Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorBasta-Fleiner, Lidija R.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-21T10:53:06Z
dc.date.available2024-05-21T10:53:06Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn0003-2565
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1511
dc.description.abstractThe paper analyses chances and paradoxes of federalism as a strategy to sustain nation building in multicultural societies, in particular those in post-ethnic war situations. The major hypothesis will be that there is no one-to-one relationship between federalism and communal peace, the latter being a condition sine qua non for nation building. The reasons lie in key challenges and paradoxes of federalism as a conflict-management device in the societies coming out of ethnic wars: Mistrust and intolerance intrinsically belong to identity conflicts; on the other hand, federalism as part and parcel of conflict transformation should be instrumental in building up trust and tolerance that are - paradoxically - a condition sine qua non for effective federal designs. Multicultural federalism can work only if it succeeds in democratically commanding a loyalty that would transcend cultural cleavages, i.e., if it democratically reconciles cultural and political pluralism. Such reconciliation is structurally unfeasible within a consequently liberal democratic set up. What constitutive principles and institutional set-up of the federal polity can sustain the viability of nation-building in multicultural societies? How can democratic reconciliation of political and cultural (ethnic, religious, linguistic) pluralism be achieved? - These are major issues of multicultural federalism. Consequently, federalism can democratically meet multicultural challenge only if it is not imposed and becomes an intrinsic part of democracy; i.e., if not only unity, but also diversity becomes a constitutive principle of democracy. If that is not the case, federalism fails to meet its major challenge: Not to radicalize the differences to which it was supposed to be a solution; notably, to address and accommodate structural causes of mistrust and intolerance in a given society (for instance, constitutional conflicts as per se ethnic conflicts). This is why multicultural federalism has an immanently built in paradox: Multicultural federalism starts with a low level of legitimacy due to the lack of trust and tolerance. Multicultural federalism has in fact to create its own preconditions.en
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceAnali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
dc.subjectpost-conflict transformationen
dc.subjectnation-buildingen
dc.subjectmulticulturalismen
dc.subjectfederalismen
dc.titleNation building: Favouring multiculturalism through federalism?en
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
dc.citation.epage240
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.other59(3): 224-240
dc.citation.spage224
dc.citation.volume59
dc.identifier.rcubconv_3109
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

ДатотекеВеличинаФорматПреглед

Уз овај запис нема датотека.

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу