Who works more, and who works smarter? Comparing judicial performance in Europe
Ko radi više, a ko pametnije? Poređenje sudijske produktivnosti u evropskim zemljama
dc.creator | Spaić, Bojan | |
dc.creator | Đorđević, Mila | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-28T09:34:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-28T09:34:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1992 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper (1) analyzes the existing theoretical framework for under standing the relationship between the judicial performance and judicial efficiency, (2) compares the judicial performances in Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia, France, Austria, and Norway for the year 2020, (3) compares the judicial performances in different instances in Serbia for the same year, and (4) examines the performance standards that are set by law for Serbian judges. The authors conclude that in 2020 Serbian judges resolved more cases in all instances (there is a higher number of resolved cas es per judge only in Austria, in first instance), while at the same time falling short of the caseload standards set in Serbian law. Also, the study found excessive difference in the performance of Serbian courts, but that does not affect the evaluation of judges, since 485 evaluated judges out of 505 got the rating “exceptionally successfully performs the function of judge” for the year 2020. | sr |
dc.description.abstract | U ovom radu (1) analiziramo postojeć i teorijski okvir za razumeva nje relacije između sudijske produktivnosti i sudske efikasnosti, (2) upo ređujemo sudijsku produktivnost u različitim instancama u Srbiji tokom 2020. godine, (3) upoređujemo sudijsku produktivnost u Srbiji sa produk tivnošću sudija u Hrvatskoj, Sloveniji, Francuskoj, Austriji i Norveškoj za istu godinu, (4) ispitujemo sudijsku normu koja je predviđena zakonom za srpske sudije. Autori zaključuju da su srpske sudije rešile više pred meta u svim instancama u 2020. godini (samo Austrija u prvom stepenu ima već i broj rešenih predmeta po sudiji), dok istovremeno ne ispunjavaju sudijsku normu koja je postavljena zakonom. Takođe, autori konstatuju veliku razliku u broju rešenih predmeta po sudiji u sudovima u Srbiji, ali se to ne odražava na ocenjivanje sudija u Srbiji, jer je 485 ocenjenih sudija od ukupno 505 sudija dobilo ocenu „izuzetno uspešno obavljaju funkciju sudije” za 2020. godinu. | sr |
dc.language.iso | en | sr |
dc.publisher | Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta Union | sr |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/HE/101079177/EU// | sr |
dc.rights | openAccess | sr |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.source | Pravni zapisi, br. 1/2024 | sr |
dc.subject | Efficiency of Justice | sr |
dc.subject | Judicial Performance | sr |
dc.subject | Evaluation of Judges | sr |
dc.subject | Judicial Organization | sr |
dc.subject | efikasnost pravosuđa | sr |
dc.subject | sudijska produktivnost | sr |
dc.subject | ocenjivanje sudija | sr |
dc.subject | organizacija pravosuđa | sr |
dc.title | Who works more, and who works smarter? Comparing judicial performance in Europe | sr |
dc.title | Ko radi više, a ko pametnije? Poređenje sudijske produktivnosti u evropskim zemljama | sr |
dc.type | article | sr |
dc.rights.license | BY | sr |
dc.citation.epage | 150 | |
dc.citation.issue | 1 | |
dc.citation.spage | 121 | |
dc.citation.volume | 15 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5937/pravzap0-49148 | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/2924/Pravni-zapisi-2024_01-05-Spaic-Djordjevic.pdf | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | sr |