Show simple item record

Liberatory "accession" to debt: An overlooked institution of the Draft Code on Obligations and contracts

dc.creatorKaranikić-Mirić, Marija
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T15:24:20Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T15:24:20Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0003-2565
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1343
dc.description.abstractSve naše zakonske odredbe u materiji promene dužnika prenete su iz Skice za zakonik o obligacijama i ugovorima. Međutim, tom prilikom je izostavljeno pravilo da poverilac i treće lice mogu izričito da ugovore oslobađajući efekat ugovora o pristupanju dugu. U Skici nije rešeno pitanje može li dužnik tome da se usprotivi. Ne znamo zašto TA odredba Skice nije preuzeta u Zakon o obligacionim odnosima. Ne znamo mnogo ni o tome kako su se razvijali stavovi Mihaila Konstantinovića o promeni dužnika. O tom razvoju postoje samo dva traga: autorizovane Beleške s predavanja koja je Konstantinović držao studentima Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu i tekst Skice. Zbog toga ovaj rad ima dva cilja. Prvo, da se razmotre promene u shvatanjima Mihaila Konstantinovića od njegovih prvih zabeleženih reči o ustanovi promene dužnika do Skice. I drugo, da se preispitaju smisao i domašaj zapostavljenog pravila o oslobađajućem pristupanju dugu.sr
dc.description.abstractAll the provisions of the Yugoslav, and subsequently Serbian, Law on Obligations of 1978 relating to substitution of debtor, originate from the Draft Code on Obligations and Contracts of 1969. However, the rule according to which the creditor and the third party may expressly discharge the original debtor was omitted from the Law. The reasons for this exclusion have not been recorded. Also, the Draft fails to specify whether the original debtor may protest their own release, i.e., if their consent is necessary for the discharge. This article has two purposes: to explore how the ideas of Mihailo Konstantinović, the sole author of the Draft, on the subject of substitution of debtor developed over time, and to examine the omitted rule on liberatory "accession" to debt or, more precisely, the assumption of debt by agreement between the creditor and a third party.en
dc.publisherUniverzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceAnali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
dc.subjectpristupanje dugusr
dc.subjectpreuzimanje dugasr
dc.subjectMihailo Konstantinovićsr
dc.subjectMihailo Konstantinovićen
dc.subjectAssumption of debten
dc.subjectAccession to debten
dc.titleOslobađajuće "pristupanje" dugu - zaboravljeni institut iz Skice za zakonik o obligacijama i ugovorimasr
dc.titleLiberatory "accession" to debt: An overlooked institution of the Draft Code on Obligations and contractsen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY
dc.citation.epage419
dc.citation.issueposeban
dc.citation.other70(poseban): 397-419
dc.citation.rankM24
dc.citation.spage397
dc.citation.volume70
dc.identifier.doi10.51204/Anali_PFBU_22MK14A
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/280/1340.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_564
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record