Prikaz osnovnih podataka o dokumentu

Tax violations of the Decree on Fiscal Benefits and Direct Grants for Mitigation of Economic Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic

dc.creatorĐokić, Minja
dc.creatorRilaković, Ilija
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-21T11:15:08Z
dc.date.available2024-05-21T11:15:08Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0003-2565
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1772
dc.description.abstractPredmet analize su poreski prekršaji kojima se inkriminišu zloupotreba i naknadni gubitak prava na fiskalne pogodnosti i direktna novčana davanja. Ti prekršaji su predviđeni uredbom, kojom su propisane i pomenute pogodnosti. Autori ispituju postojanje zakonskog osnova za propisivanje poreskih prekršaja podzakonskim aktima. U članku se ističe da se poreski prekršaji, kao i porezi, mogu predvideti samo zakonom. Zbog toga se nameće pitanje ustavnosti i zakonitosti odredaba podzakonskog akta koji propisuje poreske prekršaje. Bavimo se analizom bića poreskih prekršaja i ukazujemo na probleme s kojima se sudovi mogu susresti. Smatramo da definicija poreskih prekršaja koje ispitujemo implicira mogućnost objektivne odgovornosti. Ukazujemo da o pravima poreskih obveznika na fiskalne pogodnosti i direktna novčana davanja ne odlučuju oni sâmi već da im ta prava daje država od koje oni dobijaju te pogodnosti. Smatramo da u slučaju naknadnog gubitka prava nije primereno primeniti kaznenopravne mehanizme već je dovoljno pokrenuti prinudnu naplatu u poreskom postupku.sr
dc.description.abstractThe subject of our analysis are tax offenses in the Republic of Serbia related to abuse and subsequent loss of rights to fiscal benefits and direct grants. The article points out that tax offenses, as is the case with taxes, can only be introduced in law. For that reason, we call into question the constitutionality of the decree. Analysis of tax offenses shows that there are certain issues that could cause problems in the practical application of the decree. For instance, we believe that the definition of the tax offenses considered implies liability regardless of guilt. The state grants taxpayers the right to fiscal benefits and direct monetary payments. In the case of subsequent loss of right to fiscal benefits and direct monetary payments, we argue that it is not appropriate to apply penal measures. It is rather sufficient to initiate tax enforcement procedure.en
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceAnali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
dc.subjecturedbasr
dc.subjectporeski prekršajisr
dc.subjectne bis in idemsr
dc.subjectfiskalne pogodnostisr
dc.subjectdirektna davanjasr
dc.subjecttax offensesen
dc.subjectne bis in idemen
dc.subjectgovernment decreeen
dc.subjectfiscal benefitsen
dc.subjectdirect monetary paymentsen
dc.titlePoreski prekršaji iz Uredbe o fiskalnim pogodnostima i direktnim davanjima u cilju ublažavanja ekonomskih posledica pandemije COVID-19sr
dc.titleTax violations of the Decree on Fiscal Benefits and Direct Grants for Mitigation of Economic Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemicen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
dc.citation.epage158
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.other68(3): 129-158
dc.citation.rankM24
dc.citation.spage129
dc.citation.volume68
dc.identifier.doi10.5937/AnaliPFB2003139D
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/2011/1765.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_3391_6
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Dokumenti

Thumbnail

Ovaj dokument se pojavljuje u sledećim kolekcijama

Prikaz osnovnih podataka o dokumentu