| dc.description.abstract | The depth of jurisprudence and scholarly commentary on the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) has grown exponentially over the last few decades. One example has been the increase in CISG cases in the United States from only 16 cases from 1988 to 1999 to 92 additional cases from 2000 to the middle of 2010. This Article will draw from CISG jurisprudence, but will also provide some insights from a purely American common law perspective. In the area of contract formation relating to CISG Articles 14, 16, and 18, there is a growing jurisprudence. According to the Institute of International Commercial Laws CISG Database, the international jurisprudence includes 162 cases relating to Article 14; 13 cases related to Article 16; and 184 cases relating to Article 18. The battle of the forms scenario under Article 19 will not be discussed. However, the interconnection between Articles 18 and 19 will be discussed. This article will examine the jurisprudence relating to Articles 14, 16, and18. This examination will cover the topics of offer and acceptance, firm offers, and conduct as acceptance. From this review of the case law, and related scholarly commentary, the article analyzes the critical issues related to the application of these CISG Articles. The key insight offered is the interconnectedness of these CISG articles, along with articles 6, 8, 9, 29, and 55. | en |
