Приказ основних података о документу

Collision of duties as a defence of justification in the circumstances of pandemic

dc.creatorVuković, Igor
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T15:10:41Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T15:10:41Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2217-219X
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1181
dc.description.abstractGlobalna kriza povodom pandemije virusa Covid-19 pokrenula je izvesna pitanja od značaja i za krivično pravo. Iz više zemalja stižu uznemirujuće vesti o smrti velikog broja ljudi usled nemogućnosti zdravstvenih radnika da im zbog nedostatka uređaja za mehaničku ventilaciju pluća pruže adekvatnu medicinsku pomoć. U tom smislu, postavlja se pitanje koji su uopšte kriterijumi prema kojima bi se odlučivalo o tome ko će biti priključen na ventilator i kako se može olakšati odlučivanje lekara u ovim tragičnim pitanjima života i smrti. U radu se razmatra institut tzv. kolizije dužnosti, koja u nekim pravnim sistemima predstavlja samostalan osnov isključenja protivpravnosti, a negde podvrstu krajnje nužde. U uporednom pravu se sreće više različitih kriterijuma prema kojima bi trebalo vršiti trijažu pacijenata u situacijama katastrofe. Autor zaključuje da donošenje odgovarajućih smernica može uspostaviti standard dužnog postupanja u katastrofama, koji bi sa lekara donekle skinuo teret odlučivanja.sr
dc.description.abstractThe global crisis over the Covid-19 virus pandemic has raised some questions that are relevant to criminal law as well. Disturbing news are coming from several countries about the deaths of many people because of the inability of healthcare professionals to provide them with adequate medical care due to a lack of mechanical ventilation devices. In this regard, the question arises as to what are the criteria by which to decide who will be connected to the ventilator and how the decision-making of doctors in these tragic life and death issues can be facilitated. The paper deals with the institute of the so-called collision of duties, which in some legal systems constitutes an independent cause for the exclusion of unlawfulness and, in some cases, a type of necessity. In comparative law, a number of different criteria are met by which patients should be triaged in disaster situations. The author concludes that the adoption of appropriate guidelines can establish a standard of due diligence that would to some extent remove the burden of decision making from physicians.en
dc.publisherUniverzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd i Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceCrimen (Beograd)
dc.subjecttrijažasr
dc.subjectsmernicesr
dc.subjectpandemijasr
dc.subjectkrajnja nuždasr
dc.subjectkolizija dužnostisr
dc.subjecttriageen
dc.subjectpandemicen
dc.subjectnecessityen
dc.subjectguidelinesen
dc.subjectcollision of dutiesen
dc.titleKolizija dužnosti kao osnov opravdanja u okolnostima pandemijesr
dc.titleCollision of duties as a defence of justification in the circumstances of pandemicen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-SA
dc.citation.epage144
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.other11(2): 132-144
dc.citation.rankM51
dc.citation.spage132
dc.citation.volume11
dc.identifier.doi10.5937/crimen2002132V
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/155/1178.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_2795
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу