Show simple item record

dc.creatorMarković, Ivana
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T15:30:59Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T15:30:59Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn1450-6637
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1424
dc.description.abstractThe paper deals with the nature of female genital mutilation (FGM) as a highly gendered, harmful practice, which has in the meantime been formalized as a crime. Especially the Istanbul Convention is regarded as the driving force behind this legal development. But beyond that, this Convention, as well as the Convention of Belem do Para and the Maputo Protocol before that, have defined and located the very nature of FGM within the violence against women. By doing so, prior (false) beliefs and attempts to legitimize them due to cultural, social or religious reasons have become obsolete. The aim of this paper is to show the nature of FGM within the aforementioned instruments.en
dc.publisherViktimološko društvo Srbije, Beograd i Prometej, Novi Sad
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceTemida
dc.subjectnature of the crimeen
dc.subjectMaputo Protocolen
dc.subjectIstanbul Conventionen
dc.subjectgenderen
dc.subjectfemale genital mutilationen
dc.subjectConvention of Belem do Paraen
dc.titleThe Nature of Female Genital Mutilation According to the Istanbul Convention and Other International Instrumentsen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND
dc.citation.epage94
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.other26(1): 75-94
dc.citation.spage75
dc.citation.volume26
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/TEM2301075M
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/351/1421.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_3220
dc.identifier.wos001136758300004
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record