TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vasiljević, Mirko
AU  - Petrović-Tomić, Nataša
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1195
AB  - Autori otvaraju pitanje odgovornosti članova uprave akcionarskog društva za osiguranje za sprečavanje nezakonitog poslovanja, kao i neprimerenih radnji i uticaja koji mogu ugroziti najbolji interes društva ili naneti štetu društvu. Ovaj modalitet odgovornosti predstavlja odstupanje od opšteg statusnog režima, koji doprinosi povećanju stepena lične odgovornosti članova uprave u sektoru osiguranja. Pošavši od toga da kandidati za članove uprave u oblasti osi - guranja treba da ispune uslove vezane za poznavanje struke osiguranja, profesionalno iskustvo i profesionalni i moralni integritet, autori smatraju da se od njih osnovano očekuje da identifikuju, prate i spreče rizike koji ugrožavaju najbolji interes društva. Oni u svom poslovanju treba da se pridržavaju pravila struke osiguranja, da implementiraju odgovarajuću strategiju upravljanja rizicima i da pravovremeno spreče transakcije kojima se povređuje klauzula zabrane sukoba interesa u pravu osiguranja. Autori zaključuju da je sektorski zakonodavac obezbedio bolju zaštitu društvima u oblasti osiguranja od nezakonitih i neprimerenih uplitanja prvenstveno kontrolnih akcionara.
AB  - Authors open the issue of liability of the insurance company management (the supervisory and the executive board) for the prevention of unlawful and inappropriate actions and influences which are harmful for or are not in the best interest of the company and its shareholders, and which are performed by persons who are closely related to the company - in order to protect consumers of insurance services. In this context, the authors point out the main issues addressed in this work: the Insurance Law has introduced a special regime for transactions with related persons, which deviates from the general company regime stipulated by the Company Law and has contributed to an excessive level of personal liability of the board members in the sector of insurance. However, laws cannot regulate all the different situations that might be encountered in the course of business, and they do not need to. For that purpose, certain "core" principles to be followed in all management situations have been established for board members. These are related to the fact that reliability of candidates for board directors in the sector of insurance shall be verified when deciding about the license to work as a director. For that reason, a management board member can be expected to be aware of all risks that could affect the best interest of the company, to identify it rightly and to prevent unlawful business operations. What they need to do is to comply with the insurance rules of profession, to implement an appropriate risk management strategy and to prevent all transactions contrary to the conflict of interest clause. Authors conclude that companies in the insurance sector are better protected against conflict of interest of the controlling shareholder with the company interest than companies in general company law regime.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Odgovornost uprave akcionarskog društva za osiguranje za sprečavanje nezakonitog poslovanja
T1  - Liability of company management for preventing unlawful business operations of insurance company
EP  - 39
IS  - 1
SP  - 7
VL  - 58
DO  - 10.5937/PiP2001007X
UR  - conv_2314
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Mirko and Petrović-Tomić, Nataša",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Autori otvaraju pitanje odgovornosti članova uprave akcionarskog društva za osiguranje za sprečavanje nezakonitog poslovanja, kao i neprimerenih radnji i uticaja koji mogu ugroziti najbolji interes društva ili naneti štetu društvu. Ovaj modalitet odgovornosti predstavlja odstupanje od opšteg statusnog režima, koji doprinosi povećanju stepena lične odgovornosti članova uprave u sektoru osiguranja. Pošavši od toga da kandidati za članove uprave u oblasti osi - guranja treba da ispune uslove vezane za poznavanje struke osiguranja, profesionalno iskustvo i profesionalni i moralni integritet, autori smatraju da se od njih osnovano očekuje da identifikuju, prate i spreče rizike koji ugrožavaju najbolji interes društva. Oni u svom poslovanju treba da se pridržavaju pravila struke osiguranja, da implementiraju odgovarajuću strategiju upravljanja rizicima i da pravovremeno spreče transakcije kojima se povređuje klauzula zabrane sukoba interesa u pravu osiguranja. Autori zaključuju da je sektorski zakonodavac obezbedio bolju zaštitu društvima u oblasti osiguranja od nezakonitih i neprimerenih uplitanja prvenstveno kontrolnih akcionara., Authors open the issue of liability of the insurance company management (the supervisory and the executive board) for the prevention of unlawful and inappropriate actions and influences which are harmful for or are not in the best interest of the company and its shareholders, and which are performed by persons who are closely related to the company - in order to protect consumers of insurance services. In this context, the authors point out the main issues addressed in this work: the Insurance Law has introduced a special regime for transactions with related persons, which deviates from the general company regime stipulated by the Company Law and has contributed to an excessive level of personal liability of the board members in the sector of insurance. However, laws cannot regulate all the different situations that might be encountered in the course of business, and they do not need to. For that purpose, certain "core" principles to be followed in all management situations have been established for board members. These are related to the fact that reliability of candidates for board directors in the sector of insurance shall be verified when deciding about the license to work as a director. For that reason, a management board member can be expected to be aware of all risks that could affect the best interest of the company, to identify it rightly and to prevent unlawful business operations. What they need to do is to comply with the insurance rules of profession, to implement an appropriate risk management strategy and to prevent all transactions contrary to the conflict of interest clause. Authors conclude that companies in the insurance sector are better protected against conflict of interest of the controlling shareholder with the company interest than companies in general company law regime.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Odgovornost uprave akcionarskog društva za osiguranje za sprečavanje nezakonitog poslovanja, Liability of company management for preventing unlawful business operations of insurance company",
pages = "39-7",
number = "1",
volume = "58",
doi = "10.5937/PiP2001007X",
url = "conv_2314"
}

Vasiljević, M.,& Petrović-Tomić, N.. (2020). Odgovornost uprave akcionarskog društva za osiguranje za sprečavanje nezakonitog poslovanja. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 58(1), 7-39.
https://doi.org/10.5937/PiP2001007X
conv_2314

Vasiljević M, Petrović-Tomić N. Odgovornost uprave akcionarskog društva za osiguranje za sprečavanje nezakonitog poslovanja. in Pravo i privreda. 2020;58(1):7-39.
doi:10.5937/PiP2001007X
conv_2314 .

Vasiljević, Mirko, Petrović-Tomić, Nataša, "Odgovornost uprave akcionarskog društva za osiguranje za sprečavanje nezakonitog poslovanja" in Pravo i privreda, 58, no. 1 (2020):7-39,
https://doi.org/10.5937/PiP2001007X .,
conv_2314 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vasiljević, Mirko
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1736
AB  - Afirmacija arbitražnog rešavanja privrednih sporova u oblasti ugovornog prava, i na nacionalnim nivoima (kao nesumnjiv trend, iako različitog stepena) i na međunarodnom nivou, otvorila je pitanje mogućnosti takvog načina rešavanja i interkompanijskopravnih sporova, kako bi se sloboda volje investitora proširila iz domena osnivanja trgovačkih društava i u domen slobode izbora foruma rešavanja mogućih sporova iz brojnih pravnih odnosa te prirode. Ipak, za razliku od ugovora u kojima sloboda volje ima primat u odnosu na njena ograničenja (odnos pravila i izuzetka), sfera interkompanijskopravnih odnosa, iako u osnovi ugovorna po nastanku, u svom funkcionisanju ima naglašenu potrebu da reši sukob ugovornog i kompanijskog prava, kako bi arbitrabilnost tih sporova bila realno moguća, a, s druge strane, sfera kompanijskog prava uvek je više od ugovornog prava u fokusu pažnje nacionalnih javnih poredaka, kao univerzalne ustanove (nezavisno od svog obuhvata) koja predstavlja branu arbitrabilnosti tih sporova. U ovom članku autor najpre analizira pravnu prirodu konstitutivnih akata privrednih društava (osnivačkog akta i statuta akcionarskog društva) u kontekstu arbitražnog ugovora, na kome se jedino može zasnovati arbitrabilnost interkompanijskopravnih sporova, i zaključuje da njihova ugovorna priroda predstavlja ozbiljnu smetnju za mandatorne arbitraže tih sporova (ako bi ovi akti s ovom klauzulom bili usvojeni većinom glasova), s tim što bi teorija ugovora po pristupu mogla da bude izlaz za podsticaj arbitrabilnosti, ali samo u zatvorenim formama društava, dok u javnom akcionarskom društvu to ne bi bilo moguće, posebno u slučaju neprofesionalnih akcionara, zbog potrebe njihove dodatne zaštite ustanovama potrošačkog prava. Autor, zatim, analizira i sam pojam interkompanijskopravnih sporova i sisteme moguće objektivne arbitrabilnosti (ratione materiae) tih sporova, konstatujući da srpsko arbitražno pravo i kompanijsko pravo, posebno u mogućoj restriktivnoj koncepciji isključive nadležnosti privrednih sudova za te sporove, u najmanju ruku ima ozbiljne razloge za promene u prilog snaženja njihove arbitrabilnosti, uz određena potrebna pojedinačna isključenja, gde dominira interes javnog poretka. Najzad, autor analizira i neke aspekte multistranačke prirode interkompanijskopravnih sporova, posebno u vezi sa javnim akcionarskim društvima, kao moguće proceduralne smetnje za njihovo arbitražno rešavanje, čak i u uslovima njihove eventualne nesporne objektivne arbitrabilnosti.
AB  - The affirmation of resolution through arbitration of commercial disputes in the field of contract law, both at national levels (as an undisputable trend of varying degrees) as well as at the international level, has raised the issue of the possibility of resolving intercompany disputes in this manner, in order to extend the freedom of will of investors from the domain of establishing companies to include the domain of the freedom of choice of a forum for resolving possible disputes arising from numerous legal relations of this kind. However, unlike contracts, with the primacy of free will compared to limitations (the relation of rules and exceptions), the sphere of intercompany relations, although basically contractual by its origin, has, in its functioning, an emphasized need to resolve the conflict of contract and company law in order to make the arbitrability of these disputes realistically possible, while on the other hand, compared to the contract law, the sphere of company law is always more in the focus of attention of national public orders, as a universal institute (regardless of its scope), which represents an obstacle to arbitrability of these disputes. In this paper, the author first analyses the legal nature of the constituent acts of companies (the founding act and statute of a joint stock company) in the context of an arbitration agreement, on which the arbitrability of intercompany disputes can solely be based, finding that their contractual nature is a serious obstacle to mandatory arbitrations of these disputes (if these acts with this clause are adopted by majority of votes), and that the theory of adhesion contracts could be a solution to encourage arbitrability, but only for closed type of companies, while this would not be possible in the case of a public joint stock company, especially in the case of non-professional shareholders because of the need to additionally protect them through consumer law. The author continues by analysing the notion of intercompany disputes and systems of possible objective arbitrability (ratione materiae) of these disputes, finding that the Serbian arbitration law and company law, especially with regard to the possible restrictive concept of exclusive jurisdiction of commercial courts for these disputes, has at least serious reasons for changes in favour of strengthening their arbitrability, with certain necessary individual exclusions in case of the dominance of public order interest. Finally, the author also analyses certain aspects of multiparty nature of the intercompany disputes, especially regarding public joint stock companies, as possible procedural obstacles to their resolution through arbitration, even in cases of their possibly undisputable objective arbitrability.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Arbitražni ugovor i interkompanijskopravni sporovi
T1  - Arbitration agreement and intercompany disputes
EP  - 46
IS  - 2
SP  - 7
VL  - 66
DO  - 10.5937/AlaniPFB1802007V
UR  - conv_3026_6
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Mirko",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Afirmacija arbitražnog rešavanja privrednih sporova u oblasti ugovornog prava, i na nacionalnim nivoima (kao nesumnjiv trend, iako različitog stepena) i na međunarodnom nivou, otvorila je pitanje mogućnosti takvog načina rešavanja i interkompanijskopravnih sporova, kako bi se sloboda volje investitora proširila iz domena osnivanja trgovačkih društava i u domen slobode izbora foruma rešavanja mogućih sporova iz brojnih pravnih odnosa te prirode. Ipak, za razliku od ugovora u kojima sloboda volje ima primat u odnosu na njena ograničenja (odnos pravila i izuzetka), sfera interkompanijskopravnih odnosa, iako u osnovi ugovorna po nastanku, u svom funkcionisanju ima naglašenu potrebu da reši sukob ugovornog i kompanijskog prava, kako bi arbitrabilnost tih sporova bila realno moguća, a, s druge strane, sfera kompanijskog prava uvek je više od ugovornog prava u fokusu pažnje nacionalnih javnih poredaka, kao univerzalne ustanove (nezavisno od svog obuhvata) koja predstavlja branu arbitrabilnosti tih sporova. U ovom članku autor najpre analizira pravnu prirodu konstitutivnih akata privrednih društava (osnivačkog akta i statuta akcionarskog društva) u kontekstu arbitražnog ugovora, na kome se jedino može zasnovati arbitrabilnost interkompanijskopravnih sporova, i zaključuje da njihova ugovorna priroda predstavlja ozbiljnu smetnju za mandatorne arbitraže tih sporova (ako bi ovi akti s ovom klauzulom bili usvojeni većinom glasova), s tim što bi teorija ugovora po pristupu mogla da bude izlaz za podsticaj arbitrabilnosti, ali samo u zatvorenim formama društava, dok u javnom akcionarskom društvu to ne bi bilo moguće, posebno u slučaju neprofesionalnih akcionara, zbog potrebe njihove dodatne zaštite ustanovama potrošačkog prava. Autor, zatim, analizira i sam pojam interkompanijskopravnih sporova i sisteme moguće objektivne arbitrabilnosti (ratione materiae) tih sporova, konstatujući da srpsko arbitražno pravo i kompanijsko pravo, posebno u mogućoj restriktivnoj koncepciji isključive nadležnosti privrednih sudova za te sporove, u najmanju ruku ima ozbiljne razloge za promene u prilog snaženja njihove arbitrabilnosti, uz određena potrebna pojedinačna isključenja, gde dominira interes javnog poretka. Najzad, autor analizira i neke aspekte multistranačke prirode interkompanijskopravnih sporova, posebno u vezi sa javnim akcionarskim društvima, kao moguće proceduralne smetnje za njihovo arbitražno rešavanje, čak i u uslovima njihove eventualne nesporne objektivne arbitrabilnosti., The affirmation of resolution through arbitration of commercial disputes in the field of contract law, both at national levels (as an undisputable trend of varying degrees) as well as at the international level, has raised the issue of the possibility of resolving intercompany disputes in this manner, in order to extend the freedom of will of investors from the domain of establishing companies to include the domain of the freedom of choice of a forum for resolving possible disputes arising from numerous legal relations of this kind. However, unlike contracts, with the primacy of free will compared to limitations (the relation of rules and exceptions), the sphere of intercompany relations, although basically contractual by its origin, has, in its functioning, an emphasized need to resolve the conflict of contract and company law in order to make the arbitrability of these disputes realistically possible, while on the other hand, compared to the contract law, the sphere of company law is always more in the focus of attention of national public orders, as a universal institute (regardless of its scope), which represents an obstacle to arbitrability of these disputes. In this paper, the author first analyses the legal nature of the constituent acts of companies (the founding act and statute of a joint stock company) in the context of an arbitration agreement, on which the arbitrability of intercompany disputes can solely be based, finding that their contractual nature is a serious obstacle to mandatory arbitrations of these disputes (if these acts with this clause are adopted by majority of votes), and that the theory of adhesion contracts could be a solution to encourage arbitrability, but only for closed type of companies, while this would not be possible in the case of a public joint stock company, especially in the case of non-professional shareholders because of the need to additionally protect them through consumer law. The author continues by analysing the notion of intercompany disputes and systems of possible objective arbitrability (ratione materiae) of these disputes, finding that the Serbian arbitration law and company law, especially with regard to the possible restrictive concept of exclusive jurisdiction of commercial courts for these disputes, has at least serious reasons for changes in favour of strengthening their arbitrability, with certain necessary individual exclusions in case of the dominance of public order interest. Finally, the author also analyses certain aspects of multiparty nature of the intercompany disputes, especially regarding public joint stock companies, as possible procedural obstacles to their resolution through arbitration, even in cases of their possibly undisputable objective arbitrability.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Arbitražni ugovor i interkompanijskopravni sporovi, Arbitration agreement and intercompany disputes",
pages = "46-7",
number = "2",
volume = "66",
doi = "10.5937/AlaniPFB1802007V",
url = "conv_3026_6"
}

Vasiljević, M.. (2018). Arbitražni ugovor i interkompanijskopravni sporovi. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 66(2), 7-46.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AlaniPFB1802007V
conv_3026_6

Vasiljević M. Arbitražni ugovor i interkompanijskopravni sporovi. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2018;66(2):7-46.
doi:10.5937/AlaniPFB1802007V
conv_3026_6 .

Vasiljević, Mirko, "Arbitražni ugovor i interkompanijskopravni sporovi" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 66, no. 2 (2018):7-46,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AlaniPFB1802007V .,
conv_3026_6 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vasiljević, Mirko
AU  - Radović, Vuk
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/998
AB  - Pravo nesaglasnih akcionara predstavlja kontroverzan institut prava akcionarskih društava, zbog čega ga prihvata relativno mali broj država. U ovom radu autori prvo analiziraju ciljeve koji se žele postići uvođenjem instituta prava nesaglasnih akcionara. U tom pogledu, prvo su prikazana tradicionalna, a nakon toga i moderna objašnjenja za uvođenje, odnosno zadržavanje tog instituta. U drugom delu rada se pravo nesaglasnih akcionara posmatra kritički, i to prevashodno iz ugla problema koje stvara akcionarskom društvu. Nakon toga je identifikovano i nekoliko potencijalnih uzročnika neefikasnosti korišćenja tog prava. Sagledavanje prednosti i nedostataka prava nesaglasnih akcionara je posebno značajno za Srbiju kako bi se izveo zaključak o tome u kojoj meri su naša rešenja usklađena sa osnovnim postulatima na kojima taj institut treba da počiva.
AB  - Shareholders' right to appraisal represents a controversial topic of corporation law, which is why a relatively small number of countries accept it. In this article, the authors analyze the goals that are supposed to be achieved with the introduction of shareholders' appraisal rights. In this respect, traditional and modern explanations for the introduction or maintaining of this right have been presented. In the second part of this article, shareholders' right to appraisal has been critically examined, mostly from corporations' perspective. Afterwards, several potential causes of inefficiency of using this right have been identified. Perceiving pros and cons of shareholders' right to appraisal is of particular importance for Serbia, in order to draw a conclusion about harmonization of our legislative solutions with the theoretical foundations of this right.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Teorijske osnove prava nesaglasnih akcionara
T1  - Theoretical foundations of shareholders' right to appraisal
EP  - 27
IS  - 3
SP  - 7
VL  - 65
DO  - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1703007V
UR  - conv_430
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Mirko and Radović, Vuk",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Pravo nesaglasnih akcionara predstavlja kontroverzan institut prava akcionarskih društava, zbog čega ga prihvata relativno mali broj država. U ovom radu autori prvo analiziraju ciljeve koji se žele postići uvođenjem instituta prava nesaglasnih akcionara. U tom pogledu, prvo su prikazana tradicionalna, a nakon toga i moderna objašnjenja za uvođenje, odnosno zadržavanje tog instituta. U drugom delu rada se pravo nesaglasnih akcionara posmatra kritički, i to prevashodno iz ugla problema koje stvara akcionarskom društvu. Nakon toga je identifikovano i nekoliko potencijalnih uzročnika neefikasnosti korišćenja tog prava. Sagledavanje prednosti i nedostataka prava nesaglasnih akcionara je posebno značajno za Srbiju kako bi se izveo zaključak o tome u kojoj meri su naša rešenja usklađena sa osnovnim postulatima na kojima taj institut treba da počiva., Shareholders' right to appraisal represents a controversial topic of corporation law, which is why a relatively small number of countries accept it. In this article, the authors analyze the goals that are supposed to be achieved with the introduction of shareholders' appraisal rights. In this respect, traditional and modern explanations for the introduction or maintaining of this right have been presented. In the second part of this article, shareholders' right to appraisal has been critically examined, mostly from corporations' perspective. Afterwards, several potential causes of inefficiency of using this right have been identified. Perceiving pros and cons of shareholders' right to appraisal is of particular importance for Serbia, in order to draw a conclusion about harmonization of our legislative solutions with the theoretical foundations of this right.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Teorijske osnove prava nesaglasnih akcionara, Theoretical foundations of shareholders' right to appraisal",
pages = "27-7",
number = "3",
volume = "65",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1703007V",
url = "conv_430"
}

Vasiljević, M.,& Radović, V.. (2017). Teorijske osnove prava nesaglasnih akcionara. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 65(3), 7-27.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1703007V
conv_430

Vasiljević M, Radović V. Teorijske osnove prava nesaglasnih akcionara. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2017;65(3):7-27.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1703007V
conv_430 .

Vasiljević, Mirko, Radović, Vuk, "Teorijske osnove prava nesaglasnih akcionara" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 65, no. 3 (2017):7-27,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1703007V .,
conv_430 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vasiljević, Mirko
AU  - Jovanović, Marko
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/911
AB  - The issue of necessity as a ground for precluding wrongfulness has received close attention over the last two decades both in case law and in scholarly writings. Arbitrations conducted against Argentina for breaches of bilateral investment treaty obligations committed while fighting against economic crisis revived the old controversies related to the concept of necessity in general public international law, but also brought up some new dilemmas. This paper analyses the use of necessity in international investment law in light of what the authors suggest to be the legal purpose of this concept, points to and discusses the divergences in case law with respect to some of the elements of the defence based on necessity and offers the solutions susceptible to lead to a more harmonious understanding of necessity in international investment law.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Necessity as a ground for precluding wrongfulness in international investment law
EP  - 24
IS  - 3
SP  - 5
VL  - 64
DO  - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1603005V
UR  - conv_407
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Mirko and Jovanović, Marko",
year = "2016",
abstract = "The issue of necessity as a ground for precluding wrongfulness has received close attention over the last two decades both in case law and in scholarly writings. Arbitrations conducted against Argentina for breaches of bilateral investment treaty obligations committed while fighting against economic crisis revived the old controversies related to the concept of necessity in general public international law, but also brought up some new dilemmas. This paper analyses the use of necessity in international investment law in light of what the authors suggest to be the legal purpose of this concept, points to and discusses the divergences in case law with respect to some of the elements of the defence based on necessity and offers the solutions susceptible to lead to a more harmonious understanding of necessity in international investment law.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Necessity as a ground for precluding wrongfulness in international investment law",
pages = "24-5",
number = "3",
volume = "64",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1603005V",
url = "conv_407"
}

Vasiljević, M.,& Jovanović, M.. (2016). Necessity as a ground for precluding wrongfulness in international investment law. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 64(3), 5-24.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1603005V
conv_407

Vasiljević M, Jovanović M. Necessity as a ground for precluding wrongfulness in international investment law. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2016;64(3):5-24.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1603005V
conv_407 .

Vasiljević, Mirko, Jovanović, Marko, "Necessity as a ground for precluding wrongfulness in international investment law" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 64, no. 3 (2016):5-24,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1603005V .,
conv_407 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vasiljević, Mirko
AU  - Petrov, Vladan
AU  - Lepetić, Jelena
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/922
AB  - Obavezno članstvo u privrednim komorama je tema koja trenutno zaokuplja stručnu i nestručnu javnost u Srbiji. Autori su u ovom radu pokušali da odgovore na pitanje da li je obavezno članstvo u Privrednoj komori Srbije ustavno utemeljeno ili nije. Da bi dali adekvatan odgovor, u radu je prvo analiziran pojam i pravna priroda privredne komore, a zatim su predstavljene karakteristike javnopravnog i privatnopravnog modela komorskih sistema. Nakon toga, predstavljeno je Rešenje Ustavnog suda Republike Srbije iz 2010. godine o neprihvatanju inicijativa za pokretanje postupka za utvrđivanje neustavnosti odredaba čl. 8 i 9 Zakona o privrednim komorama iz 2001. godine. Na kraju, dat je pregled relevantnih presuda Evropskog suda za ljudska prava.
AB  - Mandatory membership in chambers of commerce is a current issue in Serbia which preoccupies not only the law experts but also the entities entitled to run businesses and public in general. The authors tried to answer the question if compulsory business membership in Serbian Chamber of Commerce is constitutional or not. After analyzing the concept and legal nature of chambers of commerce, in order to answer this question adequately, the authors bring forward characteristics of public law and private law model of chamber systems. Furthermore, they present the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Serbia rendered in 2010 considering the initiatives to institute proceedings of assessing the constitutionality of the articles 8 and 9 of the Law on Chamber of Commerce of 2001. Finally, the authors analyze the relevant judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.
PB  - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Pravo i privreda
T1  - Pravna priroda privrednih komora
T1  - Legal nature of chambers of commerce
EP  - 23
IS  - 10-12
SP  - 5
VL  - 54
UR  - conv_2195
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Mirko and Petrov, Vladan and Lepetić, Jelena",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Obavezno članstvo u privrednim komorama je tema koja trenutno zaokuplja stručnu i nestručnu javnost u Srbiji. Autori su u ovom radu pokušali da odgovore na pitanje da li je obavezno članstvo u Privrednoj komori Srbije ustavno utemeljeno ili nije. Da bi dali adekvatan odgovor, u radu je prvo analiziran pojam i pravna priroda privredne komore, a zatim su predstavljene karakteristike javnopravnog i privatnopravnog modela komorskih sistema. Nakon toga, predstavljeno je Rešenje Ustavnog suda Republike Srbije iz 2010. godine o neprihvatanju inicijativa za pokretanje postupka za utvrđivanje neustavnosti odredaba čl. 8 i 9 Zakona o privrednim komorama iz 2001. godine. Na kraju, dat je pregled relevantnih presuda Evropskog suda za ljudska prava., Mandatory membership in chambers of commerce is a current issue in Serbia which preoccupies not only the law experts but also the entities entitled to run businesses and public in general. The authors tried to answer the question if compulsory business membership in Serbian Chamber of Commerce is constitutional or not. After analyzing the concept and legal nature of chambers of commerce, in order to answer this question adequately, the authors bring forward characteristics of public law and private law model of chamber systems. Furthermore, they present the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Serbia rendered in 2010 considering the initiatives to institute proceedings of assessing the constitutionality of the articles 8 and 9 of the Law on Chamber of Commerce of 2001. Finally, the authors analyze the relevant judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Pravna priroda privrednih komora, Legal nature of chambers of commerce",
pages = "23-5",
number = "10-12",
volume = "54",
url = "conv_2195"
}

Vasiljević, M., Petrov, V.,& Lepetić, J.. (2016). Pravna priroda privrednih komora. in Pravo i privreda
Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 54(10-12), 5-23.
conv_2195

Vasiljević M, Petrov V, Lepetić J. Pravna priroda privrednih komora. in Pravo i privreda. 2016;54(10-12):5-23.
conv_2195 .

Vasiljević, Mirko, Petrov, Vladan, Lepetić, Jelena, "Pravna priroda privrednih komora" in Pravo i privreda, 54, no. 10-12 (2016):5-23,
conv_2195 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vasiljević, Mirko
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1580
AB  - Društvena odgovornost kompanija je odgovor kapitalizma sa ljudskim likom  na sistemske nedostatke filozofije liberalnog kapitalizma i ekonomije. Umesto interesa vlasnika kompanije kao jedinog legitimnog interesa, ovaj sistem promoviše multiinteresni legitimitet: zaposleni, uprava, poverioci, potrošači, država, lokalna zajednica. Društvena odgovornost kompanije nastala je kao politička deklaracija, da bi se sve više promovisala kao moralna kategorija, i, najzad, poprimila značajne obrise pravne obaveznosti i prinudne izvršivosti. Put od dobrovoljnosti ka pravnoj obaveznosti ne znači monopolizaciju principa obaveznosti, već zadržavanje standarda dobrovoljnosti u svim segmentima gde je potrebna veća fleksibilnost i ekonomski interes, odnosno njegovo  seljenje  u vode pravne obaveznosti u segmentima gde je potrebna veća zaštita korisnika usluga kompanije i veća garancija izvršivosti propisanih prava korpusa društvene odgovornosti kompanije. Ovim društvena odgovornost kompanije menja i samu prirodu kompanije, koja od institucije privatnog prava (motiv: profit za vlasnike) postaje sve više i institucija javnog prava (motiv: zaštita i drugih privatnih interesa i određenih javnih interesa), čime i ovaj sistem postaje sve više ekonomski, a sve manje politički (društveni u najširem smislu). PR Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije: Usklađivanje poslovnog prava Srbije sa pravom Evropske unije.
AB  - Corporate social responsibility is a response of capitalism with a human face to systematic deficiencies of liberal capitalism. Instead of promoting the interest of the company owner as the only legitimate interest at hand, this system promotes the legitimacy of the interest of employees, management, creditors, consumers, state as well as local community. Corporate social responsibility emerged as a political declaration. In time, it continued its development as a moral category. Finally, it was shaped with considerable intake of legal liability and compulsory execution. The authors view on the topic is that the evolution from voluntarism to legal liability did not entail a monopolization of the liability principle, but maintained the standard of voluntarism in all of the segments in which greater flexibility and economic interest were required. Similarly, the movement towards legal liability occurred in those segments in which greater protection of consumers was needed as well as greater guaranties of the execution of prescribed rights. In this way, corporate social responsibility as a system has impact upon the changes in a companys nature, tuning it to become more of a public law institution (due to motives that encompass protection of other private and public interests), while at the same time strengthening the importance of its economic character and loosening its political aspect.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Društvena odgovornost kompanija (od politike, preko morala, do prava)
T1  - Corporate social responsibility (from politics, over morality to law)
EP  - 28
IS  - 1
SP  - 5
VL  - 61
UR  - conv_3211
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Mirko",
year = "2013",
abstract = "Društvena odgovornost kompanija je odgovor kapitalizma sa ljudskim likom  na sistemske nedostatke filozofije liberalnog kapitalizma i ekonomije. Umesto interesa vlasnika kompanije kao jedinog legitimnog interesa, ovaj sistem promoviše multiinteresni legitimitet: zaposleni, uprava, poverioci, potrošači, država, lokalna zajednica. Društvena odgovornost kompanije nastala je kao politička deklaracija, da bi se sve više promovisala kao moralna kategorija, i, najzad, poprimila značajne obrise pravne obaveznosti i prinudne izvršivosti. Put od dobrovoljnosti ka pravnoj obaveznosti ne znači monopolizaciju principa obaveznosti, već zadržavanje standarda dobrovoljnosti u svim segmentima gde je potrebna veća fleksibilnost i ekonomski interes, odnosno njegovo  seljenje  u vode pravne obaveznosti u segmentima gde je potrebna veća zaštita korisnika usluga kompanije i veća garancija izvršivosti propisanih prava korpusa društvene odgovornosti kompanije. Ovim društvena odgovornost kompanije menja i samu prirodu kompanije, koja od institucije privatnog prava (motiv: profit za vlasnike) postaje sve više i institucija javnog prava (motiv: zaštita i drugih privatnih interesa i određenih javnih interesa), čime i ovaj sistem postaje sve više ekonomski, a sve manje politički (društveni u najširem smislu). PR Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije: Usklađivanje poslovnog prava Srbije sa pravom Evropske unije., Corporate social responsibility is a response of capitalism with a human face to systematic deficiencies of liberal capitalism. Instead of promoting the interest of the company owner as the only legitimate interest at hand, this system promotes the legitimacy of the interest of employees, management, creditors, consumers, state as well as local community. Corporate social responsibility emerged as a political declaration. In time, it continued its development as a moral category. Finally, it was shaped with considerable intake of legal liability and compulsory execution. The authors view on the topic is that the evolution from voluntarism to legal liability did not entail a monopolization of the liability principle, but maintained the standard of voluntarism in all of the segments in which greater flexibility and economic interest were required. Similarly, the movement towards legal liability occurred in those segments in which greater protection of consumers was needed as well as greater guaranties of the execution of prescribed rights. In this way, corporate social responsibility as a system has impact upon the changes in a companys nature, tuning it to become more of a public law institution (due to motives that encompass protection of other private and public interests), while at the same time strengthening the importance of its economic character and loosening its political aspect.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Društvena odgovornost kompanija (od politike, preko morala, do prava), Corporate social responsibility (from politics, over morality to law)",
pages = "28-5",
number = "1",
volume = "61",
url = "conv_3211"
}

Vasiljević, M.. (2013). Društvena odgovornost kompanija (od politike, preko morala, do prava). in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 61(1), 5-28.
conv_3211

Vasiljević M. Društvena odgovornost kompanija (od politike, preko morala, do prava). in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2013;61(1):5-28.
conv_3211 .

Vasiljević, Mirko, "Društvena odgovornost kompanija (od politike, preko morala, do prava)" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 61, no. 1 (2013):5-28,
conv_3211 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vasiljević, Mirko
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1537
AB  - The author analyzes the relationship between traditional civil law notions of care of prudent business person and care of prudent expert, good faith and fairness and a new business judgment rule concept of company law. Although legal tradition standardizes the meanings of these civil law notions, important for legal certainty, the author suggests that all attempts at their substitution or fitting into the concept of business judgment rule, originating from the legal culture of common law, have basically failed. The reasons are manifold: first, differences in legal traditions; second, the routine of courts and business of following the usual principles of legal thinking and practice; third, legal transplants were not made by replacing one concept with another rather by fitting one into another and combining their rules which has proved wrong. The author concludes, after the analysis of all constitutive elements of the new concept of company law - the business judgment rule, that the civil law notion of care of prudent business person or care of prudent expert remain the backbone of this new concept and that all other elements thereof may, through careful analysis be reduced to these notions. In itself, it ruins the credibility of the concept of business judgment rule and supports the authority of traditional due care notion of civil law.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Civil law and business judgment rule
EP  - 38
IS  - 3
SP  - 7
VL  - 60
UR  - conv_3072
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Mirko",
year = "2012",
abstract = "The author analyzes the relationship between traditional civil law notions of care of prudent business person and care of prudent expert, good faith and fairness and a new business judgment rule concept of company law. Although legal tradition standardizes the meanings of these civil law notions, important for legal certainty, the author suggests that all attempts at their substitution or fitting into the concept of business judgment rule, originating from the legal culture of common law, have basically failed. The reasons are manifold: first, differences in legal traditions; second, the routine of courts and business of following the usual principles of legal thinking and practice; third, legal transplants were not made by replacing one concept with another rather by fitting one into another and combining their rules which has proved wrong. The author concludes, after the analysis of all constitutive elements of the new concept of company law - the business judgment rule, that the civil law notion of care of prudent business person or care of prudent expert remain the backbone of this new concept and that all other elements thereof may, through careful analysis be reduced to these notions. In itself, it ruins the credibility of the concept of business judgment rule and supports the authority of traditional due care notion of civil law.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Civil law and business judgment rule",
pages = "38-7",
number = "3",
volume = "60",
url = "conv_3072"
}

Vasiljević, M.. (2012). Civil law and business judgment rule. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 60(3), 7-38.
conv_3072

Vasiljević M. Civil law and business judgment rule. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2012;60(3):7-38.
conv_3072 .

Vasiljević, Mirko, "Civil law and business judgment rule" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 60, no. 3 (2012):7-38,
conv_3072 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vasiljević, Mirko S.
AU  - Popović, Dušan
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/639
AB  - The development of modern Serbian competition law started in 2005 with the adoption of the Competition Act laying down rules which were generally inspired by European Union law. As is usually the case in countries in transition, the 2005 Competition Act was soon replaced by a new one, adopted in 2009. The 2009 Act further harmonised substantive competition rules with those of the EU, while at the same time empowering the Competition Authority to directly impose fines for infringements of competition law. Although it is evident that the public authorities of Serbia made certain efforts to improve competition law enforcement, it still cannot be concluded that significant progress has been made. In this paper, the authors analyse specific problems which appeared throughout six years of competition law enforcement in Serbia. Some of the problems analysed are so-called built-in errors, arising as a consequence of the choices made by the legislator. Others are, however, the result of wrongful doing by the members of the Competition Authority. Taken as a whole, they represent the main reason for the poor results achieved through competition law enforcement in Serbia. The first problem analysed is that of wrong priorities: the Competition Authority has mostly concentrated on the control of concentrations of undertakings, while generally ignoring restrictions of competition through the conclusion of anti-competitive agreements or through abuse of a dominant position. The second problem emphasised by the authors is the absence of sound economic analysis in most decisions adopted by the Competition Authority. The fining policy of the Competition Authority is also analysed in in this paper. While no fines have been imposed under the 2005 Competition Act, the Competition Authority seems to be trying to 'catch up' by imposing fines under the 2009 Act for infringements established in proceedings brought under the 2005 Act. The authors argue that this should be seen as an illegal retroactive application of law. The fourth problem in the enforcement of competition law in Serbia arises from a de facto privileged treatment of undertakings with state-owned capital.
PB  - Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge
T2  - European Business Organization Law Review
T1  - Competition Law Enforcement in Serbia: Six Years of Staggering Along
EP  - 158
IS  - 1
SP  - 141
VL  - 13
DO  - 10.1017/S1566752912000079
UR  - conv_2897
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Mirko S. and Popović, Dušan",
year = "2012",
abstract = "The development of modern Serbian competition law started in 2005 with the adoption of the Competition Act laying down rules which were generally inspired by European Union law. As is usually the case in countries in transition, the 2005 Competition Act was soon replaced by a new one, adopted in 2009. The 2009 Act further harmonised substantive competition rules with those of the EU, while at the same time empowering the Competition Authority to directly impose fines for infringements of competition law. Although it is evident that the public authorities of Serbia made certain efforts to improve competition law enforcement, it still cannot be concluded that significant progress has been made. In this paper, the authors analyse specific problems which appeared throughout six years of competition law enforcement in Serbia. Some of the problems analysed are so-called built-in errors, arising as a consequence of the choices made by the legislator. Others are, however, the result of wrongful doing by the members of the Competition Authority. Taken as a whole, they represent the main reason for the poor results achieved through competition law enforcement in Serbia. The first problem analysed is that of wrong priorities: the Competition Authority has mostly concentrated on the control of concentrations of undertakings, while generally ignoring restrictions of competition through the conclusion of anti-competitive agreements or through abuse of a dominant position. The second problem emphasised by the authors is the absence of sound economic analysis in most decisions adopted by the Competition Authority. The fining policy of the Competition Authority is also analysed in in this paper. While no fines have been imposed under the 2005 Competition Act, the Competition Authority seems to be trying to 'catch up' by imposing fines under the 2009 Act for infringements established in proceedings brought under the 2005 Act. The authors argue that this should be seen as an illegal retroactive application of law. The fourth problem in the enforcement of competition law in Serbia arises from a de facto privileged treatment of undertakings with state-owned capital.",
publisher = "Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge",
journal = "European Business Organization Law Review",
title = "Competition Law Enforcement in Serbia: Six Years of Staggering Along",
pages = "158-141",
number = "1",
volume = "13",
doi = "10.1017/S1566752912000079",
url = "conv_2897"
}

Vasiljević, M. S.,& Popović, D.. (2012). Competition Law Enforcement in Serbia: Six Years of Staggering Along. in European Business Organization Law Review
Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge., 13(1), 141-158.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752912000079
conv_2897

Vasiljević MS, Popović D. Competition Law Enforcement in Serbia: Six Years of Staggering Along. in European Business Organization Law Review. 2012;13(1):141-158.
doi:10.1017/S1566752912000079
conv_2897 .

Vasiljević, Mirko S., Popović, Dušan, "Competition Law Enforcement in Serbia: Six Years of Staggering Along" in European Business Organization Law Review, 13, no. 1 (2012):141-158,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752912000079 .,
conv_2897 .