Zdravković, Ana

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
29ca9504-835e-46dd-b617-2554dda96f5a
  • Zdravković, Ana (1)
  • Zdravković, Ana M. (1)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Access to justice and enforcement of rights – an introduction

Đorđević, Mila; Zdravković, Ana; Vojnović, Sava

(Lisboa : Lisbon Public Law Research Centre, Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa, 2025-11)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Mila
AU  - Zdravković, Ana
AU  - Vojnović, Sava
PY  - 2025-11
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2375
AB  - The debates on access to justice emerged from the historical contexts of post-industrial Western countries, and the concept gained prominence in the 1960s, during the rise of the welfare state (Maranlou, 2014: 17).1 A major turning point in the discourse was the Florence Access to Justice Project, led by Mauro Cappelletti and Bryant Garth (1981). In October 1979, a conference at the European University Institute examined the prospects for further action, and participants sought to identify the most pressing issues, evaluate key insights, and assess the broader significance of what they termed the “access to justice” movement (Cappelletti, Garth, 1981: 3).
Cappelletti and Garth discuss three “waves” of access to justice. The first wave was concerned primarily with access to courts, and the emphasis was on the problems faced by poor and marginalized groups in accessing expensive legal services and complex legal systems. The second wave related to access to justice gaps that arise not predominantly because of socio-economic factors, but as a result of the nature of the problems people experience in particular contexts. For example, so-called “diffuse interests” include consumer problems, where large groups are affected by similar issues, but there are difficulties in launching individual claims and, as a result, a significant access to justice gap. The third wave, while continuing to incorporate the concerns of the first and second waves, broadened the concern of access to justice even further, so that a host of procedural innovations that might allow access to justice began to be discussed. This included alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and other means by which people might resolve their problems without accessing the courts (Garth, Cappelletti, 1981: 9-25).
PB  - Lisboa : Lisbon Public Law Research Centre, Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa
T2  - e-Publica: revista electrónica de direito público, Vol. 12, No. 2 (1-8)
T1  - Access to justice and enforcement of rights – an introduction
EP  - 8
SP  - 1
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Đorđević, Mila and Zdravković, Ana and Vojnović, Sava",
year = "2025-11",
abstract = "The debates on access to justice emerged from the historical contexts of post-industrial Western countries, and the concept gained prominence in the 1960s, during the rise of the welfare state (Maranlou, 2014: 17).1 A major turning point in the discourse was the Florence Access to Justice Project, led by Mauro Cappelletti and Bryant Garth (1981). In October 1979, a conference at the European University Institute examined the prospects for further action, and participants sought to identify the most pressing issues, evaluate key insights, and assess the broader significance of what they termed the “access to justice” movement (Cappelletti, Garth, 1981: 3).
Cappelletti and Garth discuss three “waves” of access to justice. The first wave was concerned primarily with access to courts, and the emphasis was on the problems faced by poor and marginalized groups in accessing expensive legal services and complex legal systems. The second wave related to access to justice gaps that arise not predominantly because of socio-economic factors, but as a result of the nature of the problems people experience in particular contexts. For example, so-called “diffuse interests” include consumer problems, where large groups are affected by similar issues, but there are difficulties in launching individual claims and, as a result, a significant access to justice gap. The third wave, while continuing to incorporate the concerns of the first and second waves, broadened the concern of access to justice even further, so that a host of procedural innovations that might allow access to justice began to be discussed. This included alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and other means by which people might resolve their problems without accessing the courts (Garth, Cappelletti, 1981: 9-25).",
publisher = "Lisboa : Lisbon Public Law Research Centre, Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa",
journal = "e-Publica: revista electrónica de direito público, Vol. 12, No. 2 (1-8)",
title = "Access to justice and enforcement of rights – an introduction",
pages = "8-1"
}
Đorđević, M., Zdravković, A.,& Vojnović, S.. (2025-11). Access to justice and enforcement of rights – an introduction. in e-Publica: revista electrónica de direito público, Vol. 12, No. 2 (1-8)
Lisboa : Lisbon Public Law Research Centre, Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa., 1-8.
Đorđević M, Zdravković A, Vojnović S. Access to justice and enforcement of rights – an introduction. in e-Publica: revista electrónica de direito público, Vol. 12, No. 2 (1-8). 2025;:1-8..
Đorđević, Mila, Zdravković, Ana, Vojnović, Sava, "Access to justice and enforcement of rights – an introduction" in e-Publica: revista electrónica de direito público, Vol. 12, No. 2 (1-8) (2025-11):1-8.

BREAKING THE INVISIBLE CAGE: LIMITS OF LAW IN STRUCTURAL DISCRIMINATION

Zdravković, Ana M.

(Milano : Franco Angeli, 2024)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zdravković, Ana M.
PY  - 2024
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2004
AB  - The paper aims to map elements for a legal definition of structural discrimination as a complex form of discrimination with far-reaching implications across various societal domains. By drawing on sociological theories, it elucidates the relationship between structural inequalities and entrenched social processes and argues that structural discrimination arises from historically established social structures that perpetuate disadvantage for certain groups. The analysis investigates whether the concept of indirect discrimination is an appropriate answer to this challenge. Finally, it seeks to clarify the relationship between structural discrimination and substantive equality, ultimately contributing to a more nuanced understanding of how far we can go in using legal tools to combat discrimination and achieve a greater level of societal equality.
AB  - L’articolo mira a mappare gli elementi per una definizione legale di discriminazione strutturale come forma complessa di discriminazione con implicazioni di vasta portata in vari ambiti sociali. Basandosi su teorie sociologiche, l’articolo chiarisce la relazione tra disuguaglianze strutturali e processi sociali radicati e sostiene che la discriminazione strutturale deriva da strutture sociali storicamente stabilite che perpetuano lo svantaggio per determinati gruppi. L'analisi si concentra sul quesito se il concetto di discriminazione indiretta sia una risposta appropriata a questa sfida. Infine, la ricerca ambisce a chiarire la relazione tra discriminazione strutturale e uguaglianza sostanziale, contribuendo in ultima analisi a una comprensione più sfumata sui limiti dell'uso di strumenti legali per combattere la discriminazione e per raggiungere un livello maggiore di uguaglianza sociale.
PB  - Milano : Franco Angeli
T2  - Diritto, Immigrazione e Cittadinanza Fascicolo n. 3/2024
T1  - BREAKING THE INVISIBLE CAGE: LIMITS OF LAW IN STRUCTURAL DISCRIMINATION
EP  - 18
IS  - 3
SP  - 1
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ralf_2004
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Zdravković, Ana M.",
year = "2024",
abstract = "The paper aims to map elements for a legal definition of structural discrimination as a complex form of discrimination with far-reaching implications across various societal domains. By drawing on sociological theories, it elucidates the relationship between structural inequalities and entrenched social processes and argues that structural discrimination arises from historically established social structures that perpetuate disadvantage for certain groups. The analysis investigates whether the concept of indirect discrimination is an appropriate answer to this challenge. Finally, it seeks to clarify the relationship between structural discrimination and substantive equality, ultimately contributing to a more nuanced understanding of how far we can go in using legal tools to combat discrimination and achieve a greater level of societal equality., L’articolo mira a mappare gli elementi per una definizione legale di discriminazione strutturale come forma complessa di discriminazione con implicazioni di vasta portata in vari ambiti sociali. Basandosi su teorie sociologiche, l’articolo chiarisce la relazione tra disuguaglianze strutturali e processi sociali radicati e sostiene che la discriminazione strutturale deriva da strutture sociali storicamente stabilite che perpetuano lo svantaggio per determinati gruppi. L'analisi si concentra sul quesito se il concetto di discriminazione indiretta sia una risposta appropriata a questa sfida. Infine, la ricerca ambisce a chiarire la relazione tra discriminazione strutturale e uguaglianza sostanziale, contribuendo in ultima analisi a una comprensione più sfumata sui limiti dell'uso di strumenti legali per combattere la discriminazione e per raggiungere un livello maggiore di uguaglianza sociale.",
publisher = "Milano : Franco Angeli",
journal = "Diritto, Immigrazione e Cittadinanza Fascicolo n. 3/2024",
title = "BREAKING THE INVISIBLE CAGE: LIMITS OF LAW IN STRUCTURAL DISCRIMINATION",
pages = "18-1",
number = "3",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ralf_2004"
}
Zdravković, A. M.. (2024). BREAKING THE INVISIBLE CAGE: LIMITS OF LAW IN STRUCTURAL DISCRIMINATION. in Diritto, Immigrazione e Cittadinanza Fascicolo n. 3/2024
Milano : Franco Angeli.(3), 1-18.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ralf_2004
Zdravković AM. BREAKING THE INVISIBLE CAGE: LIMITS OF LAW IN STRUCTURAL DISCRIMINATION. in Diritto, Immigrazione e Cittadinanza Fascicolo n. 3/2024. 2024;(3):1-18.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ralf_2004 .
Zdravković, Ana M., "BREAKING THE INVISIBLE CAGE: LIMITS OF LAW IN STRUCTURAL DISCRIMINATION" in Diritto, Immigrazione e Cittadinanza Fascicolo n. 3/2024, no. 3 (2024):1-18,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ralf_2004 .