Repository of the University of Belgrade Faculty of Law
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Law
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
  • View Item
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The burden of proof for the non-conformity of goods under Art. 35 CISG

No Thumbnail
Authors
Kroll, Stefan
Article (Published version)
CC BY
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The article deals with the controversial question of which parties bears the burden to proof the non-conformity of the goods at the time the risk passes. It analyses the various approaches adopted practice and the CISG literature and advocates a graded approach balancing the allocation of the burden of proof with evidentiary privileges at the preceding evidentiary stage.
Keywords:
presumption / non-conformity of the goods / burden of proof
Source:
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2011, 59, 3, 162-180

ISSN: 0003-2565

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1526
Collections
  • Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu / The Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade
Institution/Community
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kroll, Stefan
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1526
AB  - The article deals with the controversial question of which parties bears the burden to proof the non-conformity of the goods at the time the risk passes. It analyses the various approaches adopted practice and the CISG literature and advocates a graded approach balancing the allocation of the burden of proof with evidentiary privileges at the preceding evidentiary stage.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - The burden of proof for the non-conformity of goods under Art. 35 CISG
EP  - 180
IS  - 3
SP  - 162
VL  - 59
UR  - conv_3091
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Kroll, Stefan",
year = "2011",
abstract = "The article deals with the controversial question of which parties bears the burden to proof the non-conformity of the goods at the time the risk passes. It analyses the various approaches adopted practice and the CISG literature and advocates a graded approach balancing the allocation of the burden of proof with evidentiary privileges at the preceding evidentiary stage.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "The burden of proof for the non-conformity of goods under Art. 35 CISG",
pages = "180-162",
number = "3",
volume = "59",
url = "conv_3091"
}
Kroll, S.. (2011). The burden of proof for the non-conformity of goods under Art. 35 CISG. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 59(3), 162-180.
conv_3091
Kroll S. The burden of proof for the non-conformity of goods under Art. 35 CISG. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2011;59(3):162-180.
conv_3091 .
Kroll, Stefan, "The burden of proof for the non-conformity of goods under Art. 35 CISG" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 59, no. 3 (2011):162-180,
conv_3091 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the RALF Repository | Send Feedback

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the RALF Repository | Send Feedback

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB