Dragić Živanović, Nada

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
43e58258-9ba1-4a39-bae5-8917c9f629cc
  • Dragić Živanović, Nada (3)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Elektronska uprava

Dragić Živanović, Nada; Bukazić, Dejan

(Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje, 2019)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Dragić Živanović, Nada
AU  - Bukazić, Dejan
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2108
AB  - Savremeni način komunikacije u kome se vreme podele informacija izražava
u sekundama, kao podrazumevajuću činjenicu ustanovio je internet. U
tom smislu, uprave savremenih država prinuđene su da se modrnizuju kako
bi mogle efikasno da odgovore na zahteve građana. Uvođenjem elektronske
uprave, menja se i njen koncept, pa su građani u bitno povoljnijem položaju,
kao korisnici javnih usluga. Kako bi pratila savremeni trend, Srbija je uvela
niz novena u oblasti e– uprave i osnovala Vladinu Kancelariju za informacione
tehnologije i elektronsku upravu.
AB  - If one looks at the level of sophistication of twenty services in the Republic
of Serbia in 2009, we can conclude that most of the services (7), or more
than half, were developed to the first level – only information available on the
website of the competent authority or institution authorized to provide services.
Five services met the second level, and four services were developed by the third
level. The fourth level of sophistication had only four services that were the most
developed: job search, customs declarations, public libraries and the mortgage
register of legal entities.
Although certain legal regulations were adopted in the field of e-government,
in 2009 Serbia was only at the beginning of the creation of e-government.
It was necessary to enact a number of new legal texts, whose adoption and
proper implementation in the coming period would significantly improve the
quality of life of Serbian citizens and create a much better business environment
necessary for companies.
Ten years later, we have a situation in which Serbia becomes the leading
regional leader in the field of e-government, with specially developed services
for citizens, the economy and the state administration. The Government has
also established an Office for Information Technology and eGovernment as an
operational body with the task of looking after the design, harmonization, development
and functioning of eGovernment systems and information systems
and infrastructure of state administration bodies and government departments.
In this respect, it is noticeable that the Government, by its actions, sets an example for all state bodies to use the benefits of e-government in the same way.
Adoption of the proposal of the Program of Development of eGovernment in
the Republic of Serbia for the period from 2019 to 2022 presented the priority
projects in the field of digitalization of administration in the coming period.
This is, first and foremost, the spread of high-speed internet throughout Serbia,
as well as the construction of the State Data Center in Kragujevac as a strategic
infrastructure that will enable the development of new eGovernment services
and increase the security of stored data. The introduction of electronic services
in many more areas is one of the main goals of the state administration.
PB  - Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
T2  - Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 9 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume IX
T1  - Elektronska uprava
T1  - E-Government
EP  - 314
SP  - 303
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Dragić Živanović, Nada and Bukazić, Dejan",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Savremeni način komunikacije u kome se vreme podele informacija izražava
u sekundama, kao podrazumevajuću činjenicu ustanovio je internet. U
tom smislu, uprave savremenih država prinuđene su da se modrnizuju kako
bi mogle efikasno da odgovore na zahteve građana. Uvođenjem elektronske
uprave, menja se i njen koncept, pa su građani u bitno povoljnijem položaju,
kao korisnici javnih usluga. Kako bi pratila savremeni trend, Srbija je uvela
niz novena u oblasti e– uprave i osnovala Vladinu Kancelariju za informacione
tehnologije i elektronsku upravu., If one looks at the level of sophistication of twenty services in the Republic
of Serbia in 2009, we can conclude that most of the services (7), or more
than half, were developed to the first level – only information available on the
website of the competent authority or institution authorized to provide services.
Five services met the second level, and four services were developed by the third
level. The fourth level of sophistication had only four services that were the most
developed: job search, customs declarations, public libraries and the mortgage
register of legal entities.
Although certain legal regulations were adopted in the field of e-government,
in 2009 Serbia was only at the beginning of the creation of e-government.
It was necessary to enact a number of new legal texts, whose adoption and
proper implementation in the coming period would significantly improve the
quality of life of Serbian citizens and create a much better business environment
necessary for companies.
Ten years later, we have a situation in which Serbia becomes the leading
regional leader in the field of e-government, with specially developed services
for citizens, the economy and the state administration. The Government has
also established an Office for Information Technology and eGovernment as an
operational body with the task of looking after the design, harmonization, development
and functioning of eGovernment systems and information systems
and infrastructure of state administration bodies and government departments.
In this respect, it is noticeable that the Government, by its actions, sets an example for all state bodies to use the benefits of e-government in the same way.
Adoption of the proposal of the Program of Development of eGovernment in
the Republic of Serbia for the period from 2019 to 2022 presented the priority
projects in the field of digitalization of administration in the coming period.
This is, first and foremost, the spread of high-speed internet throughout Serbia,
as well as the construction of the State Data Center in Kragujevac as a strategic
infrastructure that will enable the development of new eGovernment services
and increase the security of stored data. The introduction of electronic services
in many more areas is one of the main goals of the state administration.",
publisher = "Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje",
journal = "Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 9 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume IX",
booktitle = "Elektronska uprava, E-Government",
pages = "314-303"
}
Dragić Živanović, N.,& Bukazić, D.. (2019). Elektronska uprava. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 9 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume IX
Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje., 303-314.
Dragić Živanović N, Bukazić D. Elektronska uprava. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 9 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume IX. 2019;:303-314..
Dragić Živanović, Nada, Bukazić, Dejan, "Elektronska uprava" in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 9 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume IX (2019):303-314.

Arhuska konvencija

Dragić Živanović, Nada; Bukazić, Dejan

(Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje, 2018)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Dragić Živanović, Nada
AU  - Bukazić, Dejan
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2089
AB  - Arhuska konvencija (Konvencija o dostupnosti informacija, učešću javnosti
u donošenju odluka i pravu na pravnu zaštitu u pitanjima životne sredine, Arhus
1998) jeste međunarodni akt u oblasti zaštite životne sredine, koji je tadašnji generalni
sekretar Ujedinjenih nacija Kofi Anan opisao kao „najambiciozniji poduhvat
u smislu demokratizacije u oblasti životne sredine, pokrenut pod pokroviteljstvom
Ujedinjenih nacija“. Konvencija nije samo sporazum o zaštiti životne sredine, to je i
Konvencija o vladinoj odgovornosti i transparentnosti u donošenju odluka. Arhuska
konvencija (Konvencija o dostupnosti informacija, učešću javnosti u donošenju odluka
i pravu na pravnu zaštitu u pitanjima koja se tiču životne sredine – Arhuska
konvencija) usvojena je 25. juna 1998. godine, na Četvrtoj ministarskoj konferenciji
„Životna sredina za Evropu“, održanoj u danskom gradu Arhusu, pod pokroviteljstvom
Ekonomske komisije Ujedinjenih nacija za Evropu (UN/ECE).
AB  - The Aarhus Convention is a new kind of environmental agreement. The
Convention: links environmental rights and human rights, acknowledges that
we owe an obligation to future generations, establishes that sustainable development
can be achieved only through the involvement of all stakeholders, links
government accountability and environmental protection, focuses on interactions
between the public and public authorities in a democratic context. The
subject of the Convention goes to the heart of the relationship between people
and governments. The Convention is not only an environmental agreement, it is
also a Convention about government accountability, transparency and responsiveness.
It grants the public rights and imposes on Parties and public authorities
obligations regarding access to information and public participation and
access to justice. Moreover, the Aarhus Convention is also forging a new process
for public participation in the negotiation and implementation of international
agreements.
PB  - Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
T2  - Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 8 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume VIII
T1  - Arhuska konvencija
T1  - Aarhus Convention
EP  - 395
SP  - 382
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Dragić Živanović, Nada and Bukazić, Dejan",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Arhuska konvencija (Konvencija o dostupnosti informacija, učešću javnosti
u donošenju odluka i pravu na pravnu zaštitu u pitanjima životne sredine, Arhus
1998) jeste međunarodni akt u oblasti zaštite životne sredine, koji je tadašnji generalni
sekretar Ujedinjenih nacija Kofi Anan opisao kao „najambiciozniji poduhvat
u smislu demokratizacije u oblasti životne sredine, pokrenut pod pokroviteljstvom
Ujedinjenih nacija“. Konvencija nije samo sporazum o zaštiti životne sredine, to je i
Konvencija o vladinoj odgovornosti i transparentnosti u donošenju odluka. Arhuska
konvencija (Konvencija o dostupnosti informacija, učešću javnosti u donošenju odluka
i pravu na pravnu zaštitu u pitanjima koja se tiču životne sredine – Arhuska
konvencija) usvojena je 25. juna 1998. godine, na Četvrtoj ministarskoj konferenciji
„Životna sredina za Evropu“, održanoj u danskom gradu Arhusu, pod pokroviteljstvom
Ekonomske komisije Ujedinjenih nacija za Evropu (UN/ECE)., The Aarhus Convention is a new kind of environmental agreement. The
Convention: links environmental rights and human rights, acknowledges that
we owe an obligation to future generations, establishes that sustainable development
can be achieved only through the involvement of all stakeholders, links
government accountability and environmental protection, focuses on interactions
between the public and public authorities in a democratic context. The
subject of the Convention goes to the heart of the relationship between people
and governments. The Convention is not only an environmental agreement, it is
also a Convention about government accountability, transparency and responsiveness.
It grants the public rights and imposes on Parties and public authorities
obligations regarding access to information and public participation and
access to justice. Moreover, the Aarhus Convention is also forging a new process
for public participation in the negotiation and implementation of international
agreements.",
publisher = "Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje",
journal = "Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 8 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume VIII",
booktitle = "Arhuska konvencija, Aarhus Convention",
pages = "395-382"
}
Dragić Živanović, N.,& Bukazić, D.. (2018). Arhuska konvencija. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 8 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume VIII
Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje., 382-395.
Dragić Živanović N, Bukazić D. Arhuska konvencija. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 8 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume VIII. 2018;:382-395..
Dragić Živanović, Nada, Bukazić, Dejan, "Arhuska konvencija" in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 8 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume VIII (2018):382-395.

