Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorCerone, John
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-21T10:49:31Z
dc.date.available2024-05-21T10:49:31Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn0003-2565
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1468
dc.description.abstractThe author claims that the ICJ issued a very narrow Advisory Opinion regarding the unilateral declaration of independence, in respect of Kosovo finding that the making of the declaration was not in itself an act contrary to international law. He also stresses that, at the same time, the ICJ did not find that Kosovo had a right to secede, that Kosovos declaration was legally effective, that the attempted secession was successful, or that Kosovo is otherwise an independent state. His opinion is that this finding merely cuts off one possible avenue for arguing that the attempted secession is unlawful, and analyses the manner in which the ICJ navigated through the political morass by recasting the question posed by the UN General Assembly.en
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceAnali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
dc.subjectSerbiaen
dc.subjectLotus principleen
dc.subjectKosovo independenceen
dc.subjectInternational Court of Justiceen
dc.titleThe Kosovo advisory opinion of the International Court of Justiceen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
dc.citation.epage214
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.other58(3): 209-214
dc.citation.spage209
dc.citation.volume58
dc.identifier.rcubconv_3188
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

ДатотекеВеличинаФорматПреглед

Уз овај запис нема датотека.

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу