Uloga Pravosudne akademije u izboru sudija i javnih tužilaca u državama u okruženju
Role of the Judicial Academy in the election process of judges and public prosecutors in the neighbouring countries
dc.creator | Debeljački, Milorad | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-21T11:03:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-21T11:03:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-2565 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1636 | |
dc.description.abstract | Od prvog januara 2010. počela je s radom Pravosudna akademija, čime je zaokružen proces kreiranja savremenog sistema obrazovanja sudija i tužilaca. Pravosudna akademija je osnovana s ciljem obezbeđenja profesionalnog, nezavisnog, nepristrasnog i efikasnog obavljanja sudijske i tužilačke funkcije i efikasnog obavljanja poslova sudskog i tužilačkog osoblja. Njena osnovna funkcija jeste obuka nosilaca pravosudnih funkcija, koja može biti početna i kontinuirana. Analiza postojećeg stanja ukazala je na postojanje potrebe za daljim unapređenjem rada Pravosudne akademije. Radi ostvarenja toga cilja sačinjena je ova uporednopravna analiza koja daje prikaz uređenja položaja i uloge Pravosudne akademije u okolnim državama u postupku imenovanja na sudijske i javnotužilačke funkcije. Uporednopravni prikaz može ukazati na pozitivnopravna rešenja koja mogu služiti kao putokaz ili primer daljeg unapređenja Pravosudne akademije u Republici Srbiji. | sr |
dc.description.abstract | From January the first 2010, work of Judicial Academy has begun, thus completing the process of creating a modern system of education for judges and public prosecutors. The Judicial Academy has been established in order to provide professional, independent, impartial and efficient performance of judicial and public prosecutorial functions and efficient discharge of court and public prosecutorial staff. Its main function is training of judicial office holders, which can be the initial and continuous. Analysis of the current situation indicated the existence of a need for further improving the functioning of the Judicial Academy. In order to achieve this objective this comparative analysis has been completed, which gives an overview of regulation of the status and role of the Judicial Academy in the process of appointment to judicial and public prosecution office, in the surrounding countries. Comparative review indicates the best practices that can serve as a guideline or model for further improvement of the Judicial Academy in the Republic of Serbia. | en |
dc.rights | openAccess | |
dc.source | Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu | |
dc.subject | Pravosudna akademija | sr |
dc.subject | Organi | sr |
dc.subject | Obuke | sr |
dc.subject | Ispiti | sr |
dc.subject | Imenovanje | sr |
dc.subject | Trainings | en |
dc.subject | Selection | en |
dc.subject | Judicial Academy | en |
dc.subject | Exams | en |
dc.subject | Bodies | en |
dc.title | Uloga Pravosudne akademije u izboru sudija i javnih tužilaca u državama u okruženju | sr |
dc.title | Role of the Judicial Academy in the election process of judges and public prosecutors in the neighbouring countries | en |
dc.type | contributionToPeriodical | |
dc.rights.license | CC BY | |
dc.citation.epage | 226 | |
dc.citation.issue | 2 | |
dc.citation.other | 63(2): 209-226 | |
dc.citation.spage | 209 | |
dc.citation.volume | 63 | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/1966/1629.pdf | |
dc.identifier.rcub | conv_3239_6 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion |