Ustavne protivrečnosti pokrajinske autonomije u Srbiji (u kontekstu odluke Ustavnog suda u slučaju „Vojvodina”)

Abstract

U pogledu sistematičnog i koherentnog utvrđivanja načela pokrajinske autonomije, definisanja položaja, nadležnosti i prava autonomne pokrajine, kao i uređivanja odnosa autonomne pokrajine i Republike Srbije, Ustav Srbije (2006) sadrži jedan broj protivrečnosti koje otežavaju jasno definisanje statusa autonomije u postojećim ustavnim okvirima. To su konstatovali i eksperti Venecijanske komisije Saveta Evrope prilikom usvajanja Ustava Srbije 2006. godine. Grupa poslanika osporila je pred Ustavnim sudom Srbije Zakon o utvrđivanju nadležnosti Autonomne Pokrajine Vojvodine (2009). Ustavni sud je, srednom 2012. godine, doneo Odluku (IUz-353/2012) kojom su 22 od 36 osporenih stavki proglašene neustavnim, ali nije osporio ustavnost ovog Zakona u celini.

In regard to the a systematic and coherent establishment of provincial autonomy principles, defining the status, competence and rights of autonomous provinces, as well as clearly defining the relationship between the autonomous province and the Republic of Serbia, the Constitution of Serbia (2006) contains a number of constitutional contradictions on the issue of provincial autonomy. This was noted by the Venitian Commission of the Council of Europe when the Constitution ofSerbia was adopted in 2006. A group of parliamentary delegates contested the constitutionality of the Law on Establishing the Competencies of the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina (2009) before the Constitutional Court of Serbia. In mid-2012, the Constitutional Court adopted a Decision (IUz-353/2012) in which 22 of the 36 contested points were declared unconstitutional, but did not declare the Law as a whole unconstitutional.