Doktrina "četvrte instance" i pravo na obrazloženu presudu u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava
Fourth instance doctrine and the right to a reasoned judgement in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights
Abstract
Pravo na obrazloženu presudu koje je Evropski sud za ljudska prava stvorio u sopstvenoj praksi, zasnivajući ga na pravu na pravično suđenje, u nekim slučajevima služi strazburškom Sudu da se upusti u instanciono odlučivanje povodom predstavki u vezi s članom 6 Konvencije. To pitanje je i praktično i teorijski relevantno jer taj Sud, u skladu s doktrinom "četvrte instance" po pravilu ne postupa kao instancioni sud. U analizi nekoliko temeljnih slučajeva, autori u članku pokazuju pod kojim uslovima i na koji način se Sud u Strazburu upušta u meritorno rešavanje sporova između građana i država članica. Zaključak je da nije reč o tome da ESLJP, kada utvrđuje da li je došlo do povrede prava na obrazloženu presudu, slučajno ili nesmotreno odstupi od doktrine "četvrte instance" već o tome da je u nizu presuda ESLJP sâmo pravo na obrazloženu presudu formulisao tako da ono po sebi odstupa od te doktrine.
Right to a reasoned judgement, created by the European Court of Human Rights is used in some cases by the Court in Strasbourg to justify acting as a court of higher instance in relation to national courts regarding the article 6 of the Convention. This issue is relevant both for legal theory and legal practice, because the Court, according to the fourth instance doctrine, does not act as an instance court. By analyzing key cases, the authors show under which conditions and in what way the Strasbourg Court rules on the substance of cases. It is concluded that ECHR, in the case of the right to a reasoned judgement, does not stray from the fourth instance doctrine occasionally or by chance. A series of decisions show that the ECHR formulated the right to a reasoned judgement in such a way that the right itself deviates from the fourth instance doctrine.
Keywords:
Pravo na pravično suđenje / Pravo na obrazloženu presudu / Evropski sud za ljudska prava / Doktrina četvrte instance / Right to a reasoned judgement / Right to a fair trial / Fourth instance doctrine / European Court of Human RightsSource:
Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2019, 67, 3, 158-185Publisher:
- Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd
Collections
Institution/Community
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of BelgradeTY - JOUR AU - Dajović, Goran AU - Spaić, Bojan PY - 2019 UR - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1085 AB - Pravo na obrazloženu presudu koje je Evropski sud za ljudska prava stvorio u sopstvenoj praksi, zasnivajući ga na pravu na pravično suđenje, u nekim slučajevima služi strazburškom Sudu da se upusti u instanciono odlučivanje povodom predstavki u vezi s članom 6 Konvencije. To pitanje je i praktično i teorijski relevantno jer taj Sud, u skladu s doktrinom "četvrte instance" po pravilu ne postupa kao instancioni sud. U analizi nekoliko temeljnih slučajeva, autori u članku pokazuju pod kojim uslovima i na koji način se Sud u Strazburu upušta u meritorno rešavanje sporova između građana i država članica. Zaključak je da nije reč o tome da ESLJP, kada utvrđuje da li je došlo do povrede prava na obrazloženu presudu, slučajno ili nesmotreno odstupi od doktrine "četvrte instance" već o tome da je u nizu presuda ESLJP sâmo pravo na obrazloženu presudu formulisao tako da ono po sebi odstupa od te doktrine. AB - Right to a reasoned judgement, created by the European Court of Human Rights is used in some cases by the Court in Strasbourg to justify acting as a court of higher instance in relation to national courts regarding the article 6 of the Convention. This issue is relevant both for legal theory and legal practice, because the Court, according to the fourth instance doctrine, does not act as an instance court. By analyzing key cases, the authors show under which conditions and in what way the Strasbourg Court rules on the substance of cases. It is concluded that ECHR, in the case of the right to a reasoned judgement, does not stray from the fourth instance doctrine occasionally or by chance. A series of decisions show that the ECHR formulated the right to a reasoned judgement in such a way that the right itself deviates from the fourth instance doctrine. PB - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd T2 - Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu T1 - Doktrina "četvrte instance" i pravo na obrazloženu presudu u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava T1 - Fourth instance doctrine and the right to a reasoned judgement in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights EP - 185 IS - 3 SP - 158 VL - 67 DO - 10.5937/AnaliPFB1903166D UR - conv_499 ER -
@article{ author = "Dajović, Goran and Spaić, Bojan", year = "2019", abstract = "Pravo na obrazloženu presudu koje je Evropski sud za ljudska prava stvorio u sopstvenoj praksi, zasnivajući ga na pravu na pravično suđenje, u nekim slučajevima služi strazburškom Sudu da se upusti u instanciono odlučivanje povodom predstavki u vezi s članom 6 Konvencije. To pitanje je i praktično i teorijski relevantno jer taj Sud, u skladu s doktrinom "četvrte instance" po pravilu ne postupa kao instancioni sud. U analizi nekoliko temeljnih slučajeva, autori u članku pokazuju pod kojim uslovima i na koji način se Sud u Strazburu upušta u meritorno rešavanje sporova između građana i država članica. Zaključak je da nije reč o tome da ESLJP, kada utvrđuje da li je došlo do povrede prava na obrazloženu presudu, slučajno ili nesmotreno odstupi od doktrine "četvrte instance" već o tome da je u nizu presuda ESLJP sâmo pravo na obrazloženu presudu formulisao tako da ono po sebi odstupa od te doktrine., Right to a reasoned judgement, created by the European Court of Human Rights is used in some cases by the Court in Strasbourg to justify acting as a court of higher instance in relation to national courts regarding the article 6 of the Convention. This issue is relevant both for legal theory and legal practice, because the Court, according to the fourth instance doctrine, does not act as an instance court. By analyzing key cases, the authors show under which conditions and in what way the Strasbourg Court rules on the substance of cases. It is concluded that ECHR, in the case of the right to a reasoned judgement, does not stray from the fourth instance doctrine occasionally or by chance. A series of decisions show that the ECHR formulated the right to a reasoned judgement in such a way that the right itself deviates from the fourth instance doctrine.", publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd", journal = "Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu", title = "Doktrina "četvrte instance" i pravo na obrazloženu presudu u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava, Fourth instance doctrine and the right to a reasoned judgement in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights", pages = "185-158", number = "3", volume = "67", doi = "10.5937/AnaliPFB1903166D", url = "conv_499" }
Dajović, G.,& Spaić, B.. (2019). Doktrina "četvrte instance" i pravo na obrazloženu presudu u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet, Beograd., 67(3), 158-185. https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1903166D conv_499
Dajović G, Spaić B. Doktrina "četvrte instance" i pravo na obrazloženu presudu u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 2019;67(3):158-185. doi:10.5937/AnaliPFB1903166D conv_499 .
Dajović, Goran, Spaić, Bojan, "Doktrina "četvrte instance" i pravo na obrazloženu presudu u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava" in Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 67, no. 3 (2019):158-185, https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1903166D ., conv_499 .
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Kulturna prava u Republici Srbiji - trenutno stanje i perspektive / Cultural rights in the Republic of Serbia: Current state and perspectives
Nikolić, Aleksa (Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd, 2019) -
Kulturna prava u praksi Evropskog Suda za ljudska prava / Cultural rights in the case-law of the European court of human rights
Nikolić, Aleksa (Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd, 2020) -
Pravo na imovinu u jurisprudenciji Evropskog suda za ljudska prava / The right to property in the jurisprudence of the European court of human rights
Stanković, Marko (Harmonius - journal of Legal and Social Studies in South East Europe, 2019)