Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorJovanović, M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T15:17:18Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T15:17:18Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1581-7652
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1257
dc.description.abstractThis paper is a rejoinder to critical remarks raised in the papers by Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco, Alejandro Chehtman, David Lefkowitz, Mario Krešić, and Carmen Pavel. The paper does not respond to each author individually, but to distinctive arguments common across different contributions. In that respect, the rejoinder is divided into four parts, which largely match the structure of my book. In the first part, I address some of the meta-philosophical issues concerning the prototype theory of concepts. The second part is devoted to some clarifications of my position with respect to the (international) law’s normativity. The third part is dedicated to the claim that (international) law is justice-apt. Finally, the last part deals with some of the issues related to (international) law as an institutionalized and (coercively) guaranteed order.en
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceRevus
dc.titleOn the nature of international law: Rejoinderen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.other43(): -
dc.citation.volume43
dc.identifier.doi10.4000/revus.7283
dc.identifier.rcubconv_3227
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85106197057
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

ДатотекеВеличинаФорматПреглед

Уз овај запис нема датотека.

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу