TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bujuklić, Žika
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1705
AB  - Na osnovu arhivske građe koju je nedavno otkrio, autor pruža odgovor na pitanje koje je postavio u svom prethodnom radu Odbrana doktorata pesnika Laze Kostića u Pešti 1866. godine: Dissertatio ili Theses?. Analizom do sada nepoznate sadržine Kostićeve doktorske diplome i originalnih zapisnika sa njegovih doktorskih ispita na Kraljevskom univerzitetu u Pešti (1864-1866), autor zaključuje da je Laza Kostić stekao zvanje doktora sveukupnog prava, i civilnog i kanonskog (doctor universi iuris, utriusque iuris), na osnovu odbrane rada manjeg obima Theses e(x) scientiis juridicis et politicis, ali i izlaganjem dissertatio inauguralis pod nazivom De legibus serbicis Stephani Uros Dusan. Autor smatra da ovaj podatak značajno dopunjuje naša saznanja o izučavanju Dušanovog zakonodavstva sredinom XIX veka i omogućuje bolje sagledavanje ukupnih dometa srpske kulturne elite u Ugarskoj toga doba.
AB  - On the basis of the archival material he recently discovered, the author provides the answer to the question he asked in his recently published paper: Defense of doctorate by Serbian poet Laza Kostić in Pest in 1866: Dissertatio or Theses? By analyzing the previously unknown contents of Kostićs doctoral diploma and original records from his doctoral examinations at the Royal University in Pest (1864-1866), the author concludes that Laza Kostić was awarded the title of Doctor of General Law, both civil and canonical (doctor universi iuris, utriusque iuris), on the basis of defending the work of a smaller volume Theses e(x) scientiis juridicis et politicis, but also by the presentation of dissertatio inauguralis called De legibus serbicis Stephani Uros Dusan. The author believes that this information significantly complements our knowledge of the study of Dušans legislation in the mid-nineteenth century and enables us to better understand the overall extent of Serbian cultural elite in Hungary at that time.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Doktorska disertacija pesnika Laze Kostića De legibus serbicis Stephani Uros Dusan
T1  - Dissertatio inauguralis of Serbian poet Laza Kostić: De legibus serbicis Stephani Uros Dusan
EP  - 44
IS  - 1
SP  - 22
VL  - 66
DO  - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1801022B
UR  - conv_3031
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bujuklić, Žika",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Na osnovu arhivske građe koju je nedavno otkrio, autor pruža odgovor na pitanje koje je postavio u svom prethodnom radu Odbrana doktorata pesnika Laze Kostića u Pešti 1866. godine: Dissertatio ili Theses?. Analizom do sada nepoznate sadržine Kostićeve doktorske diplome i originalnih zapisnika sa njegovih doktorskih ispita na Kraljevskom univerzitetu u Pešti (1864-1866), autor zaključuje da je Laza Kostić stekao zvanje doktora sveukupnog prava, i civilnog i kanonskog (doctor universi iuris, utriusque iuris), na osnovu odbrane rada manjeg obima Theses e(x) scientiis juridicis et politicis, ali i izlaganjem dissertatio inauguralis pod nazivom De legibus serbicis Stephani Uros Dusan. Autor smatra da ovaj podatak značajno dopunjuje naša saznanja o izučavanju Dušanovog zakonodavstva sredinom XIX veka i omogućuje bolje sagledavanje ukupnih dometa srpske kulturne elite u Ugarskoj toga doba., On the basis of the archival material he recently discovered, the author provides the answer to the question he asked in his recently published paper: Defense of doctorate by Serbian poet Laza Kostić in Pest in 1866: Dissertatio or Theses? By analyzing the previously unknown contents of Kostićs doctoral diploma and original records from his doctoral examinations at the Royal University in Pest (1864-1866), the author concludes that Laza Kostić was awarded the title of Doctor of General Law, both civil and canonical (doctor universi iuris, utriusque iuris), on the basis of defending the work of a smaller volume Theses e(x) scientiis juridicis et politicis, but also by the presentation of dissertatio inauguralis called De legibus serbicis Stephani Uros Dusan. The author believes that this information significantly complements our knowledge of the study of Dušans legislation in the mid-nineteenth century and enables us to better understand the overall extent of Serbian cultural elite in Hungary at that time.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Doktorska disertacija pesnika Laze Kostića De legibus serbicis Stephani Uros Dusan, Dissertatio inauguralis of Serbian poet Laza Kostić: De legibus serbicis Stephani Uros Dusan",
pages = "44-22",
number = "1",
volume = "66",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1801022B",
url = "conv_3031"
}

Bujuklić, Ž.. (2018). Doktorska disertacija pesnika Laze Kostića De legibus serbicis Stephani Uros Dusan. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 66(1), 22-44.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1801022B
conv_3031

Bujuklić Ž. Doktorska disertacija pesnika Laze Kostića De legibus serbicis Stephani Uros Dusan. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2018;66(1):22-44.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1801022B
conv_3031 .

Bujuklić, Žika, "Doktorska disertacija pesnika Laze Kostića De legibus serbicis Stephani Uros Dusan" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 66, no. 1 (2018):22-44,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1801022B .,
conv_3031 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bujuklić, Žika
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1725
AB  - Autor analizira desetak teza iz oblasti rimskog prava sadržanih u doktorskom radu Nikole Krstića Theses ex scientis juridicis et politicis, koji je odbranio na Kraljevskom univerzitetu u Pešti 1854. godine. Ovaj latinski tekst do sada nigde nije objavljen, pa je celovito prevođenje i stručno komentarisanje zadatak koji tek čeka pravnu nauku. Međutim, autor je već na osnovu parcijalne analize, koja obuhvata samo manji isečak od ukupno sedamdesetak teza, zaključio da je ovaj kandidat raspolagao zavidnim pravničkim obrazovanjem i smelošću da se upusti u do tada nedovoljno istražene oblasti pravne nauke. Krstić je pokazao dobro poznavanje temeljnih ustanova rimskog prava i želju da u svoje teze unese problematiku koja je inovativna, nedovoljno ispitana. Upoređivao je rimske ustanove međusobno, komparirao ih sa pravom drugih antičkih naroda, tragajući za njihovim uticajima u srednjovekovnoj Srbiji i u modernim građanskim zakonicima (SGZ i AGZ). Krstićeva istraživanja su prvi začeci pravnoistorijske nauke u nas i on se opravdano smatra osnivačem te pravne discipline na Beogradskom univerzitetu. Autor zaključuje da su pitanja koja je Krstić pokrenuo ostala predmet proučavanja brojnih civilista i romanista, sve do najnovijih vremena. .
AB  - The author analyses a dozen of claims (theses) from Roman law in the doctoral work of Nikola Krstić Theses ex scientis juridicis et politicis, who defended it at the Royal University of Pest in 1854. This Latin text has not been published so far, so comprehensive translation with expert commentary is a task that is awaiting our legal science. However, on the basis of this partial analysis, which includes only a small piece of a total of seventy theses, the author concludes that this candidate had an enviable legal education and a boldness to engage in an under-investigated area of legal science. Krstić showed a good knowledge of the basic institutions of Roman law and desire to introduce in its theses the issues that are innovative, insufficiently tested. He was comparing different Roman institutions mutually, comparing them also with the law of other ancient nations, searching for their influences in medieval Serbia and modern Civil Codes (Serbian and Austrian). Krstićs work represents the first step in the area of legal history in Serbia and he is justified as the founder of this legal discipline at the University of Belgrade. The author concludes that the questions that Krstić raised still remain the subject of studying of numerous civilians and Romanists, up to the most recent times.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Rimsko pravo u doktorskim tezama Nikole Krstića iz 1854. godine
T1  - Roman law in doctoral theses of Nikola Krstić from 1854
EP  - 56
IS  - 3
SP  - 31
VL  - 66
DO  - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1803031B
UR  - conv_3060
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bujuklić, Žika",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Autor analizira desetak teza iz oblasti rimskog prava sadržanih u doktorskom radu Nikole Krstića Theses ex scientis juridicis et politicis, koji je odbranio na Kraljevskom univerzitetu u Pešti 1854. godine. Ovaj latinski tekst do sada nigde nije objavljen, pa je celovito prevođenje i stručno komentarisanje zadatak koji tek čeka pravnu nauku. Međutim, autor je već na osnovu parcijalne analize, koja obuhvata samo manji isečak od ukupno sedamdesetak teza, zaključio da je ovaj kandidat raspolagao zavidnim pravničkim obrazovanjem i smelošću da se upusti u do tada nedovoljno istražene oblasti pravne nauke. Krstić je pokazao dobro poznavanje temeljnih ustanova rimskog prava i želju da u svoje teze unese problematiku koja je inovativna, nedovoljno ispitana. Upoređivao je rimske ustanove međusobno, komparirao ih sa pravom drugih antičkih naroda, tragajući za njihovim uticajima u srednjovekovnoj Srbiji i u modernim građanskim zakonicima (SGZ i AGZ). Krstićeva istraživanja su prvi začeci pravnoistorijske nauke u nas i on se opravdano smatra osnivačem te pravne discipline na Beogradskom univerzitetu. Autor zaključuje da su pitanja koja je Krstić pokrenuo ostala predmet proučavanja brojnih civilista i romanista, sve do najnovijih vremena. ., The author analyses a dozen of claims (theses) from Roman law in the doctoral work of Nikola Krstić Theses ex scientis juridicis et politicis, who defended it at the Royal University of Pest in 1854. This Latin text has not been published so far, so comprehensive translation with expert commentary is a task that is awaiting our legal science. However, on the basis of this partial analysis, which includes only a small piece of a total of seventy theses, the author concludes that this candidate had an enviable legal education and a boldness to engage in an under-investigated area of legal science. Krstić showed a good knowledge of the basic institutions of Roman law and desire to introduce in its theses the issues that are innovative, insufficiently tested. He was comparing different Roman institutions mutually, comparing them also with the law of other ancient nations, searching for their influences in medieval Serbia and modern Civil Codes (Serbian and Austrian). Krstićs work represents the first step in the area of legal history in Serbia and he is justified as the founder of this legal discipline at the University of Belgrade. The author concludes that the questions that Krstić raised still remain the subject of studying of numerous civilians and Romanists, up to the most recent times.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Rimsko pravo u doktorskim tezama Nikole Krstića iz 1854. godine, Roman law in doctoral theses of Nikola Krstić from 1854",
pages = "56-31",
number = "3",
volume = "66",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1803031B",
url = "conv_3060"
}

Bujuklić, Ž.. (2018). Rimsko pravo u doktorskim tezama Nikole Krstića iz 1854. godine. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 66(3), 31-56.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1803031B
conv_3060

Bujuklić Ž. Rimsko pravo u doktorskim tezama Nikole Krstića iz 1854. godine. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2018;66(3):31-56.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1803031B
conv_3060 .

