Oslobađajuće "pristupanje" dugu - zaboravljeni institut iz Skice za zakonik o obligacijama i ugovorima
Liberatory "accession" to debt: An overlooked institution of the Draft Code on Obligations and contracts
dc.creator | Karanikić-Mirić, Marija | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-11T15:24:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-11T15:24:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-2565 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1343 | |
dc.description.abstract | Sve naše zakonske odredbe u materiji promene dužnika prenete su iz Skice za zakonik o obligacijama i ugovorima. Međutim, tom prilikom je izostavljeno pravilo da poverilac i treće lice mogu izričito da ugovore oslobađajući efekat ugovora o pristupanju dugu. U Skici nije rešeno pitanje može li dužnik tome da se usprotivi. Ne znamo zašto TA odredba Skice nije preuzeta u Zakon o obligacionim odnosima. Ne znamo mnogo ni o tome kako su se razvijali stavovi Mihaila Konstantinovića o promeni dužnika. O tom razvoju postoje samo dva traga: autorizovane Beleške s predavanja koja je Konstantinović držao studentima Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu i tekst Skice. Zbog toga ovaj rad ima dva cilja. Prvo, da se razmotre promene u shvatanjima Mihaila Konstantinovića od njegovih prvih zabeleženih reči o ustanovi promene dužnika do Skice. I drugo, da se preispitaju smisao i domašaj zapostavljenog pravila o oslobađajućem pristupanju dugu. | sr |
dc.description.abstract | All the provisions of the Yugoslav, and subsequently Serbian, Law on Obligations of 1978 relating to substitution of debtor, originate from the Draft Code on Obligations and Contracts of 1969. However, the rule according to which the creditor and the third party may expressly discharge the original debtor was omitted from the Law. The reasons for this exclusion have not been recorded. Also, the Draft fails to specify whether the original debtor may protest their own release, i.e., if their consent is necessary for the discharge. This article has two purposes: to explore how the ideas of Mihailo Konstantinović, the sole author of the Draft, on the subject of substitution of debtor developed over time, and to examine the omitted rule on liberatory "accession" to debt or, more precisely, the assumption of debt by agreement between the creditor and a third party. | en |
dc.publisher | Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd | |
dc.rights | openAccess | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.source | Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu | |
dc.subject | pristupanje dugu | sr |
dc.subject | preuzimanje duga | sr |
dc.subject | Mihailo Konstantinović | sr |
dc.subject | Mihailo Konstantinović | en |
dc.subject | Assumption of debt | en |
dc.subject | Accession to debt | en |
dc.title | Oslobađajuće "pristupanje" dugu - zaboravljeni institut iz Skice za zakonik o obligacijama i ugovorima | sr |
dc.title | Liberatory "accession" to debt: An overlooked institution of the Draft Code on Obligations and contracts | en |
dc.type | article | |
dc.rights.license | BY | |
dc.citation.epage | 419 | |
dc.citation.issue | poseban | |
dc.citation.other | 70(poseban): 397-419 | |
dc.citation.rank | M24 | |
dc.citation.spage | 397 | |
dc.citation.volume | 70 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK14A | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/280/1340.pdf | |
dc.identifier.rcub | conv_564 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion |