Show simple item record

dc.creatorHiber, Dragor
dc.creatorPavić, Vladimir
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T14:27:09Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T14:27:09Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn0003-2565
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/696
dc.description.abstractThe focus of the paper is on the analysis of different approaches to situation when the parties are allowed to agree on sums payable in the event of breach of obligations, issues pertaining to contractual penalties in general as well as practical and doctrinal differences in their compensatory and penal goal. The authors reflect on some of the acute issues raised in recent arbitral practice with respect to the topic of contractual penalties, particularly in the sphere of privatization agreements. One of the problems analyzed relates to characterization of the secured obligations in privatizations, reductions of penalties as well as the issue of combining contractual penalties with bank guarantees and with the prohibition of restitution contained in the Law on Privatization of the Republic of Serbia.en
dc.publisherUniverzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceAnali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
dc.subjectProportionality principleen
dc.subjectPrivatization Agreementsen
dc.subjectNon-performanceen
dc.subjectDelayen
dc.subjectContractual penaltiesen
dc.titleContractual penalty clauses in recent Serbian arbitration practiceen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY
dc.citation.epage81
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.other61(3): 63-81
dc.citation.rankM24
dc.citation.spage63
dc.citation.volume61
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/433/693.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_317
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record