TY  - CONF
AU  - Kolaković Bojović, Milica
PY  - 2024
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2116
AB  - The election of judges to the International Criminal Court
(ICC) is a critical process that shapes the Court’s legitimacy and effectiveness.
This paper delves into the normative framework governing the election
of ICC judges, explores the challenges arising from the past election
cycles, examines national nomination procedures in the State Parties, and
discusses the efforts to enhance these procedures. By scrutinizing these
aspects, the paper aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse on improving
the democratic legitimacy of the ICC through the lens of the recent,
ongoing and the forthcoming activities of the Advisory Committee for
nomination of judges of the International Criminal Court (ACN), but also
with respect of the role that in that plays the Assembly of ICC (ASP). Since
ACN plays a pivotal role in enhancing the nomination procedures for ICC
judges, it has been actively engaged in developing non-binding instruments
aimed at improving the transparency, inclusivity, and integrity of the
nomination process. These efforts were made in response to the challenges
identified in past election cycles, including concerns regarding the quality
of candidates and nomination process itself, gender and geographical representation,
and overall fairness.
AB  - Izbor sudija međunarodnog krivičnog suda (MKS) je
veoma važan process koji utiče na legitimnost i efikasnost suda. Ovaj rad
zadire u normativni okvir koji uređuje izbor sudija MKS, istražuje izazove
proizaše iz poslednjih izbornih ciklusa, analizira nacionalne procedure
nominovanja kandidata od strane Država članica i diskutuje napore koji
su učinjeni na unapređenju tih procedura. Produbljujući ove aspekte, rad
ima za cilj da doprinese tekuć em diskursu o poboljšanju demokratskog
legitimiteta MKS-a kroz lupu nedavnih, tekuć ih i predstojećih aktivnosti
Savetodavnog komiteta za nominaciju sudija Međunarodnog krivičnog
suda (ACN), ali i u pogledu uloge koju u tom procesu ima Skupština država
članica MKS-a (ASP). Pošto ACN igra ključnu ulogu u unapređenju postupaka
nominovanja kandidata za sudije MKS-a, aktivno je angažovan u
razvoju neobvezujuć ih instrumenata koji imaju za cilj da poboljšanje transparentnosti,
inkluzivnosti i integriteta procesa nominovanja. Ovi napori
su napravljeni kao odgovor na izazove identifikovane u prošlim izbornim
ciklusima, uključujući zabrinutost u pogledu kvaliteta kandidata i procesa
nominacije, rodnu i geografsku zastupljenost i generalno legitimitet.
PB  - Beograd : Udruženje za međunarodno krivično pravo : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
C3  - Однос међународног кривичног и националног кривичног права  : зборник радова са међународне научне конференције, Палић,  14–17. јун 2024. године. Том 1 /  Relation between international and national  criminal law : Volume I
T1  - Election of Judges of the International Criminal Court: Towards Integrity and Transparency of the National Nomination Procedures
T1  - Izbor sudija međunarodnog krivičnog suda: u pravcu integriteta i transparentnosti nacionalnih procedura za nominovanje
EP  - 160
SP  - 143
DO  - 10.51204/Zbornik_UMKP_24106A
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Kolaković Bojović, Milica",
year = "2024",
abstract = "The election of judges to the International Criminal Court
(ICC) is a critical process that shapes the Court’s legitimacy and effectiveness.
This paper delves into the normative framework governing the election
of ICC judges, explores the challenges arising from the past election
cycles, examines national nomination procedures in the State Parties, and
discusses the efforts to enhance these procedures. By scrutinizing these
aspects, the paper aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse on improving
the democratic legitimacy of the ICC through the lens of the recent,
ongoing and the forthcoming activities of the Advisory Committee for
nomination of judges of the International Criminal Court (ACN), but also
with respect of the role that in that plays the Assembly of ICC (ASP). Since
ACN plays a pivotal role in enhancing the nomination procedures for ICC
judges, it has been actively engaged in developing non-binding instruments
aimed at improving the transparency, inclusivity, and integrity of the
nomination process. These efforts were made in response to the challenges
identified in past election cycles, including concerns regarding the quality
of candidates and nomination process itself, gender and geographical representation,
and overall fairness., Izbor sudija međunarodnog krivičnog suda (MKS) je
veoma važan process koji utiče na legitimnost i efikasnost suda. Ovaj rad
zadire u normativni okvir koji uređuje izbor sudija MKS, istražuje izazove
proizaše iz poslednjih izbornih ciklusa, analizira nacionalne procedure
nominovanja kandidata od strane Država članica i diskutuje napore koji
su učinjeni na unapređenju tih procedura. Produbljujući ove aspekte, rad
ima za cilj da doprinese tekuć em diskursu o poboljšanju demokratskog
legitimiteta MKS-a kroz lupu nedavnih, tekuć ih i predstojećih aktivnosti
Savetodavnog komiteta za nominaciju sudija Međunarodnog krivičnog
suda (ACN), ali i u pogledu uloge koju u tom procesu ima Skupština država
članica MKS-a (ASP). Pošto ACN igra ključnu ulogu u unapređenju postupaka
nominovanja kandidata za sudije MKS-a, aktivno je angažovan u
razvoju neobvezujuć ih instrumenata koji imaju za cilj da poboljšanje transparentnosti,
inkluzivnosti i integriteta procesa nominovanja. Ovi napori
su napravljeni kao odgovor na izazove identifikovane u prošlim izbornim
ciklusima, uključujući zabrinutost u pogledu kvaliteta kandidata i procesa
nominacije, rodnu i geografsku zastupljenost i generalno legitimitet.",
publisher = "Beograd : Udruženje za međunarodno krivično pravo : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu",
journal = "Однос међународног кривичног и националног кривичног права  : зборник радова са међународне научне конференције, Палић,  14–17. јун 2024. године. Том 1 /  Relation between international and national  criminal law : Volume I",
title = "Election of Judges of the International Criminal Court: Towards Integrity and Transparency of the National Nomination Procedures, Izbor sudija međunarodnog krivičnog suda: u pravcu integriteta i transparentnosti nacionalnih procedura za nominovanje",
pages = "160-143",
doi = "10.51204/Zbornik_UMKP_24106A"
}

Kolaković Bojović, M.. (2024). Election of Judges of the International Criminal Court: Towards Integrity and Transparency of the National Nomination Procedures. in Однос међународног кривичног и националног кривичног права  : зборник радова са међународне научне конференције, Палић,  14–17. јун 2024. године. Том 1 /  Relation between international and national  criminal law : Volume I
Beograd : Udruženje za međunarodno krivično pravo : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu., 143-160.
https://doi.org/10.51204/Zbornik_UMKP_24106A

Kolaković Bojović M. Election of Judges of the International Criminal Court: Towards Integrity and Transparency of the National Nomination Procedures. in Однос међународног кривичног и националног кривичног права  : зборник радова са међународне научне конференције, Палић,  14–17. јун 2024. године. Том 1 /  Relation between international and national  criminal law : Volume I. 2024;:143-160.
doi:10.51204/Zbornik_UMKP_24106A .

Kolaković Bojović, Milica, "Election of Judges of the International Criminal Court: Towards Integrity and Transparency of the National Nomination Procedures" in Однос међународног кривичног и националног кривичног права  : зборник радова са међународне научне конференције, Палић,  14–17. јун 2024. године. Том 1 /  Relation between international and national  criminal law : Volume I (2024):143-160,
https://doi.org/10.51204/Zbornik_UMKP_24106A . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kolaković-Bojović, Milica
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1657
AB  - Implementation of the Checks and balances principle as one of the milestones in modern democracies, demonstrates its full complexity when it comes to balancing guaranties of judicial independence and the need to prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the rights. Additional issue in that process is determination of the border line between constitutional and guaranties of judicial independence prescribed by law. Raising that issue opens various questions which go beyond the legal framework itself. It actually tackles the historical, political and cultural country background. Furthermore, if analyzed from the prospective of the requirements defined in the accession negotiation process with the EU, constitutional guaranties of (non)application of the EU standards might demotivate candidate countries in their efforts to achieve substantial reform results.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Constitutional provisions on judicial independence and EU standards
EP  - 204
IS  - 3
SP  - 192
VL  - 64
DO  - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1603192K
UR  - conv_3007_6
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Kolaković-Bojović, Milica",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Implementation of the Checks and balances principle as one of the milestones in modern democracies, demonstrates its full complexity when it comes to balancing guaranties of judicial independence and the need to prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the rights. Additional issue in that process is determination of the border line between constitutional and guaranties of judicial independence prescribed by law. Raising that issue opens various questions which go beyond the legal framework itself. It actually tackles the historical, political and cultural country background. Furthermore, if analyzed from the prospective of the requirements defined in the accession negotiation process with the EU, constitutional guaranties of (non)application of the EU standards might demotivate candidate countries in their efforts to achieve substantial reform results.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Constitutional provisions on judicial independence and EU standards",
pages = "204-192",
number = "3",
volume = "64",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1603192K",
url = "conv_3007_6"
}

Kolaković-Bojović, M.. (2016). Constitutional provisions on judicial independence and EU standards. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 64(3), 192-204.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1603192K
conv_3007_6

Kolaković-Bojović M. Constitutional provisions on judicial independence and EU standards. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2016;64(3):192-204.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1603192K
conv_3007_6 .

Kolaković-Bojović, Milica, "Constitutional provisions on judicial independence and EU standards" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 64, no. 3 (2016):192-204,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1603192K .,
conv_3007_6 .