovinskih interesa. Autor kritikuje ovakvo rešenje i ukazuje na potrebu da se neimovinskim interesima pravnih lica prizna zaštita u okviru odštetnog prava. Autor zasniva svoju kritiku na uporednopravnom istraživanju i teorijskim stavovima o funkcijama novčane naknade neimovinske štete. U radu se takođe ukazuje na opasnost za slobodu govora koja bi nastala kada bi država i nosioci javnih ovlašćenja imali mogućnost da traže naknadu neimovinske štete.
AB  - This article examines the possibility and legitimacy of accepting the right of legal persons to claim damages for non-pecuniary loss. Because of a specific understanding of non-pecuniary loss as the suffering of the victim and the corresponding understanding of satisfaction as the main goal of awarding damages, Serbian law does not allow legal persons to claim damages for injury of their non-pecuniary interests. The author criticizes this solution and shows the need of protecting non-pecuniary interests of legal persons within tort law. The author bases his views on comparative research and theoretical views on the functions of damages for non-pecuniary loss. Danger for the freedom of speech which might arise if the state and public bodies had the right to claim damages for non-pecuniary loss is also discussed.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Neimovinska šteta pravnih lica
T1  - Non-pecuniary loss of legal persons
EP  - 468
IS  - 7-9
SP  - 451
VL  - 57
UR  - conv_2303
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vukotić, Miloš",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Ovaj rad istražuje mogućnost i opravdanost priznavanja prava na naknadu neimovinske štete pravnim licima. Usled specifičnog shvatanja neimovinske štete kao patnje oštećenika i pratećeg shvatanja o ličnom zadovoljenju kao cilju novčane naknade, u srpskom pravu pravna lica nemaju pravo na naknadu za povredu neimovinskih interesa. Autor kritikuje ovakvo rešenje i ukazuje na potrebu da se neimovinskim interesima pravnih lica prizna zaštita u okviru odštetnog prava. Autor zasniva svoju kritiku na uporednopravnom istraživanju i teorijskim stavovima o funkcijama novčane naknade neimovinske štete. U radu se takođe ukazuje na opasnost za slobodu govora koja bi nastala kada bi država i nosioci javnih ovlašćenja imali mogućnost da traže naknadu neimovinske štete., This article examines the possibility and legitimacy of accepting the right of legal persons to claim damages for non-pecuniary loss. Because of a specific understanding of non-pecuniary loss as the suffering of the victim and the corresponding understanding of satisfaction as the main goal of awarding damages, Serbian law does not allow legal persons to claim damages for injury of their non-pecuniary interests. The author criticizes this solution and shows the need of protecting non-pecuniary interests of legal persons within tort law. The author bases his views on comparative research and theoretical views on the functions of damages for non-pecuniary loss. Danger for the freedom of speech which might arise if the state and public bodies had the right to claim damages for non-pecuniary loss is also discussed.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Neimovinska šteta pravnih lica, Non-pecuniary loss of legal persons",
pages = "468-451",
number = "7-9",
volume = "57",
url = "conv_2303"
}

Vukotić, M.. (2019). Neimovinska šteta pravnih lica. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 57(7-9), 451-468.
conv_2303

Vukotić M. Neimovinska šteta pravnih lica. in Pravo i privreda. 2019;57(7-9):451-468.
conv_2303 .

Vukotić, Miloš, "Neimovinska šteta pravnih lica" in Pravo i privreda, 57, no. 7-9 (2019):451-468,
conv_2303 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vukotić, Miloš
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1073
AB  - Ovaj rad je posvećen pravnim problemima koji se javljaju u vezi sa nasleđivanjem preduzeća zbog sukoba između načela naslednog prava i načela kompanijskog prava. Analiza obuhvata nasleđivanje preduzetnika i nasleđivanje udela u privrednim društvima.Autor ispituje mogućnost nasleđivanja u zavisnosti od pravnog oblika preduzeća. Osobenosti nekih pravnih formi preduzeća dovode u pitanje mogućnost naslednopravne sukcesije. Faktički kontinuitet, međutim, može se ostvariti putem ugovornog prava, nezavisno od nasleđivanja. Autor ističe značaj razlikovanja naslednopravne sukcesije, kao univerzalne sukcesije koja nastupa po samom zakonu, od drugih načina sticanja položaja preduzetnika odnosno člana privrednog društva.
AB  - This article is devoted to legal problems which arise in connection with inheriting a business due to the conflict of the principles of succession law and the principles of company law. The analysis covers inheriting entrepreneurs and shares in commercial companies. The author examines the possibility of succession depending on the legal form of the business. Characteristics of certain legal forms of business put into question the possibility of succession. Factual continuity, however, may be achieved through contract law, independently from the law of succession. The author stresses the importance of distinguishing inheriting, as universal succession which operates by force of law, from other methods of acquiring the position of entrepreneur or shareholder of a commercial company.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Nasleđivanje preduzeća
T1  - Inheriting a business
EP  - 195
IS  - 10-12
SP  - 165
VL  - 56
UR  - conv_2266
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vukotić, Miloš",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Ovaj rad je posvećen pravnim problemima koji se javljaju u vezi sa nasleđivanjem preduzeća zbog sukoba između načela naslednog prava i načela kompanijskog prava. Analiza obuhvata nasleđivanje preduzetnika i nasleđivanje udela u privrednim društvima.Autor ispituje mogućnost nasleđivanja u zavisnosti od pravnog oblika preduzeća. Osobenosti nekih pravnih formi preduzeća dovode u pitanje mogućnost naslednopravne sukcesije. Faktički kontinuitet, međutim, može se ostvariti putem ugovornog prava, nezavisno od nasleđivanja. Autor ističe značaj razlikovanja naslednopravne sukcesije, kao univerzalne sukcesije koja nastupa po samom zakonu, od drugih načina sticanja položaja preduzetnika odnosno člana privrednog društva., This article is devoted to legal problems which arise in connection with inheriting a business due to the conflict of the principles of succession law and the principles of company law. The analysis covers inheriting entrepreneurs and shares in commercial companies. The author examines the possibility of succession depending on the legal form of the business. Characteristics of certain legal forms of business put into question the possibility of succession. Factual continuity, however, may be achieved through contract law, independently from the law of succession. The author stresses the importance of distinguishing inheriting, as universal succession which operates by force of law, from other methods of acquiring the position of entrepreneur or shareholder of a commercial company.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Nasleđivanje preduzeća, Inheriting a business",
pages = "195-165",
number = "10-12",
volume = "56",
url = "conv_2266"
}

Vukotić, M.. (2018). Nasleđivanje preduzeća. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 56(10-12), 165-195.
conv_2266

Vukotić M. Nasleđivanje preduzeća. in Pravo i privreda. 2018;56(10-12):165-195.
conv_2266 .

