Prikaz osnovnih podataka o dokumentu

dc.creatorKrstić, Ivana
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T15:29:01Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T15:29:01Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0925-9880
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1400
dc.description.abstractThis paper is provoked by Rosalind Dixon's book on Responsible Judicial Review and the arguments expressed by the author. The paper deals with the independence of the Constitutional Court in Serbia, as the most important requirement for a responsive judicial review. The main premise is that because of the appointment of judges, almost unknown in professional circles, and their servile relationship with other branches of government, the Constitutional Court acts as a guardian of controversial executive policies. The author briefly describes the origins of the Serbian Constitutional Court and the level of its independence. Some relevant cases are presented that demonstrate the existence of several strategies applied by judges which support the thesis that judges allow political and other factors to influence their decisions. The author also presents human rights cases that illustrate a very formalistic approach of the Court that influences its own legitimacy and lack of support.en
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceReview of Central and East European Law
dc.titleSerbian Constitutional Court – (In)dependent Protector of the Rule of Law and Human Rights?en
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.epage518
dc.citation.issue3-4
dc.citation.other48(3-4): 490-518
dc.citation.spage490
dc.citation.volume48
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/15730352-bJa10090
dc.identifier.rcubconv_3311
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85182227147
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Dokumenti

DatotekeVeličinaFormatPregled

Uz ovaj zapis nema datoteka.

Ovaj dokument se pojavljuje u sledećim kolekcijama

Prikaz osnovnih podataka o dokumentu