TY  - JOUR
AU  - Turanjanin, Veljko
AU  - Čvorović, Dragana
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1704
AB  - Sastav sudećih veća jedno je od najinteresantnijih pitanja današ­njice, pogotovo u vremenu velikih reformskih poduhvata. Različita shvatanja potrebe za učešćem građana-laika u savremenom krivičnom postupku doprinela su zanimljivim pristupima u regulisanju tog pitanja. Na prvom mestu, postoje pravi porotni sistemi, koji su odlika prevashodno angloameričkog pravnog sistema, ali su njegove ideje našle mesto i u evropskim zakonodavstvima. Postoje i države u kojima sudeće veće predstavlja jedno telo, sastavljeno od sudija profesionalaca i sudija porotnika, dok u pojedinim imamo, takođe, i sudije profesionalce i porotnike, ali su prvi zaduženi za rešavanje pravnih, a drugi za rešavanje činjeničnih pitanja. Autori u radu porede strukturu sudskih veća u krivičnim postupcima za punoletna lica u pojedinim balkanskim zemljama, od kojih su, primera radi, Slovenija i Hrvatska članice Evropske unije, dok su druge u procesu pridruživanja. Neke od njih teže profesionalizaciji sudstva, izbacujući građane-laike iz sastava sudskog veća, dok su ih druge zadržale, pri čemu obim njihove nadležnosti varira od države do države.
AB  - The composition of a criminal court stands as one of the most interesting issues in the comparative law. Different viewpoints when it comes to the need of including non-professional citizens in the contemporary criminal procedure have contributed to interesting approaches related to regulating this issue. First of all, there are original jury systems that are a feature related mainly to the Anglo-American legal systems, but whose ideas have found their place in the European legislature as well. Furthermore, there are countries where the trial body stands as a separate authority, which consists of professional judges and lay judges, whereas some of the countries have both professional judges and lay judges, the first being in charge of resolving legal issues, and the second ones being in charge of factual issues. There are many articles devoted to the jury systems in the world, but in a very small proportion of them we could find solutions from the mixed court of the Balkan countries. Mixed court is one of the features continental countries. The authors compare Balkan countries, where Slovenia and Croatia being the European Union Members, whereas the rest of them are in the process of accession. Thereby, some of the countries strive to get their courts become more professional by leaving out citizens non-professional from the composition of trial chamber, while some of them have kept them, whereby the scope of their jurisdiction varies from one country to another. Today, it is a great question whether a mixed court will survive legislative changes, due to the criticism of the jurists and non-jurists.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Struktura sudskih veća u krivičnim sudovima
T1  - Composition of the criminal courts
EP  - 219
IS  - 2
SP  - 187
VL  - 66
DO  - 10.5937/AlaniPFB1802187T
UR  - conv_3030
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Turanjanin, Veljko and Čvorović, Dragana",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Sastav sudećih veća jedno je od najinteresantnijih pitanja današ­njice, pogotovo u vremenu velikih reformskih poduhvata. Različita shvatanja potrebe za učešćem građana-laika u savremenom krivičnom postupku doprinela su zanimljivim pristupima u regulisanju tog pitanja. Na prvom mestu, postoje pravi porotni sistemi, koji su odlika prevashodno angloameričkog pravnog sistema, ali su njegove ideje našle mesto i u evropskim zakonodavstvima. Postoje i države u kojima sudeće veće predstavlja jedno telo, sastavljeno od sudija profesionalaca i sudija porotnika, dok u pojedinim imamo, takođe, i sudije profesionalce i porotnike, ali su prvi zaduženi za rešavanje pravnih, a drugi za rešavanje činjeničnih pitanja. Autori u radu porede strukturu sudskih veća u krivičnim postupcima za punoletna lica u pojedinim balkanskim zemljama, od kojih su, primera radi, Slovenija i Hrvatska članice Evropske unije, dok su druge u procesu pridruživanja. Neke od njih teže profesionalizaciji sudstva, izbacujući građane-laike iz sastava sudskog veća, dok su ih druge zadržale, pri čemu obim njihove nadležnosti varira od države do države., The composition of a criminal court stands as one of the most interesting issues in the comparative law. Different viewpoints when it comes to the need of including non-professional citizens in the contemporary criminal procedure have contributed to interesting approaches related to regulating this issue. First of all, there are original jury systems that are a feature related mainly to the Anglo-American legal systems, but whose ideas have found their place in the European legislature as well. Furthermore, there are countries where the trial body stands as a separate authority, which consists of professional judges and lay judges, whereas some of the countries have both professional judges and lay judges, the first being in charge of resolving legal issues, and the second ones being in charge of factual issues. There are many articles devoted to the jury systems in the world, but in a very small proportion of them we could find solutions from the mixed court of the Balkan countries. Mixed court is one of the features continental countries. The authors compare Balkan countries, where Slovenia and Croatia being the European Union Members, whereas the rest of them are in the process of accession. Thereby, some of the countries strive to get their courts become more professional by leaving out citizens non-professional from the composition of trial chamber, while some of them have kept them, whereby the scope of their jurisdiction varies from one country to another. Today, it is a great question whether a mixed court will survive legislative changes, due to the criticism of the jurists and non-jurists.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Struktura sudskih veća u krivičnim sudovima, Composition of the criminal courts",
pages = "219-187",
number = "2",
volume = "66",
doi = "10.5937/AlaniPFB1802187T",
url = "conv_3030"
}

Turanjanin, V.,& Čvorović, D.. (2018). Struktura sudskih veća u krivičnim sudovima. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 66(2), 187-219.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AlaniPFB1802187T
conv_3030

Turanjanin V, Čvorović D. Struktura sudskih veća u krivičnim sudovima. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2018;66(2):187-219.
doi:10.5937/AlaniPFB1802187T
conv_3030 .

Turanjanin, Veljko, Čvorović, Dragana, "Struktura sudskih veća u krivičnim sudovima" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 66, no. 2 (2018):187-219,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AlaniPFB1802187T .,
conv_3030 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Čvorović, Dragana
AU  - Turanjanin, Veljko
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1625
AB  - Kraj XX veka je pokazao da su skoro sve evropske zemlje doživele neuspeh u suzbijanju kriminaliteta. Usled toga, proučavajući uporedno pravo, zakonodavci su počeli da traže pravne institute kako bi uspostavili nove mehanizme efikasnijeg rešavanja krivičnih predmeta. Kao pravni transplantat koji je zaživeo u skoro svim evropskim državama izdvaja se sporazum o priznanju krivičnog dela, koji u pojedinim neizbežno prati sistem pravog porotnog suđenja. Među njima, Francuska predstavlja državu s dugom tradicijom učešća građana u krivičnim postupcima. U ovoj zemlji porotno suđenje se odvija duže od dvesta godina, a nastalo je po ugledu na engleski porotni sud. Međutim, kao što je to slučaj i danas, gotovo je nemoguće jedan pravni institut preuzeti iz jednog zakonodavstva i implementirati u drugo u istom obliku, pa je tako i porotni sistem suđenja doživeo prilagođavanja francuskom krivičnom postupku. O tom najbolje svedoče mnogobrojni zakonski akti doneti u međuvremenu, putem kojih je porota doživljavala konstantne transformacije. U ovom radu autori obrađuju više celina. Nakon uvodnih napomena o porotnom suđenju objašnjuju položaj i ulogu porotnika u krivičnom postupku. Potom daju presek njihovog položaja kroz razvoj ovog tipa suđenja, da bi posle analizirali porotu prema pozitivnom francuskom pravu. Takođe, kroz ceo rad daje se i komparativna analiza pojedinih elemenata ovog oblika suđenja, a na kraju su data zaključna razmatranja u kojima autori na jedan rezimirani način sumiraju rezultate do kojih su došli u proučavanju predmetne problematike.
AB  - End of the XX century showed that almost all European countries have failed in the suppression of the crime. As a result, they began to seek new legal institutes to establish new mechanisms for efficient resolution of criminal cases. First of all, they stand out plea agreement, which in some countries inevitably follows the system of real jury trial. Among them, France stands out as a country with a long tradition of citizens participation in criminal proceedings. Specifically, in this country jury trial takes place more than two hundred years, and was created on the model of English jury. However, almost immediately began the process of separating and distinguishing jury trials in these geographically close states. As it is case today, it is almost impossible to take a legal institute from one state and implement it in the legislation of another state in the same form. So, the English type of jury underwent to the adjustments to the French criminal procedure. That is the best illustrated with the numerous legislative acts adopted in the meantime, through which the jury experienced constant transformation. Since it is one of the oldest jury systems in the world, the author paid the attention to it in this work. The author deals with several units and after the introduction remarks he will explain the position and the role of lay judges in criminal proceedings. Then, he gives a cross-section of their position through the development of this type of trial. After that, he analyzes a jury according to positive French law. Also, throughout the paper provides a comparative analysis of some elements of this type of trial, and on the end he gives a concluding remarks.
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Uloga porote u francuskom krivičnom postupku
T1  - The role of the jury system in the French criminal procedure
EP  - 233
IS  - 1
SP  - 217
VL  - 63
DO  - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1501217C
UR  - conv_3224
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Čvorović, Dragana and Turanjanin, Veljko",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Kraj XX veka je pokazao da su skoro sve evropske zemlje doživele neuspeh u suzbijanju kriminaliteta. Usled toga, proučavajući uporedno pravo, zakonodavci su počeli da traže pravne institute kako bi uspostavili nove mehanizme efikasnijeg rešavanja krivičnih predmeta. Kao pravni transplantat koji je zaživeo u skoro svim evropskim državama izdvaja se sporazum o priznanju krivičnog dela, koji u pojedinim neizbežno prati sistem pravog porotnog suđenja. Među njima, Francuska predstavlja državu s dugom tradicijom učešća građana u krivičnim postupcima. U ovoj zemlji porotno suđenje se odvija duže od dvesta godina, a nastalo je po ugledu na engleski porotni sud. Međutim, kao što je to slučaj i danas, gotovo je nemoguće jedan pravni institut preuzeti iz jednog zakonodavstva i implementirati u drugo u istom obliku, pa je tako i porotni sistem suđenja doživeo prilagođavanja francuskom krivičnom postupku. O tom najbolje svedoče mnogobrojni zakonski akti doneti u međuvremenu, putem kojih je porota doživljavala konstantne transformacije. U ovom radu autori obrađuju više celina. Nakon uvodnih napomena o porotnom suđenju objašnjuju položaj i ulogu porotnika u krivičnom postupku. Potom daju presek njihovog položaja kroz razvoj ovog tipa suđenja, da bi posle analizirali porotu prema pozitivnom francuskom pravu. Takođe, kroz ceo rad daje se i komparativna analiza pojedinih elemenata ovog oblika suđenja, a na kraju su data zaključna razmatranja u kojima autori na jedan rezimirani način sumiraju rezultate do kojih su došli u proučavanju predmetne problematike., End of the XX century showed that almost all European countries have failed in the suppression of the crime. As a result, they began to seek new legal institutes to establish new mechanisms for efficient resolution of criminal cases. First of all, they stand out plea agreement, which in some countries inevitably follows the system of real jury trial. Among them, France stands out as a country with a long tradition of citizens participation in criminal proceedings. Specifically, in this country jury trial takes place more than two hundred years, and was created on the model of English jury. However, almost immediately began the process of separating and distinguishing jury trials in these geographically close states. As it is case today, it is almost impossible to take a legal institute from one state and implement it in the legislation of another state in the same form. So, the English type of jury underwent to the adjustments to the French criminal procedure. That is the best illustrated with the numerous legislative acts adopted in the meantime, through which the jury experienced constant transformation. Since it is one of the oldest jury systems in the world, the author paid the attention to it in this work. The author deals with several units and after the introduction remarks he will explain the position and the role of lay judges in criminal proceedings. Then, he gives a cross-section of their position through the development of this type of trial. After that, he analyzes a jury according to positive French law. Also, throughout the paper provides a comparative analysis of some elements of this type of trial, and on the end he gives a concluding remarks.",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Uloga porote u francuskom krivičnom postupku, The role of the jury system in the French criminal procedure",
pages = "233-217",
number = "1",
volume = "63",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1501217C",
url = "conv_3224"
}

Čvorović, D.,& Turanjanin, V.. (2015). Uloga porote u francuskom krivičnom postupku. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 63(1), 217-233.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1501217C
conv_3224

Čvorović D, Turanjanin V. Uloga porote u francuskom krivičnom postupku. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2015;63(1):217-233.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1501217C
conv_3224 .

Čvorović, Dragana, Turanjanin, Veljko, "Uloga porote u francuskom krivičnom postupku" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 63, no. 1 (2015):217-233,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1501217C .,
conv_3224 .