Show simple item record

On the institution of representation in private law

dc.creatorCvetković, Valentina
dc.creatorVuletić, Vladimir
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T15:25:54Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T15:25:54Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0039-2138
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1362
dc.description.abstractUgovor o nalogu (mandatum) nastao je u rimskom pravu. Na temelju tog ugovora uređeno je posredno zastupanje. Prve moderne građanske kodifikacije priznaju neposredno zastupanje na osnovu punomoćja, ali ga vezuju za ugovor o nalogu. Samostalna ustanova punomoćja nastaje u nemačkom pravu u drugoj polovini XIX veka pri čemu je najveću zaslugu u osamostaljivanju punomoćja od mandata imalo učenje Paula Labanda. U slučaju neposrednog zastupanja pravna dejstva preduzetih pravnih radnji neposredno nastupaju za zastupanog. S obzirom na to da prilikom preduzimanja pravne radnje zastupnik izjavljuje volju, postavlja se pitanje da li izjavljenu volju treba shvatiti kao volju zastupnika ili volju zastupanog. Savremena literatura je u neposrednom zastupanju pre sklona da vidi zamenu volje zastupanog voljom zastupnika. Takvo shvatanje prirode zastupanja u privatnom pravu ima zanimljivo poreklo koje seže u XIII vek.sr
dc.description.abstractMandate contract was created in Roman law, thanks to which was regulated indirect representation. The first modern civil codes have acknowledged direct representation based on a power-of-attorney but linked it to a mandate contract. The power-of-attorney as an independent institute emerged in the late 19th century under German law, with Paul Laband's theory taking the biggest credit in the separation of the power-of-attorney from the mandate contract In the case of the direct representation, the legal effects of undertaken legal acts directly occur for the represented person. Considering that when undertaking a legal act, the representative declares the will, the question arises whether the declared will should be understood as the will of the representative or the will of the represented. Answering the question, contemporary legal writers tend to see the replacement of the will of the represented by the will of the representative. Such an understanding of the nature of representation in private law has an interesting origin that dates back to the 13th century.en
dc.publisherInstitut za uporedno pravo, Beograd
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceStrani pravni život
dc.subjectzastupanjesr
dc.subjectugovor o nalogusr
dc.subjectrimsko pravosr
dc.subjectpunomoćjesr
dc.subjectprvi moderni građanski zakonicisr
dc.subjectRoman lawen
dc.subjectrepresentationen
dc.subjectpower-of at torneyen
dc.subjectmodern civil codesen
dc.subjectmandate contracten
dc.titleO zastupanju u privatnom pravusr
dc.titleOn the institution of representation in private lawen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY
dc.citation.epage490
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.other(3): 477-490
dc.citation.spage477
dc.identifier.doi10.56461/SPZ_22308KJ
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/294/1359.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_1211
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record