Drawing on a 2018 survey on a convenience sample of 716 Serbian and 393 Croatian legal professionals, we assess their attitudes towards Serbian and Croatian judiciaries against their key dimensions: independence, efficiency, quality, and fairness and impartiality. Legal professionals in both countries have little confidence in their judiciary, which we take as a proxy for legitimacy. Hence, both judiciaries are faced with an internal crisis of legitimacy. Respondents also scored judiciaries low on each of the key dimensions, while regression analysis confirmed that these attitudes are strong predictors of legitimacy. The results indicate that apparent differences in historical trajectories have not undermined common post-transitional political struggles over the role of judiciaries.
Izvor:
Europe-Asia Studies, 2022, 74, 6, 945-967
Izdavač:
Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, Abingdon
TY - JOUR
AU - Vuković, Danilo
AU - Mrakovčić, Marko
PY - 2022
UR - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1355
AB - Drawing on a 2018 survey on a convenience sample of 716 Serbian and 393 Croatian legal professionals, we assess their attitudes towards Serbian and Croatian judiciaries against their key dimensions: independence, efficiency, quality, and fairness and impartiality. Legal professionals in both countries have little confidence in their judiciary, which we take as a proxy for legitimacy. Hence, both judiciaries are faced with an internal crisis of legitimacy. Respondents also scored judiciaries low on each of the key dimensions, while regression analysis confirmed that these attitudes are strong predictors of legitimacy. The results indicate that apparent differences in historical trajectories have not undermined common post-transitional political struggles over the role of judiciaries.
PB - Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, Abingdon
T2 - Europe-Asia Studies
T1 - Legitimacy, Independence and Impartiality: How do Serbian and Croatian Legal Professionals Assess Their Judiciaries?
EP - 967
IS - 6
SP - 945
VL - 74
DO - 10.1080/09668136.2021.2019195
UR - conv_3148
ER -
@article{
author = "Vuković, Danilo and Mrakovčić, Marko",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Drawing on a 2018 survey on a convenience sample of 716 Serbian and 393 Croatian legal professionals, we assess their attitudes towards Serbian and Croatian judiciaries against their key dimensions: independence, efficiency, quality, and fairness and impartiality. Legal professionals in both countries have little confidence in their judiciary, which we take as a proxy for legitimacy. Hence, both judiciaries are faced with an internal crisis of legitimacy. Respondents also scored judiciaries low on each of the key dimensions, while regression analysis confirmed that these attitudes are strong predictors of legitimacy. The results indicate that apparent differences in historical trajectories have not undermined common post-transitional political struggles over the role of judiciaries.",
publisher = "Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, Abingdon",
journal = "Europe-Asia Studies",
title = "Legitimacy, Independence and Impartiality: How do Serbian and Croatian Legal Professionals Assess Their Judiciaries?",
pages = "967-945",
number = "6",
volume = "74",
doi = "10.1080/09668136.2021.2019195",
url = "conv_3148"
}
Vuković, D.,& Mrakovčić, M.. (2022). Legitimacy, Independence and Impartiality: How do Serbian and Croatian Legal Professionals Assess Their Judiciaries?. in Europe-Asia Studies
Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, Abingdon., 74(6), 945-967.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2021.2019195
conv_3148
Vuković D, Mrakovčić M. Legitimacy, Independence and Impartiality: How do Serbian and Croatian Legal Professionals Assess Their Judiciaries?. in Europe-Asia Studies. 2022;74(6):945-967.
doi:10.1080/09668136.2021.2019195
conv_3148 .
Vuković, Danilo, Mrakovčić, Marko, "Legitimacy, Independence and Impartiality: How do Serbian and Croatian Legal Professionals Assess Their Judiciaries?" in Europe-Asia Studies, 74, no. 6 (2022):945-967,
https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2021.2019195 .,
conv_3148 .