Bujuklić, Žika, "Rimsko pravo u doktorskim tezama Nikole Krstića iz 1854. godine" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 66, no. 3 (2018):31-56,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1803031B .,
conv_3060 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bujuklić, Žika
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1987
AB  - Autor analizira žustru naučnu polemiku s kraja XIX veka povodom
objavljivanja prvog srpskog prevoda kapitalnog udžbenika Ludviga Arntsa „Pandekte“.
Oštra kritika kvaliteta ovog poduhvata došla je iz pera katoličkog teologa
i profesora crkvenog prava u Zagrebu Luke Marjanovića, a odgovorio mu je
autor prevoda, ugledni profesor Velike škole u Beogradu Dragiša Mijušković. Obe
rasprave su se, nažalost, udaljile od prevodilačkih i terminoloških pitanja i uplovile
u političko nadmetanje o tome čija je duhovna i kulturna baština dominantnija. To
pokazuje koliko su jezičke razmirice oduvek bile samo povod za isticanje prividno
dubokih civilizacijskih razlika između ova dva etnički bliska naroda. Autor zaključuje
da se do danas nije ništa bitnije izmenilo i da se bliskost ovih naroda, ne samo
jezička, može iskoristiti ili kao povod za međusobno zbližavanje ili kao casus belli
za rat izazvan „narcizmom malih razlika“ (Frojd).
AB  - The author analyzes the fierce scientific polemic of the late nineteenth century
regarding the publication of the first Serbian translation of capital textbook „Pandekte”
by Ludwig Arnts. Severe criticism on the quality of this undertaking was
made by Luka Marjanović, the Catholic theologian and professor of Canon Law in
Zagreb, to whom answered author of the translation Dragiša Mijušković, prominent
professor at the Great School in Belgrade. Unfortunately, both debates went far
away from translation and terminology questions and turned into political competition
about whose spiritual and cultural inheritance was dominant. It shows how
linguistic disputes have always been good reason for the emphasis of seemingly
deep civilization differences between these two ethnically close nations. The author
concludes that nothing has significantly changed till today and that the closeness
of these nations, not only linguistic, can be used as a pretext for mutual rapprochement,
or as a casus belli for a war provoked by „narcissism of small differences”
(Freud).
PB  - Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
T2  - Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 5 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume V
T1  - O srpskom prevodu „Pandekta“ Ludviga Arntsa (1890/1896)
T1  - On The Serbian Translation of the Pandecta by Ludwig Arndts (1890-96)
EP  - 162
SP  - 153
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Bujuklić, Žika",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Autor analizira žustru naučnu polemiku s kraja XIX veka povodom
objavljivanja prvog srpskog prevoda kapitalnog udžbenika Ludviga Arntsa „Pandekte“.
Oštra kritika kvaliteta ovog poduhvata došla je iz pera katoličkog teologa
i profesora crkvenog prava u Zagrebu Luke Marjanovića, a odgovorio mu je
autor prevoda, ugledni profesor Velike škole u Beogradu Dragiša Mijušković. Obe
rasprave su se, nažalost, udaljile od prevodilačkih i terminoloških pitanja i uplovile
u političko nadmetanje o tome čija je duhovna i kulturna baština dominantnija. To
pokazuje koliko su jezičke razmirice oduvek bile samo povod za isticanje prividno
dubokih civilizacijskih razlika između ova dva etnički bliska naroda. Autor zaključuje
da se do danas nije ništa bitnije izmenilo i da se bliskost ovih naroda, ne samo
jezička, može iskoristiti ili kao povod za međusobno zbližavanje ili kao casus belli
za rat izazvan „narcizmom malih razlika“ (Frojd)., The author analyzes the fierce scientific polemic of the late nineteenth century
regarding the publication of the first Serbian translation of capital textbook „Pandekte”
by Ludwig Arnts. Severe criticism on the quality of this undertaking was
made by Luka Marjanović, the Catholic theologian and professor of Canon Law in
Zagreb, to whom answered author of the translation Dragiša Mijušković, prominent
professor at the Great School in Belgrade. Unfortunately, both debates went far
away from translation and terminology questions and turned into political competition
about whose spiritual and cultural inheritance was dominant. It shows how
linguistic disputes have always been good reason for the emphasis of seemingly
deep civilization differences between these two ethnically close nations. The author
concludes that nothing has significantly changed till today and that the closeness
of these nations, not only linguistic, can be used as a pretext for mutual rapprochement,
or as a casus belli for a war provoked by „narcissism of small differences”
(Freud).",
publisher = "Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje",
journal = "Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 5 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume V",
booktitle = "O srpskom prevodu „Pandekta“ Ludviga Arntsa (1890/1896), On The Serbian Translation of the Pandecta by Ludwig Arndts (1890-96)",
pages = "162-153"
}

Bujuklić, Ž.. (2015). O srpskom prevodu „Pandekta“ Ludviga Arntsa (1890/1896). in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 5 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume V
Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje., 153-162.

Bujuklić Ž. O srpskom prevodu „Pandekta“ Ludviga Arntsa (1890/1896). in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 5 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume V. 2015;:153-162..

Bujuklić, Žika, "O srpskom prevodu „Pandekta“ Ludviga Arntsa (1890/1896)" in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 5 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume V (2015):153-162.

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bujuklić, Žika
PY  - 2014
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1964
AB  - Аутор се бави судбином овог средњовековног града после доласка под
млетачку власт и констатује да се на примеру Будве јасно показује како
промена моћног и цивилизацијски супериорног „заштитника” не мора
нужно обезбедити даљи просперитет и свим његовим поданицима. Ус-
лед најезде Турака, геостратешка позиција Будве се потпуно променила
и она је сведена на млетачко војно утврђење. За православни живаљ у
градовима Зетског приморја, па и Будве, то је период вишевековне борбе,
не само за голи опстанак, него и за очување свог духовног наслеђа. Аутор
закључује да су управо преписи Душановог законика (Паштровски, Гр-
баљски) и Законоправила Св. Саве (Иловички) представљали основ очу-
вања српско-византијске правне традиције на приморју, како световне,
тако и духовне. Отуда аутор констатује да је доба настанка Будван-
ског статута, за владавине цара Душана, представљало врхунац раз-
воја будванске комуне, зенит која она у наредним вековима више није
могла достићи.
AB  - The author deals with the fate of the medieval commune of Budva after
coming under Venetian rule and notes that the example of this city clearly
shows how the change of a powerful and in the sense of civilization, superior
„protector” does not necessarily ensure future prosperity for all his subjects. As
a result of the Turkish invasion, the geo-strategic position of Budva changed
completely and it was reduced to a Venetian military fortress. For the Orthodox
population in the cities of the Zeta coast, including Budva, this was a period of
many centuries of struggle not only to survive, but also to preserve their spiritual
heritage. The author concludes that the copies of Dušan’s Code (Paštrovski,
Grbaljski) and Nomokanon of St. Sava (Ilovički), were the basis of preserving
the Serbian-Byzantine legal tradition on the coast, both secular and spiritual.
Therefore, the author concludes that the time when the Statute of Budva was
created, during the reign of Emperor Dušan, represents the pinnacle of development
of the Budva commune, a zenith which it, in the coming centuries, could
no longer reach.
PB  - Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
T2  - Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 4 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume IV
T1  - Rimsko-vizantijska pravna tradicija u budvanskoj komuni pod mletačkom vlašću
T1  - Roman-Byzantine Legal Tradition in Budva under Venetian Rule
EP  - 136
SP  - 122
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Bujuklić, Žika",
year = "2014",
abstract = "Аутор се бави судбином овог средњовековног града после доласка под
млетачку власт и констатује да се на примеру Будве јасно показује како
промена моћног и цивилизацијски супериорног „заштитника” не мора
нужно обезбедити даљи просперитет и свим његовим поданицима. Ус-
лед најезде Турака, геостратешка позиција Будве се потпуно променила
и она је сведена на млетачко војно утврђење. За православни живаљ у
градовима Зетског приморја, па и Будве, то је период вишевековне борбе,
не само за голи опстанак, него и за очување свог духовног наслеђа. Аутор
закључује да су управо преписи Душановог законика (Паштровски, Гр-
баљски) и Законоправила Св. Саве (Иловички) представљали основ очу-
вања српско-византијске правне традиције на приморју, како световне,
тако и духовне. Отуда аутор констатује да је доба настанка Будван-
ског статута, за владавине цара Душана, представљало врхунац раз-
воја будванске комуне, зенит која она у наредним вековима више није
могла достићи., The author deals with the fate of the medieval commune of Budva after
coming under Venetian rule and notes that the example of this city clearly
shows how the change of a powerful and in the sense of civilization, superior
„protector” does not necessarily ensure future prosperity for all his subjects. As
a result of the Turkish invasion, the geo-strategic position of Budva changed
completely and it was reduced to a Venetian military fortress. For the Orthodox
population in the cities of the Zeta coast, including Budva, this was a period of
many centuries of struggle not only to survive, but also to preserve their spiritual
heritage. The author concludes that the copies of Dušan’s Code (Paštrovski,
Grbaljski) and Nomokanon of St. Sava (Ilovički), were the basis of preserving
the Serbian-Byzantine legal tradition on the coast, both secular and spiritual.
Therefore, the author concludes that the time when the Statute of Budva was
created, during the reign of Emperor Dušan, represents the pinnacle of development
of the Budva commune, a zenith which it, in the coming centuries, could
no longer reach.",
publisher = "Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje",
journal = "Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 4 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume IV",
booktitle = "Rimsko-vizantijska pravna tradicija u budvanskoj komuni pod mletačkom vlašću, Roman-Byzantine Legal Tradition in Budva under Venetian Rule",
pages = "136-122"
}

Bujuklić, Ž.. (2014). Rimsko-vizantijska pravna tradicija u budvanskoj komuni pod mletačkom vlašću. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 4 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume IV
Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje., 122-136.

Bujuklić Ž. Rimsko-vizantijska pravna tradicija u budvanskoj komuni pod mletačkom vlašću. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 4 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume IV. 2014;:122-136..

Bujuklić, Žika, "Rimsko-vizantijska pravna tradicija u budvanskoj komuni pod mletačkom vlašću" in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 4 / Perspectives of Implementa                  tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume IV (2014):122-136.

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bujuklić, Žika
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1944
AB  - Ovaj tekst se nadovezuje na ranije objavljeni rad pod istim naslovom i autor
u nastavku govori o položaju pravničkog staleža i srpske inteligencije u Monarhiji,
a potom o njihovom uticaju na kulturnu situaciju u Kneževini Srbiji.
Na kraju analizira početke pravničkog obrazovanja u Srbiji posle oslobođenja
od otomanske vlasti.
AB  - This text is continuation of the earlier published paper under the same title
and author below talking about the position of legal profession and Serbian
intelligence in the Austrian monarchy, then about their impact on the cultural
situation of the Principality of Serbia. Finally, author analyzes the beginnings of
legal education in Serbia after the liberation from the Ottomans.
PB  - Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
T2  - Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 3 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume III
T1  - Formiranje pravne terminologije kod Srba u XIX veku (2)
T1  - Formation of Legal Terminology Among Serbs in the XIX Century (2)
EP  - 142
SP  - 124
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Bujuklić, Žika",
year = "2013",
abstract = "Ovaj tekst se nadovezuje na ranije objavljeni rad pod istim naslovom i autor
u nastavku govori o položaju pravničkog staleža i srpske inteligencije u Monarhiji,
a potom o njihovom uticaju na kulturnu situaciju u Kneževini Srbiji.
Na kraju analizira početke pravničkog obrazovanja u Srbiji posle oslobođenja
od otomanske vlasti., This text is continuation of the earlier published paper under the same title
and author below talking about the position of legal profession and Serbian
intelligence in the Austrian monarchy, then about their impact on the cultural
situation of the Principality of Serbia. Finally, author analyzes the beginnings of
legal education in Serbia after the liberation from the Ottomans.",
publisher = "Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje",
journal = "Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 3 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume III",
booktitle = "Formiranje pravne terminologije kod Srba u XIX veku (2), Formation of Legal Terminology Among Serbs in the XIX Century (2)",
pages = "142-124"
}

Bujuklić, Ž.. (2013). Formiranje pravne terminologije kod Srba u XIX veku (2). in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 3 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume III
Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje., 124-142.

Bujuklić Ž. Formiranje pravne terminologije kod Srba u XIX veku (2). in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 3 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume III. 2013;:124-142..

Bujuklić, Žika, "Formiranje pravne terminologije kod Srba u XIX veku (2)" in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 3 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume III (2013):124-142.

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bujuklić, Žika
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1594
AB  - Autor u ovom radu ispituje značenje pojmova ius i lex tokom razvoja rimske države, dajući široku istorijsku genezu odnosa ova dva fenomena. Najčešće se oni shvataju kao dve usko povezane kategorije, od kojih je zakon viđen kao jedan od izvora koji formira pravni poredak u celini. Međutim, upravo tako shvaćena njihova bliskost, nameće problem razlikovanja same sadržine i definisanja njihovih međusobnih odnosa. Polazeći od rezultata izloženih u studiji B. Bjondija, autor polemiše sa stavovima ovog italijanskog romaniste. Zamera mu što prednost daje normativnom metodu, zanemarujući istorijski, sociološki, pa i politički aspekt ovih pravnih fenomena. Upravo uzimajući ove faktore u obzir, autor daje široku panoramu razvoja ove dve ustanove, počev od arhaičnog perioda, doba republike, klasične i post-klasične epohe, sve do vremena Justinijana. Autor zaključuje da analizom istorijskih okolnosti i sociopolitičkih protivrečnosti koje su uticale na uobličavanje pravnih fenomena, postaje jasnije kako su ius i lex nastajali, menjali se i dobijali odgovarajuću normativnu sadržinu - od antike, pa preko srednjovekovne recepcije, sve do naših dana.
AB  - In this paper the author examines the meaning of terms ius and lex during the development of the Roman state, giving a broad historical genesis of the relationship between these two concepts. They are often perceived as two closely related categories. It is clear that from the closeness of these concepts arises the problem of differentiating the content and defining their relationships. Starting from the results set forth in the study of B. Biondi, the author argues with the attitudes of this famous Italian romanist, reproaches him for favoring the normative method, and ignoring the historical, sociological and political aspects of these legal phenomena. Just taking these factors into account, the author gives a broad panorama of the development of these two institutions, ranging from archaic times, the period of the Republic, classical and post-classical era, up to the time of Justinian. The author concludes that an analysis of historical circumstances and socio-political contradictions that have influenced the shaping of legal phenomena, it becomes clear in which way ius and lex emerged, changed and given appropriate normative contents - from ancient times, through the medieval reception until modern times.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Višeznačnost termina ius i lex i njihov međusobni odnos
T1  - Multiple meanings of terms ius and lex and their relationship
EP  - 42
IS  - 2
SP  - 21
VL  - 61
UR  - conv_3074
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bujuklić, Žika",
year = "2013",
abstract = "Autor u ovom radu ispituje značenje pojmova ius i lex tokom razvoja rimske države, dajući široku istorijsku genezu odnosa ova dva fenomena. Najčešće se oni shvataju kao dve usko povezane kategorije, od kojih je zakon viđen kao jedan od izvora koji formira pravni poredak u celini. Međutim, upravo tako shvaćena njihova bliskost, nameće problem razlikovanja same sadržine i definisanja njihovih međusobnih odnosa. Polazeći od rezultata izloženih u studiji B. Bjondija, autor polemiše sa stavovima ovog italijanskog romaniste. Zamera mu što prednost daje normativnom metodu, zanemarujući istorijski, sociološki, pa i politički aspekt ovih pravnih fenomena. Upravo uzimajući ove faktore u obzir, autor daje široku panoramu razvoja ove dve ustanove, počev od arhaičnog perioda, doba republike, klasične i post-klasične epohe, sve do vremena Justinijana. Autor zaključuje da analizom istorijskih okolnosti i sociopolitičkih protivrečnosti koje su uticale na uobličavanje pravnih fenomena, postaje jasnije kako su ius i lex nastajali, menjali se i dobijali odgovarajuću normativnu sadržinu - od antike, pa preko srednjovekovne recepcije, sve do naših dana., In this paper the author examines the meaning of terms ius and lex during the development of the Roman state, giving a broad historical genesis of the relationship between these two concepts. They are often perceived as two closely related categories. It is clear that from the closeness of these concepts arises the problem of differentiating the content and defining their relationships. Starting from the results set forth in the study of B. Biondi, the author argues with the attitudes of this famous Italian romanist, reproaches him for favoring the normative method, and ignoring the historical, sociological and political aspects of these legal phenomena. Just taking these factors into account, the author gives a broad panorama of the development of these two institutions, ranging from archaic times, the period of the Republic, classical and post-classical era, up to the time of Justinian. The author concludes that an analysis of historical circumstances and socio-political contradictions that have influenced the shaping of legal phenomena, it becomes clear in which way ius and lex emerged, changed and given appropriate normative contents - from ancient times, through the medieval reception until modern times.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Višeznačnost termina ius i lex i njihov međusobni odnos, Multiple meanings of terms ius and lex and their relationship",
pages = "42-21",
number = "2",
volume = "61",
url = "conv_3074"
}

Bujuklić, Ž.. (2013). Višeznačnost termina ius i lex i njihov međusobni odnos. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 61(2), 21-42.
conv_3074

Bujuklić Ž. Višeznačnost termina ius i lex i njihov međusobni odnos. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2013;61(2):21-42.
conv_3074 .

Bujuklić, Žika, "Višeznačnost termina ius i lex i njihov međusobni odnos" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 61, no. 2 (2013):21-42,
conv_3074 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bujuklić, Žika
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1583
AB  - After the liberation from long Turkish occupation during XIX century, and some temporary influence of Sharia law, Serbia was able to turn again towards its European roots, and especially towards its rich legal tradition. The normative reception of the Roman law tradition could have been obtained in Serbia only upon reaching higher level of economic standards and basic legal education. Thereof, the doctrinal reception which included establishing certain educational institutions, language standardization, and, especially, the existence of the corresponding legal terminology, had to come first. Legal subjects at the Belgrade Higher School (established in 1808) and Lyceum (1838), was gradually developed into the Legal department, that would grow into the Faculty of Law. But, the other centers that influenced the general development of Serbian culture were out of borders of Serbia, in Vienna, Pest, and especially in Vojvodina (Sremski Karlovci, Novi Sad). The ideology of the new-born Serbian bourgeoisie, based on Roman law principles of inviolability of private proprety, was opposite to the old patriarchal mentality, based on collective ownership and mutual solidarity. Anyway, so-called  original accumulation of capital was protected by regulations of the Serbian Civil Code (1844). Parallely, at the academic level, Roman Law was established as a separate subject in 1853 and was headed by professor Rajko Lešjanin. He had completed his legal studies at prestigious West-European universities, like many other Serbian romanists in the XIX centuries (Mihajlo Radovanović, Dragiša Mijušković, Giga Geršić, Živko Milosavljević et al.). Apart from strong spiritual and religious connection between the Serbian and Russian people, Serbian intellectuals obtained not only high education, but they also brought liberal and democratic ideas in the Serbian Principality from the West.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Doctrinal reception of European (Roman) law tradition in post-Ottoman Serbia
EP  - 118
IS  - 3
SP  - 101
VL  - 61
UR  - conv_3203
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bujuklić, Žika",
year = "2013",
abstract = "After the liberation from long Turkish occupation during XIX century, and some temporary influence of Sharia law, Serbia was able to turn again towards its European roots, and especially towards its rich legal tradition. The normative reception of the Roman law tradition could have been obtained in Serbia only upon reaching higher level of economic standards and basic legal education. Thereof, the doctrinal reception which included establishing certain educational institutions, language standardization, and, especially, the existence of the corresponding legal terminology, had to come first. Legal subjects at the Belgrade Higher School (established in 1808) and Lyceum (1838), was gradually developed into the Legal department, that would grow into the Faculty of Law. But, the other centers that influenced the general development of Serbian culture were out of borders of Serbia, in Vienna, Pest, and especially in Vojvodina (Sremski Karlovci, Novi Sad). The ideology of the new-born Serbian bourgeoisie, based on Roman law principles of inviolability of private proprety, was opposite to the old patriarchal mentality, based on collective ownership and mutual solidarity. Anyway, so-called  original accumulation of capital was protected by regulations of the Serbian Civil Code (1844). Parallely, at the academic level, Roman Law was established as a separate subject in 1853 and was headed by professor Rajko Lešjanin. He had completed his legal studies at prestigious West-European universities, like many other Serbian romanists in the XIX centuries (Mihajlo Radovanović, Dragiša Mijušković, Giga Geršić, Živko Milosavljević et al.). Apart from strong spiritual and religious connection between the Serbian and Russian people, Serbian intellectuals obtained not only high education, but they also brought liberal and democratic ideas in the Serbian Principality from the West.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Doctrinal reception of European (Roman) law tradition in post-Ottoman Serbia",
pages = "118-101",
number = "3",
volume = "61",
url = "conv_3203"
}

Bujuklić, Ž.. (2013). Doctrinal reception of European (Roman) law tradition in post-Ottoman Serbia. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 61(3), 101-118.
conv_3203

Bujuklić Ž. Doctrinal reception of European (Roman) law tradition in post-Ottoman Serbia. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2013;61(3):101-118.
conv_3203 .

Bujuklić, Žika, "Doctrinal reception of European (Roman) law tradition in post-Ottoman Serbia" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 61, no. 3 (2013):101-118,
conv_3203 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bujuklić, Žika
PY  - 2012
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1926
AB  - Uspešnim ustancima na početku XIX veka srpski narod je obnovio svoju
državu, povratio samostalnu crkvu i počeo da uspostavlja svoje obrazovne i
kulturne institucije. Zbog toga je bilo neophodno stvoriti i zvanični književni
jezik, uključujući i odgovarajuću pravnu terminologiju. Tek iz perspektive ovih
revolucionarnih promena i analizom novouspostavljenjih istorijskih i sociopolitičkih
okvira, može se razumeti značaj ostvarenja dva važna kulturna poduhvata
za srpski, ali i druge južnoslovenske narode (Hrvate i Slovence) – oba
nastala u Beču i međusobno veoma povezana: Književno-jezički dogovor iz
1850. i Pravno-politički rečnik austrijskih Slovena iz 1853. godine (Juridischpolitische
Terminologie für die slawischen Sprachen Oesterreichs: Deutsch-kroatische,
serbische und slowenische Separat– Ausgabe). Mada je u nauci i dalje
sporno koliki je bio njihov stvarni doprinos u uzgradnji jezika ovih naroda,
pobedom Vukove reforme (1847), oličenom Bečkim dogovorom (1850), srpski
narod je zasigurno uspostavio osnove svog književnog jezika. Time je utemeljen
jedan od najvažnijih međaša u istorijskom sledu koji je ovaj narod vodio
od stvaranja sopstvenog jezika i svoje nacije, do samostalne države i odgovarajućeg
pravnog poretka. Neophodan preduslov za to bilo je formiranje precizne
pravne terminologije, bilo na osnovama govornog narodnog jezika, stvaranjem
odgovarajućih kovanica ili doslovnim prevodom sa drugih evropskih jezika
(uglavnom nemačkog).
AB  - From the early XIX century, the Serbian people has renewed through successful
uprisings its state, regained independent Church and began to establish
their own educational and cultural institutions. To this aim it was necessary
to establish the official literary language, including appropriate legal terminology.
Only from the perspective of these revolutionary changes and analysis of
historical and socio-political framework, one can understand the importance
of achieving two important cultural endeavor in Serbian and other South Slavonic
people (Croats and Slovenians) – both in Vienna and came highly related
to each other. The first one was Literary and linguistic Agreement achieved in
1850, and the second was Legal and Political Vocabulary for Austrian Slavs published
in 1853 (Juridisch-politische Terminologie für die slawischen Sprachen
Oesterreichs: Deutsch-kroatische, serbische und slowenische Separat– Ausgabe).
Although it is still disputable what was their actual contribution to the language
formation of South Slavonic nations, with victorious Vuk Karadžić’s reform
(1847), represented by Vienna Agreement (1850), the Serbian people certainly
established the basis of their official language. This is one of the most important
milestones in the historical sequence that led these people from forming their
own language and their own nation, to an independent state and a proper legal
order. A necessary precondition for such development was the creation of accurate
legal terminology, whether by speaking the vernacular language, by composing
appropriate new words or by verbatim translations from other European
languages (mainly German).
PB  - Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
T2  - Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 2 / Perspectives of Implementa                                                                     tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume II
T1  - Formiranje pravne terminologije kod Srba u XIX veku
T1  - Formation of the legal terminology among Serbs in the XIX century
EP  - 169
SP  - 146
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Bujuklić, Žika",
year = "2012",
abstract = "Uspešnim ustancima na početku XIX veka srpski narod je obnovio svoju
državu, povratio samostalnu crkvu i počeo da uspostavlja svoje obrazovne i
kulturne institucije. Zbog toga je bilo neophodno stvoriti i zvanični književni
jezik, uključujući i odgovarajuću pravnu terminologiju. Tek iz perspektive ovih
revolucionarnih promena i analizom novouspostavljenjih istorijskih i sociopolitičkih
okvira, može se razumeti značaj ostvarenja dva važna kulturna poduhvata
za srpski, ali i druge južnoslovenske narode (Hrvate i Slovence) – oba
nastala u Beču i međusobno veoma povezana: Književno-jezički dogovor iz
1850. i Pravno-politički rečnik austrijskih Slovena iz 1853. godine (Juridischpolitische
Terminologie für die slawischen Sprachen Oesterreichs: Deutsch-kroatische,
serbische und slowenische Separat– Ausgabe). Mada je u nauci i dalje
sporno koliki je bio njihov stvarni doprinos u uzgradnji jezika ovih naroda,
pobedom Vukove reforme (1847), oličenom Bečkim dogovorom (1850), srpski
narod je zasigurno uspostavio osnove svog književnog jezika. Time je utemeljen
jedan od najvažnijih međaša u istorijskom sledu koji je ovaj narod vodio
od stvaranja sopstvenog jezika i svoje nacije, do samostalne države i odgovarajućeg
pravnog poretka. Neophodan preduslov za to bilo je formiranje precizne
pravne terminologije, bilo na osnovama govornog narodnog jezika, stvaranjem
odgovarajućih kovanica ili doslovnim prevodom sa drugih evropskih jezika
(uglavnom nemačkog)., From the early XIX century, the Serbian people has renewed through successful
uprisings its state, regained independent Church and began to establish
their own educational and cultural institutions. To this aim it was necessary
to establish the official literary language, including appropriate legal terminology.
Only from the perspective of these revolutionary changes and analysis of
historical and socio-political framework, one can understand the importance
of achieving two important cultural endeavor in Serbian and other South Slavonic
people (Croats and Slovenians) – both in Vienna and came highly related
to each other. The first one was Literary and linguistic Agreement achieved in
1850, and the second was Legal and Political Vocabulary for Austrian Slavs published
in 1853 (Juridisch-politische Terminologie für die slawischen Sprachen
Oesterreichs: Deutsch-kroatische, serbische und slowenische Separat– Ausgabe).
Although it is still disputable what was their actual contribution to the language
formation of South Slavonic nations, with victorious Vuk Karadžić’s reform
(1847), represented by Vienna Agreement (1850), the Serbian people certainly
established the basis of their official language. This is one of the most important
milestones in the historical sequence that led these people from forming their
own language and their own nation, to an independent state and a proper legal
order. A necessary precondition for such development was the creation of accurate
legal terminology, whether by speaking the vernacular language, by composing
appropriate new words or by verbatim translations from other European
languages (mainly German).",
publisher = "Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje",
journal = "Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 2 / Perspectives of Implementa                                                                     tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume II",
booktitle = "Formiranje pravne terminologije kod Srba u XIX veku, Formation of the legal terminology among Serbs in the XIX century",
pages = "169-146"
}

Bujuklić, Ž.. (2012). Formiranje pravne terminologije kod Srba u XIX veku. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 2 / Perspectives of Implementa                                                                     tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume II
Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje., 146-169.

Bujuklić Ž. Formiranje pravne terminologije kod Srba u XIX veku. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 2 / Perspectives of Implementa                                                                     tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume II. 2012;:146-169..

Bujuklić, Žika, "Formiranje pravne terminologije kod Srba u XIX veku" in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 2 / Perspectives of Implementa                                                                     tion of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume II (2012):146-169.

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bujuklić, Žika
PY  - 2011
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1906
AB  - U ovom radu autor se bavi recepcijom rimskog prava na evropskom tlu,
ukazujući na razloge koji su omogućili njegovo postojanje u različitim epohama.
Ono što je zajedničko antičkom, feudalnom i modernom dobu jeste koncept
koji počiva na ideji o jedinstvenom, univerzalnom pravu, koje prati odgovarajući
jedinstveni poredak u društvu: unum sit ius cum unum sit imperium. Na
vrhuncu svoje moći ta ideja je postojala u Rimu (ius civile), potom je obnovljena
u evropskim feudalnim monarhijama (ius commune) i još uvek postoji kao
praktičan uzor i inspiracija za uobličavanje evropskog komunitarnog prava (ius
Europaeum).
AB  - The author deals with the reception of Roman law in the European ground,
indicating the reasons that made possible its existence in different epochs. What
is common to the ancient, feudal and modern times is a concept based on the
idea of unique and universal law, followed by the corresponding unique order
in society: sit unum ius cum sit unum imperium. At the height of its power, this
idea existed in Rome (ius civile), then has been restored in the European feudal
monarchies (ius commune), and is stil existing on the level of principals and as
and inspiration of European community law (ius Europaeum).
PB  - Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje
T2  - Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 1 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume I
T1  - Rimski koreni evropskog komunitarnog prava
T1  - Roman roots in the European community law
EP  - 155
SP  - 143
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Bujuklić, Žika",
year = "2011",
abstract = "U ovom radu autor se bavi recepcijom rimskog prava na evropskom tlu,
ukazujući na razloge koji su omogućili njegovo postojanje u različitim epohama.
Ono što je zajedničko antičkom, feudalnom i modernom dobu jeste koncept
koji počiva na ideji o jedinstvenom, univerzalnom pravu, koje prati odgovarajući
jedinstveni poredak u društvu: unum sit ius cum unum sit imperium. Na
vrhuncu svoje moći ta ideja je postojala u Rimu (ius civile), potom je obnovljena
u evropskim feudalnim monarhijama (ius commune) i još uvek postoji kao
praktičan uzor i inspiracija za uobličavanje evropskog komunitarnog prava (ius
Europaeum)., The author deals with the reception of Roman law in the European ground,
indicating the reasons that made possible its existence in different epochs. What
is common to the ancient, feudal and modern times is a concept based on the
idea of unique and universal law, followed by the corresponding unique order
in society: sit unum ius cum sit unum imperium. At the height of its power, this
idea existed in Rome (ius civile), then has been restored in the European feudal
monarchies (ius commune), and is stil existing on the level of principals and as
and inspiration of European community law (ius Europaeum).",
publisher = "Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje",
journal = "Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 1 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume I",
booktitle = "Rimski koreni evropskog komunitarnog prava, Roman roots in the European community law",
pages = "155-143"
}

Bujuklić, Ž.. (2011). Rimski koreni evropskog komunitarnog prava. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 1 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume I
Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje., 143-155.

Bujuklić Ž. Rimski koreni evropskog komunitarnog prava. in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 1 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume I. 2011;:143-155..

Bujuklić, Žika, "Rimski koreni evropskog komunitarnog prava" in Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije : zbornik radova. Knj. 1 / Perspectives of Implementation of European Standards in Serbian Legal System : Volume I (2011):143-155.