„Budućnost“ Kjoto protokola i stanje u Srbiji

Dragić Živanović, Nada

(Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje, 2017)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Dragić Živanović, Nada
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2012
AB  - Protokol iz Kjota uz Okvirnu konvenciju Ujedinjenih nacija o promeni klime
(The Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change) dodatak je međunarodnom sporazumu o klimatskim promenama, potpisan
sa ciljem smanjivanja emisije ugljen-dioksida i drugih gasova koji izazivaju
efekat staklene bašte. Bilo je neophodno da kao izuzetno značajan bude usvojen
od strane što većeg broja država. Navedena zamisao nije u potpunosti ostvarena.
Sjedinjene Američke Države kao jedan od najvećih zagađivača nisu ga ratifikovale.
Problemi su postojali i u stavovima drugih zemalja pri konferencijama koje su
usledile. Sa druge strane postoje i pozitivni primeri nerazvijenih zemalja, recimo
primer Kosova i Metohije.
AB  - The Kyoto Protocol is an international treaty which extends the 1992 United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) that commits
State Parties to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, based on the scientific consensus
that global warming is occurring and it is extremely likely that human-made CO2
emissions have predominantly caused it. The Kyoto Protocol was adopted in Kyoto,
Japan, on December 11, 1997 and entered into force on February 16, 2005. There
are currently 192 parties (Canada withdrew effective December 2012) to the Protocol.
The US signed the Protocol on 12 November 1998, during the Clinton presidency.
To become binding in the US, however, the treaty had to be ratified by the
Senate, which had already passed the 1997 non-binding Byrd-Hagel Resolution, expressing
disapproval of any international agreement that did not require developing
countries to make emission reductions and “would seriously harm the economy of
the United States”. The resolution passed 95–0. Therefore, even though the Clinton
administration signed the treaty, it was never submitted to the Senate for ratification.
As of 2016, the US is the only signatory that has not ratified the Protocol. The
US accounted for 36% of emissions in 1990. As such, for the treaty to go into legal
effect without US ratification, it would require a coalition including the EU, Russia,
Japan, and small parties. A deal, without the US Administration, was reached in
the Bonn climate talks held in 2001.
PB  - Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
T2  - Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 7 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume VII
T1  - „Budućnost“ Kjoto protokola i stanje u Srbiji
T1  - “The Future” of the Kyot Protocol and the Condidtions in Serbia
EP  - 407
SP  - 396
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Dragić Živanović, Nada",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Protokol iz Kjota uz Okvirnu konvenciju Ujedinjenih nacija o promeni klime
(The Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change) dodatak je međunarodnom sporazumu o klimatskim promenama, potpisan
sa ciljem smanjivanja emisije ugljen-dioksida i drugih gasova koji izazivaju
efekat staklene bašte. Bilo je neophodno da kao izuzetno značajan bude usvojen
od strane što većeg broja država. Navedena zamisao nije u potpunosti ostvarena.
Sjedinjene Američke Države kao jedan od najvećih zagađivača nisu ga ratifikovale.
Problemi su postojali i u stavovima drugih zemalja pri konferencijama koje su
usledile. Sa druge strane postoje i pozitivni primeri nerazvijenih zemalja, recimo
primer Kosova i Metohije., The Kyoto Protocol is an international treaty which extends the 1992 United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) that commits
State Parties to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, based on the scientific consensus
that global warming is occurring and it is extremely likely that human-made CO2
emissions have predominantly caused it. The Kyoto Protocol was adopted in Kyoto,
Japan, on December 11, 1997 and entered into force on February 16, 2005. There
are currently 192 parties (Canada withdrew effective December 2012) to the Protocol.
The US signed the Protocol on 12 November 1998, during the Clinton presidency.
To become binding in the US, however, the treaty had to be ratified by the
Senate, which had already passed the 1997 non-binding Byrd-Hagel Resolution, expressing
disapproval of any international agreement that did not require developing
countries to make emission reductions and “would seriously harm the economy of
the United States”. The resolution passed 95–0. Therefore, even though the Clinton
administration signed the treaty, it was never submitted to the Senate for ratification.
As of 2016, the US is the only signatory that has not ratified the Protocol. The
US accounted for 36% of emissions in 1990. As such, for the treaty to go into legal
effect without US ratification, it would require a coalition including the EU, Russia,
Japan, and small parties. A deal, without the US Administration, was reached in
the Bonn climate talks held in 2001.",
publisher = "Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje",
journal = "Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 7 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume VII",
booktitle = "„Budućnost“ Kjoto protokola i stanje u Srbiji, “The Future” of the Kyot Protocol and the Condidtions in Serbia",
pages = "407-396"
}
Dragić Živanović, N.. (2017). „Budućnost“ Kjoto protokola i stanje u Srbiji. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 7 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume VII
Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje., 396-407.
Dragić Živanović N. „Budućnost“ Kjoto protokola i stanje u Srbiji. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 7 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume VII. 2017;:396-407..
Dragić Živanović, Nada, "„Budućnost“ Kjoto protokola i stanje u Srbiji" in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 7 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume VII (2017):396-407.