Show simple item record

dc.creatorPejović, Aleksandar Andrija
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-21T11:19:17Z
dc.date.available2024-05-21T11:19:17Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0003-2565
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1822
dc.description.abstractThe rule of law in the EU is a very complex concept due to its nature, different understanding and its diverse practical implementation, which has led to rule of law backsliding. In parallel, the rule of law represents a crucial pillar of the conditionality policy of new accession processes. The EUs recent enlargement methodology introduced more stringent and conditional criteria for progress. This resulted in similarities between TEU Article 7 sanctioning mechanism and the new enlargement methodology that implies elaborate sanctions approach for candidate countries in cases of values breaches, backsliding, stagnation and lagging behind. The EU polity has, therefore, taken advantage of the empiric knowledge about the rule of law within its own borders and in the enlargement countries, constantly moving between the thin and the thick concept of the rule of law. The two processes have been feeding into each other, therefore, resulting in a growing convergence.en
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceAnali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
dc.subjectWestern Balkansen
dc.subjectTEU article 7en
dc.subjectsanctioning mechanismen
dc.subjectEU accession negotiationsen
dc.subjectenlargement methodologyen
dc.titleRule of law through the mirror glass: Is the new 2020 enlargement methodology a pre-accession TEU Article 7 mechanism?en
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
dc.citation.epage633
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.other69(3): 607-633
dc.citation.spage607
dc.citation.volume69
dc.identifier.doi10.51204/Anali_PFBU_21306A
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/1897/1815.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_3359
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record