Hutmani srpskog srednjovekovnog prava
Hutman of Serbian medieval law
Апстракт
Tema rada je ustanova hutmana u srpskom srednjovekovnom rudarskom pravu. Prvo pitanje na koje se daje odgovor jeste u kojoj meri je ona plod transplantacije saskih običaja u srpsko pravo. Drugi cilj rada je da se odrede ovlašćenja i dužnosti hutmana, kao i način njihovog izbora ili postavljenja. Kako rezultati pokazuju, Zakonik o rudnicima despota Stefana poznaje dva instituta hutmana. Prvi je pomoćni organ urbarara, koji sa njim meri zemlju i postavlja granice eksploatacionih polja prilikom dodeljivanja koncesije i prilikom proboja, za šta naplaćuje takse. Verovatno je da ga je postavljao carinik zakupac regalnih prava. Druga ustanova je nadzornik pojedinačnog rudnika, koji evidentira članove rudarskog ortačkog društva, prima njihove uplate troškova, verovatno vodi računa i o pravičnom, urednom i ugovorenom obavljanju ostalih poslova u rudniku, a angažuju ga ortaci. U radu su primenjeni jezičko, sistemsko i istorijsko tumačenje, uporedni metod i regresivna analiza.
The subject of the paper is the institute of hutman in Serbian medieval mining law. The first question to be answered is related to the extent of transplantation of the institute from Saxon customs to Serbian written law. The second aim is the definition of the competence of hutman and the way he was appointed. The results indicate the Despot Stefan's Mining Code recognized two different institutes of hutman. The first was auxiliary service to urbarar, measuring and marking the land in the procedure of granting mining concessions and after breaking one mine into another, charging a fee. He was probably appointed by tax collectors. The second one is the supervisor of a mine, entitled to collect the payment from the owners of its shares, to record it and presumably to take care of correct conducting all kind of activities in the mine. Most likely he was employed by the shareholders of the mine partnership. The linguistic, systemic, and historical interpretation is applied as well as the ...comparative method and regressive analysis.
Кључне речи:
Zakonik o rudnicima / Zakonik despota Stefana / Rudarsko pravo / Novo Brdo / Hutman / Novo Brdo Code / Mining law / Mining Codification / Hutmann / Despot Stefan's CodeИзвор:
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2022, 70, 2, 497-510Издавач:
- Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
Институција/група
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of BelgradeTY - JOUR AU - Katančević, Andreja PY - 2022 UR - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1318 AB - Tema rada je ustanova hutmana u srpskom srednjovekovnom rudarskom pravu. Prvo pitanje na koje se daje odgovor jeste u kojoj meri je ona plod transplantacije saskih običaja u srpsko pravo. Drugi cilj rada je da se odrede ovlašćenja i dužnosti hutmana, kao i način njihovog izbora ili postavljenja. Kako rezultati pokazuju, Zakonik o rudnicima despota Stefana poznaje dva instituta hutmana. Prvi je pomoćni organ urbarara, koji sa njim meri zemlju i postavlja granice eksploatacionih polja prilikom dodeljivanja koncesije i prilikom proboja, za šta naplaćuje takse. Verovatno je da ga je postavljao carinik zakupac regalnih prava. Druga ustanova je nadzornik pojedinačnog rudnika, koji evidentira članove rudarskog ortačkog društva, prima njihove uplate troškova, verovatno vodi računa i o pravičnom, urednom i ugovorenom obavljanju ostalih poslova u rudniku, a angažuju ga ortaci. U radu su primenjeni jezičko, sistemsko i istorijsko tumačenje, uporedni metod i regresivna analiza. AB - The subject of the paper is the institute of hutman in Serbian medieval mining law. The first question to be answered is related to the extent of transplantation of the institute from Saxon customs to Serbian written law. The second aim is the definition of the competence of hutman and the way he was appointed. The results indicate the Despot Stefan's Mining Code recognized two different institutes of hutman. The first was auxiliary service to urbarar, measuring and marking the land in the procedure of granting mining concessions and after breaking one mine into another, charging a fee. He was probably appointed by tax collectors. The second one is the supervisor of a mine, entitled to collect the payment from the owners of its shares, to record it and presumably to take care of correct conducting all kind of activities in the mine. Most likely he was employed by the shareholders of the mine partnership. The linguistic, systemic, and historical interpretation is applied as well as the comparative method and regressive analysis. PB - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd T2 - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu T1 - Hutmani srpskog srednjovekovnog prava T1 - Hutman of Serbian medieval law EP - 510 IS - 2 SP - 497 VL - 70 DO - 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22205A UR - conv_577 ER -
@article{ author = "Katančević, Andreja", year = "2022", abstract = "Tema rada je ustanova hutmana u srpskom srednjovekovnom rudarskom pravu. Prvo pitanje na koje se daje odgovor jeste u kojoj meri je ona plod transplantacije saskih običaja u srpsko pravo. Drugi cilj rada je da se odrede ovlašćenja i dužnosti hutmana, kao i način njihovog izbora ili postavljenja. Kako rezultati pokazuju, Zakonik o rudnicima despota Stefana poznaje dva instituta hutmana. Prvi je pomoćni organ urbarara, koji sa njim meri zemlju i postavlja granice eksploatacionih polja prilikom dodeljivanja koncesije i prilikom proboja, za šta naplaćuje takse. Verovatno je da ga je postavljao carinik zakupac regalnih prava. Druga ustanova je nadzornik pojedinačnog rudnika, koji evidentira članove rudarskog ortačkog društva, prima njihove uplate troškova, verovatno vodi računa i o pravičnom, urednom i ugovorenom obavljanju ostalih poslova u rudniku, a angažuju ga ortaci. U radu su primenjeni jezičko, sistemsko i istorijsko tumačenje, uporedni metod i regresivna analiza., The subject of the paper is the institute of hutman in Serbian medieval mining law. The first question to be answered is related to the extent of transplantation of the institute from Saxon customs to Serbian written law. The second aim is the definition of the competence of hutman and the way he was appointed. The results indicate the Despot Stefan's Mining Code recognized two different institutes of hutman. The first was auxiliary service to urbarar, measuring and marking the land in the procedure of granting mining concessions and after breaking one mine into another, charging a fee. He was probably appointed by tax collectors. The second one is the supervisor of a mine, entitled to collect the payment from the owners of its shares, to record it and presumably to take care of correct conducting all kind of activities in the mine. Most likely he was employed by the shareholders of the mine partnership. The linguistic, systemic, and historical interpretation is applied as well as the comparative method and regressive analysis.", publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd", journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu", title = "Hutmani srpskog srednjovekovnog prava, Hutman of Serbian medieval law", pages = "510-497", number = "2", volume = "70", doi = "10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22205A", url = "conv_577" }
Katančević, A.. (2022). Hutmani srpskog srednjovekovnog prava. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 70(2), 497-510. https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22205A conv_577
Katančević A. Hutmani srpskog srednjovekovnog prava. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2022;70(2):497-510. doi:10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22205A conv_577 .
Katančević, Andreja, "Hutmani srpskog srednjovekovnog prava" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 70, no. 2 (2022):497-510, https://doi.org/10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22205A ., conv_577 .