Show simple item record

dc.creatorSerafim, Andreas
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-21T11:12:40Z
dc.date.available2024-05-21T11:12:40Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0003-2565
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1744
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores how religious argumentation is used in the construction of sexual and social identities, and the impact this may have had on the audiences in Athenian courts. There are only a few references to religion in Attic oratory that point to and undermine an individuals sexuality and/or social standing. These references fall largely into two related categories: aggressive references that denote morally, socially, legally and sexually condemnable identities; and occupational references that describe the social occupation of people in relation to religious duties and obligations. It has been argued that orators use of religious discourse for identity construction is designed to sustain a close bond between the speaker and the audience, while also estranging their opponents from the group.en
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceAnali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
dc.subjectSocial identityen
dc.subjectSexualityen
dc.subjectReligious argumentationen
dc.subjectImpietyen
dc.subjectIdentityen
dc.titleConstructing identities: Religious argumentation, sexuality and social identity in Attic forensic oratoryen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
dc.citation.epage253
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.other67(3): 233-253
dc.citation.rankM24
dc.citation.spage233
dc.citation.volume67
dc.identifier.doi10.5937/AnaliPFB1903246S
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/1852/1737.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_3300
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record