Приказ основних података о документу

Pluralism of constitutions or of constitutional factors? Constitutionalization of the EU law and the concept of divisible sovereignty

dc.creatorLukić, Maja
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T14:25:23Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T14:25:23Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn0353-7919
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/679
dc.description.abstractUčenje o ustavnom pluralizmu smatra se podobnim za razumevanje i praćenje promena same EU i posebno njene pravne prirode. Izvan te specifične svrhe, ustavni pluralizam ima veoma ograničenu primenjivost za dublje razumevanje pravne prirode EU. U istorijskoj perspektivi je teško pronaći primer političke zajednice u kojoj je više ustavnih sistema postojalo naporedo. Razlikovanje evolutivne od revolucionarne ustavnosti izgleda veoma primenljivo na primeru Evropske unije, budući da je samo u slučaju evolutivne ustavnosti moguće postojanje jednog drugog pluralizma - pluralizma ustavnih činilaca. Imajući u vidu arhitekturu Evropske unije, primenljivost modela evolutivne ustavnosti čini se daleko većom od pojma ustavnog pluralizma. Evolutivna ustavnost takođe dozvoljava i podeljenu suverenost, što dalje znači i pojmovno razdvajanje suverenosti od države budući da se EU ne može smatrati državom. Podeljena suverenost ne znači odustajanje od vrednosti demokratske vladavine i odgovorne vlade.sr
dc.description.abstractThe doctrine of constitutional pluralism is considered to be an appropriate method for understanding and monitoring changes of the EU itself and, particularly, of its legal nature. Apart from such specific use, constitutional pluralism as a concept has very limited applicability in describing the legal nature of the EU. From a historical perspective, it is difficult to identify a single political community in which several constitutional systems coexisted. The European Union is a fine example of the differentiation between evolutive and revolutionary constitutions, for only in the case of evolutive constitutions is it possible to recognize another type of pluralism - the pluralism of constitutional factors. Considering the overall picture of the European Union, the applicability of the model of evolutive constitutionality seems to be far greater than the usefulness of the concept of constitutional pluralism. The concept of evolutive constitutionality is capable of allowing for the possibility that sovereignty may be divisible. This would also entail a conceptual decoupling of the quality of sovereignty from the concept of state, for it is evident that the European Union may not be regarded as a state. Divisible sovereignty does not amount to abandonment of the values of democratic governance and an accountable government.en
dc.publisherUniverzitet u Nišu, Niš
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceTeme
dc.subjectustavni pluralizamsr
dc.subjectpodeljena suverenostsr
dc.subjectkonstitucionalizacijasr
dc.subjectEvropska unijasr
dc.subjectevolutivna ustavnostsr
dc.subjectthe European Unionen
dc.subjectevolutive constitutionalityen
dc.subjectdivisible sovereigntyen
dc.subjectconstitutionalizationen
dc.subjectconstitutional pluralismen
dc.titlePluralizam ustava ili ustavnih činilaca? Konstitucionalizacija prava Evropske unije i podeljena suverenostsr
dc.titlePluralism of constitutions or of constitutional factors? Constitutionalization of the EU law and the concept of divisible sovereigntyen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND
dc.citation.epage1718
dc.citation.issue4
dc.citation.other37(4): 1705-1718
dc.citation.rankM24
dc.citation.spage1705
dc.citation.volume37
dc.identifier.rcubconv_1783
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

ДатотекеВеличинаФорматПреглед

Уз овај запис нема датотека.

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу