Ugovorna odgovornost skladištara
Contractual liability of warehousekeeper
Abstract
U ovom radu se razmatra odgovornost skladištara za gubitak i oštećenje robe tokom uskladištenja. Iako je većinsko shvatanje u srpskoj pravnoj teoriji da je ugovorna odgovornost skladištara objektivna, autor navodi više argumenata u prilog njegove de lege lata subjektivne odgovornosti. Iako postoje opravdani razlozi da odgovornost skladištara de lege ferenda bude objektivna, na osnovu analize odredbe Zakona o obligacionim odnosima o oslobođenju skladištara od odgovornosti ne može se doneti nesumnjiv zaključak da skladištar odgovara objektivno, odnosno bez obzira na svoju krivicu. Osim Zakona o obligacionim odnosima, autor razmatra i odredbe drugih zakona koji regulišu ovo pitanje. Rad sadrži i analizu uporednog prava kako bi se uvidelo kakva je regulativa ovog pitanja u stranom zakonodavstvu i da li ono može poslužiti kao uzor prilikom eventualnih izmena našeg zakonskog teksta.
In this paper the author analyzes liability of warehousekeeper for loss of or damage to goods in the course of storage. Although there is a majority opinion in Serbian legal doctrine that the contractual liability of warehousekeeper is strict one, the author makes several arguments in favor of his de lege lata fault-based liability. Despite the fact that there are justifiable reasons for strict liability of the warehousekeeper de lege ferenda, on the basis of the analysis of the provisions of Serbian Law of Contracts and Torts (Law on Obligations) on warehousekeeper's exemption from contractual liability, no indisputable conclusion can be drawn that the warehousekeeper's liability is strict one, i.e. no-fault liability. In addition to the provisions of the Law on Obligations, the author also considers the provisions of other Serbian laws that regulate this issue. This paper also contains an analysis of comparative law in order to observe the regulation of this issue in foreign countrie...s' law and make the conclusion whether comparative law could serve as a model for any amendments of Serbian legislation.
Keywords:
ugovorna odgovornost / ugovor o uskladištenju / skladište / skladištar / warehousekeeper / warehouse / storage agreement / contractual liability / bailmentSource:
Pravo i privreda, 2020, 58, 2, 199-234Publisher:
- Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd
Funding / projects:
- Projekat Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu: Identitetski preobražaj Srbije
Collections
Institution/Community
Pravni fakultet / Faculty of Law University of BelgradeTY - JOUR AU - Mišković, Maša PY - 2020 UR - https://ralf.ius.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1184 AB - U ovom radu se razmatra odgovornost skladištara za gubitak i oštećenje robe tokom uskladištenja. Iako je većinsko shvatanje u srpskoj pravnoj teoriji da je ugovorna odgovornost skladištara objektivna, autor navodi više argumenata u prilog njegove de lege lata subjektivne odgovornosti. Iako postoje opravdani razlozi da odgovornost skladištara de lege ferenda bude objektivna, na osnovu analize odredbe Zakona o obligacionim odnosima o oslobođenju skladištara od odgovornosti ne može se doneti nesumnjiv zaključak da skladištar odgovara objektivno, odnosno bez obzira na svoju krivicu. Osim Zakona o obligacionim odnosima, autor razmatra i odredbe drugih zakona koji regulišu ovo pitanje. Rad sadrži i analizu uporednog prava kako bi se uvidelo kakva je regulativa ovog pitanja u stranom zakonodavstvu i da li ono može poslužiti kao uzor prilikom eventualnih izmena našeg zakonskog teksta. AB - In this paper the author analyzes liability of warehousekeeper for loss of or damage to goods in the course of storage. Although there is a majority opinion in Serbian legal doctrine that the contractual liability of warehousekeeper is strict one, the author makes several arguments in favor of his de lege lata fault-based liability. Despite the fact that there are justifiable reasons for strict liability of the warehousekeeper de lege ferenda, on the basis of the analysis of the provisions of Serbian Law of Contracts and Torts (Law on Obligations) on warehousekeeper's exemption from contractual liability, no indisputable conclusion can be drawn that the warehousekeeper's liability is strict one, i.e. no-fault liability. In addition to the provisions of the Law on Obligations, the author also considers the provisions of other Serbian laws that regulate this issue. This paper also contains an analysis of comparative law in order to observe the regulation of this issue in foreign countries' law and make the conclusion whether comparative law could serve as a model for any amendments of Serbian legislation. PB - Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd T2 - Pravo i privreda T1 - Ugovorna odgovornost skladištara T1 - Contractual liability of warehousekeeper EP - 234 IS - 2 SP - 199 VL - 58 DO - 10.5937/PiP2002199M UR - conv_2320 ER -
@article{ author = "Mišković, Maša", year = "2020", abstract = "U ovom radu se razmatra odgovornost skladištara za gubitak i oštećenje robe tokom uskladištenja. Iako je većinsko shvatanje u srpskoj pravnoj teoriji da je ugovorna odgovornost skladištara objektivna, autor navodi više argumenata u prilog njegove de lege lata subjektivne odgovornosti. Iako postoje opravdani razlozi da odgovornost skladištara de lege ferenda bude objektivna, na osnovu analize odredbe Zakona o obligacionim odnosima o oslobođenju skladištara od odgovornosti ne može se doneti nesumnjiv zaključak da skladištar odgovara objektivno, odnosno bez obzira na svoju krivicu. Osim Zakona o obligacionim odnosima, autor razmatra i odredbe drugih zakona koji regulišu ovo pitanje. Rad sadrži i analizu uporednog prava kako bi se uvidelo kakva je regulativa ovog pitanja u stranom zakonodavstvu i da li ono može poslužiti kao uzor prilikom eventualnih izmena našeg zakonskog teksta., In this paper the author analyzes liability of warehousekeeper for loss of or damage to goods in the course of storage. Although there is a majority opinion in Serbian legal doctrine that the contractual liability of warehousekeeper is strict one, the author makes several arguments in favor of his de lege lata fault-based liability. Despite the fact that there are justifiable reasons for strict liability of the warehousekeeper de lege ferenda, on the basis of the analysis of the provisions of Serbian Law of Contracts and Torts (Law on Obligations) on warehousekeeper's exemption from contractual liability, no indisputable conclusion can be drawn that the warehousekeeper's liability is strict one, i.e. no-fault liability. In addition to the provisions of the Law on Obligations, the author also considers the provisions of other Serbian laws that regulate this issue. This paper also contains an analysis of comparative law in order to observe the regulation of this issue in foreign countries' law and make the conclusion whether comparative law could serve as a model for any amendments of Serbian legislation.", publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd", journal = "Pravo i privreda", title = "Ugovorna odgovornost skladištara, Contractual liability of warehousekeeper", pages = "234-199", number = "2", volume = "58", doi = "10.5937/PiP2002199M", url = "conv_2320" }
Mišković, M.. (2020). Ugovorna odgovornost skladištara. in Pravo i privreda Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd., 58(2), 199-234. https://doi.org/10.5937/PiP2002199M conv_2320
Mišković M. Ugovorna odgovornost skladištara. in Pravo i privreda. 2020;58(2):199-234. doi:10.5937/PiP2002199M conv_2320 .
Mišković, Maša, "Ugovorna odgovornost skladištara" in Pravo i privreda, 58, no. 2 (2020):199-234, https://doi.org/10.5937/PiP2002199M ., conv_2320 .