Приказ основних података о документу
Dejstva prevare koja potiče od trećeg pri zaključenju teretnih ugovora
Third parties' fraud and conclusion of onerous contracts
dc.creator | Dabić, Snežana | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-11T14:51:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-11T14:51:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0354-3501 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/950 | |
dc.description.abstract | Tradicionalni je zahtev u uporednom pravu da prevara potiče od saugovarača, kako bi uticala na punovažnost teretnih ugovora. Prevara od strane trećeg samo izuzetno rađa pravo na poništenje - ako saugovarač za nju zna ili mora znati. Na prvi pogled se čini da je ovo ograničenje razumno postavljeno i da na adekvatan način miri suprotstavljene interese žrtve prevare i njenog saugovarača. Ali, njegovi nedostaci upravo dolaze do izražaja u slučajevima u kojima postoji mnogo veći rizik uticaja trećih lica na volju saugovarača, kao što je, primera radi, zaključenje ugovora u korist trećeg. Da li i kakvo dejstvo ima prevara koja potiče od beneficijara onda kada saugovarač za nju nije niti znao niti morao znati? Pored toga, značajna uloga koju pojedina treća lica imaju u procesu zaključenja ugovora, istupajući na strani jednog saugovarača, uticala je na to da ih sudovi u uporednom pravu izuzmu iz kategorije 'trećih' i njihovu prevaru imputiraju tom saugovaraču, kao da ju je sam učinio, iako za nju nije niti znao niti morao znati. Od krucijalnog značaja jeste pitanje: koja se lica ne smatraju trećim u domenu odredaba o prevari?. | sr |
dc.description.abstract | It is a traditional requirement in comparative law that fraud should be an act of a contracting party, in order to affect the validity of onerous contracts. Fraudulent behavior of third parties will only exceptionally give right to the annulment - if the contracting party knew or should have known of it. On the face of it, the rule seems to be reasonable and that it adequately reconciles conflicting interests of victims of fraud and contracting party. However, its weaknesses emerge especially in cases where a much higher risk of influence of third parties exists, for example, in conclusion of contracts in favor of third parties. Does the fraudulent behavior of the beneficiary affect the validity of the contract? In addition, when certain third parties have a significant role in the conclusion of the contract, protecting the interests of only one party, the comparative practice shows that courts do not consider them as 'third parties and impute the consequences of their fraudulent behavior to that contracting party, even though it neither knew nor should have known of the fraud. Therefore, the question: with respect to the provisions regulating fraud, which persons cannot be considered as third parties?. | en |
dc.publisher | Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd | |
dc.rights | openAccess | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.source | Pravo i privreda | |
dc.subject | treća lica | sr |
dc.subject | teretni ugovori | sr |
dc.subject | prevara | sr |
dc.subject | odgovornost za štetu | sr |
dc.subject | mane volje | sr |
dc.subject | third parties | en |
dc.subject | onerous contracts | en |
dc.subject | liability | en |
dc.subject | fraud | en |
dc.subject | defects of consent | en |
dc.title | Dejstva prevare koja potiče od trećeg pri zaključenju teretnih ugovora | sr |
dc.title | Third parties' fraud and conclusion of onerous contracts | en |
dc.type | article | |
dc.rights.license | BY | |
dc.citation.epage | 107 | |
dc.citation.issue | 10-12 | |
dc.citation.other | 55(10-12): 80-107 | |
dc.citation.rank | M51 | |
dc.citation.spage | 80 | |
dc.citation.volume | 55 | |
dc.identifier.rcub | conv_2231 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion |
Документи
Датотеке | Величина | Формат | Преглед |
---|---|---|---|
Уз овај запис нема датотека. |