Vukotić, Miloš, "Nasleđivanje preduzeća" in Pravo i privreda, 56, no. 10-12 (2018):165-195,
conv_2266 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vukotić, Miloš
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/944
AB  - The author of the paper discusses rules relating to will execution formalities, and rules relating to interpretation of wills in order to show the importance of legal policy and general legal values for interpretation of wills. Aharon Barak's theory of purposive interpretation is a starting point for the discussion because this theory emphasizes the importance of objective elements for interpretation of wills. The author analyses the main problems that arise in connection with interpretation of wills and indicates possible policy considerations underlying different approaches to interpretation. The author concludes that courts have a justifiably large freedom to interpret the words of the will and that there is convergence between civil law and common law approach to interpretation of wills, and this interpretation is often based on objective rules not connected to the most likely intent of the testator.
PB  - Pravni Fakultet Sveucilista Josipa Jurja Strossmayera & Osijeku, Osijek
T2  - Pravni vjesnik
T1  - Influence of objective elements on the interpretation of wills
EP  - 29
IS  - 1
SP  - 9
VL  - 33
DO  - 10.25234/pv/4943
UR  - conv_3039
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vukotić, Miloš",
year = "2017",
abstract = "The author of the paper discusses rules relating to will execution formalities, and rules relating to interpretation of wills in order to show the importance of legal policy and general legal values for interpretation of wills. Aharon Barak's theory of purposive interpretation is a starting point for the discussion because this theory emphasizes the importance of objective elements for interpretation of wills. The author analyses the main problems that arise in connection with interpretation of wills and indicates possible policy considerations underlying different approaches to interpretation. The author concludes that courts have a justifiably large freedom to interpret the words of the will and that there is convergence between civil law and common law approach to interpretation of wills, and this interpretation is often based on objective rules not connected to the most likely intent of the testator.",
publisher = "Pravni Fakultet Sveucilista Josipa Jurja Strossmayera & Osijeku, Osijek",
journal = "Pravni vjesnik",
title = "Influence of objective elements on the interpretation of wills",
pages = "29-9",
number = "1",
volume = "33",
doi = "10.25234/pv/4943",
url = "conv_3039"
}

Vukotić, M.. (2017). Influence of objective elements on the interpretation of wills. in Pravni vjesnik
Pravni Fakultet Sveucilista Josipa Jurja Strossmayera & Osijeku, Osijek., 33(1), 9-29.
https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/4943
conv_3039

Vukotić M. Influence of objective elements on the interpretation of wills. in Pravni vjesnik. 2017;33(1):9-29.
doi:10.25234/pv/4943
conv_3039 .

Vukotić, Miloš, "Influence of objective elements on the interpretation of wills" in Pravni vjesnik, 33, no. 1 (2017):9-29,
https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/4943 .,
conv_3039 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Karanikić Mirić, Marija
AU  - Vukotić, Miloš
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1989
AB  - Program usaglašavanja srpskog prava s pravom Evropske unije predviđa
da se do kraja 2015. donese krovni zakon kojim bi se Direktiva 2006/123/EZ o uslugama
na unutrašnjem tržištu transponovala u srpsko pravo. Ovom Direktivom
nalaže se državama članicama da u svoja nacionalna zakonodavstva unesu garantije
slobode poslovnog nastanjivanja i slobode prekograničnog pružanja usluga u
cilju liberalizacije unutrašnjeg tržišta usluga. Njena osobenost može se prepoznati
u kombinaciji različitih regulatornih pristupa: deregulacija uslužnih delatnosti;
uspostavljanje elektronske uprave i administrativne saradnje; obezbeđivanje kvaliteta
usluga putem samoregulacije. Složenost pravnog režima Direktive o uslugama
dodatno je uvećana velikim brojem uslužnih delatnosti i pravnih oblasti na koje se
ona ne primenjuje. Pravilna implementacija Direktive o uslugama stoga predstavlja
ozbiljan izazov za srpskog zakonodavca i relevantne organe javne vlasti. U ovom
radu analiziraju se osnovna pravila Direktive o uslugama i pružaju smernice za
njenu implementaciju u pravni sistem Republike Srbije.
AB  - According to the programme of harmonization of Serbian law with the law of the
European Union, an umbrella legislation should be adopted by the end of 2015,
which would transpose Directive 2006/123/EC on services in the internal market
into Serbian law. This Directive requires member states to introduce guarantees of
the freedom of establishment and the freedom of cross-border provision of services
into their national legislation, with the aim of liberalisation of the internal market
for services. Its main characteristic may be recognized in a combination of different
regulatory approaches: deregulation of service activities; establishment of electronic
governance and administrative cooperation; ensuring the quality of services through
self-regulation. The complexity of the legal regime of the Services Directive is
further increased by a large number of service activities and legal areas to which
it does not apply. Effective implementation of the Services Directive, therefore,
represents a serious challenge for the Serbian legislator and for the relevant public
authorities. This paper analyses the main provisions of the Services Directive and
offers guidelines for its implementation in the legal system of the Republic of Serbia.
PB  - Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
T2  - Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 5 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume V
T1  - Usaglašavanje prava Republike Srbije s Direktivom 2006/123/EZ o uslugama na unutrašnjem tržištu
T1  - Harmonization of Serbian Law with Directive 2006/123/EC on Services in the Internal Market
EP  - 212
SP  - 189
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Karanikić Mirić, Marija and Vukotić, Miloš",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Program usaglašavanja srpskog prava s pravom Evropske unije predviđa
da se do kraja 2015. donese krovni zakon kojim bi se Direktiva 2006/123/EZ o uslugama
na unutrašnjem tržištu transponovala u srpsko pravo. Ovom Direktivom
nalaže se državama članicama da u svoja nacionalna zakonodavstva unesu garantije
slobode poslovnog nastanjivanja i slobode prekograničnog pružanja usluga u
cilju liberalizacije unutrašnjeg tržišta usluga. Njena osobenost može se prepoznati
u kombinaciji različitih regulatornih pristupa: deregulacija uslužnih delatnosti;
uspostavljanje elektronske uprave i administrativne saradnje; obezbeđivanje kvaliteta
usluga putem samoregulacije. Složenost pravnog režima Direktive o uslugama
dodatno je uvećana velikim brojem uslužnih delatnosti i pravnih oblasti na koje se
ona ne primenjuje. Pravilna implementacija Direktive o uslugama stoga predstavlja
ozbiljan izazov za srpskog zakonodavca i relevantne organe javne vlasti. U ovom
radu analiziraju se osnovna pravila Direktive o uslugama i pružaju smernice za
njenu implementaciju u pravni sistem Republike Srbije., According to the programme of harmonization of Serbian law with the law of the
European Union, an umbrella legislation should be adopted by the end of 2015,
which would transpose Directive 2006/123/EC on services in the internal market
into Serbian law. This Directive requires member states to introduce guarantees of
the freedom of establishment and the freedom of cross-border provision of services
into their national legislation, with the aim of liberalisation of the internal market
for services. Its main characteristic may be recognized in a combination of different
regulatory approaches: deregulation of service activities; establishment of electronic
governance and administrative cooperation; ensuring the quality of services through
self-regulation. The complexity of the legal regime of the Services Directive is
further increased by a large number of service activities and legal areas to which
it does not apply. Effective implementation of the Services Directive, therefore,
represents a serious challenge for the Serbian legislator and for the relevant public
authorities. This paper analyses the main provisions of the Services Directive and
offers guidelines for its implementation in the legal system of the Republic of Serbia.",
publisher = "Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje",
journal = "Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 5 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume V",
booktitle = "Usaglašavanje prava Republike Srbije s Direktivom 2006/123/EZ o uslugama na unutrašnjem tržištu, Harmonization of Serbian Law with Directive 2006/123/EC on Services in the Internal Market",
pages = "212-189"
}

Karanikić Mirić, M.,& Vukotić, M.. (2015). Usaglašavanje prava Republike Srbije s Direktivom 2006/123/EZ o uslugama na unutrašnjem tržištu. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 5 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume V
Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje., 189-212.

Karanikić Mirić M, Vukotić M. Usaglašavanje prava Republike Srbije s Direktivom 2006/123/EZ o uslugama na unutrašnjem tržištu. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 5 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume V. 2015;:189-212..

Karanikić Mirić, Marija, Vukotić, Miloš, "Usaglašavanje prava Republike Srbije s Direktivom 2006/123/EZ o uslugama na unutrašnjem tržištu" in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 5 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume V (2015):189-212.

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Vukotić, Miloš
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1957
AB  - Предмет овог рада је опозивост понуде, односно питање да ли се
правно дејство понуде може прекинути накнадном изјавом понудиоца.
Одговор на то питање зависи од многих околности, али су од нарочитог
значаја темељни правни принципи и традиционална учења која леже
у основи правнотеоријског појма понуде у одређеном националном пра-
ву. Главне дилеме које се јављају у вези са дејством и правном природом
понуде изложена су у упоредноправној и догматској анализи најкарак-
теристичнијих европских националних правних система, са посебним
освртом на однос српског права према традиционалним европским док-
тринама.
AB  - The subject of this work is revocability of offer i.e. the question whether
legal effects of an offer can be ended by a subsequent declaration of the offeror.
The answer to that question depends on many circumstances, most important
of which are fundamental legal principles and traditional doctrines which lie in
the basis of the theoretical legal notion of offer in any given national law. The
main dilemmas arising in connection with the effect and legal nature of offer
are expounded through comparative and dogmatic legal analysis of the most
characteristic European national legal systems, with a special reference to the
relationship of Serbian law to traditional European doctrines.
PB  - Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
T2  - Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 3 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume III
T1  - Opozivost ponude u kontekstu evropske prаvne teorije
T1  - Revocability of Offer in the Context of European Legal Theory
EP  - 361
SP  - 345
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Vukotić, Miloš",
year = "2013",
abstract = "Предмет овог рада је опозивост понуде, односно питање да ли се
правно дејство понуде може прекинути накнадном изјавом понудиоца.
Одговор на то питање зависи од многих околности, али су од нарочитог
значаја темељни правни принципи и традиционална учења која леже
у основи правнотеоријског појма понуде у одређеном националном пра-
ву. Главне дилеме које се јављају у вези са дејством и правном природом
понуде изложена су у упоредноправној и догматској анализи најкарак-
теристичнијих европских националних правних система, са посебним
освртом на однос српског права према традиционалним европским док-
тринама., The subject of this work is revocability of offer i.e. the question whether
legal effects of an offer can be ended by a subsequent declaration of the offeror.
The answer to that question depends on many circumstances, most important
of which are fundamental legal principles and traditional doctrines which lie in
the basis of the theoretical legal notion of offer in any given national law. The
main dilemmas arising in connection with the effect and legal nature of offer
are expounded through comparative and dogmatic legal analysis of the most
characteristic European national legal systems, with a special reference to the
relationship of Serbian law to traditional European doctrines.",
publisher = "Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje",
journal = "Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 3 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume III",
booktitle = "Opozivost ponude u kontekstu evropske prаvne teorije, Revocability of Offer in the Context of European Legal Theory",
pages = "361-345"
}

Vukotić, M.. (2013). Opozivost ponude u kontekstu evropske prаvne teorije. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 3 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume III
Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje., 345-361.

Vukotić M. Opozivost ponude u kontekstu evropske prаvne teorije. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 3 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume III. 2013;:345-361..

Vukotić, Miloš, "Opozivost ponude u kontekstu evropske prаvne teorije" in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 3 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume III (2013):345-361.

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vukotić, Miloš
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1540
AB  - U XII knjizi Digesta nalazi se tekst u kojem Celz odbacuje postojanje kupoprodaje u situaciji kada jedna strana daje novac da bi dobila roba. Međutim, takva situacija, tj. novčana razmena, uvek u redovnim okolnostima čini sadržinu kontrakta kupoprodaje, tako da se mora postaviti pitanje - zašto je Celz doneo odluku koja je naizgled u suprotnosti s opštim pravilima rimskog obligacionog prava? Razmatrajući odgovore koji su već ponuđeni u literaturi, autor raspravlja nekoliko mogućih rešenja i ukazuje na osnovne dileme koje se javljaju u svakom od njih. Kao najjednostavnije objašnjenje ističe se mogućnost da je ugovor zaključen pod čisto potestativnim uslovom, dok se po svojoj inventivnosti ističu teze o razmeni uz doplatu i o posebnoj strukturi transakcije koja je uslovila isključivanje kontraktne tužbe. Autor zauzima kritički stav prema pravilu o vacuam possessionem tradere i pokušava da ukaže na njegov ograničeni praktični domašaj.
AB  - In the XII book of the Digest stands a text in which Celsus denies the existence of sale when one party gives money in order to receive a slave. However, that situation, i.e. a monetary exchange, in usual circumstances always constitutes a contract of sale, rendering it necessary to pose the question - why did Celsus make a decision which is, at face value, contrary to the general principles of the Roman law of obligations? Examining the answers that have already been given in the literature, the author discusses several possible solutions and points out their respective key dilemmas. The explanation that the contract was concluded under a fully potestative condition stands out as the simplest, while the theses of an exchange with payment and of a special structure of the transaction which excluded the contractual action stand out as especially inventive. The author takes a critical stance towards the principle of vacuam possessionem tradere and tries to show its limited practical scope.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - D.12.4.16 - kupoprodaja ili neosnovano obogaćenje?
T1  - D.12.4.16: Sale or unjustified enrichment
EP  - 390
IS  - 2
SP  - 378
VL  - 60
UR  - conv_3177
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vukotić, Miloš",
year = "2012",
abstract = "U XII knjizi Digesta nalazi se tekst u kojem Celz odbacuje postojanje kupoprodaje u situaciji kada jedna strana daje novac da bi dobila roba. Međutim, takva situacija, tj. novčana razmena, uvek u redovnim okolnostima čini sadržinu kontrakta kupoprodaje, tako da se mora postaviti pitanje - zašto je Celz doneo odluku koja je naizgled u suprotnosti s opštim pravilima rimskog obligacionog prava? Razmatrajući odgovore koji su već ponuđeni u literaturi, autor raspravlja nekoliko mogućih rešenja i ukazuje na osnovne dileme koje se javljaju u svakom od njih. Kao najjednostavnije objašnjenje ističe se mogućnost da je ugovor zaključen pod čisto potestativnim uslovom, dok se po svojoj inventivnosti ističu teze o razmeni uz doplatu i o posebnoj strukturi transakcije koja je uslovila isključivanje kontraktne tužbe. Autor zauzima kritički stav prema pravilu o vacuam possessionem tradere i pokušava da ukaže na njegov ograničeni praktični domašaj., In the XII book of the Digest stands a text in which Celsus denies the existence of sale when one party gives money in order to receive a slave. However, that situation, i.e. a monetary exchange, in usual circumstances always constitutes a contract of sale, rendering it necessary to pose the question - why did Celsus make a decision which is, at face value, contrary to the general principles of the Roman law of obligations? Examining the answers that have already been given in the literature, the author discusses several possible solutions and points out their respective key dilemmas. The explanation that the contract was concluded under a fully potestative condition stands out as the simplest, while the theses of an exchange with payment and of a special structure of the transaction which excluded the contractual action stand out as especially inventive. The author takes a critical stance towards the principle of vacuam possessionem tradere and tries to show its limited practical scope.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "D.12.4.16 - kupoprodaja ili neosnovano obogaćenje?, D.12.4.16: Sale or unjustified enrichment",
pages = "390-378",
number = "2",
volume = "60",
url = "conv_3177"
}

Vukotić, M.. (2012). D.12.4.16 - kupoprodaja ili neosnovano obogaćenje?. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 60(2), 378-390.
conv_3177

Vukotić M. D.12.4.16 - kupoprodaja ili neosnovano obogaćenje?. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2012;60(2):378-390.
conv_3177 .

Vukotić, Miloš, "D.12.4.16 - kupoprodaja ili neosnovano obogaćenje?" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 60, no. 2 (2012):378-390,
conv_3177 .