Repository of the University of Belgrade Faculty of Law
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Law
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • View Item
  •   RALF
  • Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Uticaj prestanka ugovora na stečeno pravo svojine pribavioca i trećeg lica u srpskom pravu

Influence of the contract termination on the acquired ownership of acquirer and third party in Serbian law

Thumbnail
2018
Download 🢃
1026.pdf (270.1Kb)
Authors
Dolović-Bojić, Katarina
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Predmet ovog rada je ispitivanje opravdanosti primene načela kauzalne tradicije u situaciji kada ugovor kao osnov sticanja prestane da postoji, nakon što je došlo do predaje/upisa u registar nepokretnosti, te i njegov uticaj na položaj trećih lica na koja je sporno pravo svojine preneto. Gotovo je jednoglasno prihvaćeno stanovište da opstanak prava svojine trećeg lica zavisi od njegove savesnosti. Tu počinje, ali se, uglavnom, i završava odgovor na to pitanje. Na njega se stavlja tačka bez dalje analize. Međutim, pitanja se otvaraju, a nelogičnosti nameću same. Prvo, kako se shvata savesnost trećeg lica, odnosno, kada je on savestan, a kada ne? Drugo, u kom trenutku se ispituje savesnost trećeg? Treće, po nama je najinteresantnije, a možda i najbitnije pitanje da li je uopšte savesnost trećeg bitna za opstanak već stečenog prava.
It is indisputable that the principle of causal tradition can be applied at the time of acquisition of ownership. Also, in case of delivery/registration based on non-existent/invalid contract, it will be indisputable obligation of the acquirer to return the thing i.e. it will be followed by removal of the entered right in the register. The same will be in the case when the termination of the contract occurred after delivery/registration, but only if the acquirer did not transfer its ownership. However, if the legal ground - the contract has ceased to exist after registration and ownership transferred to a third party, the situation changes significantly. The scene has been entered by a person who has fulfilled the conditions and thus has become the owner. Termination of the contract as the basis for the acquisition of his predecessor, despite the principle of causal tradition, cannot affect the acquired rights of third parties. A widely accepted view of good faith of the third party as... a criterion for determining the impact of contract termination to the acquired ownership is considered absolutely unacceptable.

Keywords:
Upis u registar nepokretnosti / Savesnost / Prestanak ugovora / Pravo svojine / Načelo kauzalne tradicije / Termination of contract / Registration / Principle of Causal Tradition / Ownership / Good faith
Source:
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2018, 66, 1, 218-235
Publisher:
  • Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
Funding / projects:
  • Projekat Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu: Identitetski preobražaj Srbije

DOI: 10.5937/AnaliPFB1801218D

ISSN: 0003-2565

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1029
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Institution/Community
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of Belgrade
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Dolović-Bojić, Katarina
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1029
AB  - Predmet ovog rada je ispitivanje opravdanosti primene načela kauzalne tradicije u situaciji kada ugovor kao osnov sticanja prestane da postoji, nakon što je došlo do predaje/upisa u registar nepokretnosti, te i njegov uticaj na položaj trećih lica na koja je sporno pravo svojine preneto. Gotovo je jednoglasno prihvaćeno stanovište da opstanak prava svojine trećeg lica zavisi od njegove savesnosti. Tu počinje, ali se, uglavnom, i završava odgovor na to pitanje. Na njega se stavlja tačka bez dalje analize. Međutim, pitanja se otvaraju, a nelogičnosti nameću same. Prvo, kako se shvata savesnost trećeg lica, odnosno, kada je on savestan, a kada ne? Drugo, u kom trenutku se ispituje savesnost trećeg? Treće, po nama je najinteresantnije, a možda i najbitnije pitanje da li je uopšte savesnost trećeg bitna za opstanak već stečenog prava.
AB  - It is indisputable that the principle of causal tradition can be applied at the time of acquisition of ownership. Also, in case of delivery/registration based on non-existent/invalid contract, it will be indisputable obligation of the acquirer to return the thing i.e. it will be followed by removal of the entered right in the register. The same will be in the case when the termination of the contract occurred after delivery/registration, but only if the acquirer did not transfer its ownership. However, if the legal ground - the contract has ceased to exist after registration and ownership transferred to a third party, the situation changes significantly. The scene has been entered by a person who has fulfilled the conditions and thus has become the owner. Termination of the contract as the basis for the acquisition of his predecessor, despite the principle of causal tradition, cannot affect the acquired rights of third parties. A widely accepted view of good faith of the third party as a criterion for determining the impact of contract termination to the acquired ownership is considered absolutely unacceptable.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
T1  - Uticaj prestanka ugovora na stečeno pravo svojine pribavioca i trećeg lica u srpskom pravu
T1  - Influence of the contract termination on the acquired ownership of acquirer and third party in Serbian law
EP  - 235
IS  - 1
SP  - 218
VL  - 66
DO  - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1801218D
UR  - conv_447
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Dolović-Bojić, Katarina",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Predmet ovog rada je ispitivanje opravdanosti primene načela kauzalne tradicije u situaciji kada ugovor kao osnov sticanja prestane da postoji, nakon što je došlo do predaje/upisa u registar nepokretnosti, te i njegov uticaj na položaj trećih lica na koja je sporno pravo svojine preneto. Gotovo je jednoglasno prihvaćeno stanovište da opstanak prava svojine trećeg lica zavisi od njegove savesnosti. Tu počinje, ali se, uglavnom, i završava odgovor na to pitanje. Na njega se stavlja tačka bez dalje analize. Međutim, pitanja se otvaraju, a nelogičnosti nameću same. Prvo, kako se shvata savesnost trećeg lica, odnosno, kada je on savestan, a kada ne? Drugo, u kom trenutku se ispituje savesnost trećeg? Treće, po nama je najinteresantnije, a možda i najbitnije pitanje da li je uopšte savesnost trećeg bitna za opstanak već stečenog prava., It is indisputable that the principle of causal tradition can be applied at the time of acquisition of ownership. Also, in case of delivery/registration based on non-existent/invalid contract, it will be indisputable obligation of the acquirer to return the thing i.e. it will be followed by removal of the entered right in the register. The same will be in the case when the termination of the contract occurred after delivery/registration, but only if the acquirer did not transfer its ownership. However, if the legal ground - the contract has ceased to exist after registration and ownership transferred to a third party, the situation changes significantly. The scene has been entered by a person who has fulfilled the conditions and thus has become the owner. Termination of the contract as the basis for the acquisition of his predecessor, despite the principle of causal tradition, cannot affect the acquired rights of third parties. A widely accepted view of good faith of the third party as a criterion for determining the impact of contract termination to the acquired ownership is considered absolutely unacceptable.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu",
title = "Uticaj prestanka ugovora na stečeno pravo svojine pribavioca i trećeg lica u srpskom pravu, Influence of the contract termination on the acquired ownership of acquirer and third party in Serbian law",
pages = "235-218",
number = "1",
volume = "66",
doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1801218D",
url = "conv_447"
}
Dolović-Bojić, K.. (2018). Uticaj prestanka ugovora na stečeno pravo svojine pribavioca i trećeg lica u srpskom pravu. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 66(1), 218-235.
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1801218D
conv_447
Dolović-Bojić K. Uticaj prestanka ugovora na stečeno pravo svojine pribavioca i trećeg lica u srpskom pravu. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2018;66(1):218-235.
doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1801218D
conv_447 .
Dolović-Bojić, Katarina, "Uticaj prestanka ugovora na stečeno pravo svojine pribavioca i trećeg lica u srpskom pravu" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 66, no. 1 (2018):218-235,
https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1801218D .,
conv_447 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the RALF Repository | Send Feedback

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the RALF Repository | Send Feedback

EU_logoOpenAIRERCUB