Osvrt na pravilnik o postupku za rešavanje sporova povodom registracije .rs domena

Abstract

Krajem 2010. godine pristupilo se sveobuhvatnoj reformi alternativnog sistema rešavanja sporova povodom registracije .rs domena. Osnovana je Komisija za rešavanje sporova kao specijalizovano stalno telo pri Privrednoj komori Srbije i donet je novi Pravilnik o postupku za rešavanje sporova povodom registracije .rs domena. U pogledu materijalnopravnih odredaba, novi Pravilnik uglavnom prati rešenja UDRP pravila, čime se omogućava oslanjanje na međunarodnu praksu u ovoj oblasti. Praksa tela koja primenjuju UDRP pravila, kao i dosadašnja praksa arbitražnih veća pod okriljem Registra nacionalnog Internet domena Srbije biće zato od velike koristi u budućem tumačenju ovih uslova. U pogledu procesnopravnih odredaba, novi Pravilnik, koji je Skupština Registra nacionalnog Internet domena Srbije usvojila u decembru 2010. godine, znatno detaljnije uređuje pravila postupka. Naročito je afirmisano načelo ekonomičnosti propisivanjem relativno kratkih rokova za pojedine procesne radnje kao i za okončanje samog postupka, a razrešen je i sporan odnos alternativog i sudskog postupka za rešavanje sporova u ovoj oblasti.

In late 2010, the alternative dispute resolution system first put in place in 2007 for disputes related to .rs domain name registration has undergone significant reform. The Commission for Dispute Resolution has been founded as a specialized, permanent body within the Serbian Chamber of Commerce, and the new Rules on .rs domain name dispute resolution have been adopted. Regarding the substantive provisions, the new Rules are generally in line with the UDRP Rules, which allows for the reception of international practice in this field. The case-law of panels applying the UDRP Rules, as well as previous decisions adopted by panels acting under the auspices of the Serbian National Registar of Domain Names could serve as an inspiration for further interpretation of substantive rules. Furthermore, the new Rules have set up a more elaborated procedural framework than the one existing under the previous version of the Rules. The principle of procedural efficiency has been particularly enhanced through fixing relatively short time periods for performing certain procedural acts, as well as for conducting and completing the process itself. In addition, a somewhat problematic relationship between the court proceedings and the ADR mechanism in the previous version of the Rules has now been regulated in conformity with the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions.