Приказ основних података о документу

Dark side of the plea bargaining

dc.creatorBajović, Vanja
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T15:03:57Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T15:03:57Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0550-2179
dc.identifier.urihttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1099
dc.description.abstractAmerički institut sporazuma o priznanju krivičnog dela uveden je u naše pravo 2009. godine sa primarnim ciljem da se postupci pojednostave, učine efikasnijim i bržim, a sudovi i tužilaštva rasterete prevelikog broja predmeta. Kako ovaj institut pogoduje svim procesnim akterima kritike na njegov račun u našoj teoriji su retke, čime se prećutkuje činjenica da se njime zarad efikasnoti žrtvuje činjenična tačnost. Osnovno pitanje ove analize je da li je tačna konstatacija pojedinih američkih autora da je nagodba zapravo " savršen sistem za osudu nevinih"? U vezi sa tim razmatraju se pitanja da li i zašto i nevina lica priznaju krivicu, u kojoj meri stroga kaznena politika pogoduje zaključivanju sporazuma i na koji način tužioci koriste zaključene sporazume u cilju olakšavanja dokaznog tereta u drugim predmetima.sr
dc.description.abstractPlea bargaining is a procedural mechanism through which criminal case is resolved without trial, by consensus of the parties. The agreement consists of the defendant pleading guilty in exchange for prosecutor's promise to charge him less serious than is supported by the evidence, not to charge him for some crimes or to request certain sentence. Plea bargaining is product and significant part of the American criminal justice, where the vast majority of criminal cases are settled on that way. This institute was introduced in Serbian law in 2009, with the aim to simplify criminal procedure, making it more efficient and faster. In the Article is discussed the extent of plea bargaining's innocence problem. The basic question is whether is true the statement of Professor Alshuler that a plea bargaining is " a nearly perfect system for convicting the innocent". In regard with that, the questions that are discussed are why innocent plead guilty, whether policy of 'zero tolerance ' on criminality favour plea agreements, haw the prosecutor becomes the most importunate figure of the criminal justice system etc. According to Serbian CPC defence is not allowed to cross-examine co-defendant who is already convicted or prosecuted in severed criminal proceedings, but instead of that judge just read the transcript of his testimony (Art. 406). The Highest Court of Cassation even more broadened the effects of this problematic provision, allowing as evidence against defendant the statement of co-defendant given in the plea agreement, instead of his direct examination! in the last part of the paper is analysed this problematic view and the extended effect of plea agreement in Serbian case law.en
dc.publisherUniverzitet u Novom Sadu - Pravni fakultet, Novi Sad
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceZbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad
dc.subjectsporazum o priznanju krivičnog delasr
dc.subjectlažno priznanje pretpostavka nevinostisr
dc.subjectpresumption of innocenceen
dc.subjectplea agreementen
dc.subjectfalse confessionen
dc.titleTamna strana sporazuma o priznanju krivičnog delasr
dc.titleDark side of the plea bargainingen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY
dc.citation.epage251
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.other53(1): 233-251
dc.citation.rankM24
dc.citation.spage233
dc.citation.volume53
dc.identifier.doi10.5937/zrpfns53-21955
dc.identifier.fulltexthttps://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/81/1096.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_2584
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу